British man 'devastated' after being kicked out of Dubai for face tattoos
A British man's dream holiday to Dubai was ruined after he was refused entry because of his tattoos.
Jordan Howman, 34, landed at Dubai International Airport for a week-long getaway with his fiancée Theresa, 38, and daughter Kaic, 16.
Jordan, from Crewe, had forked out £3,000 for his third trip to the United Arab Emirates, his 'favourite country in the world.'
But on arrival, he was pulled over by customs officers, before being refused entry after a six-hour wait due to his face tattoos.
Jordan got the markings on his face around eight or nine years ago alongside words like 'blessed', 'family' and 'crazy life' and said it has never caused problems during his previous two visits to Dubai.
He said: 'It has absolutely devastated me. I feel like I've been massively discriminated against.
'My missus has been crying her eyes out.'
'There's no law against face tattoos – there's nothing like that.
The plasterer said the experience had made him feel 'absolutely rubbish' and had put him off travelling to Dubai again.
He added: 'It was my favourite country, but this has absolutely ruined it. Now I'll never go again. I've lost all of my money because of a pattern on my face.'
The UAE has become one of the go-to destinations for wealthy British expats and holidaymakers alike.
But the state's socially conservative policies can cause problems for visiting foreigners.
Britons have previously faced arrest for public displays of affection, including kissing.
The UAE also has a zero tolerance for drugs, with passengers found with even residual amounts of illegal substances facing a prison sentence.
Jordan's Emirates airline touched down at Dubai International Airport on Wednesday, June 111, at 7.30am.
'It was my third trip to Dubai,' he said.
'I'd had no problems all the other times. But this time, as we got in, I scanned my passport and was just about to go through security when an airport worker pulled us aside.
'We were about to put our hand luggage on the conveyor belt when the man said: 'Follow me'.'
After taking Jordan aside, the man asked if he'd had his passport stamped before taking it from him.
'Then he snatched my passport out of my hand,' he said.
'There had been nowhere to stamp it – we'd used the electronic gates. It was just an excuse to get the passport out of my hand.'
After being held in a waiting room for over four hours, Jordan was transferred to immigration at around 12pm, he said.
By this time, his family had reached the five-star Anantara hotel.
He called his partner and she got a taxi to the airport but he says 'they wouldn't let me see her' and she got a taxi back to the hotel, costing a total of £250.
Jordan said he was not given his passport back for some time which was 'terrifying'.
'A woman came and took me upstairs to immigration, where they said: 'He's not coming in because of his face tattoos – you're not coming in because of the way you look',' he said.
'One of the staff behind the desk said a more senior immigration officer made the decision, saying I was not to enter Dubai and that I must leave the country immediately.' More Trending
At 2.30pm, Jordan was put on another Emirates flight heading back to the UK.
'They sent me on a flight back to Manchester. It was only when I landed that I got my passport back. Friday morning was the first time I got to see my daughter, over Facetime', he said.
Metro approached Dubai Airports for a comment and an attempt was made to contact the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigh Affairs Dubai.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Is it safe to travel to Dubai right now? Latest Foreign Office tourist advice after US strikes Iran
MORE: Florida attorney general offers Trump 'Alligator Alcatraz' prison to hold immigrants
MORE: Why I keep going back to the world's 'most overrated' city
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
You'll need strong stomach for this hideously fascinating documentary
*** WHEN you walk in the first thing that hits you is the smell. Then the flies and maggots. This was Lauren Baker, one of the crime scene cleaners of the title, matter-of-factly describing her job. You need a strong stomach for this kind of work. Ditto watching a documentary about it. There have been a few programmes on the subject (plus the Greg Davies sitcom), such is the public's fascination with crime and gore. But rarely do they get as up close and stomach-churning as this ten-parter. Dividing its time between the US and UK, viewers were promised a look 'beyond the police tape'. In Kent, Lauren was dealing with 'an unattended death in a bungalow', a very British-sounding tragedy if ever there was one. The (decomposed) body had been removed, no foul play suspected, leaving Lauren and her team to clear and clean the place. A running commentary went through the various hazards and the nasty things they could do to anyone not covered head to foot in PPE. For Lauren, we were told, cleaning wasn't just physical. 'She also performs a ritual to cleanse the space spiritually'. This consisted of opening a window (a given, you might have thought) and saying 'go and be free'. One to file under W for 'Whatever gets you through the day', perhaps. Read more In Baton Rouge, Louisiana, the cleaners had their own home-grown scourge to deal with - fentanyl. Its microscopic particles get everywhere, including the lungs, so when a car came in with a bullet hole in the window and a strong suspicion that it had been used to run drugs, it was all hands to the cleaning sprays. Back in Kent, Lauren was piecing together the deceased's life from the things left behind. 'Something to do with Kent highways,' she thought. 'Everyone's got a story, haven't they?' Her story included starting her own business after a spell of bar work. She has made a success of it, bringing up a family on the way. Now she wouldn't trade the job for another in 'a million years'. Her late dad would have been proud, she says, justifiably. In Los Angeles there was a trail of blood to be followed. Not as bad as the one that was a mile long - that took a whole crew working through the night - but enough. Various talking heads, forensic specialist this and former cop that, walked viewers through the scene. Though some were experts in the bleedin' obvious - 'without blood you don't live' - a few made interesting points. The blood could not simply be sluiced away, for instance, or it would enter the water supply. The cleaners did a meticulous job; the places were transformed. Then it struck you: all this effort was being expended to sell the property on, or allow residents to move back in. Life went on. 'This will make a really lovely home for someone,' said Lauren. Irrational or not, it was a chilling thought.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Scheme to register foreign agents comes into force but China avoids top tier
The new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs) comes into effect from Tuesday, requiring anyone carrying out 'political influence activities' on behalf of a foreign power to register with the Government or face prosecution. The rules, which cover activities such as political communications or lobbying, were introduced in 2023 as part of efforts to strengthen national security amid concerns about covert action by foreign governments. Security minister Dan Jarvis said: 'We welcome legitimate engagement with all countries, but we will not tolerate covert attempts to manipulate our political system or society. 'The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme gives us the tools to confront growing threats to our national security, one of the foundations of our plan for change, without compromising the openness that defines our democracy.' The new rules also include an 'enhanced tier', which requires anyone working for certain states to declare any activity, not just political work. Mr Jarvis said: 'This is about creating accountability and visibility so that covert influence operations have nowhere to hide, and ensuring we have the tools to detect and disrupt them.' Failing to register with Firs carries a maximum sentence of two years, or five years for agents of states in the enhanced tier. So far, only Iran and Russia have been placed in the enhanced tier, with both nations accused of operating covertly in the UK to shape public opinion and intimidate opponents. But despite calls from some MPs to include China in the enhanced tier, Russia and Iran remain the only nations on the list. Beijing has been repeatedly accused of seeking to covertly influence British politics and academia. A 2023 report by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee found China had engaged in 'aggressive' interference, including seeking to 'penetrate or buy academia to ensure that its international narrative is advanced and criticism of China suppressed.' Following the announcement in April that Russia would be included in the enhanced tier, Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was 'astonishing' that China had not received similar treatment and accused the Government of 'prioritising economic links over national security'. At the time, Mr Jarvis replied that the Government had a 'consistent long-term and strategic approach' to the UK's relationship with China. He added: 'The Government's policy is clear – we will co-operate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must, including on issues of national security.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Scheme to register foreign agents comes into force but China avoids top tier
The new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs) comes into effect from Tuesday, requiring anyone carrying out 'political influence activities' on behalf of a foreign power to register with the Government or face prosecution. The rules, which cover activities such as political communications or lobbying, were introduced in 2023 as part of efforts to strengthen national security amid concerns about covert action by foreign governments. Security minister Dan Jarvis said: 'We welcome legitimate engagement with all countries, but we will not tolerate covert attempts to manipulate our political system or society. 'The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme gives us the tools to confront growing threats to our national security, one of the foundations of our plan for change, without compromising the openness that defines our democracy.' The new rules also include an 'enhanced tier', which requires anyone working for certain states to declare any activity, not just political work. Mr Jarvis said: 'This is about creating accountability and visibility so that covert influence operations have nowhere to hide, and ensuring we have the tools to detect and disrupt them.' Failing to register with Firs carries a maximum sentence of two years, or five years for agents of states in the enhanced tier. So far, only Iran and Russia have been placed in the enhanced tier, with both nations accused of operating covertly in the UK to shape public opinion and intimidate opponents. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said in April it was 'astonishing' that China had not received similar treatment to Russia (PA) But despite calls from some MPs to include China in the enhanced tier, Russia and Iran remain the only nations on the list. Beijing has been repeatedly accused of seeking to covertly influence British politics and academia. A 2023 report by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee found China had engaged in 'aggressive' interference, including seeking to 'penetrate or buy academia to ensure that its international narrative is advanced and criticism of China suppressed.' Following the announcement in April that Russia would be included in the enhanced tier, Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was 'astonishing' that China had not received similar treatment and accused the Government of 'prioritising economic links over national security'. At the time, Mr Jarvis replied that the Government had a 'consistent long-term and strategic approach' to the UK's relationship with China. He added: 'The Government's policy is clear – we will co-operate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must, including on issues of national security.'
