logo
Majority of Australians think China will be world's most powerful country by 2035, poll finds

Majority of Australians think China will be world's most powerful country by 2035, poll finds

The Guardian15-06-2025

A majority of Australians expect China will be the most powerful country in the world by 2035 as trust in the US tumbles, new research has found.
Just over one in three Australians (36%) trusted the US to act responsibly on the world stage, representing a 20-point fall from 2024 and the smallest proportion since the Lowy Institute began polling in 2005.
The thinktank's 2025 report found only one in four respondents had any confidence in president Donald Trump's approach to world affairs – less than half of the 46% who expressed faith in Joe Biden the previous year.
Confidence in the Chinese leader, Xi Jinping, rose four points to 16%, and Australians were evenly split on whether Xi or Trump was a more reliable partner.
Australians were just as likely to view China as an economic partner than as a security threat for the first time since 2020 – though a high proportion of voters still distrust China and believe it will become a military threat to Australia in the next 20 years.
'There's slightly more trust, slightly less threat perceptions, [but] it's still a pretty bleak picture for how Australians look at China,' said Ryan Neelam, the poll author and a director at the Lowy Institute.
A majority of respondents believed the US would come to Australia's defence if it were attacked, with 63% agreeing, a drop from the 75% agreement recorded in similar questions in recent years.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
But Australians nonetheless continued to support the strong military relationship, despite a loss of trust likely inspired by Trump's 'shocking' and 'norm-breaking' foreign policy, according to Neelam.
'It's almost as if the Australian public are separating those two things in their minds: the instability and unpredictability of Trump's approach to world affairs, from the institution of the alliance.'
Since the 2024 survey, the gap between Australians' trust in the US compared with China has more than halved, as perceptions of China continued to improve from their nadir in 2022, Neelam said.
'That's quite remarkable for Australia's key security ally to have such a low level of trust,' he said.
'The weight of expectation is that China will be more powerful and more predominant in the global system.'
Just over one in four respondents believed the US would be the most important and powerful nation in 10 years' time, with more than half expecting China to take the lead.
Four in five voters said the alliance with the US was important for Australia's security, similar to the support observed in 2023 and 2024.
Support for the Aukus nuclear-powered submarine deal was also steady with two-thirds of those polled in favour, similar to the level observed since 2022.
Coalition voters and residents of Queensland and Western Australia were especially supportive, each recording about four in five people in favour, while Victorians and Labor voters were more lukewarm, at three in five.
Respondents were polled in March, prior to the US defence department's announcement of a review of the Aukus deal, which Anthony Albanese described as 'appropriate' ahead of a possible meeting with Trump on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada.
Three in five people expressed confidence in Albanese's approach to world affairs in the Lowy poll, putting the prime minister just behind France's Emmanuel Macron and New Zealand's Christopher Luxon.
Luxon was the most trusted world leader, though nearly a quarter of those polled expressed no view, most of whom saying they did not know who he was.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims
Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims

Anthony Albanese 's plan to impose a new tax on super balances above $3million is likely to hit more than five million young Australians by retirement and not just 80,000 people as Labor claims, new analysis shows. The re-elected Labor government has the numbers with the Greens to get its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill through the Senate when Parliament resumes next month. For the past two years, Labor has been arguing its plan to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million, before assets are sold, would affect the top 0.5 per cent of super savers or just 80,000 people. This would take the headline tax rate to 30 per cent, as the new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains was added on to the existing 15 per cent tax on earnings during the accumulation phase for all super accounts. Controversially, Labor isn't indexing it for inflation, arguing a future government could do so, like they periodically do for income tax rates. Wilson Asset Management has done new modelling showing this failure to index the new tax would affect 5.4million Australians, aged 18 to 34, by the time they turned 67 and were able to qualify for the age pension. 'All age cohorts under the age of 35 would be captured by the taxation on unrealised gains by retirement,' it said. The modelling showed Labor's new tax on super balances above $3million, known as tax Division 296, would even affect young Aussies with a zero super balance now. 'Our modelling indicates those aged 27 and under with a zero starting superannuation balance would exceed the unindexed cap before retirement,' it said. 'This has led to some characterising it as a "stealth tax", one that fundamentally alters the long-term investment incentives within superannuation.' A 19-year-old worker on a $54,088 salary, with zero super, would have $3.491million in retirement savings by 2071. Someone who is 20 now on a $66,768 salary and just $75,000 in super now would $5.197million in superannuation by 2072. Australians who studied longer before starting work would also be affected, with a 27-year-old worker with zero super, on a $90,315 salary now, like to have $3.098million in super by 2065. A typical income earner, now 34, with $180,000 in super would $3.5million in super by 2058. These Australians would face an annual tax bill in the hundreds of thousands depending how much their fund had growth during the previous financial year. Wilson Asset Management Management founder Geoff Wilson said young Australians would suffer in decades to come. 'The proposed tax on unrealised gains will not merely be a burden on individual superannuation accounts exceeding $3million, the failure to index means a 25- year-old who today starts with a zero-superannuation balance will be captured by the time they reach retirement,' he said. Wilson Asset Management warned that forcing those with a self-managed super fund to sell assets, to avoid going above the $3million threshold, would discourage investors from backing technology start-ups. 'The policy will constrict the flow of essential risk capital to the engine room of the Australian economy – our small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and innovative start-ups,' it said. 'It is a policy that threatens to undermine the foundations of Australia's economic dynamism by inhibiting the very companies that drive innovation, competition, and future growth.' Wilson Asset Management has released a new discussion paper called, 'Critiquing the Proposed Taxation on Unrealised Gains in Superannuation.' AMP last month warned Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains above the $3million threshold would affect the average 22-year-old worker in four decades' time but Wilson Asset Management's modelling shows the effects would capture workers aged 19 to 34 now. Compulsory employer super contributions are rising to 12 per cent on July 1.

British IDF soldier dies in Gaza combat
British IDF soldier dies in Gaza combat

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

British IDF soldier dies in Gaza combat

A British - Israeli soldier, Sergeant Yisrael Natan Rosenfeld, 20, was killed in combat in northern Gaza. Sergeant Rosenfeld, from Ra'anana, was a member of the 601st Combat Engineering Battalion and reportedly died from an explosive device on Sunday. The UK Foreign Office is investigating reports of his British nationality, as he had moved to Israel from London 11 years ago. The conflict in Gaza, ongoing since October 7, 2023, has resulted in over 860 Israeli soldier deaths and more than 56,000 fatalities in Gaza, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Donald Trump urged progress in ceasefire talks, while Israeli officials are planning visits to Washington for negotiations, and Israel issued a new evacuation order for northern Gaza.

Paul Keating says young Australians are guaranteed to have $3m in super by retirement – but not everyone agrees
Paul Keating says young Australians are guaranteed to have $3m in super by retirement – but not everyone agrees

The Guardian

time34 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Paul Keating says young Australians are guaranteed to have $3m in super by retirement – but not everyone agrees

Paul Keating says the 12% rate of compulsory super contributions from 1 July will 'guarantee' a young Australian joining the workforce today will have more than $3m in savings by the time they retire. A statement from the former prime minister celebrating the day 'the system finally matures' came with an implicit criticism of Labor's proposal to put an extra 15% tax on earnings from super balances over $3m. The Australian Financial Review has reported that the former prime minister has privately blasted as 'unconscionable' the Albanese government's decision to not adjust the threshold each year in line with inflation or wages growth. Keating on Monday wrote that the 12% rate would 'guarantee personal super accumulations in excess of $3m at retirement, reducing the call by the age pension on the Australian budget to 2% of GDP in the 2050s'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The former PM's claim goes further than other critics of the policy, which Treasury estimates will affect 80,000 individuals when it comes into effect. AMP's deputy chief economist, Diana Mousina, said an 'average' 22-year-old earning $98,000 today would breach the $3m limit by the time they retire at age 67. The Financial Services Council has estimated that 204,000 workers under the age of 30 will have super balances of more than $3m by the time they retire – still less than 5% of that group. None have said workers were 'guaranteed' to crack $3m in super savings. And while other tax policy experts have said while indexation is common, they believe it is virtually impossible that the threshold will not be adjusted over the coming years and decades. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Guardian Australia sought clarification on the $3m claim, but Keating was unavailable before deadline for publication. Despite Keating's concerns, the policy is expected to pass parliament with the support of the Greens in the senate. The final scheduled 0.5 percentage-point lift in SG comes 25 years later than Keating hoped when he laid out his vision in a 1991 speech. 'Tomorrow, 34 years after I nominated a 12% wage equivalent as the appropriate level of compulsory contribution into superannuation, the system finally matures,' Monday's statement said. Keating said the advent of compulsory super had slashed the country's reliance on taxpayer-funded pensions, pointing out that France spends 14% of its GDP on public pensions, Germany 10%, and the United States 7%. 'Australia's pension call on the budget is currently just 2.3% of GDP – a sunken level thanks entirely to universal superannuation. 'Superannuation, like Medicare, is now an Australian community standard, binding the whole population as a national economic family, with each person having a place.' He told the AFR that savers would have been between $250,000 and $300,000 better off were it not for John Howard's decision in 1996 to freeze the rate at 9% until 2013.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store