China's Xi urges respect, 'right track' in call with South Korean counterpart
In their first phone call since Lee took office last week, Xi said healthy, stable and continuously deepening China-South Korea relations were conducive to regional and world peace and stability, according to state broadcaster CCTV.
China is South Korea's biggest trading partner and diplomatic relations between the two have improved since a 2017 spat over South Korea's installation of a U.S. missile defence system that Beijing opposed.
Xi urged the two countries to strengthen exchanges, adhere to the direction of "friendly neighbours" and jointly safeguard global and regional industrial, supply chains.
A strategic cooperative partnership between both countries would bring more benefits to both and "inject more certainty into the chaotic regional and international situation."
"It is necessary to respect each other's core interests and major concerns, firmly grasp the general direction of bilateral relations, and ensure that relations always move forward on the right track," Xi was quoted as saying by CCTV.
Lee's decisive victory in last week's snap election stands to usher in a sea-change in Asia's fourth-largest economy.
He faces what could be the most daunting set of challenges for a South Korean leader in nearly three decades, ranging from healing a country deeply scarred by his predecessor's martial law attempt to tackling unpredictable protectionist moves by the United States, a major trading partner and a security ally.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US-China talks to restart as hopes grow for trade war truce extension
The US and China are due to start a fresh round of talks on Monday as expectations grow that the world's two biggest economies could agree a 90-day extension to their trade war truce. The meetings in Sweden - led on Washington's side by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and for Beijing by Vice Premier He Lifeng - come hours after US President Donald Trump announced a framework tariffs deal with the European Union. The current 90-day truce between the US and China - which saw the two countries temporarily lowering tariffs on each other - is set to end on 12 August. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, the US and China had raised import levies on each other to more than 100%. The current 90-day tariffs pause came after top officials from the US and China met in Geneva and London earlier this year. Last week, Bessent said talks with China were in "a very good place" and suggested the new round of talks could result in a second truce. On Monday, citing sources on both sides, the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported that the US and China are expected to extend the truce by another three months. The BBC has contacted the Chinese embassy in the US and the US Treasury Department for comment. The latest US-China talks come after Washington struck deals with both the EU and Japan in the last week. On Sunday, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade agreement framework. It ended a months-long standoff between two of the world's biggest economic partners. Last week, Trump said Washington had agreed a "massive" trade deal with Tokyo. Under the agreement, Japan would invest $550bn (£407bn) in the US while its goods sold to America would be taxed at 15% when they reach the country - below the 25% tariff Trump had threatened. The US has also struck tariffs deals with the UK, Indonesia and Vietnam. At 10%, Britain has negotiated the lowest US tariff rate so far. No similar breakthrough is expected from the US-China talks this week but, with expectations of an extension to their truce, there are hopes that global trade will not be hit by fresh tariffs disruption. Asia is reeling from Trump's tariff salvo – is anyone winning? What the US-Japan deal means for Asia and the world Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump will birth a ‘golden age' for Bitcoin at the expense of the dollar
Wolfgang Münchau is a columnist for DL News. He is co-founder and director of Eurointelligence, and writes a column on European affairs for UnHerd. Opinions are his own. Probably the most under-reported economic story of our time is the strong appreciation of the euro against the dollar. While the Bitcoin prices rose 26% in dollar terms this year, it was up only 13% in euros. People fret about Donald Trump's tariffs, but the exchange-rate supercharges the tariffs. If a US buyer imported a product from the EU at a cost of $1.03 at the beginning of the year, it now costs $1.16 net of tariffs. Add a 10% tariff, and you are at $1.28. If the tariff were 30%, the rate determined by Trump to take effect August 1, the price goes up to $1.47. That's almost 50% up on the year. And for the Europeans it gets worse. Because China has soft-pegged the renminbi to the dollar, the EU is hit by a double-whammy exchange rate shock from its two most important trading partners. After Trump imposed his tariff on China, Chinese goods started flooding the European markets in April and May. Because of Chinese dominance of rare earths, there is only so much the Europeans can do about this. If they hit the Chinese too hard, Beijing will cut them off from essential supplies for their industries. 'Seismic shift' What's happening is a seismic shift in US economic policy similar to what happened in 1971. President Richard Nixon's 'new economic policy' included a 10% unilateral tariff on imports, a 10% cut in US foreign aid, and the dollar's withdrawal from the Bretton Woods system of semi-fixed exchange rate. The parallels are almost one-to-one. After the US extricated itself from Bretton Woods, the dollar depreciated. The Europeans, and the Germans in particular, protested, but there was nothing they could do about it. Again, it looks like history repeating itself. The brain behind the 1971 operation was not Nixon himself, but his treasury secretary, John Connally. And this is the main difference to today where the driving force is the president. What is also different is that the trading partners, and especially Europe, are in a more vulnerable position. Germany is more reliant on exports for economic growth than it was back then. It has a higher trade surplus against the rest of the world, and especially against the US. Trump's policies pose an existential threat for them. And for the EU as well, since their economic model critically depends on Germany. Recalibrating the world economy The Europeans could have put themselves in a more advantageous position, had they created a fiscal and capital markets union alongside the euro. That would have the euro on a trajectory where it could one day take over from the dollar as the world's leading global currency. But instead, EU member states chose to prioritise national fiscal sovereignty. The Europeans did not prepare themselves for a financial world without the support of the US. As was the case in the early 1970s, the fall in the dollar, and the rise in tariffs together form part of a programme that will end up recalibrating global trade and financial flows beyond what anyone would imagine. While all eyes are focused on the tariffs, the dollar devaluation is the far more consequential part of the policy. My expectation is that we are only at the beginning of this change as the US is losing the safe-haven status for global investors. All the evidence so far points that Trump pursues dollar devaluation on purpose. Section 899 of his One Big Beautiful Bill would have been a revenge wealth tax on global investors. It has now been removed. But ask yourself: why did they put this clause into the bill in the first place? Why is Trump taking every opportunity to insult Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve? Why does he keep calling on the Fed to cut rates by hundreds of basis points? You would not do that if you wanted a strong dollar. And you would certainly not draw up the One Big Beautiful Bill with its unfunded tax cuts. The independent Congressional Budget Office estimated that the budget plan would increase the debt-to-GDP ratio of the US to 124% from 100% by 2034. In that period, the annual interest costs would double to 4.2%. The annual deficit would be running at 7%. If you truly cared about the dollar, you would not pass a budget like this, talk about firing the central bank chief, or try to sneak in a wealth tax on global investors. 'Undermining the dollar' The Trump administration's undermining of the dollar is not a bug. It's a feature. Trump is a Mercantilist — just as the Chinese and the Germans were before them. He wants a manufacturing-based economy. You would be mistaken to think, as virtually all macroeconomists do, that this attempt is bound to fail. We can debate whether this is a good idea or not. But it will happen. If you create the right incentives, anything can happen. Trump is winning. He is not chickening out. And that's hard for his opponents to admit. He needs the tariffs because he needs the money to fund his deficit. It's as simple as that. There is no higher purpose behind the tariffs. Trump is not concerned about global imbalances. This is the stuff people like me talk about, perhaps too much. For Trump, it's just the money. When I recently predicted in a DL News column that crypto and gold would enter a golden age, this is the scenario that is behind it — a White House that is dead serious about weakening the dollar. China has capital controls. It is aeons away from offering similar services. So is the euro. A world in which the dollar is simultaneously debased and without competition is the most fertile environment for cryptocurrencies. They can thrive through two independent channels: directly, as a store of value and indirectly through stablecoins. Dollar stablecoins appear to be the only ones with a chance to prevail in online payments systems. You can describe a stablecoins in many ways. I look at them as financial derivatives whose underlying security are US treasury bonds. If and when the dollar debases, so will stablecoins by definition. As a store of value, they will be as useless as the dollar. I would not touch them as an investment, but they are a potentially important transaction currency. During a meeting of international finance ministers in 1971, Treasury Secretary John Connally told his colleagues: 'The dollar is our currency, but your problem'. That was 54 years ago. It is still true today. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China opposes Czech president's visit to Dalai Lama
HONG KONG (Reuters) -China said it "resolutely opposed" Czech President Petr Pavel's meeting in India with Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, and urged the Czech side to "abide by its one-China political commitment" and maintain healthy and stable relations. China's embassy in the Czech Republic posted the notice late on Sunday and said China firmly opposes any form of contact between officials of any country and the Dalai "clique". Pavel met with the Dalai Lama on July 27, it said. "China urges the Czech side to abide by its one-China political commitment, take immediate and effective measures to eliminate the bad influence," the statement said. It added that the Czech side should stop sending "any wrong signals to 'Tibetan independence' separatist forces." The Dalai Lama has been living in exile in India since 1959 following a failed uprising against Chinese rule in Tibet, and Indian foreign relations experts say his presence gives New Delhi leverage against China. India is also home to about 70,000 Tibetans and a Tibetan government-in-exile.
