China opens third extension to sensitive Taiwan Strait flight path
China last year moved the M503 route closer to the median line, drawing a similarly angry response from Taipei, which says any changes to the flight route and its extensions must be communicated in advance and agreed by both sides.
The opening of the W121 extension comes days before the annual Han Kuang military and civil defense drills that Taiwan holds to simulate a Chinese blockade and invasion of the democratic island.
The median line had for years served as an unofficial barrier between Chinese-claimed Taiwan and China, but China says it does not recognize its existence and Chinese warplanes now regularly fly over it as Beijing seeks to pressure Taipei to accept its sovereignty claims.
The Civil Aviation Authority of China said that "in order to further optimize the airspace environment and improve operational efficiency, from now on, civil aviation will use the W121 connection line of the M503 route."
Taiwan's China policy-making Mainland Affairs Council said in a statement to Reuters that mainland China "used unilateral actions to change the status quo and increase cross-strait and regional unrest."
This is the third extension after W122 and W123, which are to the south of W121, opened last year. All three go west to east, from mainland China in the direction of Taiwan.
This measure is aimed at "ensuring flight safety, reducing flight delays, and protecting the rights and interests of passengers," China's Taiwan Affairs Office said.
It added that the opening was "beneficial" to both sides of the strait.
Taipei disputed the explanation as "unjustified", saying "the number of international air travelers on the mainland has not yet recovered" to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels.
Taiwan, facing ramped-up military pressure from China, which considers the separately governed island as its own, begins its Han Kuang exercises on July 9 and they are set to last for 10 days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
an hour ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Trading rules that served the world so well must be rebuilt
A mine for rare-earth metals in Inner Mongolia, northern China (Reuters) Although the United States and China reached an agreement to mutually rescind high tariffs, there is still a potential for flareups. Avoiding further negative ramifications on the global economy is paramount. Ministerial-level discussions between the two nations in London in early June led Beijing to lift its restrictions on rare-earth metal exports to the United States. For its part, Washington partially removed restrictions on semiconductor-related exports to China. During the discussions, the focus was on China's restrictions on exports of rare-earth metals. Rare-earth metals are used in high-performance magnets and optical equipment. They are also indispensable to a wide range of products, from automobiles and home appliances to missiles and fighter jets. China has about a 70-percent share of the global market in rare-earth metals. From April, Beijing implemented a system to regulate rare-earth metal exports on grounds they could be used not only for commercial products but also military purposes. But China did not explain the standards it uses for the assessment. That led to concerns being raised by both the United States and Europe. In Japan, Suzuki Motor Corp. has had to stop production of some models. Beijing began restricting exports of rare-earth metals after a Chinese fishing boat collided with a Japan Coast Guard cutter close to the disputed Senkaku Islands in 2010. The move was seen as retaliation against Japan. However, China said it was simply protecting its resources. In 2012, Japan, the United States and Europe filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization, which ruled against China. Even with its latest move, Beijing has not retracted its explanation that restrictions were needed because the metals could be used for both military and commercial purposes. This is not an issue that involves only criticizing China. Since his first term, U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified restrictions on semiconductor exports to China. It was intended to thwart China from gaining the advantage in a sector that has direct national security implications. China's restrictions on rare-earth metals can be seen as tit-for-tat for the U.S. semiconductor restrictions. Whatever the reason, excuses for limiting or preventing trade should not be permitted. After two world wars, the global economy operated on the common understanding that a relationship based on free trade provides national security benefits to all. But that recognition now stands on the brink of collapse. An action plan was compiled at the June Group of Seven summit to diversify the sources of rare-earth metals. The intention was to move away from dependence on China, but doing so will likely be difficult in the near term, given the overwhelming share controlled by China. Every nation has national security considerations. But with the deeper mutual economic dependence now in place, nations need to figure out rules that protect the free trade order. In the background to the United States and China sitting down at the negotiating table lies the condition of mutual dependency, which differs from what existed between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. We call on both superpowers to fulfill their responsibility. --The Asahi Shimbun, July 7
Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
Where do trade talks stand in the rush to avert higher U.S. tariffs?
US President Donald Trump unveiled tariffs customized to dozens of trading partners in April, as the White House slammed a lack of 'reciprocity' in trade ties By Beiyi SEOW and Julien GIRAULT U.S. President Donald Trump has said he will send letters to select trade partners facing tariff hikes as early as Monday, piling pressure on countries to strike a deal with Washington before a new August 1 deadline. The White House announced sharp levies on dozens of economies in April, citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trade relations, which were set to kick in on Wednesday, July 9. Trump announced on Friday the levies' imposition would be pushed to August 1 to allow time for talks to wrap up, but said he signed 12 letters to inform some countries of rate hikes, which will likely be sent on Monday. With Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying the administration was "close to several deals," where do things stand for economies from Taiwan to the European Union? Japan: Rice, autos at stake Despite being a close U.S. ally and major source of foreign investment, Japan might not escape Trump's tariff hike. Tokyo's trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa has made numerous trips to Washington through the end of June. But Trump recently criticized what he described as Japan's reluctance to open up further to U.S. rice and auto exports. "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal," Trump said, adding that the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine." EU: 'Ready' for deal The European Union said it is "ready for a deal" with Washington, with the bloc's trade chief meeting his U.S. counterparts Thursday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU was targeting an "agreement in principle" when it came to the initial July 9 cutoff. Bessent said the European Union is "making very good progress" after a slow start. With no deal, the U.S. tariff on EU goods doubles from the "baseline" of 10 percent to 20 percent -- with Trump previously threatening a 50 percent level. Vietnam: A pact with uncertainties Washington and Hanoi unveiled a trade pact Wednesday with much fanfare and few details, but it allowed Vietnam to avoid Trump's initial 46 percent tariff. Under the agreement, Vietnamese goods face a minimum 20 percent tariff while products made elsewhere face a 40 percent levy -- a clause to restrict "transshipping" by Chinese groups. But there remain questions on how the higher levy would apply to products using foreign parts. There is also a risk that Beijing will adopt retaliatory measures, analysts warned. India: A good position Indian manufacturers and exporters want to believe they can avoid a 26 percent tariff. Negotiations between both countries have been going well for weeks, and Trump himself suggested at the end of June that a "very big" agreement was imminent. Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said the feedback he received "suggests positive developments." But he maintained that the situation was fluid. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has stressed that agriculture and dairy products remain "very big red lines." South Korea: Muted optimism Seoul, which is already reeling from U.S. tariffs on steel and autos, wants to avert a sweeping 25 percent levy on its other exports. Cooperation in shipbuilding could be a bargaining chip, but "at this stage, both sides still haven't clearly defined what exactly they want," said new President Lee Jae Myung on Thursday. "I can't say with confidence that we'll be able to wrap everything up by July 8," he added. Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan in the wings Other Asian economies including Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia, which faces a 49 percent tariff, wait with bated breath. Indonesia has indicated willingness to boost energy, agriculture and merchandise imports from the United States. Bangladesh is proposing to buy Boeing planes and step up imports of U.S. agriculture products. Taiwan, for whom Washington is a vital security partner, faces a 32 percent duty without a pact. Although both sides have faced bumps along the way, Taiwanese Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim said "negotiators from both sides are working diligently" to find a path forward. Switzerland: Hope for delay Switzerland's government said Washington has acknowledged it was acting in good faith, and assumes its tariff level will remain at 10 percent on July 9 while negotiations continue. But without a decision by the president as of the end of June, Switzerland did not rule out that levies could still rise to a promised 31 percent. © 2025 AFP
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Waseda Professor: Vietnam Should Change Industrial Structure Based on Indirect Exports; Focus on Domestic Industries
Vietnam should strive to transform and upgrade its industrial structure to revitalize its domestic industries, Tran Van Tho, professor emeritus of Waseda University, said in a recent interview with The Yomiuri Shimbun. Tho also said Japan should take a strong stance in defending free trade, which would benefit the global economy. The following is excerpted from the interview, which was conducted by Yomiuri Shimbun Correspondent Shunpei Takeuchi. Japan and other Asian countries have grown thanks to the strength of the United States' huge and diversified market, where everything from luxury goods to inexpensive daily necessities sell. Following the Japan-U.S. trade friction [in the 1980s], South Korean and Taiwanese exports to the United States grew. However, Washington's trade deficit with them also expanded, causing trade friction. In recent years, China and Southeast Asian nations have expanded their exports to the United States and received benefits. China, in particular, has accelerated its industrialization as the 'world's factory' on the back of its abundant labor force to become a superpower. China has become something that the United States can ill afford to ignore, and the first administration of U.S. President Donald Trump focused on measures against China. The result of the U.S.-China trade friction at that time was China's accelerated relocation of production bases to Southeast Asian countries and India. Vietnam, which borders China, in particular saw an influx of capital, partly because it was easy for Chinese businesses to relocate production bases or to establish a framework on the division of labor. I, as a member of the economic advisory group to Vietnam's then-Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc from 2016 to 2021, viewed the move as a golden opportunity for Vietnam to receive more direct foreign investment. However, I was also concerned that Vietnam's growing reliance on foreign capital could hinder the development of domestic companies. I advised the prime minister to prevent the unrestricted influx of new foreign investment into the country and select foreign capital that can help facilitate industrial restructuring. Chinese companies [over the past decade] have stepped up their efforts to manufacture products in Vietnam to reroute Chinese products for export to the United States. With foreign-invested enterprises accounting for more than 70% of the country's total exports by value, Vietnam prospered from exports to the United States. But last year Washington had a trade deficit with Vietnam in excess of $100 billion, its third largest. Trump can be considered a 'businessman.' He applies business management techniques to domestic and foreign politics, and makes deals without regard for aligning interests. This trend has intensified in his second administration, with the announcement of reciprocal tariffs aimed at even allied countries. Trump announced that tariffs on goods imported from Cambodia will be increased to 49%, for instance, as he sees Southeast Asian countries as locations for rerouting Chinese products for export to the United States. On July 2, Trump said he had reached a tariff deal with Vietnam, ahead of other Asian countries. He said Vietnam will see its exports face a 20% tariff — less than half the 46% he had initially announced. Vietnam apparently made a significant concession in the trade negotiations by setting tariffs on U.S. products at 0%. If the agreement is implemented, Vietnam's exports to the United States will slow down, while the United States will export to Vietnam aircraft, liquefied natural gas and other items which are in high demand in the country, thereby reducing its trade deficit. Trump will leverage this achievement to pressure other countries into making concessions. Products transshipped in Vietnam for export to the United States will be subject to a 40% tariff. Vietnam should transform its industrial structure, which relies on exporting finished products made with intermediate goods from China and South Korea, to reduce its dependence on foreign capital and advance the upgrading of domestic industries. Diversifying export destinations is also necessary. The presence of Japan is significant in terms of formulating responses to U.S. tariff measures. As a leader that has spearheaded the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement, Japan should strongly affirm its stance in defending free trade, which would benefit the global economy.
