Reform UK council leader stands by Northamptonshire councillors over X posts
The Reform UK leader of West Northamptonshire Council has stood by two councillors criticised for posts on social media.Newly elected Ivan Dabbs was criticised by an MP for "disrespectful" comments online about King Charles III, while Ron Firman came under fire for posts made in 2017 and 2018.Mark Arnull, who was appointed leader last week, said he was "looking forward to them joining the administration".Reform UK took political control of the authority after winning 42 seats in the recent local elections.
Dabbs, elected for Reform in Deanshanger and Paulerspury, made comments on X about the king and monarchy - the tweet received several reposts from Britain First.Labour MP for Northampton South Mike Reader said the councillor had "repeatedly disrespected the King, our monarchy, and country".Arnull said that Dabbs "got quite close to the line, but I don't believe he did cross the line".
'Happy to have them'
Firman also came under fire for old tweets that were called offensive, sexist and racist. At the time, he was reminded of the code of conduct by East Hunsbury Parish Council, where he sat as a councillor.Arnull said: "The information on [Mr Firman] was in the public domain and he was duly elected."He added he had "spoken to" both councillors and he was "happy to have them as part of my administration".Since the elections, the council is now made up of 42 Reform councillors, 17 Conservatives, nine Labour, six Liberal Democrats and two Independent councillors.The Tories had been in control of the council since the first elections for the authority in 2021, but lost control to reform in the elections earlier this month.
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Immigration reforms for ‘complete reset' to be introduced in Parliament
Legislation to end the recruitment of care workers from abroad is set to be introduced as part of a raft of immigration reforms. New rules to be laid in Parliament on Tuesday will also seek to increase salary and skills thresholds up to degree level for skilled workers, which will cut eligibility for 111 occupations. A new time-limited temporary shortage list will also be introduced until the end of 2026 for below degree level, where recruiting foreign workers is key to build critical infrastructure or industrial strategy. But those workers will no longer be able to bring their families and will not be entitled to salary and visa fee discounts. The legislative measures are the first policy changes to be introduced from the Government's Immigration White Paper to tighten controls and cut migration to the UK. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'We are delivering a complete reset of our immigration system to restore proper control and order, after the previous government allowed net migration to quadruple in four years. 'These new rules mean stronger controls to bring migration down, to restore order to the immigration system and to ensure we focus on investing in skills and training here in the UK.' The changes, if approved by MPs and peers, will come into force from July 22. Further measures from the White Paper such as increasing English language requirements and raising the immigration skills charge are also expected to be in place by the end of the year. The White Paper is aimed at reducing numbers, clamping down on abuses of the system and ending a reliance on cheap foreign labour. Home Office estimates indicate that changes from the plan could reduce the number of people coming to the UK by up to 100,000 per year, when looking at eight of its proposals including on study and work routes and a higher level of English language requirement. But the move to scrap care worker visas has sparked concerns from the sector, with GMB national officer Will Dalton describing the decision as 'potentially catastrophic' as the care sector was 'utterly reliant on migrant workers' and still had more than 130,000 vacancies across the country. The Home Office believes there are 40,000 potential members of staff originally brought over by 'rogue' providers who could work in the sector while UK staff are trained up. Transitional arrangements for overseas care workers already in the UK have also been set out on Tuesday, according to the department.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trans charity demands investigation into EHRC following Supreme Court ruling on gender
A leading trans campaign group has requested an investigation into the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), claiming its conduct in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on gender has been unlawful, The Independent can reveal. It comes after the Supreme Court ruled that trans women are not legally women under the Equalities Act. TransLucent said they have submitted a formal complaint to the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) – the worldwide membership-based network of national human rights institutions (NHRIs)– claiming that the UK's equalities watchdog is failing to adhere to the Paris Principles. The Paris Principles set out the minimum standards that NHRIs must meet in order to be considered credible and to operate effectively. The key pillars of the Paris Principles are pluralism, independence and effectiveness. TransLucent alleges that public statements made by EHRC commissioners, including chairwoman Baroness Falkner, demonstrate the body has already formed a 'settled view' on the implications of last month's Supreme Court ruling, pre-empting the end of the consultation on the ruling. Baroness Falkner previously described the ruling as a "a victory for common sense'. She has also said: "If a male is allowed to use a women-only service, it isn't any longer a single-sex space." But TransLucent said positions such as this render the consultation 'unfair and unlawful', arguing that public authority consultations 'require an open mind at a formative stage". They have also argued this breaches the principles of independence and pluralism by 'undermining the ability of key stakeholders like TransLucent to provide meaningful views". 'Given the resulting fear and uncertainty within the transgender community, TransLucent urges GANHRI to investigate and ensure the EHRC conducts its consultation with a genuinely open mind', the organisation said. The EHRC last month launched a consultation on the draft updates to its Code of Practice following the Supreme Court's ruling that the term "sex" in the Equality Act refers to biological sex. The consultation is seeking feedback on how the ruling, which clarified that a Gender Recognition Certificate does not change a person's legal sex for Equality Act purposes, impacts the guidance provided in the Code. But Steph Richards, the organisation's director, told The Independent that the trans community has had 'no confidence in the EHRC for several years'. 'Without a single transgender EHRC commissioner, MP or trans peer, we are reliant on allies, international bodies and the courts to make our case for fairness and equality', she said. While gender critical campaigners have hailed the ruling as a victory for biological women, there are concerns it will put trans people at risk and exclude them from public life. Interim guidance published by the equalities watchdog in the wake of the ruling says that trans women 'should not be permitted to use the women's facilities' in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals. But last month, The Independent r evealed that lawyers acting on behalf of TransLucent sent a letter to the watchdog warning that the guidance 'incorrectly states the legal position' of the court ruling. The letter criticises the body, saying it failed to consult with trans people before publishing its interim guidance, ahead of an ongoing consultation on the issue. Speaking at the Women and Equalities Committee in the Commons earlier this month month, Baroness Falkner defended the EHRC's interim guidance, saying the update was 'necessarily very brief'. 'We had high demand for some kind of explanation, and it was only the headlines that we were highlighting of the Supreme Court judgement', she said. 'When you have a synopsis of something, it can never spell out all the nuance… I would tell people to judge us by what the final consultation document is, because that will be the more definitive word on what we have found and will be the result of a conversation with, in fact, groups like TransActual. 'We are listening to them. We have scheduled meetings with those groups, and we are listening to what they are telling us about their experience on the ground. We will, of course, take that in mind.'
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer braces for major welfare rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer is bracing for the biggest Labour rebellion of his premiership at a crunch vote on his flagship welfare Bill this evening. MPs are due to vote for the first time on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at 7pm. Sir Keir hoped he had defused the revolt last week after he caved in to rebel demands to water down some of his welfare cuts. But the Prime Minister is still facing a rebellion by dozens of Labour MPs who are due to vote against the Bill because they believe the Government's concessions do not go far enough amid concerns it will push tens of thousands of people into poverty. Some 39 Labour MPs have signed a new amendment designed to torpedo the legislation. That would be far short of the 83 needed to overturn the Government's majority and to kill the Bill but a rebellion of 39 would still represent a hammer blow to Sir Keir's authority. Join the conversation in the comments section below.
