logo
Successive governments have failed to turn bus services around, watchdog says

Successive governments have failed to turn bus services around, watchdog says

Rhyl Journal3 days ago

Services have been reduced and passenger numbers are below pre-coronavirus levels, a report by the National Audit Office (NAO) said.
The study, which covers England outside London, warned that the sector's commercial viability has weakened as revenues have fallen and costs have risen.
It warned that rural and suburban areas face a 'cycle of decline' whereby services are withdrawn because of low demand, which leads to a further fall in passenger numbers and more cuts.
Most local bus services are run by private companies, who set routes and timetables aimed at making a profit.
Some services seen as socially necessary are financially supported by local transport authorities.
Public funding to bus operators accounted for half their revenue in 2023/24, at £1.8 billion.
In February 2020, then-Conservative prime minister Boris Johnson pledged £3 billion in funding over five years for buses.
The Department for Transport (DfT) published a national bus strategy for England, Bus Back Better, in March 2021, which set out that the department wanted services to be more frequent, cheaper and better integrated with other forms of transport.
The NAO said the total number of bus journeys made in the year to the end of March 2024 was 1.78 billion, down 9% from 1.96 billion in 2019/20.
Over the same period, the mileage covered by buses fell by 15%.
Following Labour's success in the July 2024 general election, the Bus Back Better strategy is no longer government policy.
The DfT's Bus Services Bill – which is at committee stage in the House of Commons – will lead to an overhaul of buses by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services.
But the NAO noted that this franchising model is 'difficult and expensive' to adopt, and recommended that the department should better target the support it gives different local transport authorities depending on their needs.
Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said: 'Bus travel should be an easy and reliable transport choice but governments' attempts to improve services have not always worked.
'DfT should work with local transport authorities and the bus sector to maximise the impact of the available resources in reversing the decline in bus usage.'
A DfT spokesperson said: 'Better buses are around the corner and are central to the Government's Plan for Change— connecting communities, strengthening the local economy, and boosting access to jobs.
'After decades of decline, we're providing a record £1 billion investment to improve the reliability and frequency of bus services across the country.
'Our landmark Bus Bill, now progressing through parliament, will protect routes and prevent services from being scrapped – putting buses back into local control and bringing passengers back to the heart of buses.'
Graham Vidler, chief executive of industry body the Confederation of Passenger Transport, said commercial operators 'delivered growth' in many towns and cities by investing in new routes, zero-emission buses and more frequent services.
He went on: 'With a level of public investment still low by European standards, passenger numbers outside London grew by 15% last year and 83% of customers said they were satisfied.
'We do not recognise the description of an industry with weakening commercial viability.
'What's crucial going forward is that public funding delivers the outcomes that matter to passengers.
'More buses to more destinations with quick, reliable journey times should be front and centre of investment plans.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lifetime ISAs leave some with less money than they put in, MPs warn
Lifetime ISAs leave some with less money than they put in, MPs warn

BBC News

time31 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Lifetime ISAs leave some with less money than they put in, MPs warn

Some people who pay into a Lifetime Individual Savings Account (LISA) may end up getting less money out than they put in, MPs have warned, as they call for the product to be under 40 can open a LISA to either help save towards retirement or buy a first home. You can put in up to £4,000 a year and the government will top it up by 25%.But the Treasury Committee said if LISA funds were withdrawn early due to unforeseen circumstances, charges mean people face losing 6.25% of their own savings. It also warned the "complex" product may not suit everyone, and it might have been mis-sold to people on certain government has said previously it is looking at reforming ISAs. You can hold a LISA in addition to any other type of individual savings account, such as a cash ISA or a stocks and shares ISA. These other options allow you to pay in up to £20,000 a year. Dual purpose LISAs were launched in 2017 under the then-Conservative then, 6% of eligible adults have opened one, with about 1.3 million accounts still open, according to the most recent figures. MPs on the Treasury Committee have been gathering evidence on whether the product is still fit for a new report, the committee said the LISA's dual purpose to help people save for both the short- and long-term "makes it more likely consumers will choose unsuitable investment strategies". "Cash LISAs may suit those saving for a first home but may not achieve the best outcome for those using it as a retirement savings product, as they are unable to invest in higher risk but potentially higher return products such as bonds and equities," the report said.'We used a Lifetime ISA to buy our first home'It noted a surge in withdrawal charges, with almost double the amount of people making an unauthorised withdrawal (99,650) compared to the number of people who used their LISA to buy a home (56,900) in committee said this should be considered a possible indication that the product was not working as also described the rules which penalise benefit claimants as "nonsensical".Currently any savings held in a LISA can affect eligibility for universal credit or housing benefit, whereas this is not the case for other personal or workplace pension schemes. If that is not changed, the committee said the LISA should be "clearly labelled as an inferior product" to those who may be eligible for such benefits. Best use of public money? The Office for Budget Responsibility predicts spending on bonuses paid on LISAs will cost the Treasury around £3bn over the next five committee questioned whether the LISA was "the best use of public money given the current strain on public finances" and also raised concerns that the product could be "subsidising the cost of a first home for wealthier people at a significant cost to the taxpayer". "We are still awaiting further data that may shed some light on who exactly the product is helping," said committee chair Dame Meg Hillier."What we already know, though, is that the Lifetime ISA needs to be reformed before it can genuinely be described as a market-leading savings product for both prospective homebuyers and those who want to start saving for their retirement at a young age." The BBC has contacted the Treasury for a response to the government has previously said it is "looking at options for reforms" when it comes to ISAs to encourage investing has said that while it is important to support people to save, it wants to get the balance right.

George Freeman, MP for Mid Norfolk, refers himself to watchdog over 'cash for questions' allegations
George Freeman, MP for Mid Norfolk, refers himself to watchdog over 'cash for questions' allegations

ITV News

time10 hours ago

  • ITV News

George Freeman, MP for Mid Norfolk, refers himself to watchdog over 'cash for questions' allegations

The Conservative MP for Mid Norfolk has referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog after he was accused of taking money to ask questions of government on behalf of a private company. The Times reported that George Freeman broke multiple rules set out in the MP's code of conduct, including lobbying on behalf of a private company. The report alleged that he was paid by firm that helped him write questions which were submitted to Labour ministers. The newspaper published what it said were leaked emails that showed exchanges in which Mr Freeman had asked the company's director what to ask about as he prepared written parliamentary questions related to space data and emissions tracking. He reportedly tabled the questions, which are a way for MPs to ask for more information on the policies and activities of government departments, to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. He became a paid adviser with GHGSat, a monitoring service for greenhouse gas emissions, in April last year. The appointments watchdog Acoba advised him that in taking up the role, 'there are risks associated with your influence and network of contacts gained whilst in ministerial office'. 'In particular, this is a company that is interested in government policy and decisions relating to the civil space sector and emissions. 'You noted you have made it clear to the company that you will not lobby government on its behalf, and this will not form part of your role.' Mr Freeman told the Times: 'As a longstanding advocate of important new technologies, companies and industries, working cross-party through APPGs (All-Party Parliamentary Groups) and the select committee, I regularly ask experts for clarification on technical points and terminology, and deeply respect and try to assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest. 'Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government), I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism. 'I don't believe I have done anything wrong but I am immediately referring myself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and will accept his judgment in due course.' Mr Freeman and GHGSat have been contacted for comment. A Conservative Party spokesperson said: 'George Freeman MP has referred himself to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. 'It would be inappropriate for the Conservative Party to comment further whilst the Commissioner's inquiries are ongoing.' The Lib Dems and Labour called for Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to suspend him. A Labour spokesperson said: 'Cash for questions was a hallmark of Tory sleaze in the 1990s, and three decades on the same issue has raised its head again. 'George Freeman has referred himself for investigation so now Kemi Badenoch must suspend him from the Tory whip.' Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper MP said: 'This looks like the same old sleaze and scandal people have come to expect from the Conservative Party. 'Kemi Badenoch should immediately suspend the whip from George Freeman while this is investigated. 'Failure to act would confirm that even after being booted out of government, the Conservatives are still hopelessly out of touch.' The MP for Mid Norfolk is currently on the science, innovation and technology committee and a trade envoy. He was responsible for the UK space agency in his previous role as a minister in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology under Rishi Sunak.

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'
Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

Daily Mirror

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

The Covid-19 Inquiry will on Monday hear from relatives prevented from saying their final goodbyes to loved ones in care homes, while parties were being held in Downing Street Families are demanding that politicians are held to account after describing their heartbreaking final moments with loved ones. This week the UK Covid-19 Inquiry will look at the impact of the pandemic on care homes and how social distancing guidelines meant many relatives were prevented from saying their final goodbyes. Families have told of their anger that ex-PM Boris Johnson 's government had at the same time been holding parties in Downing Street and flouting social distancing rules. The first wave of the pandemic saw the virus sweep through care homes as untested residents were sent there from struggling hospitals. ‌ ‌ During the first peak between March and June 2020 66,000 people died in care homes, with a third of those deaths attributed to Covid-19. Sharon Cook's parents were care home residents in Hinckley, Leicestershire, and died a week apart in 2020. Sharon, 60, told the Mirror: 'There was no even waving through the window for us because they were on the second floor. 'When we found out the government were having parties it just felt like we were being disrespected. You have to put your grief on hold because you're dealing with your anger because your loss is being disrespected. Then we had all the denials and all these countless thousands of deaths were kind of being written off as some sort of typing error. That government was a disgrace.' Sharon's mum Joan, aged 85, fell ill and had to be taken to hospital and a few days later tested positive for Covid and passed away. Her dad Alf Cook, 87, was a Parkinson's sufferer and was given the news in his care home. ‌ Sharon explained: 'Dad had been very much looked after by mum in the care home and suddenly she wasn't there. I think sometimes he thought he was the problem, not the pandemic, and that everyone was wearing masks because of him. 'I'm an only child and I was all he had but at that point there were no more visits. I was really upset about that because I just felt he needed me. He didn't take long then he died. I did wonder if he just gave up because I wasn't allowed in. You just get swamped by grief.' The Mirror revealed in November 2021 that gatherings had taken place in Downing Street when London was under tier 3 restrictions during 2020. They included a number of leaving parties and a Christmas party on December 18. ‌ Louise Baker, from Aberdeen, told the Mirror her father Sandy Adam died at his care home two days before the infamous Christmas party. Louise, 49, said: 'Before lockdown dad would come round our house every Sunday for dinner. He had dementia but it wasn't that far progressed that he didn't know who we were. 'After lockdown none of it made sense to him. Initially we could just shout in through a small gap in his tilt window but he was very hard of hearing. We couldn't hug him. I was extremely angry because we found out one of those parties in Downing Street coincided with my dad's death. I'm absolutely furious.' ‌ Sandy, a retired dentist, had been allowed a meeting on the car park with Louise before his death at the age of 81 but they were not allowed within five metres of each other. She explained: 'It was so difficult because he felt the cold quite acutely and he was really grumpy. You weren't allowed to hug and like to do anything normal and he couldn't hear us. He just sat there with his arms folded.' Sharon and Louise's accounts will be played today in an impact film at the start of Module 6 in front of inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett. ‌ Louise added: 'In the next pandemic there has to be a balance struck between the protection of the both people who are vulnerable to infections and their right to dignity and the right to human contact and their right to family life. I'm not pretending I have any of these answers but we need to find a balance. "There needs to be a recognition of the damage being done by the deprivation that people were experiencing, that level of isolation and the removal of basic rites of passage, like being able to see your loved one's body in their coffin.' ‌ Among the key government decisions being discussed at the inquiry from this week will be that in March 2020 to rapidly discharge hospital patients into care homes without testing or a requirement for them to isolate. A 2022 High Court judgement that ruled the policy was unlawful as it failed to take into account the risk to elderly and vulnerable care home residents of asymptomatic transmission of the virus. Between early March and early June 2020, nearly 20,000 care home residents in England and Wales died with Covid-19. That's about a third of all care home deaths during that period. ‌ Many bereaved care home families, including Sharon Cook, say their loved ones had Do Not Resuscitate - so called DNRs - placed on them against their wishes. Sharon said politicians should be held to account for their handling of the pandemic and subject to criminal proceedings if found to be negligent. She said: 'There needs to be greater accountability. I often say that if it was a pilot that had acted so recklessly and cost people their lives unnecessarily, or if it was a surgeon, there wouldn't be any question about, they would be interrogated and summoned to court. So why are politicians any different? ‌ 'It's not right that people with this much power can treat it with such little respect, have such devastating outcomes and no consequences.' Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK has written an open letter to the inquiry chair Baroness Hallett objecting to the fact that ex-PM Boris Johnson will not appear before the latest module about the social care sector. Jean Adamson, a spokesperson for Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said: 'Bereaved families have waited years for this moment. The care module is one of the most important parts of the Inquiry. It will examine how and why thousands of people were left unprotected in care homes and in the community, and why so many died without support, without dignity, and without accountability. ‌ 'But we are seriously concerned about the way this module is being handled. It is unacceptable that Boris Johnson and other key decision-makers will not be called to give evidence.' A Lancet study later found that during the first wave of the pandemic care homes residents were 17 times more likely to die compared to private home residents of a similar age. This compared to a ten times higher risk before the pandemic, as people in residential care are generally more frail and unwell. ‌ Covid bereaved families are expected to gather outside the opening of Module 6 of the inquiry today. The £200 million inquiry was set up to examine the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, the UK's response to it and to learn lessons for the next pandemic. Its latest module on the social care sector will take place at Dorland House in Paddington, west London. Ben Connah, Secretary at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, said: 'Sharon and Louise's stories are so powerful. Sadly, their experiences are not unique. Tens of thousands of people living in care lost their lives to Covid during the pandemic. 'This is why it is so important that the UK Covid-19 Inquiry spends the next five weeks investigating how the virus affected the care sector. Questions will be asked in public of key politicians, scientists, healthcare professionals and other experts. Our Chair, Baroness Heather Hallett, will get answers. 'We will begin with powerful evidence from bereaved individuals. Their experiences are front and centre of our hearings this week. 'The inquiry is making speedy progress. The country must learn the lessons of the last pandemic as quickly as possible - because we all know there will be another one.' This week the inquiry will investigate the impact of the pandemic on the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It will start with opening statements from core participants and impact evidence from bereaved individuals before an appearance from former Health Secretary Matt Hancock on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store