
In defence of exorcism
British politics and ghosts are subjects that rarely meet. Sometimes an MP or parliamentary aide might report a sighting of one of various spirits that inhabit the Palace of Westminster. It is said, for instance, that the ghost of the assassin John Bellingham haunts the Commons lobby at the spot where he gunned down Spencer Perceval. And last year the diary secretary to speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle excited the tabloids with her claim that once, in one of parliament's side rooms, she felt a phantom dog nuzzling against her leg.
In general, though, politicians aren't preoccupied with the paranormal. One exception is David Bull, the former TV presenter of Most Haunted Live! and the new chairman of Reform UK. On Good Morning Britain earlier this month, he was asked by Richard Madeley whether he had ever seen a ghost. Not only did Bull admit to having driven with a ghost in the boot of his car, he also told how a poltergeist had taken hold of the celebrity medium, Derek Acorah, and tried to strangle him.
This story was retold the other week with sceptical merriment at The Spectator's weekly editorial meeting. Feeling that I should intervene in support of the supernatural, I confessed to the editor and his crew that I once hired someone to perform an exorcism at my house in Maida Vale. Merriment turned to suspiciously demonic laughter.
What were the supernatural events that led to my experience with exorcism? I am a heavy sleeper, but even I was occasionally woken by the banging of doors on the second floor. But not as much as friends who had to sleep in the guest room. They also reported sudden chills and apparitions.
The man I turned to for help was not a priest but a dowser. He was a big cheese in the British Society of Dowsers. He was not at all 'new age'; he looked and spoke like an accountant. He identified the spirit of a young girl crouching in the corner of the room and thought that she had probably been a prostitute. Villas built in Little Venice in the 19th century, often for mistresses, became brothels in the 1920s. The Warrington public house on Randolph Avenue, close by my home, was a famous house of ill repute. Some have suggested that the word 'randy' (lustful) derives from the location.
To release the ghost from her physic imprisonment, I was encouraged to knock a double door between two guest rooms at great expense. It worked. No more banging doors. I was so convinced by my dowser that when I later bought a pied-à-terre in Kensington Gardens Square, I got him to give it a psycho-spiritual once-over.
My account leaves one big unanswered question. Why did I believe so readily in the presence of a pesky ghost in my house? The answer is simple. I have previous experience of the supernatural. Some years earlier I was sitting in my apartment in Bombay when I was called to the telephone. A woman called Rita Rogers wanted to speak to me. She told me that my father, Frank, who had died some years earlier, was sending me a message. He wanted me to have his gold Rolex watch.
Not only had I never heard of Rita (who later became famous as the clairvoyant who gave advice to Princess Diana), nor she of me, but she could not have known about my father or his watch. I rang my mother, who told me that she had been meaning to give it to me. It was handed over. As communication from beyond the grave goes, it did make me wonder why my father had sent me such a humdrum message.
Despite my own supernatural experiences, I still find it difficult to take ghost stories seriously – even my own. As a historian and geopolitical analyst, I live in a world of facts, evidence and logic. When friends or acquaintances tell me about the time they saw a ghost, I pass it off as an amusing anecdote in which I only half-believe.
By contrast, for most of history society has taken this stuff very seriously. The best-known early account of exorcism took place at Gerasene, near the Sea of Galilee. Here Jesus met a lunatic possessed by demons (literally 'unclean spirits' in Greek) and asked his name. 'My name is Legion, for we aremany.' Legion begged Jesus to 'send us among the pigs'. The demons were duly despatched into a nearby herd of pigs, which rushed into a lake and drowned.
But exorcism predates Christianity. In the first millennium bc, shamans in Mesopotamia called asipu performed exorcisms. The Roman-Jewish historian Flavius Josephus recorded how a holy man called Eleazar called on King Solomon to draw demons out ofthe noses of victims. Meanwhile, demons in the Islamic world, jinn, have always been dealt with by exorcists called raqui.
In the West, the publication of De Exorcismis et Supplicationibus Quibusdam ('Of Exorcisms and Certain Supplications') in 1614 defined the practice of exorcism until minor adjustments were made in Vatican II. These changes stressed the connection between exorcism and baptism. It's a connection heavily emphasised in the Orthodox churches, which do exorcisms all the time. 'At every baptism we spit on Satan – literally,' one accomplished icon painter told me.
The practice of exorcism today is seen by some to be an archaic medieval hang-over. But Pope Francis in an interview warned against the 'spiritual lukewarmness' that left people open to 'diabolical possession'. According to Vatican News, the demand for exorcisms in Italy has tripled in recent years and annual requests exceed half a million. Some attribute this to an increased use of recreational drugs and psychiatric disorders.
In Britain, exorcisms are carried out by specially trained priests – in the Church of England there are 42, one for each diocese. And although they don't like to publicise it, NHS consultant psychiatrists have been known to work with exorcists (or 'deliverance ministers', as the C of E calls them) to treat patients with mental health problems.
The belief in ghosts is an important part of human history. And despite the sceptics, it still has a place in modern life. It would be a great subject for Reform's new chairman to get his teeth into.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Lord Falconer's selective constitutional memory
Good old Charlie Falconer. For more than 15 years now, the noble Lord has been trying, desperately, to ram assisted dying through parliament. Kim Leadbeater's Bill represents his eighth attempt at legalising suicide following previous efforts in 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2019, 2022 and 2024. Now, with a narrow majority of just 23 MPs backing Leadbeater's legislation, Falconer clearly senses the victory that has eluded him for so long… The New Labour grandee penned a piece in the Times last week headlined 'Assisted dying will end the anguish. We won't let wreckers derail it.' It concluded that MPs had 'decided the law must change. The Lords will scrutinise and improve but it will respect and give effect to that decision.' In short, what MPs say, goes. Appearing subsequently on Tuesday's edition of the Today programme, he was asked whether the role of the Lords was to 'ultimately uphold something that the directly elected members of the Commons have decided to go ahead with.' 'Correct', replied Falconer. But has the good Lord himself stuck to this self-denying ordinance? A quick look at his voting record would certainly suggest not. For back in October 2011, he was one of 220 Peers, mostly Labour, who tried to vote down the Coalition's Health and Social Care Bill – despite it having passed the Commons with a majority of 65 MPs at Third Reading. He subsequently tried to delay Tory changes to tax credits in October 2015, despite it passing the Commons with a majority of 22. And, more recently, he voted against the 2023 Illegal Migration Bill – despite a Commons majority of 59. The point here is *not* that the Lords cannot vote down legislation passed by MPs. It is that those supporting assisted dying ought to recognise the rights and responsibilities of the Upper House – and be honest about their own voting records in parliament. Otherwise there will be inevitable talk of rules for thee but not for me…


Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Emma Raducanu humiliated Donald Trump-supporting Wimbledon ace who caused storm this week
Emma Raducanu humiliated Donald Trump-supporting Wimbledon ace who caused storm this week Maria Sakkari made headlines for her fiery on-court clash last weekend, but the Greek tennis star was left to rue her words by Emma Raducanu at Wimbledon last year Maria Sakkari has stirred up controversy with her on-court antics (Image: Rob Newell - CameraSport, CameraSport via Getty Images ) Emma Raducanu once embarrassed a controversial tennis star who attended US President Donald Trump's inauguration gala at Wimbledon. Greek tennis star Maria Sakkari found herself in the spotlight for the wrong reasons last weekend after she was involved in a foul-mouthed confrontation at the Bad Homburg Open in Germany. The 29-year-old took issue with Yulia Putintseva after beating the Russian-born Kazakh 7-5, 7-6 in the competition's third round. Tensions spilt over post-match as the players clasped hands over the net, with Sakkari seemingly unhappy with the handshake. She told Putintseva to "act like a human being,' to which the latter responded by saying she had, before instructing Sakkari to "go f*** herself". Visibly taken aback, Sakkari replied: "What?!" Putintseva gestured with her arms outstretched, having possibly been left upset by Sakkari's reaction to winning an epic tiebreaker. She then kept gesturing for her opponent to walk away, with Sakkari instead following her rival to her chair and demanding: 'F***ing hell, I'm what?' before brutally telling Putintseva: 'Nobody likes you.' Article continues below Sakkari is no stranger to fiery behaviour on the court, having also clashed with Danielle Collins in Montreal back in 2023. After hitting a ball into the stands, Collins complained about the action to the umpire. Sakkari, while preparing for her second serve, responded: "It didn't even hit anyone. It was on the ground." Collins refused to back down as she stated: "Shut your mouth, shut your mouth.' That only served to escalate the argument, with Sakkari adding: "What's your problem? I didn't hit anyone. I framed the ball," to which Collins said: "You hit the ball into the stands, Maria. You almost hit someone." Sakkari even tried to unsettle British No. 1 Emma Raducanu before their third-round match at Wimbledon last year, suggesting it wouldn't be an easy encounter for Raducanu against a top-ten player. Emma Raducanu dismantled the Greek tennis star at Wimbledon (Image: Getty ) However, Sakkari was left to rue her words as she was defeated inside 92 minutes with a score of 6-2, 6-3, making 31 unforced errors in the process. Article continues below Remarkably, Sakkari and her boyfriend, Konstantinos Mitsotakis, were spotted at the inauguration gala for Trump ahead of his second presidential term earlier this year. Mitsotakis gained an invitation to the event due to his father, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, being the Greek Prime Minister. They were invited by Congressman Konstantinos Bilirakis, representative for Florida. Mitsotakis, whose grandfather was also the Prime Minister of the country, has been dating Sakkari since around 2020. Raducanu, meanwhile, was overcome with emotion after coming from behind to beat Ann Li in the first round at Eastbourne earlier this week. The world No. 38 has been struggling with back spasms and was forced to pull out of the Berlin Open last week. Raducanu showed resilience by recovering after losing the first set and securing the win, giving her some much-needed confidence in the build-up to Wimbledon.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Working-class voters are shifting from Labour to Reform. Here's why
New analysis reveals Labour is increasingly becoming the party of wealthier voters, with those earning over £70,000 more likely to support them. Working-class voters, particularly those earning £20,000 or less, are significantly shifting their allegiance to Reform UK, which leader Nigel Farage claims is now the true party of the working class. This political realignment is linked to working-class discontent over the cost of living crisis, reliance on public services, and issues like Brexit and immigration. Reform UK is attracting these voters with specific policy promises, while Labour defectors to Reform are often less educated and voted to leave the European Union, the analysis found. The findings indicate a broken traditional link between Labour and its working-class base, prompting calls for a party reset following internal disputes over welfare reform.