Encroachers can't claim right to continue occupying public land: Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court
has held that encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land till their rehabilitation claims are not resolved, as this would unduly impede public projects.
The high court made the observation while granting liberty to the
DDA
to proceed with the
demolition action
at
Bhoomiheen Camp
in South Delhi's Kalkaji in accordance with law.
Justice Dharmesh Sharma said the writ petitions were not only flawed due to the misjoinder of multiple parties with multiple causes of action, but also failed to meet the essential threshold provided by the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy for being considered eligible for relocation and rehabilitation.
"None of the petitioners have any legal right to continue occupying the JJ cluster incessantly, to the detriment of the public at large," the court said in its order passed on June 6.
The court passed the judgment on a batch of petitions, involving around 1,200 people, seeking direction to the
Delhi Development Authority
(DDA) to suspend any further demolition activity, maintain the status quo at the site, and refrain from physically evicting the petitioners from their respective 'jhuggi jhopri' clusters.
Live Events
The petitioners also sought a direction to the DUSIB to conduct a proper and comprehensive survey of the affected residents and rehabilitate them in accordance with the 2015 policy.
The high court said there can be no gainsaying that the petitioners have no vested right to seek rehabilitation, as it is not an absolute constitutional entitlement available to encroachers such as themselves.
"The right to rehabilitation arises solely from the prevailing policy that binds them. The determination of eligibility for rehabilitation is a separate process from the removal of encroachers from public land.
"Encroachers cannot claim a right to continue occupying public land pending the resolution of their rehabilitation claims under the applicable policy, as this would unduly impede public projects," it said.
The court, however, allowed rehabilitation of some of them and directed the DDA to allocate the
EWS category
flats.
The nearly three-decades-old slum cluster at Bhoomiheen Camp was home to migrants from
Uttar Pradesh
, Bihar, and
West Bengal
, among others.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Delhi HC to give judgement on Celebi's security clearance order tomorrow: What we know
The Delhi High Court is expected to deliver its judgment on Celebi Aviation Holding's security clearance cancellation by the union government, tomorrow (July 7, Monday), according to a report by ANI. The Turkey-based ground handling and cargo operations company challenged the central government's move to revoke its security clearance citing alleged national security concerns, after the Pahalgam terror attack. In a hearing before the Delhi HC on May 21, Celebi argued that the Indian government's decision to scrap the company's security clearance after Turkey backed Pakistan in the conflict post Pahalgam, is 'against the principles of natural justice', and had affected its business operations in the country. It added that business contracts with airports across India were being cancelled after the government last week scrapped the firm's security clearance, citing national security risks. 'Our business and contracts have been affected,' said senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi. Further, the company's Indian unit asserted that it operates as an Indian company, with all employees being Indian nationals. 'We are an Indian company, employees are Indian,' Celebi told the court, and urged it to quash the revocation of its security clearance, as per a Reuters report. In his argument for the government, Solicitor general Tushar Mehta told the HC on May 22 that the Centre has 'plenary powers' i.e. absolute powers, when it comes to protecting the country's national security. 'Plenary powers rest with the government to avoid any potential threat to the country. Ground handling companies have access to the entire airport and aircraft. Hence, the director general of BCAS can use his sui generis powers to eliminate the immediate threat,' Mehta stated. He contended that the government is dealing with the most 'delicate' subject of civil aviation and national security and sovereignty of the nation. The Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) on 15 May withdrew the security clearance of Celebi's Indian airport services arm, citing national security risks and halting its operations at nine airports, including Delhi and Mumbai. The decision came amid growing demand for boycotting the firm headquartered in Istanbul, Turkey—a country that sided with Pakistan during escalated tensions with India. After the furore, Celebi specifically addressed and refuted claims of a link to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's daughter, Sümeyye Erdoğan, clarifying that she has no ownership stake in the company and that shareholding is limited to Can and Canan Celebioglu, who each hold 17.5 per cent and have no political affiliations. Further, 65 per cent of the parent organisation is owned by international institutional investors, it said. (With inputs from Agencies)
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Delhi govt sets November deadline to clear Yamuna floodplains of encroachments
The Delhi government has directed agencies to remove all encroachments from the Yamuna floodplains by November, as part of a 45‑point action plan for cleaning and rejuvenation of the river, officials said on Saturday. Yamuna cleanup is a flagship commitment of the BJP government. In its first budget, the government allocated ₹9,000 crore to the water and sewerage sector, officials noted. The Yamuna traverses 52 km through Delhi; the 22 km stretch between Wazirabad and Okhla is the most polluted and remains the primary focus of planning and policy efforts. Coordinated effort under chief minister's plan Chief Minister Rekha Gupta approved the action plan, which was discussed in a recent meeting chaired by the chief secretary. Key agencies involved include Delhi Jal Board (DJB), Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Irrigation and Flood Control (I&FC) Department, and Delhi Development Authority (DDA), officials added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Würzburg: GEERS sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung GEERS Undo DDA to remove floodplain encroachments Under the plan, the DDA has been instructed to clear all encroachments—including illegal nurseries, unauthorised structures, waste dumping, squatters, and farming—along Yamuna floodplains in east, northeast, and south Delhi by November. Officials noted that anti-encroachment drives often face resistance due to lack of formal demarcation of floodplain zones. A DDA survey last year claimed that nearly two‑thirds of these floodplain areas had been encroached in recent years. Past achievements and ongoing duties In recent years, the DDA has reclaimed 224 acres of floodplain land and developed public green spaces such as Asita in East Delhi. In April, it told the National Green Tribunal that 24 acres were freed from encroachment under the Yamuna Vanasthali project between Wazirabad Barrage and ISBT Kashmere Gate . Live Events Drain encroachments to be cleared The action plan also targets encroachments in drains feeding into the Yamuna. The MCD, New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC), and DDA are tasked with clearing stormwater drain encroachments, while MCD and I&FC departments will address encroachments along drain alignments. Comprehensive project consolidation Projects related to Yamuna rejuvenation have been grouped under ten working heads, including drains, sewage, solid waste management, enhancement of ecological flow, and stricter enforcement, each with specific deadlines.
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
Salute to sacrifice: How disability pension for armed forces veterans won legal sanctity
The Delhi High Court, in a landmark verdict, has delivered a decisive blow to the ministry of defence's move to deny disability pensions to hundreds of retired armed forces personnel.A division bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur dismissed nearly 300 writ petitions, upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's rulings in favour of the veterans. The pension claims were initially denied due to the disability being deemed 'Neither Attributable nor Aggravated' (NANA) by the competent medical board, as per the pension December, INDIA TODAY's story War Over The Wounded (edition dated December 16, 2024) had highlighted the issue wherein the ministry of defence resorted to filing hundreds of appeals in higher courts to challenge disability pensions to armed forces personnel by contradicting the government's stated policy to reduce defence ministers Manohar Parrikar and Nirmala Sitharaman had issued directives not to challenge tribunal orders granting disability benefits. Yet the ministry continued to file appeals, often against widows and disabled soldiers. For veterans, the percentage of disability is a critical factor that determines their pension and associated benefits. In September 2023, the ministry of defence revised the disability benefit rules, but clarified that the rule would apply only to those persons who retire after September 21, 2023, with no retrospective of defence staff General Anil Chauhan made it clear the disability pension-related rules had been revised to protect genuine soldiers' requirements. 'A study was [done] to protect the genuine interest of the personnel, who acquired disability during service, while preventing the exploitation of its liberal provisions from misuse,' he July 1, while delivering the order, the high court bench stated that the purpose of granting disability pension to personnel of the Indian armed forces was to provide necessary financial support to those who had sustained a disability or illness during their service, due to service conditions.'It is not an act of generosity but a rightful and just acknowledgement of the sacrifices endured by them, which manifests in the form of disabilities/disorders suffered during their military service. Such a pension ensures that a soldier who suffers injury or disability due to service conditions is not left without support and is able to live with financial security and dignity. It is a measure that upholds the State's responsibility towards its soldiers, who have served the nation with courage and devotion,' the court on behalf of the government, the attorney general informed the high court that in the present batch of petitions, none of the 'individuals has been out of service'. Consequently, not a single one of them is, per se, eligible to be considered for the award of disability pension. He further submitted that the Armed Forces Tribunal did not consider the revised entitlement rule of 2008 by the ministry of defence while passing on judgment. 'Such a departure from the provisions clearly enunciated by the government of India has rendered its policies on the subject completely irrelevant, redundant and ineffective,' the attorney general challenging the disability element to pensioners, the attorney general submitted that in the current cases, the disabilities of the respondents were assessed by the Release Medical Board (RMB) as well as by the competent/appellate authorities as neither attributable to nor aggravated by the military service, after considering their entire medical history and service concluding his stand, the attorney general stated that the medical board consists of experts who thoroughly assess individuals and their complete medical history in accordance with the relevant medical provisions. Based on this examination, they determine whether the disability can be considered attributable to or aggravated by military service. 'Therefore, the courts, within their limited scope of judicial review, should refrain from disputing the opinion of the medical board unless there is compelling medical evidence on record to contradict it,' he the court stated that it must always be kept in view that the armed forces personnel, while defending the country, have to perform their duties in extremely harsh and inhuman weather and conditions, wherein surviving each day is a challenge. It is, therefore, incumbent upon the RMB to furnish cogent and well-reasoned justification for their conclusions that the disease/disability suffered by the personnel cannot be said to be attributable to or aggravated by such service onus is not discharged by the RMB by simply relying on when such disability/disease is noticed also said that it must be noted that even in peace stations, military service is inherently stressful due to a combination of factors, such as strict discipline, long working hours, limited personal freedom and constant readiness for deployment. The psychological burden of being away from family, living in isolated or challenging environments, and coping with the uncertainty of sudden transfers or duties adds to this strain. The toll of continuous combat training further contributes to mental fatigue.'Despite the absence of active conflict or the challenges of hard area postings, the demanding nature of military life at peace stations can significantly impact the overall well-being of personnel,' the court said, adding that soldiers are always aware that threat is never far environment, wherein danger is a constant reality for their peers and could become their own at any moment, creates a persistent state of mental and emotional strain that cannot be overlooked. Thus, military service, whether in peace locations or operational zones, inherently carries stress that may predispose armed force personnel to medical conditions, including hypertension, the court to India Today Magazine- Ends
