logo
France's Macron calls tariffs imposed by powerful countries a form of 'blackmail'

France's Macron calls tariffs imposed by powerful countries a form of 'blackmail'

Straits Times13 hours ago

FILE PHOTO: French President Emmanuel Macron flanked by French Presidency General Secretary Emmanuel Moulin and France's General Fabien Mandon attends a national security meeting on the crisis between Israel and Iran in the Jupiter room at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/Pool/File Photo
French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday that tariffs levied by powerful countries were often a form of "blackmail" rather than instruments to rebalance trade.
His comments during a speech at the International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, Spain, came with the European Union negotiating a trade deal with the United States ahead of a July 9 deadline, though he did not specifically refer to the United States or U.S. President Donald Trump.
"We need to restore freedom and equity to international trade, much more than barriers and tariffs, which are devised by the strongest, and which are often used as instruments of blackmail, not at all as instruments of rebalancing," Macron said.
He also urged support - and a rethinking - of the World Trade Organization to bring it in line with goals to fight inequality and climate change.
"Bringing back a trade war and tariffs at this moment in the life of the planet is an aberration, especially when I see the tariffs that are being imposed on countries that are just beginning their economic takeoff," Macron said.
Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs in April in which he said countries would face taxes on imports into the United States ranging from 10-50%, though he later reversed course and mostly lowered them for 90 days.
The United Nations trade agency had said the tariffs could have a catastrophic impact on developing countries, with some of the world's least developed, such as Lesotho, Cambodia, Laos, Madagascar and Myanmar, facing some of the highest levies.
Macron, a vocal critic of Washington's tariff campaign, has also said it is an aberration to ask Europeans to spend more on defence while launching a trade war. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan says it won't sacrifice farm sector for tariff deal after Trump rice complaints
Japan says it won't sacrifice farm sector for tariff deal after Trump rice complaints

Straits Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Japan says it won't sacrifice farm sector for tariff deal after Trump rice complaints

Japan's Farm Minister Shinjiro Koizumi has lamented the influx of foreign rice as a threat to Japan's food security. PHOTO: REUTERS Japan says it won't sacrifice farm sector for tariff deal after Trump rice complaints TOKYO – Japan will not sacrifice the agricultural sector as part of its tariff talks with the United States, its top negotiator said on July 1, after President Donald Trump complained that the key Asian ally was not buying American rice. Mr Trump's comment, made in a social media post on June 30, comes as Tokyo scrambles to convince the US to scrap a 25 per cent tariff on Japanese cars and a 24 per cent reciprocal tariff on other Japanese imports. The reciprocal tariff has been paused until July 9, but Japan has yet to secure a trade deal after nearly three months of negotiations. While the auto sector is Japan's top employer and exporter, the farm sector has traditionally been an important voting bloc for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party, which faces key Upper House elections on July 20. 'I have repeatedly stated that agriculture is the foundation of the nation,' top trade negotiator and Economy Minister Ryosei Akazawa said during a news conference. 'In negotiations with the United States, our stance remains unchanged: We will not engage in talks that would sacrifice the agricultural sector,' he said, adding that he would continue to negotiate with his US counterparts to protect Japan's national interests. Mr Akazawa, who returned from his seventh trip to Washington a few days ago, declined to say whether rice was part of those discussions. Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social that Japan's reluctance to import American-grown rice was a sign that countries have become 'spoiled with respect to the United States of America'. 'I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' he wrote. American rice imports rise Japan has, in fact, imported historically high volumes of US rice in recent months as domestically grown rice has skyrocketed in price since 2024, hurting consumers. But Tokyo caps tariff-free imports of staple rice, which is consumed at meals as opposed to rice used for feed or ingredients in other products, at 100,000 tonnes a year and imposes a levy of 341 yen (S$3) per kg for anything beyond that. That amount is a fraction of Japan's total annual consumption of about 7 million tonnes. While Farm Minister Shinjiro Koizumi has lamented the influx of foreign rice as a threat to Japan's food security, the government has brought forward a tender usually held in September for the year's first 30,000 tonnes of tariff-free staple rice imports as part of efforts to lower domestic prices. Results of that tender, held on June 27, showed applications for 81,853 tonnes, or nearly three times as much as the amount auctioned. Of the total tendered, 25,541 tonnes was from the US, followed by 1,500 tonnes from Australia and 708 tonnes from Thailand. Tariffed imports have also increased. In May alone, private companies imported some 10,600 tonnes of staple rice, of which about three-quarters came from the US, Finance Ministry data shows. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

RWS' new biophilic mall Weave opens to public on July 1
RWS' new biophilic mall Weave opens to public on July 1

Straits Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

RWS' new biophilic mall Weave opens to public on July 1

The three-storey development, billed by Resorts World Sentosa as a lifestyle and community enclave, spans 20,000 sq m and houses almost 40 tenants. PHOTO: RESORTS WORLD SENTOSA RWS' new biophilic mall Weave opens to public on July 1 SINGAPORE – Resorts World Sentosa's (RWS) new biophilic mall, Weave, has opened its doors to visitors on July 1. The three-storey development, billed by the integrated resort as a lifestyle and community enclave, spans 20,000 sq m and houses almost 40 tenants. Not all tenants have opened, but some seven or so food and beverage (F&B) outlets are already operational, including Middle Eastern eatery WeWa, Chinese tea chain Chagee and Taiwanese restaurant Din Tai Fung. Other stores to look out for include a flagship outlet for sportswear brand Adidas and two F&B concepts by Michelin-starred French chef Paul Pairet: French bistro Moutarde and ice-cream parlour Sundae Royale. These will open in the third quarter of 2025. Pairet's compatriot, renowned pasty chef Pierre Herme, opens his first Singapore outpost at Weave with a two-storey outlet on Aug 1. Local brands, opening later in the year, will also be represented, including kidswear label Le Petit Society and traditional snack shop Old Seng Choong, which is slated to launch its first open-concept bakery. 'Weave represents a pivotal milestone in our RWS 2.0 transformation journey as we reimagine how guests experience luxury and leisure in one seamless environment,' said Ms Lam Xue Ying, vice-president of Singapore Oceanarium and Destination Experience for RWS, in a press s tatement, adding that it is 'a space designed to inspire ease and exploration'. The mall will be situated next to Universal Studios Singapore and Singapore Oceanarium, taking over the space occupied by RWS' original shopping area, The Forum. Weave, designed by international architectural firm Benoy and landscape architects from local landscaping firm ICN Design, was envisioned to be a green destination in multiple ways – featuring actual greenery throughout via green walls and shrubbery-lined walkways, while also incorporating sustainable infrastructure. An artist's impression of Weave, envisioned as a green destination in multiple ways, including shrubbery-lined walkways. PHOTO: RESORTS WORLD SENTOSA For instance, the original ethylene tetrafluoroethylene roofing of The Forum has been enhanced for Weave such that it deflects more heat and further reduces temperature increases due to ambient sunlight. Additionally, Weave will make use of the cold water by-product generated by the hot water usage in RWS' hotels to cool the air that feeds into the mall. Weave, named after the weave pattern in the architecture, is part of a larger development plan at RWS. Weave mall takes over the space occupied by RWS' original shopping area, The Forum. PHOTO: RESORTS WORLD SENTOSA In November 2024, RWS' holding company, Genting Singapore, held a ground-breaking ceremony for its up-and-coming waterfront development at RWS, slated for completion by 2030. The $6.8 billion project adds more than 164,000 sq m to RWS, including plans to build a Super Nintendo World in Universal Studios Singapore. An 88m-high experiential 'mountain trail' and two more hotels with 700 rooms in total are also part of the development. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

What went wrong for BP? Once a hunter, oil giant is now prey
What went wrong for BP? Once a hunter, oil giant is now prey

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

What went wrong for BP? Once a hunter, oil giant is now prey

BP's failed four-year transition experiment has destroyed market credibility and value, says an analyst PHOTO: REUTERS News analysis What went wrong for BP? Once a hunter, oil giant is now prey LONDON – For months, speculation has been building that UK energy giant BP could be acquired by a competitor. Its lacklustre returns and low share price have made it a tempting takeover target. An activist shareholder had built up a significant stake in BP and was pushing the company to sell assets to raise cash, and industry analysts began to wonder how long it would take until the entire company was on the auction block. The situation came to a head on June 26 when Shell, BP's crosstown rival, was forced to issue a denial to media reports about merger talks between the two companies. BP, which remains one of the world's largest energy companies, is beginning to take steps to enhance its appeal to investors, including cutting costs and bolstering the oil and gas operations that produce the cash to fund the company's large dividend payouts. It may struggle, though, to shake off the impression that it is a troubled company in danger of losing control of its own destiny. BP's predicament is a major reversal for a company that was once one of the oil industry's most adventurous and predatory. At the end of the last century, BP's chief executive officer at the time, John Browne, helped lead a merger wave with deals worth tens of billions of dollars for companies like Amoco and Arco, two large US oil producers. Mr Browne was also at the forefront of a foray by Western energy companies into Russia. Under his successors, though, BP has been blown off course by a series of mishaps and worse, including the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion in 2010, which caused a major environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and killed 11 people. It still haunts the company, which continues to pay around US$1 billion a year in damages. The most recent series of missteps followed the appointment of Bernard Looney as CEO in 2020. Mr Looney began a radical reshaping of BP's activities toward cleaner energy that some investors and analysts applauded. His plan included investing heavily in green energy while reducing oil and natural gas production. The timing of this effort proved unfortunate. Oil prices, which had plummeted during the Covid-19 pandemic, rose after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, making BP's aims to reduce oil output a turnoff for investors. At the same time, higher prices for materials and equipment and a rise in interest rates hurt some renewable projects like offshore wind, where Mr Looney placed some big bets. More recently, the Trump administration has largely quashed offshore wind developments in the United States. Already BP has taken write-offs of US$1.1 billion in US offshore wind projects. 'BP's failed four-year transition experiment has destroyed market credibility and value,' Irene Himona, an analyst at Bernstein, a Wall Street research firm, wrote in a note in May. Mr Looney left in 2023 over a failure to disclose personal relationships with employees at the company. His successor, Murray Auchincloss, has tried to stabilise the core oil and gas business, but investors are not yet convinced that he understands the need for decisive change. As chief financial officer, he was one of Mr Looney's closest lieutenants and often joined him in presentations to investors. BP once enjoyed a reputation as the home of skilled explorers for oil and gas, but rebuilding that business after years of starving it may not be easy. Ms Himona said that, in this decade, the company had been finding enough oil and gas to replace only about 40 per cent of the reserves it pumped. BP also at least temporarily lost a large portion of the oil and gas on its books when it put the 20 per cent stake that it owns in Rosneft, the state-controlled Russian company, on ice in 2022 after the invasion of Ukraine. UBS estimates that BP's ratio of net debt to equity at the end of 2024 was a high 83.6 per cent, compared with 21.5 per cent for Shell. 'BP's main issue is it's stuck between strategies,' said Raghavendra Rau, a professor at the Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge. The company needs to come up with a 'clear, consistent' approach, he said. Analysts say expected downward pressure on oil prices could work against BP because the company's earnings depend strongly on petroleum production. Shell, by contrast, has methodically built up one of the world's largest liquefied natural gas units, valued by UBS at US$86.5 billion. And Exxon Mobil has taken the leading position in Guyana, where oil output has grown rapidly. Shell and BP produce comparable volumes of oil and natural gas, yet the market valuation of Shell, now about £151 billion (S$264 billion), is more than double that of BP at about £57 billion. Despite its problems, BP has important strengths. It is one of the major producers in the US as well as in Azerbaijan, a major gas exporter, and Iraq. But if it cannot shore up its stock price, which has fallen about 20 per cent over the past year, it could look so cheap that it becomes an ever more tempting target for a takeover or breakup. Shell has ruled out making a bid now without the invitation of BP's board or an offer from a third party. But a takeover would create one of the world's largest energy companies, with nearly one-quarter of the global LNG market, UBS estimates. In fact, the theme of merging the two giants has come up before. In his book 'Beyond Business,' Mr Browne, the former CEO, said he had talked about a deal with his Shell counterpart, Jeroen van der Veer, in 2004. For now, though, Shell has said that it sees a takeover as a potential distraction from its focus on streamlining operations. In May, for instance, Wael Sawan, Shell's CEO, implied that buying back its own shares was a better option than most acquisitions. 'We want to be value hunters,' he said.' 'Today, value hunting, in my view, is buying back more Shell.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store