Jeffries sparks social media firestorm with 'low energy' pic holding baseball bat opposing Trump bill
"House Democrats will keep the pressure on Trump's One Big Ugly Bill," Jeffries posted on Instagram on Wednesday, along with a photo of himself holding a Louisville Slugger and standing in his office.
The post was widely criticized by conservatives.
"Low energy," Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., posted on X.
"I guess, 'union thug,' is a vibe choice," author Chad Felix Greene posted on X.
"Nah, we beat the Dems at that too," Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., posted on X along with a photo of him helping the Republicans beat the Democrats at the annual congressional baseball game.
"I don't think it's hyperbolic to say he may be the worst congressional leader in modern history," GOP communicator Matt Whitlock posted on X.
"Incitement to violence is all they have left," Security Studies Group President Jim Hanson posted on X.
"What exactly does he mean by this? Is this a threat?" White House deputy press secretary Abigail Marone posted on X.
"Beta," Rep. Tony Wied, R-Wis., posted on X.
"The gap between how much charisma he has and how much he thinks he has could fill the Grand Canyon," Targeted Victory President Matt Gorman posted on X.
"Sir, please put the Louisville Slugger DOWN," Sean Southard, communications director for Montana GOP Gov. Greg Gianforte, posted on X.
Jeffries' office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
After posting, Jeffries appears to have changed the photo's caption to, "Protecting your healthcare is as American as baseball, motherhood and apple pie."
Republicans and Democrats debated Trump's signature reconciliation package all night on Wednesday, and the discussions continued into Thursday morning, where Republicans are expected to have the necessary votes to pass the legislation.
Jeffries gave a marathon speech on the House floor that was given a standing ovation from Democrats but criticized by Republicans, including Vice President JD Vance, who posted on X that the speech was actually driving undecided Republicans to support the bill.
"GOP Congressman just texted me: 'I was undecided on the bill but then I watched Hakeem Jeffries performance and now I'm a firm yes,'" Vance posted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Proposes UFC Event in Wild Location
Trump Proposes UFC Event in Wild Location originally appeared on Athlon Sports. President Donald Trump's relationship with the UFC is well-documented. He has attended multiple events, and fighters like Conor McGregor have visited him at the White House, reinforcing the alliance between the MMA promotion and his political brand. The UFC's massive popularity, especially among younger male demographics, makes it a centerpiece for Trump and his supporters, who include the UFC's CEO and President, Dana White. Advertisement Now, Trump has floated a bold and unconventional idea to celebrate America's upcoming 250th anniversary: a UFC championship fight on the White House grounds. Donald Trump and Dana WhiteEd Mulholland-GettyImages During a speech at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, Trump revealed his desire for a large-scale event featuring a UFC fight with up to 25,000 spectators as part of the "America250" festivities. 'Does anybody watch UFC? The great Dana White? We're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there,' Trump said. While the announcement energized Trump's supporters, the feasibility and appropriateness of hosting a violent combat sport on White House property were clearly not in the president's consideration. The White House has never before been used as a venue for a pay-per-view sporting event, let alone a sport with a fan base as rowdy as MMA. Advertisement Overlooked in his proclamation were the logistical hurdles, including Secret Service approvals and crowd control, that could make the plan more aspirational than practical. The UFC's involvement adds another layer of controversy. While the organization has grown into a mainstream sports powerhouse, it has also faced criticism over fighter pay, benefits, and overall dwindling quality. As of now, the proposal lacks concrete details, and the idea is likely nothing more than mere political theater. Given Trump's history of controversy, however, the possibility cannot be entirely ruled out. Related: The UFC Could Be On The Verge Of A Huge Partnership Related: Dana White & Mark Zuckerberg Announce UFC-Meta Partnership: Enhanced Fan Experience, But at What Cost to Fighters? This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 4, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Star Lawyer Who Defended Trump's Family Issues Stark Warning About Presidency
The super-lawyer who kept Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump out of legal jeopardy during Robert Mueller's Russian investigation now fears Donald Trump will demolish the very institutions that protected them. 'I have never been as concerned as to whether our system can withstand the pressure it is being put to,' Abbe Lowell told the Financial Times, warning that the White House is 'pushing the tree to the point that it could break,' noting that during Trump's first term, critics of the president said democracy was 'tested but didn't break.' The legal eagle has defended several high-profile Democrat figures—including Bill Clinton and Joe Biden's son, Hunter. But he is perhaps best known for his high-stakes work for Trump's daughter and son-in-law. In June 2017, the Daily Beast reported that Kushner, 44, who is married to Ivanka, 43, had hired Lowell to join his defense team as Robert Mueller's Russia probe heated up. The following month, Ivanka followed suit, tasking the prominent lawyer to provide 'legal and ethical advice' as investigators examined possible campaign ties to Moscow, bringing both Trump family members under the same high-powered counsel. Now, Lowell says, Ivanka father's behavior in his second term threatens to smash the constitutional 'wall' separating courts from executive muscle. 'The crack you put in the wall today becomes the gash tomorrow,' Lowell had told Congress in 1998. That was 'not a bad prophecy', Lowell told the FT, saying that the structure is 'more than cracked, not yet crumbled.' In an attempt to fight back, Lowell, 73, has launched Lowell & Associates to combat what he calls government 'over-reach.' Nine law firms, he says, have already 'buckled' under Trump-era intimidation—agreeing to nearly $1 billion in work that advances the president's agenda while muzzling internal critics. Several defectors from those firms have signed up to Lowell's boutique organization, Lowell said, with many more showing interest. Clients include New York Attorney General Letitia James—now under federal investigation after winning a massive civil-fraud judgment against Trump—and former DHS official Miles Taylor, whose security clearance vanished after he blasted the president. Both hope Lowell's aggressive strategy can blunt a barrage of executive orders targeting universities, NGOs and even courthouses. 'I don't know the administration has the ability, breadth, depth and expertise to handle all' the resulting lawsuits, Lowell said. Yet the veteran litigator is under no illusion every legal action will stick. With a Supreme Court that 'believes in an executive branch with broad power,' reports the FT, Lowell says challengers must craft cases on First Amendment grounds rather than on presidential authority. Because if Trump diminishes the authority of the country's courts, Lowell warns, 'there will just be rubble from that wall.' The Daily Beast has approached the White House for comment.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: Market focus shifts to Trump tariff countdown
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Kevin Buckland U.S. investors may have been feeling good going into the long Independence Day weekend, but those vibes failed to carry through to Asia. Optimism over the resilience of the U.S. economy, after much more robust than expected monthly payrolls figures, has been quickly overshadowed by a cloud of uncertainty as U.S. President Donald Trump's deadline for higher tariff rates looms on July 9. Despite initial confidence from Trump and his team that there would be a flurry of deals, an agreement with Vietnam announced on Wednesday takes the total so far to just three, including framework agreements with Britain and China. Trump's approach on tariffs has shifted accordingly: He said letters will start going out to trading partners on Friday with the duties they will pay on trade with the United States. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said a deal with India is close, but talks with Japan and South Korea - which had been touted as likely early successes - have been stalled for weeks. The deal with Vietnam also risks irking China, with its stipulation of 40% levies on so-called trans-shipments of products basically made elsewhere (i.e., China) in order to receive a "Made in Vietnam" sticker. Some Asian countries may be hoping they've done enough to address U.S. concerns, and will receive just the baseline 10% tariff in their letters. Thailand, for example, said today it "hopes there will be good news" following trade talks with Washington. The EU is pushing for an "agreement in principle" ahead of July 9 but, as might be expected from such a sprawling economic bloc, pleasing all parties will be difficult. Brussels is bracing for any outcome, including a return to tit-for-tat tariff escalation. One point on which European diplomats seem aligned is that tariff relief needs to be immediate, or any deal is off. Traders and investors also need to mull the broad and long-term impact of Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill, now about to become law, and its potential to swell the deficit by $3.4 trillion by some estimates. Global equities, led by Wall Street, may be trading at all-time peaks, but that could mean there's plenty of room for a drop back to earth if Trump's trade war turns ugly again. Key developments that could influence markets on Friday: - U.S. Independence Day holiday - Germany industrial orders (May) - France, Italy, Spain industrial output (all May) - Germany, France, Italy construction PMIs (all June) Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here. (By Kevin Buckland; Editing by Edmund Klamann)
