logo
Teachers, business owners granted COVID vaccine appeal

Teachers, business owners granted COVID vaccine appeal

Perth Nowa day ago
Teachers sacked for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine and small business owners impacted by the mandate have been granted an appeal against the Queensland government.
The Queensland Court of Appeal ruled on Tuesday in favour of seven teachers and 12 small business owners who wish to fight again that the mandate was unlawful.
Gold Coast teacher Cherie Jean Ishiyama was sacked from her job in 2022 after refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine, breaching the state's mandate for frontline staff, including educators.
Five other teachers and an early childhood educator also refused to be vaccinated, fearing they would be terminated from their jobs due to the mandate.
Among the 12 hospitality owners, many were unvaccinated and could not enter their businesses and were forced to treat staff and visitors differently based on their vaccination status.
Others were fully vaccinated but had to restrict access to patrons who were unvaccinated, which "significantly" impacted turnover.
The group lodged an application in 2022 against the COVID-19 mandate made by the Queensland government and former chief health officer John Gerrard, claiming it was "unlawful" and detrimental to their human rights.
The mandate, which applied to workers in educational settings, correctional services facilities, police watch houses, youth detention centres, and airports, and required only vaccinated people with proof to enter businesses, was revoked later in 2022.
The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the state government in 2023 to grant summary dismissal because the group was no longer affected by the mandate, given it had been revoked.
The group was also made to pay the state government's costs.
The teachers and business owners appealed the decision, seeking "declaratory relief" and for the state government to instead pay the costs.
Declaratory relief means a court can determine the legal rights of parties without ordering anything to be done or awarding damages.
Again, the state government argued the Supreme Court's decision should be upheld because none of the group was at risk of future prosecution for not complying with the revoked mandate and there were "no foreseeable consequences".
The Court of Appeal on Tuesday granted the appeal and overturned the state government's summary dismissal application.
"There is no other good reason to deny the applicants their day in court in their attempt to establish the merits of their claims for declaratory orders in relation to alleged past contraventions," Justice John Bond ruled.
"There is a strong public interest in determining whether or not there is any merit in their claims."
Justice Bond also ruled the state government and Dr Gerrard must pay the costs of the application.
"There is no good reason why costs should not follow the event, and they should not have their costs in this court and below," Justice Bond said.
The granting of the appeal means the teacher and small business owner's case can now go back before the courts.
It comes after the Queensland Supreme Court made a landmark ruling in 2024 that police and ambulance service workers were unlawfully directed to receive vaccines or face potential disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom killer triple-murderer in prison, lawyers
Mushroom killer triple-murderer in prison, lawyers

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Mushroom killer triple-murderer in prison, lawyers

The world may know in the next few months whether triple-murderer Erin Patterson will fight the guilty verdicts handed down by a jury this week. Australia's trial of the decade wrapped up in a small Victorian town on Monday as Patterson, 50, was found guilty of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth by poisoning a beef wellington lunch with toxic mushrooms. Patterson and her lawyers have two central avenues of appeal should they decide to contest the Supreme Court jury's verdicts. The court will reconvene for sentencing sometime in the coming month. Defence lawyers will ask the court to order pre-sentence reports about her psychological state, criminal history, health and chance for rehabilitation. Another date for the sentencing proper will be set. Patterson and her lawyers have 28 days to file an appeal against the convictions, the sentence handed down, or both. Patterson is expected to be handed a life sentence, with a minimum non-parole period longer than 30 years. Victoria's last triple murderer got life in prison with a minimum of 33 years. If Patterson's lawyers go for an appeal, there are two broad arguments they could make. They could base an appeal on a contention Justice Christopher Beale made an error in the way he summed up the case. The second avenue is arguing the verdicts were 'unsafe and unsatisfactory'. This 28-day deadline after sentencing is expected to begin at an as-yet-undetermined sentencing date in the next four weeks. There is also room for the prosecution to appeal the sentence if they believe it is too lenient. If Patterson's lawyers file an application to appeal, the Court of Appeal will decide whether hearing a challenge is worth the court's time. If the Court of Appeal is willing to hear the challenge, getting a court date will take months. The three Court of Appeal judges could determine the evidence was insufficient to produce the guilty verdicts beyond reasonable doubt or there have been errors of law; both would result in the verdict being quashed. Quashed verdicts could trigger a retrial. But if the Court of Appeal decides hearing an appeal is not warranted, Patterson and her lawyers can go up to the High Court for leave to appeal. Very few criminal cases get leave to appeal in the High Court. If this challenge to the highest court is unsuccessful, Patterson's legal challenges will be exhausted. On Monday a jury found Patterson guilty of the murders of Heather Wilkinson, 66, Gail Patterson, 70, and Don Patterson, 70, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, 71. Patterson is in custody in a protection unit at Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, west of Melbourne, where she has been since her arrest in November 2023.

Mushroom killer triple-murderer in prison, lawyers
Mushroom killer triple-murderer in prison, lawyers

West Australian

time3 hours ago

  • West Australian

Mushroom killer triple-murderer in prison, lawyers

The world may know in the next few months whether triple-murderer Erin Patterson will fight the guilty verdicts handed down by a jury this week. Australia's trial of the decade wrapped up in a small Victorian town on Monday as Patterson, 50, was found guilty of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth by poisoning a beef wellington lunch with toxic mushrooms. Patterson and her lawyers have two central avenues of appeal should they decide to contest the Supreme Court jury's verdicts. The court will reconvene for sentencing sometime in the coming month. Defence lawyers will ask the court to order pre-sentence reports about her psychological state, criminal history, health and chance for rehabilitation. Another date for the sentencing proper will be set. Patterson and her lawyers have 28 days to file an appeal against the convictions, the sentence handed down, or both. Patterson is expected to be handed a life sentence, with a minimum non-parole period longer than 30 years. Victoria's last triple murderer got life in prison with a minimum of 33 years. If Patterson's lawyers go for an appeal, there are two broad arguments they could make. They could base an appeal on a contention Justice Christopher Beale made an error in the way he summed up the case. The second avenue is arguing the verdicts were 'unsafe and unsatisfactory'. This 28-day deadline after sentencing is expected to begin at an as-yet-undetermined sentencing date in the next four weeks. There is also room for the prosecution to appeal the sentence if they believe it is too lenient. If Patterson's lawyers file an application to appeal, the Court of Appeal will decide whether hearing a challenge is worth the court's time. If the Court of Appeal is willing to hear the challenge, getting a court date will take months. The three Court of Appeal judges could determine the evidence was insufficient to produce the guilty verdicts beyond reasonable doubt or there have been errors of law; both would result in the verdict being quashed. Quashed verdicts could trigger a retrial. But if the Court of Appeal decides hearing an appeal is not warranted, Patterson and her lawyers can go up to the High Court for leave to appeal. Very few criminal cases get leave to appeal in the High Court. If this challenge to the highest court is unsuccessful, Patterson's legal challenges will be exhausted. On Monday a jury found Patterson guilty of the murders of Heather Wilkinson, 66, Gail Patterson, 70, and Don Patterson, 70, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, 71. Patterson is in custody in a protection unit at Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, west of Melbourne, where she has been since her arrest in November 2023.

How mushroom killer could appeal
How mushroom killer could appeal

Perth Now

time3 hours ago

  • Perth Now

How mushroom killer could appeal

The world may know in the next few months whether triple-murderer Erin Patterson will fight the guilty verdicts handed down by a jury this week. Australia's trial of the decade wrapped up in a small Victorian town on Monday as Patterson, 50, was found guilty of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth by poisoning a beef wellington lunch with toxic mushrooms. Patterson and her lawyers have two central avenues of appeal should they decide to contest the Supreme Court jury's verdicts. The court will reconvene for sentencing sometime in the coming month. Defence lawyers will ask the court to order pre-sentence reports about her psychological state, criminal history, health and chance for rehabilitation. A mural of Erin Patterson was painted in a Melbourne laneway in June. NewsWire / Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia The painting was amended this week. NewsWire / David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia Another date for the sentencing proper will be set. Patterson and her lawyers have 28 days to file an appeal against the convictions, the sentence handed down, or both. Patterson is expected to be handed a life sentence, with a minimum non-parole period longer than 30 years. Victoria's last triple murderer got life in prison with a minimum of 33 years. If Patterson's lawyers go for an appeal, there are two broad arguments they could make. They could base an appeal on a contention Justice Christopher Beale made an error in the way he summed up the case. Erin Patterson's defence lawyers have so far been tight-lipped about the prospect of an appeal. NewsWire / Diego Fedele Credit: News Corp Australia The second avenue is arguing the verdicts were 'unsafe and unsatisfactory'. This 28-day deadline after sentencing is expected to begin at an as-yet-undetermined sentencing date in the next four weeks. There is also room for the prosecution to appeal the sentence if they believe it is too lenient. If Patterson's lawyers file an application to appeal, the Court of Appeal will decide whether hearing a challenge is worth the court's time. If the Court of Appeal is willing to hear the challenge, getting a court date will take months. The three Court of Appeal judges could determine the evidence was insufficient to produce the guilty verdicts beyond reasonable doubt or there have been errors of law; both would result in the verdict being quashed. The only person to survive the lunch, Ian Wilkinson, was a constant fixture at the lengthy trial. NewsWire / David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia Quashed verdicts could trigger a retrial. But if the Court of Appeal decides hearing an appeal is not warranted, Patterson and her lawyers can go up to the High Court for leave to appeal. Very few criminal cases get leave to appeal in the High Court. If this challenge to the highest court is unsuccessful, Patterson's legal challenges will be exhausted. On Monday a jury found Patterson guilty of the murders of Heather Wilkinson, 66, Gail Patterson, 70, and Don Patterson, 70, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, 71. Patterson is in custody in a protection unit at Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, west of Melbourne, where she has been since her arrest in November 2023.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store