‘PSA:' Expert Says This State Will Soon Change Its Speeding Law. Then He Reveals the Offense Will Carry Jail Time
Crabcakes and football are what Maryland is known for, as famously said in 'Wedding Crashers.' Well, soon it will also be known for this new speeding law that is going into place in October 2025.
Max Frizalone (@frizwoods) recently shared a new Maryland law that will arrest people driving 30 miles per hour over the speed limit.
This attorney's TikTok has more than 940,000 views as of this writing.
What Is the New Speeding Law Going Into Place?
'Watch your speed, Maryland drivers,' Frizalone warns.
Frizalone from
FrizWoods Criminal Defense law firm
reveals a new Maryland speeding law that leads to jail time. The
Sergeant Patrick Kepp Act
is set to take effect in October 2025. This new law imposes harsher penalties for reckless drivers. It includes the potential for up to 60 days in jail and a $1,000 fine for going 30 mph above the speed limit.
The law 'will hold reckless drivers more accountable with stricter penalties and real consequences,' County Police Chief Marc Yamada said in a written
statement
.
Currently, reckless driving and any form of speeding is a high ticket fine and points on your driver's record. However, the law is set to change and now carries jail time. The reclassification from high-tier speeding tickets into a criminal traffic offense punishable by jail time, fines, and points on your license will take place on October 1, 2025.
This law is named after police officer
Patrick Kepp
, who lost both of his legs after a driver intentionally struck him at a speed of more than 100 mph.
'If you are going fast enough, you could be going in the back of the cruiser,' Max concludes in his post.
Drivers Want Maryland to Raise Speed Limits
Frizalone told
Motor1
, 'I'd like to see the state's highway speeds increased as someone who drives across the state every day. The speed limit shouldn't feel like the minimum speed, but it does when it's as slow as 50 to 65 miles per hour on divided highways.'
Maryland highway speed limits do vary across the state.
Speed limits
on highways in Maryland range from 50-70 mph. See below for specifications on speed limits:
30 mph on all highways in a business district and undivided highways in a residential district
35 mph on divided highways in a residential district
50 mph on other undivided highways
55 mph on other divided highways
70 mph on interstate highways and expressways
'I believe all highways should be 65 mph across the state,' Frizalone told
Motor1
.
'They need to raise the speed limits already,' one TikTok commenter agreed.
'Maryland speed limits are so slow. It's actually insane,' another commenter added.
Maryland Is Known for Slow Speed Limits and Speed Traps
Maryland deployed the Safe Speed
Automated Speed Enforcement Program (ASE)
, which uses technology and cameras to catch drivers speeding. With this program, officers do not need to pull you over to give you a citation; it'll come to you in the mail.
The two main areas where Maryland sets speed traps are in school zones and construction zones. These traps are sophisticated and clever. Maryland utilizes both fixed and mobile speed cameras. In school zones, Maryland uses
ASE
speed cameras to provide consistent enforcement where speeding is particularly treacherous. Having an officer chase down a speeding driver in a school zone is dangerous, so fixed speed cameras are placed.
In addition, mobile cameras are disguised as SUVs and parked in any
construction zones
with a posted speed limit of 45 mph or higher. In other words, any construction taking place on a highway will have a mobile speed trap camera present. These cameras will
ticket
at 12 mph or more over the limit. The Maryland Road Worker Protection Act, passed in 2024, raised
fines
for speeding in work zones in 2025.
As a former Maryland driver, I know firsthand how Maryland frequently sets up sneaky speed traps across the state. Between the speed cameras, parked SUVs, and the police officers hiding with speed guns, you were always on the lookout for these traps.
With the number of laws and initiatives Maryland has recently put into place, it's safe to assume the speed limits won't rise anytime soon.
Will This Law Change Driving Behavior?
There is no denying the dangers of speeding and reckless driving. Ensuring safety amongst drivers is a top priority for any state. However, many drivers ignore speed limits on highways in Maryland.
'In Maryland the speed limit on highways doesn't matter. Accepted speed on the highway is 80 mph (despite that the actual speed limit is 70),' one
Reddit
post claims.
Drivers are often encouraged to follow the flow of traffic when driving. In Maryland, the flow is usually over the speed limit. Maryland's
Flow of Traffic Law
requires drivers to move at a minimum speed noted on a sign on any given road. By driving under the speed limit, the potential for danger rises. You can even get a
ticket
for driving too slowly if it impedes the normal flow of traffic.
With this in mind, drivers usually obey the flow of traffic and ignore speed limits. While on paper, the Sergeant Patrick Kepp Act is a great law to enforce, will Maryland drivers actually change their driving behavior? The comments section didn't make it seem so.
'The people questioning how one can go 30 over have clearly never driven in Maryland,' one TikTok commenter shared.
'On 95, the average speed is 85,' another shared.
'They also need a law that anyone going under the speed limit goes to jail for 60 days also,' one commenter joked.
Reckless driving certainly isn't a laughing matter, considering the serious consequences that can occur. With laws like the Sergeant Patrick Kepp Act and using technology like ASE throughout school zones and construction zones, Maryland clearly desires safer roads. Whether drivers take this law seriously, only time will tell.
Now Trending
'It's for Weight Reduction Ofc They Use Cheap Plastic:' Why Is the Interior of This $250K Lamborghini Crunchy to the Touch?
Walmart Customer Catches Someone Stealing a Corvette in the Parking Lot. Then He Reports It to Security
Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily.
back
Sign up
For more information, read our
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Use
.
Share this Story
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Reddit
WhatsApp
E-Mail
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
14 hours ago
- Motor 1
‘I Legit Have Nightmares:' Customer Buys Chevy Suburban From Dealership. Then She Runs Into This Issue 3 Weeks Later
A mom shared scary footage of her Chevy Suburban's brakes allegedly failing while she was on the road, just three weeks after buying it. Tiffany Maillet (@upholsterygirl239) uploaded the viral clip on TikTok, where it accrued over 5.9 million views. In it, her evident panic was captured in the moment, along with how she worked with an officer to get her car to stop. The mother of five writes in a text overlay that's visible from the onset of her video, 'Just got a Chevy Suburban from the Chevy Dealership and experienced something out of my nightmares. I'm a mom of 5 kids and I HAVE to have my car. I just paid for summer camp for Monday. Today is my son's birthday. This is so awful.' Her TikTok shows dashcam footage recorded while she's on the road. Next, she suddenly makes an exclamation that would make any driver's heart sink and stomach churn: 'My, my, my car's not braking! My car's not braking!' The vehicle in front of her appears to come to a stop, its red brake lights engaged. Suburban Brake Failure On the TikToker's dashcam, she can be seen lurching ahead, nearing the stopped vehicle. On the opposite side of the road, a white SUV with flashing emergency lights is parked. The car on the road in front of her slowly moves up, creating enough room for her to veer into the far left lane. It's separated by a concrete curb divider, which the TikToker careens toward as she honks her horn several times. 'It's not braking!' she says with a cracked, fearful voice. Following this, she drives up on the curb, stopping right beside the white SUV, which has the word 'Sheriff' written on the side. Once she's adjacent to the police officer's vehicle, she shouts out to the officer. 'My car won't brake! I'm pushing so hard on the pedal!' she says. Quickly, the law enforcement official informs her to 'put on the emergency brake.' She hesitates and then quickly asks, 'Where's the emergency brake?' He repeats again, 'emergency brake.' She states, 'I'm pushing so hard on my brake!' and as she does so, a radio can be heard going off in the background of the clip. Emergency Brake Engaged Next, it seems she's managed to locate the emergency braking mechanism while the officer exits his vehicle to assist her. 'This thing?' she asks, sniffling. 'Yes, push that down,' he says. The mom then tearfully says to her husband on the phone, 'I'm next to the cop right now,' before explaining what happened to her vehicle. 'I was stopped back at that stop sign, and ... I was holding the brake down, and it kind of felt like it crunched for a second.' The officer replies, 'Yeah.' She continues, 'And it just started sliding and it wouldn't stop going, and I'm like holding it down as hard as I could.' Then, she addresses her husband on the phone, 'Can you call your mom because she's behind me and I want her to know. All right, bye.' At the end of her video, she tells the officer that she just recently purchased the car 'three weeks ago.' What Should You Do If Your Brakes Fail? Ideally, no driver would ever have to deal with brake failure. However, there are methods folks can adhere to in order to safely bring their car to a stop in the event their brakes give out. First, commuters should attempt to pump their brakes in case they've locked up. In some cases, repeatedly engaging the brakes can 'unlock' them, bringing vehicles to a stop. If that doesn't work, defensive driving school iDriveSafely recommends immediately putting on one's hazard lights. This will alert others on the road to steer clear of your car. Following this, place your vehicle into a lower gear. Doing so will 'slow down your car.' Conversely, the outlet cautions against immediately placing the car in neutral. That's because it 'will take away the engine braking effect.' Consequently, one's car won't start to decelerate. Furthermore, instantly shutting off one's car will also disable power steering, making it harder to control. Once your car is slowing down, slowly guide it to an area away from regular traffic flow. This can be a shoulder, outlet, or slightly raised curve, or even on the outskirts of the left or right-most lane. Next, iDriveSafely recommends engaging the emergency brake. Often, this brake's engagement system is in the form of a lever located near the car's center console. Many vehicles place it in the form of a small pedal left of the standard brake, so be cognizant of where it is and how to activate your e-brake. Chevy Dealership Admits Fault Following her harrowing road incident, Maillet posted other videos pertaining to her experience. In this particular TikTok commenting on the situation, she shared the outcome of her correspondence with the dealership. According to her, the reason she wasn't able to stop was due to aftermarket brakes. Additionally, she says a service tech informed the sales team that the brakes would need to be swapped out prior to the sale for safety reasons. However, she says the sales manager didn't want to eat the cost of a brake swap. Ultimately, Maillet added that upon escalating the issue, the dealership admitted fault. At the end of her clip, Maillet speculated just how much more dangerous a situation she could've found herself in. 'I MEAN I COULD HAVE BEEN GOING 80 DOWN THE HIGHWAY AND MY FAMILY WAS AT RISK. complete negligence,' she writes in a text overlay. More on Dealerships 'This Is Why No One Wants to Work at Dealerships:' Mechanic Works on Audi With Nail in Tire. Then He Turns on the Computer Dealership Worker Is Oh-So-Close To Closing Car Sale. Then a Receptionist Ruins It In 1 Minute What Maillet found even more troubling was the fact that her five children were with her when she bought the car, meaning the sales team had no qualms with putting all of them in a vehicle that had potentially faulty brakes. 'I legit went to the dealership with my 5 kids and he still thought it was a good idea to stick me in the Suburban absolute shame on @chevrolet,' she writes in the caption. When Dealerships Give You a Dud Unfortunately, used car sales isn't exactly known to be the most scrupulous of vocations. But just because a car is previously owned doesn't mean buyers aren't legally protected by what Lemon Car Law refers to as 'implied warranties.' This effectively means 'the dealer guarantees the vehicle will function as it is supposed to,' the outlet states. However, there is some nomenclature to consider. If you purchase a vehicle 'as is' from a dealer, then you are assuming all liability for any repairs to the vehicle. This doesn't seem to be the case with Maillet's purchase, as she explained the Chevy dealership took responsibility for not swapping the brakes. But not everyone is so fortunate as to have purchased a car from a dealership that's willing to own up to its mistakes. And if you didn't enter an 'as-is' agreement and the dealership lies about any damage incurred to the vehicle, you could have a claim against it. Furthermore, as Lemon Car Law states, if integral components are compromised, then drivers could take legal action. There are several steps involved in this process. First, Lemon Car Law recommends contacting your state's consumer protection office. This will allow you to start a record of lodging a formal complaint against the dealership that sold you the vehicle. Moreover, lodging a complaint with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) may also help garner more attention to your claim. While possessing no legal authority, many companies take BBB ratings seriously. So, bad marks against the company could incentivize it to take action. Additionally, should your vehicle still fall under the manufacturer's base warranty, Lemon Car Law also suggests filing with the National Center for Dispute Settlement. Commenters React Maillet also narrated in the video, 'Just talked to the general manager of Chevy, and they told me they never should have sold me that car, and that they were in the wrong, and they're sorry.' Several folks who replied to her video concurred with the general manager's statement that the dealership was in the wrong. One user penned, 'You have a lawsuit!' urging Maillet to take legal action against the business. Another echoed this sentiment, stating their admittance of fault may ultimately assist with her claim: 'Call a lawyer - IMMEDIATELY! They just admitted fault and incompetence. Go get your coin.' 'Huge huge lawsuit. You cannot release a car with compromised brakes,' someone else wrote. Others on TikTok shared experiences working in auto sales that were similar to Maillet's close call. 'I hated doing used cars because of stuff like this. Sales only want to do enough to get it to roll off the lot. Who cares about customer safety right?' According to this user, refusal to perform component swaps is a common occurrence. 'Happens all the time. And the service department always gets the blame.' However, there was someone else who appeared confused about the hate directed toward third-party vehicle options. 'What's wrong with aftermarket Brakes? There are millions of cars/trucks on the road with non oem brakes on them and have no issues.' Motor1 has reached out to Maillet via TikTok comment for further information. The story will be updated should she respond. Now Trending 'I've Got a Scat, I Love It:' Dealership Customer Asks About a 'Shelby' They Spotted on the Lot. Then They Found Out the Price 'How Bad Is This?' Woman Hears a Clink While She's Driving. Then She Pulls Over and IDs the Real Source of the Problem Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Motor 1
21 hours ago
- Motor 1
‘Check the Card Slot as Well:' Chevron Customer Issues Warning on Using Tap-To-Pay for Gas. Then He Shows What to Look For
People may be aware of credit card skimmers being used to steal credit card information, but it can get worse. A man recently issued a warning about a scam that takes advantage of the tap-to-pay option at gas stations. The Real Educated Maniac (@therealeducatedmaniac) warned viewers on TikTok about being on alert when using tap-to-pay systems, as thieves have been targeting customers while they fill up their gas tanks. He says people should only use them if they've checked that they are above board. 'I'm about to show you one example of the tap-to-pay scam, and this one's at the gas station,' the creator says before walking up to a Chevron gas station pump. He says that before people just put their phone or card up to the reader, they should check to see if it is legitimate. According to the TikToker, scammers take 'a little black strip' with a symbol on it that looks identical to the one on legitimate tap-to-pay readers. He says they then place this strip on top of the reader. He goes on to explain that the sticker has a chip in it that captures credit card information when one is held up to make a payment. The danger is that the transaction usually goes through, so people don't even realize what has happened until it's too late. The man suggests scratching at the corner of the reader to see if the sticker comes off. Other Instances of Gas Station Scams In Aurora, Colorado, the police department issued an alert to the public about another scam involving the contactless payment system at gas stations. According to the Economic Crimes Division, scammers are drilling holes into the sensor that reads the card information. This forces customers to swipe their cards to pay, at which point thieves steal their information using skimming devices. What Should You Do If You Spot a Suspicious Sticker? The Aurora police advise that the best defense against contactless payment scams is to be alert when fueling up your car. Be sure to carefully check the payment reader for holes, stickers, or anything else unusual before using it to pay. If you see something unusual, alert a gas station employee. You may also consider filing a police report. Viewers Express Their Gratitude The Real Educated Maniac garnered over 121,000 views on his post. Several viewers were thankful for the PSA. 'Thank you for posting this. I'm so tired of these scammers,' one wrote. 'Thank you! They BEEN doing this,' said another seemingly unsurprised commenter. 'They have some readers that can be put in the store as well,' another user warned. Some even added their own advice and tips for paying at the gas station. 'I use a prepaid card that I add money to. To the exact amount that I'm going to pump, but thank you for the tip,' one person suggested. 'Apple Pay uses encryption to protect your data during transactions and to keep financial information secure. Your actual card number is never stored on your de[v]ice or transmitted to merchants,' one proponent of digital wallets said. Another person similarly recommended the Samsung wallet. 'I pay with cash,' commented someone else. Motor1 reached out to The Real Educated Maniac via email for further comment. This story will be updated should he respond. Now Trending 'This Is Why No One Wants to Work at Dealerships:' Mechanic Works on Audi With Nail in Tire. Then He Turns on the Computer 'I Listed It For a Fair Price:' Man Lists Jeep on Facebook. Then a Prospective Buyer Brings a Friend Named 'Tommy Roughknuckles' Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Outside the Diddy Trial, a New Media Guard Rules
Every weekday around 3 p.m. local time at the federal courthouse in lower Manhattan, a frenzy begins. Following hours of sensational testimony and evidence in the sex-trafficking and racketeering trial of hip-hop and fashion mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs — whose nosedive as a cultural icon after three decades of success seems to sink him further from those heights as new victims take the stand to implicate and denounce him — you'll spot the first trickle of media types, supporters and everyday folks stepping out of the rear entrance at Manhattan federal court. Some are frantically typing on their just-returned smartphones (which are contraband inside the building), instantly relaying the lurid details from the day's testimony; others make a beeline to catch the uptown 6 train beneath nearby City Hall to a midtown newsroom. After watching hour upon hour of often harrowing allegations of forced sex, battery of women, coercion, gaslighting and emotional cruelty by a romantic partner, which the women named as Combs' victims have delivered nearly every weekday for five weeks, some of the people exiting the courthouse, with no newsroom or editor to speak of, quickly attach their phones to tripods or selfie sticks to spill the courtroom tea du jour online. Soon, a black van is spotted pulling up to 500 Pearl Street, and it's time to race around to the front of the courthouse to capture the afternoon's most valuable moment. More from The Hollywood Reporter Stray Kids' Seungmin Is Burberry's Newest Brand Ambassador K-pop Star Bain is Ready to Open a New Chapter Following Historic Coming Out: "I Can Finally Be Free" G-Dragon Is Headed to North America and Europe for World Tour Here, a scrum of livestreamers, YouTubers and TikTok influencers coalesce to snag footage of the Combs' family leaving court. Janice Combs, the defendant's mother, who, after his father was killed, raised him 30 miles north of the courthouse, is the most sought-after photo subject as she attends the trial daily. A moment of chaos erupts when Janice, 83, exits the court and walks the 20 feet to a vehicle that's just arrived. 'Janice! I'd drink your bathwater!' one young livestreamer yells out a few weeks into the trial (he was referencing dialogue from The Color Purple, he tells me later). Janice's popularity during this trial is followed by that of her grandsons, King and Justin Dior Combs, who both make for big moments for the livestreaming set — or for their viewers, rather, as hundreds, or for some thousands, are watching and commenting in real time, fueling the online Diddy media industrial complex. It's a classic media frenzy moment, but these are not typical media professionals. The livestreamers have stepped into the Diddy trial beat for the past eight weeks, bringing a wide range of voices as they discuss the legal case and defendant's unlikely life story. It could come with a trigger warning: 'Not only will there be discussions of domestic violence and emotional abuse, while creating content, you might fall down a rabbit hole leading to unfounded comparisons to Jeffrey Epstein and the collection of kompromat, wild speculation about every celebrity who's met the rapper and, in turn, link already unfounded rumors to QAnon.' All of this and more has already happened online amid the explosion of Diddy-related video content that came after Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura filed her civil suit against Combs and again after his arrest. Sure, not all of the new media creators and livestreamers are guilty of creating any of this dangerous clickbait, but they stand outside the courthouse in its context and the wild possibilities of revelations at his trial that are now butting up against the the reality of this case. The trial's livestreaming players each come with a unique delivery style that's less polished or familiar, and rife with the slang du jour. Among this gang of street journalists are the sometimes frantic and frazzled but, more often than not, sharp and informative explainers like YouTuber Tisa Tells; the conspiratorial voice of FamerTube; the comedy trial coverage of first-timer Sam Croupen, who has a 510,000 followers and a growing TikTok fanbase; and the wildly popular Rotten Mango, aka true crime podcaster Stephanie Soo, who has taken up the Diddy trial and is running with it so successfully she overtook Joe Rogan as the top podcaster on YouTube. This trial and the non-professionals covering it have been commanding the eyes and ears of so many that the old guard is even playing nice, at least anecdotally. 'The way the mainstream has treated influencers has changed so much,' said Brianna Logan, who told The Hollywood Reporter she is in New York after crowdsourcing funds and has covered several big trials for her Instagram account. 'When I was covering Ghislane Maxwell, it was so disrespectful the way I was treated. Like, 'Give me that seat! I want to sit there,' and they're like, 'Oh, cute. You're on Instagram.' They're so much more respectful now. It's different. I think they have to acknowledge that their numbers are down. Social media numbers are up — there's no denying that. And it's probably good of them to admit there is a change happening.' Behind us, across from Pearl Street and distanced from this new media gaggle, stands the media's old guard, firmly set up with expensive cameras and weather-protective canopies in a neat row on the west side of Columbus Park. Hair and makeup are on point. But it's unclear if these camera-ready reporters are actually inside watching the trial unfold each day before their stand-up live shot. This may not matter because legacy media outlets have an entire apparatus moving information from the courtroom that is fodder for live blogs and published in near-real-time — giving a detailed rundown of testimony, feds vs. defense courtroom tension, Combs' silent antics with the jury and Judge Arun Subramanian's shifting mood. What all of this costs the networks and cable news outlets is surely sizable; what's produced is beholden to the many limitations or traditions of TV news: outmoded news segment formats, restrictive standards. red tape and, often, middle-of-the-road story selection. The result? Legacy media isn't getting the full Diddy trial story as some of it unfolds right in front of their poised cameras. The contrast between these two groups of media figures — all parties being content creators, after all — and their proximity to the court when it lets out at 3 p.m. feels too on the nose. With online news' pivot to video nearly a decade ago and the TikTok and influencer era that followed, impactful on-camera reporting has shifted away from the stoic, as-neutral-as-possible, serious journalist to the selfie-style-shooting, personable, quirky novice who caters to an audience of their own creation. On any given weekday outside Combs' trial, content creators and livestreamers shout rundowns and takes to their followers, some even fielding legal questions. The problem for many is that these livestreams are often unpolished and, at times, messy, with cringe-inducing errors, admissions of having 'no idea what I'm talking about.' This has always been an uncomfortable fact around the democratization of media and the rise of individual voices as news sources on social media, Substack, YouTube and the rest. With the backbone of a news report, namely fact checking and sourcing, jettisoned in favor of trust cultivated by personality-driven influencers and popular takes, will the truth slip out of the old idea of journalism and holding truth to power? This slippage is occurring amid some upsetting trends for the old guard and great news for digital platforms. According to the Pew Research Center, 86 percent of Americans turn to digital devices for news, with two-thirds using news websites and apps and around half getting news directly from social media channels. Meanwhile, 23 percent say they prefer to get their news from apps and websites, but those who prefer social media news rose 6 to 18 percent. This is deeply relevant to this moment and the Combs' narrative and trial, which comes 30 years after television and cameras in the courtroom rattled the O.J. Simpson trial, which may have affected public opinion and contributed to the case exposing deep national divides along race. The influencers and livestreamers may not have such an impact here, but the size and diversity among the audiences they command can mobilize and shouldn't be ignored. 'You get so many passionate people telling stories and creating content in different ways,' creator Emilie Hagen told THR outside the federal court. 'You have people that are sleeping outside as a career right now, just aiding the culture of Diddy. It shows what he built, and it shows why the stakes are so high.' Hagen, one of several one-woman producer-hosts milling about the courthouse perimeter each day, also dabbles in comedy, written journalism and ghostwriting. She had garnered attention online by meticulously preserving rapper Kanye 'Ye' West's oft-deleted missives and rantings (@kanyesposts). Since she crowdfunded her followers to fly to New York for Combs' trial in mid-May, she's been uploading rapid-fire clips, consisting of her roving around the Diddy trial happenings outside of the Pearl Street federal courthouse. She posts her incisive and, at times, revealing work on the regular platforms: Instagram, which gets the bulk of her traffic; YouTube; and Twitch. She arrived from California, as she told THR in an interview, 'more interested in documenting the chaos surrounding the courthouse, what characters it attracts, and what the culture like is outside the courthouse.' Hagen's move was wise at this untelevised trial, where phones or even vapes won't move past security. She was the first to nail down the story behind a group of seemingly unhoused and potentially high men and women donning 'Free Diddy' T-shirts who had gathered in Columbus Park. What looked like a semi-transparent orchestrated pro-Combs protest turned out to be a promotion for Diddycoin, a cryptocurrency launched by two of Combs' sons. That this stunt took place feet from the cameras owned by the networks and was missed but exposed by a roving livestreamer speaks more than that the story was confronted by a tenacious reporter. Hagen has also revealed, by simply walking over, phone extended and asking for an interview, the identity and firsthand account of the woman who was dragged from the courtroom after running to the front of the gallery and yelling to Combs; mainstream outlets largely referred to Jacqueline 'Candor' Williams as an 'unidentified woman;' and when West arrived in court, Hagen was kind enough to provide THR with some of the details of his visit. 'These characters are as much a part of the trial, I think, as the people inside,' Hagen said, referring not only to the estimated two dozen livestreamers documenting the trial's major revelations and its strange fringes, but also everyone in the spectacle: the angry man who arrives daily to rant at the crowd, the man who turned up in Renaissance-era garb, the revelers and the Diddy truthers. Some of the livestreaming new guard feel an ownership of the Diddy story that the mainstream media hasn't earned — or forfeited by not covering Ventura's 2023 civil suit against Combs. They watched as interest from the networks and other mainstream outlets grew after Combs' quick settlement out of court came the next day. They noticed as Combs' legal woes became a hot story and then possible RICO case. The interest outside of streaming gradually grew with civil lawsuits and complaints, and then exploded with a salacious civil case in February 2024 from producer Rodney 'Lil Rod' Jones. From there, the Diddy headlines came daily and eventually were unavoidable. For livestreamers like Donat Ricketts, a.k.a. Donat POV, this is tantamount to theft of services. 'I'm the most viral thing out here,' Donat tells me outside the courthouse as we wait for the Combs family to depart for the day. 'Like, getting them engaged, actually having critical thinking and viewpoints. I understand a lot.' Donat explains how he shadowed under different lawyers in Los Angeles in a four-year program but says he decided he doesn't want to be a lawyer, because you have to 'get indoctrinated.' He'd rather livestream from the big trials of rappers and others who will help him grow Donat POV's audience. But the media trying to take over from here stings, he says. 'I think the significance of this case, in this very moment, is showing the power of streaming platforms,' he told THR. 'You gotta understand something: When Cassie filed a lawsuit before the prosecutor and they sent Diddy a letter. I have a video [from then] with 650,000 views talking about Diddy — we're the ones who really amplified this. The mainstream media is playing catch-up, and we always said that we weren't gonna let mainstream media take authority over something that we did the work to investigate.' Donat's coverage of the Combs' trial — personality-driven, entertaining (if unpolished), informed but not always correct, deeply engaged with its audience — encapsulates the advantages and pitfalls of the imperfect medium. Influencer content and livestreaming's continuous audience-gobbling from the mainstream's old guard is not an 'if' question but one of 'how much' on quarterly damage assessments amid shrinking resources for newsrooms. As for the persistent pitfalls of the one-person newsroom — no fact-checking, no logistics, no security or crisis training and just too much information for one person to process and deliver — it seems that some of the deeper and most problematic issues of this encroachment will go unaddressed, at least for now. 'I think people are trying to uncover something big,' Hagen said about her coverage. 'I'm trying to capture a moment in culture, emotionally. Traditional media can't really explore that. CNN can't be talking about their emotions. They just have to stick to the facts.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More
