Someone must have grabbed him, Zayn Rayyan's mother tells court
Ismanira Abdul Manaf made the statement while testifying on the second day of her defence trial for a charge of neglecting Zayn Rayyan in a manner likely to cause physical injury.
She gave evidence before Judge Dr Syahliza Warnoh, according to a report by Sinar Harian.
During cross-examination by Deputy Public Prosecutor Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin, the 30-year-old said she believed this to be the case because she did not hear the footsteps of the late Zayn while he was supposedly walking up to the second floor of Block R, Pangsapuri Idaman, in Damansara Damai.
The first defence witness agreed with the prosecution's suggestion that, logically, one would have heard running footsteps if the special needs child had been grabbed or taken.
Prosecutor: I put it to you that during the incident, in fact, no one was grabbed or abducted. Agree?
Ismanira: Disagree.
Prosecutor: Logically, you would have seen Zayn Rayyan behind you or seen him being grabbed – but you told the court you kept looking back at him.
Ismanira: I did look back at Zayn Rayyan, but not at all times, as I was using my senses to monitor him.
Prosecutor: Wouldn't it be clearer if you had used your sight rather than hearing?
Ismanira: Agree.
Prosecutor: Do you agree that relying on hearing is not an accurate method of supervision, especially when monitoring a special needs child like Zayn Rayyan?
The mother of two responded that she did not agree.
Ismanira, who works as an accounts clerk, also denied a prosecution suggestion that she had left Zayn alone at the playground and returned home by herself.
Her lawyer Haresh Mahadevan objected to the line of questioning, arguing that the narrative of Zayn being left alone at the playground had never been raised by prosecution witnesses.
Raja Zaizul Faridah responded that the fourth prosecution witness, former investigating officer Inspector Nina Syamimi Syamsuddin from Petaling Jaya District Police Headquarters, had stated this in a previous hearing.
'She was their witness, so the defence may re-examine her. At this point, I am fulfilling my duty as the prosecution during cross-examination,' she said.
After hearing submissions from both sides, Judge Syahliza recorded all objections but allowed the prosecution to proceed with the question.
The trial will continue on Wednesday.
According to the amended charge, Ismanira is accused of having custody of six-year-old Zayn Rayyan and neglecting him in a manner likely to cause physical injury.
The offence was allegedly committed in the area of Block R, Pangsapuri Idaman, Damansara Damai, up to a nearby river, between noon on Dec 5, 2023 and 9.55pm the following day.
She is charged under Section 31(1)(a) of the Child Act 2001 and faces a penalty under Section 31(1) of the same Act, which provides for a fine of up to RM50,000, imprisonment of up to 20 years, or both, upon conviction.
On Dec 6, 2023, Zayn Rayyan was found dead in a stream near Pangsapuri Idaman at around 10pm.
He had earlier been reported missing and was discovered lying approximately 200 metres from his residential block.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
32 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Zayn Rayyan's mum denies changing outfits twice the day he went missing
KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — The mother of the late Zayn Rayyan Abdul Matin denied that she changed her clothes at home while her son was missing, despite a witness saying otherwise. Ismanira Abdul Manaf testified at the Petaling Jaya Sessions Court during her defence hearing on a neglect case. According to Sinar Harian, the 30-year-old mother said she only went up to her apartment to check if Zayn Rayyan had returned by himself. She explained that she spent less than five minutes inside to put down his school bag and other items. Ismanira also disagreed with the suggestion that she met her neighbour, Rashidah Rajali, on the stairs twice that day. The prosecution witness had previously told the court that she saw Ismanira twice in different outfits. Rashidah claimed she first saw Ismanira wearing a white shirt and black trousers, and later saw her in different, darker patterned clothes. Ismanira faces a charge under the Child Act 2001 for neglecting her son in a manner that could cause him physical injury.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Key witness claims company used to funnel bribes to Lim Guan Eng
KUALA LUMPUR: The key prosecution witness in the Penang undersea tunnel corruption trial involving Lim Guan Eng told the Sessions Court today that his vehicle company was used as a conduit for bribery payments to the former chief minister. Businessman G. Gnanaraja, 44, testified that Lim had instructed him to set up a company, Bumi Muhibah Capital Holding Sdn Bhd, and open a bank account for it. The company was incorporated on Aug 10, 2016, and in August 2017, he used it to facilitate bribe payments to Lim. 'All instructions to establish the company and open the account were given by Lim while we were in a car en route to Publika on Aug 20, 2017. The company held a CIMB Bank account at the CIMB KLCC branch. 'I had full access to the account as I was the sole authorised individual to withdraw funds,' he said while reading his witness statement during the trial involving the Penang road and undersea tunnel project. The 37th prosecution witness added that he became acquainted with Datuk Zarul Ahmad Mohd Zulkifli, then Director of Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd (CZCSB), around May 2017. Between Aug 10 and 19, 2017, they communicated regarding Gnanaraja acting as the intermediary between Zarul Ahmad and Lim. Gnanaraja testified that Datuk Zarul selected him as an intermediary to deliver cash to Lim based on trust and the fact that he was not affiliated with any opposition party at the time. He further stated that during a meeting at Hotel Impiana in Ipoh on Aug 18, 2017, he and Zarul discussed a sum of RM2 million that Zarul intended to hand over to Lim. 'Later that day, around 5 pm, while I was at home, Datuk Zarul called and asked to meet him at Eastin Hotel, Petaling Jaya at 6 pm. Upon arrival, Datuk Zarul exited his vehicle, retrieved two dark-coloured bags and placed them in the boot of my car. 'I understood the bags contained cash as Datuk Zarul said '1M' while placing the first bag and '1M' again with the second. By '1M', I understood him to mean one million ringgit,' he said. Gnanaraja added that upon returning home, he opened both bags and found they contained bundles of RM100 banknotes. 'I did not count the bundles of cash. I confirm that both bags remained in my study and were not moved until I received a call from Datuk Zarul on Aug 20, 2017,' he said. Gnanaraja said, on that morning, he received a phone call from Zarul Ahmad instructing him to prepare one of the bags containing RM1 million and proceed to the vicinity of Hotel Wen Worth in Pudu to pick up Lim. 'When we reached there, Lim, dressed in the official white chief minister's attire bearing the Penang state crest, entered Datuk Zarul's car. I was wearing a batik shirt. 'Lim greeted us and exchanged pleasantries with both of us. He informed me that he had initially intended to arrange a meeting between me and an individual named Datuk Ewein, but chose instead to speak with me directly to discuss confidential financial matters intended for his benefit,' Gnanaraja testified. According to the amended first charge, Lim, 64, is accused, in his capacity as the then chief minister of Penang, of abusing his position to receive a bribe of RM3.3 million to assist a company owned by Zarul Ahmad in securing the Major Roads and Undersea Tunnel Construction Project in Penang, valued at RM6,341,383,702. The offence allegedly took place between January 2011 and August 2017 at the Chief Minister's Office in Penang. Under the amended second charge, Lim is accused of soliciting a 10 percent bribe out of the project's future profits from Zarul Ahmad for assisting his company in securing the same project. The solicitation allegedly took place near The Gardens Hotel, Lingkaran Syed Putra, Mid Valley City, between 12.30 am and 2.00 am in March 2011. Additionally, Lim faces two charges of disposing of a couple of state-owned lots of land in Penang, valued at RM208.8 million, to a developer linked to the undersea tunnel project. These offences were allegedly committed at the Penang Land and Mines Office, Komtar, on Feb 17, 2015, and March 22, 2017. The trial before Judge Azura Alwi resumes on Aug 19. - Bernama
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Businesswoman pleads not guilty to making false statement to SSM
KUANTAN: A businesswoman pleaded not guilty at the Sessions Court here on Wednesday (July 23) to a charge of making a false statement to the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) regarding the resignation of three company directors two years ago. Datuk Azjuriyahti Azlan, 46, entered the plea after the charge was read before Judge Noor Aisah Mohamed. Azjuriyahti and her husband, Datuk Sri Mohd Nazrul Izad Mohd Arsad, 46, are accused of allowing Kumpulan Maju Desa Industri (KMDI) Holding Sdn Bhd company secretary Hasnifalina Ramlee to submit a false statement concerning the resignation of three individuals as company directors. The false statement involving the resignation of L. Sivakumar, Associate Professor Dr Mohd Zainizan Shahdan and Shahkeer Azzat Zailan via a Section 58 form was allegedly committed at Wisma KMDI, Jalan Gambut, on June 20, 2023. She was charged under Section 591(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2016 (Act 777), which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment, a fine of up to RM3 million, or both, upon conviction. SSM prosecuting officer Abdul Hadi Abdul Muti proposed bail at RM30,000 with one surety. However, defence counsel Muhammad Nazrin Mohd Seth requested a reduction to between RM5,000 and RM8,000, citing that the surety is a contractor with irregular income. The court allowed bail at RM8,000 and fixed Aug 28 for mention and submission of documents. The court also issued a warrant of arrest against Mohd Nazrul Izad for failing to appear for today's proceedings. Muhammad Nazrin informed the court that his client was hospitalised at a private facility due to multiple health issues and submitted a hospital admission letter. However, Abdul Hadi argued that a private hospital letter was insufficient, and the accused must furnish a medical certificate from a government hospital or clinic. The court subsequently ordered Mohd Nazrul Izad to submit a medical certificate issued by a government medical officer of Grade 41 or above, on the next mention date. - Bernama
