logo
No more GI Joe trucks: Army swaps iconic Humvee for a faster, cheaper vehicle

No more GI Joe trucks: Army swaps iconic Humvee for a faster, cheaper vehicle

USA Today4 days ago
WASHINGTON – The Army is swapping an icon – the 40-year-old Humvee – for a lighter, faster, cheaper truck designed for future battlefields.
The Infantry Squad Vehicle, more dune buggy than armored truck, is one of the most visible signs of the Army's transition from Cold War-era equipment that has defined it for generations. The grinding insurgencies that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union demanded more and more armor to protect troops from roadside bombs. In their place: a range of vehicles and drones that can be fielded quickly, and, in many cases, with commercial, off-the-shelf technology.
"The Humvee is the quintessential G.I. Joe vehicle," said Alex Miller, the chief technical adviser to Army leadership for transforming its equipment. "It is the quintessential Army vehicle we've had in the inventory since 1985. So, 40 years of Humvee. It was good for what it was built for, which was high mobility at the time. It is not good for the fight we think we're going to be in."
That fight, to Pentagon officials like Miller, likely involves China and will require speed and agility to survive. Battles will also almost certainly resemble the combat sparked by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Lethal drones have turned slow-moving trucks and even tanks into death traps.
Enter the Infantry Squad Vehicle. It's basically a stretched-out, stripped-down all-terrain vehicle without doors or a roof with seating for as many as nine soldiers. The Army plans to equip its light infantry units with the trucks, along with hundreds of drones to spy on and attack enemies.
The Army's new signature vehicle
During World War II and for most of the 40 years that followed, the olive-drab Jeep became synonymous with the Army. The small, rugged truck crossed over into civilian use and is the ancestor of the off-road vehicles and SUVs that patrol suburbs and ferry kids to the frontlines of soccer games.
The High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle, better known as the Humvee, had another 40-year run as the Army's workhorse truck beginning in 1985. The Pentagon bought more than 300,000 Humvees, and nearly 100,000 remain in service. Soldiers have driven them in operations from Afghanistan to Alaska. More versatile than a Jeep, the Humvee offered multiple versions, including one that could hunt and destroy a tank with a missile.
They gained infamy, though, in Iraq and Afghanistan, where insurgents relentlessly attacked their chief vulnerability: a flat bottom made of aluminum easily shredded by explosives buried in roads. Improvised explosive devices, IEDs, became the number one killer of U.S. troops in both wars.
The Pentagon, under Defense Secretary Robert Gates, made replacing the Humvee the military's top priority during the George W. Bush administration. The Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, a heavy truck with a V-shaped hull that deflected the blast from bombs, saved the lives and limbs of thousands of troops.
In 2012, then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter released data to USA TODAY on the effectiveness of MRAPs in IED attacks.
"You are between nine and 14 times less likely to be killed if you were in an MRAP than if you were in a Humvee," Carter said.
But the protection the MRAP offered came at the cost of speed and agility. The Pentagon bought smaller, armored trucks such as the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. Though nimbler than MRAPs, JLTV's bulk meant it couldn't be sped to battlefields.
The Army's new 'Jeep' is easier to repair
Thousands of pounds lighter and $80,000 cheaper than the Humvee, the Infantry Squad Vehicle is based on the Chevrolet Colorado truck built in Missouri. It's basically the same truck that consumers can buy at a local dealership. Only about 20% of the Infantry Squad Vehicle's components, including communication and electronic gear, are unique to the Army.
That's a key difference compared to trucks such as Humvees and JLTVs, which were custom-built for the military.
'You can repair it anywhere on earth as long as you have access to commercial parts rather than a special military vehicle with special military parts,' said Miller, the Army's top technical adviser.
Some Pentagon officials, however, acknowledge that the tradeoff for speed and expense is losing the armor that saved lives and limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Infantry Squad Vehicle represents the Army's latest assessment of what soldiers will need for the next war.
The new drones and robots accompanying the truck can be sent ahead of it to help soldiers avoid ambushes. Speed, not armor, is what will save soldiers' lives in the next fight, Miller said.
'The longer you sit and the slower you are, the easier it is to kill you,' he said.
The Infantry Squad Vehicle represents the Army's best guess, based on decades of combat experience, of what will work best for future combat, according to a senior Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly.
The vehicle isn't meant to withstand an attack, the official said. It's designed to whisk soldiers within a few miles of the frontline and allow them to walk a short distance to the fight.
If the Army gets drawn back into a bloody, urban fight with IEDs?
We'll buy something else, the official said.
Michael O'Hanlon, a national security expert at the Brookings Institution, counts himself a skeptic of the ISV.
He recalled that 20 years ago, the Army sank billions into what it called Future Combat Systems. The initiative was intended to replace Abrams tanks and Bradley Infantry Fighting vehicles with a fleet of manned and unmanned systems. It failed.
"Worked great on Powerpoint," O'Hanlon said. "But the technology wasn't there then (to find everything before it exploded or impacted) and it still isn't. Like Muhammad Ali said, 'I'll float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.' Except the technology may not deliver.
"They had to cut something but I'm wary about this choice."
What do soldiers think of it?
Soldiers in the 101st Airborne Division were among the first in the Army to drive the trucks. Many swear by it.
Its light weight, relative to a Humvee, means the Infantry Squad Vehicle can be carried by a Black Hawk helicopter for a short distance with a sling. A twin-rotor Chinook helicopter can carry two of the trucks inside its cargo bay for a greater distance. A Humvee's weight requires a Chinook, and then just one can be carried in a sling.
On the ground, the Infantry Squad Vehicle is faster than a Humvee and more fuel-efficient. Speed helps infantry soldiers keep pace with armored units traveling to war, said Col. Trevor Voelkel, who commands the 1st Mobile Brigade Combat Team for the 101st Airborne Division. Voelkel's brigade tested new equipment, including about 200 of the trucks, at the Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Polk in Louisiana in May.
'We're getting back to our original concept of the Humvee,' Voelkel said. 'But with a newer, lighter, more commercial vehicle that's going to be easier to repair, cheaper to repair.'
William Melko, a 1st sergeant in Voelkel's brigade, had experience driving other Army trucks in Afghanistan. None of them, he said, gave his soldiers a better view of potential threats around them. It's easier to drive, too, especially for younger soldiers.
'The best way that I can describe it is like a normal pickup,' Melko said.
Last year, after Hurricane Helene swamped the southeast, Lt. Col. Jonathan Nielsen commanded a battalion of the 101st that responded to the flooding in North Carolina. His soldiers drove Infantry Squad Vehicles on damaged roads inaccessible to a Humvee, he said.
The trucks also maneuvered through city streets better than Humvees.
'ISV is going to be an iconic vehicle,' Nielsen said.
Contributing: Ramon Padilla, Graphics
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Cleaning My Car Out Today:' Texas Man Leaves Water Bottle in Jeep. Then it Causes Irreversible Damage
‘Cleaning My Car Out Today:' Texas Man Leaves Water Bottle in Jeep. Then it Causes Irreversible Damage

Motor 1

timea day ago

  • Motor 1

‘Cleaning My Car Out Today:' Texas Man Leaves Water Bottle in Jeep. Then it Causes Irreversible Damage

A man is going viral on TikTok after showing the damage caused to his car when he left his water bottle in it in the Texas heat. TikTok user Guero Navarrete (@gueronavarrete1) didn't share many specifics—like whether the bottle was plastic or glass, how long it sat in the sun, or exactly how hot it was outside—but the results were dramatic. In his video, he shows the inside of his Jeep, where the passenger side appears scorched, almost as if a small fire had broken out. 'That's what happens when you leave a water bottle in the front seat and the sun hits it just right and it acts like a magnifying glass,' Navarrete wrote in an on-screen caption. As of this writing, the clip has garnered over 433,900 views. Can This Really Happen? Yes, a water bottle—especially a plastic one—can explode or even spark a fire in a hot car. If the sun hits it just right, it can act like a magnifying glass , focusing heat onto something flammable, such as a seat or a piece of paper. Heat can also cause the liquid inside to expand, building pressure. If that pressure gets too high, the bottle can burst . There's also the issue of chemicals. When plastic bottles heat up, they can start to break down and leach substances into the water—something you probably don't want to drink. To avoid all that, don't leave plastic bottles sitting in the sun. Toss them in the trunk, cover them up, or use an insulated container instead. Stainless steel and glass bottles are also better options since they withstand heat better. What Else Should I Avoid? Water bottles aren't the only things that can turn dangerous in a hot car. During summer, it's crucial to avoid leaving certain items behind due to the extreme heat. According to Capital Insurance Group , aerosol cans, electronics, food and drinks, disposable lighters, medications, and anything containing batteries can all become serious hazards. Experts say aerosol cans can explode if left in direct sunlight or inside a sweltering car, since heat builds pressure inside the can. The same goes for lighters, which can leak or combust when exposed to extreme temperatures. Phones, laptops, and battery-powered electronics can overheat, get damaged, or, in some cases, catch fire. Sunscreen and other pressurized personal care products can also degrade or explode. Food and medicine spoil fast in high heat, and certain medications can become less effective or even dangerous. The short answer is that it's best to treat your car like an oven in the summer. If you wouldn't leave it in an oven, don't leave it on your seat. Commenters Make Note to Check on Their Cars Viewers who saw Navarrete's video took it as a cue to clean out their vehicles—especially in the middle of a brutal heatwave . 'Thank you for letting me know cleaning my car out today,' one said. 'To-do list: Clean out the car #1 water bottle,' another quipped. 'Running to my car now to get the millions of water bottles from my daughter,' added a third woman. Some suggested another way to avoid the problem altogether: Just shell out for tinted windows. 'My windows are too dark for that to happen,' shared one TikTok user. 'Get tint,' advised another. 'Why [does] nobody like tinting their windows anymore?' a third asked. Motor1 has reached out to Navarrete via TikTok direct message. Now Trending Woman Asks TikTok What's Wrong With Her Mini Cooper. Then a Mechanic in the Comments Figures It Out Just by Listening to a Sound 'I Just Bought It:' Woman Uses Groupon to Pay For Her Oil Change. Then the Mechanic Asks Her What Type of Car She Drives Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

Beaten-down carmakers smell fatter profits under Trump
Beaten-down carmakers smell fatter profits under Trump

Axios

time2 days ago

  • Axios

Beaten-down carmakers smell fatter profits under Trump

For all their complaints about how unfair President Trump's tariffs are for U.S. automakers, the industry seems quite pleased with his environmental policies, which lift a massive regulatory cost burden. Why it matters: Trump's agenda could wind up as a net win for the auto industry, allowing them to sell more high-margin, U.S.-built trucks and SUVs for the foreseeable future, while avoiding penalties for not building enough electric vehicles. Stunning stat: Together, General Motors, Ford and Stellantis are projecting nearly $10 billion in gross tariff costs this year. For the most part, they're eating those taxes rather than passing them on to consumers. Yes, but: Trump's deregulation policies could help them offset most or all of that burden, depending on the outcome of continuing trade talks. Driving the news: In quarterly earnings calls with analysts, the CEOs of the Detroit 3 said Trump's reversal of Biden-era EV policies will boost their finances. "To build what customers really want is going to be a tailwind for us," said Ford CEO Jim Farley, citing what he called a "multi-billion dollar opportunity" over the next couple of years. GM CEO Mary Barra had a similar message, calling Trump's regulatory policies a "huge opportunity" that allow the automaker to keep selling profitable trucks and SUVs while EV demand slowly builds. Stellantis, meanwhile, is bringing back muscle cars and Hemi engines now that it's no longer obliged to produce EVs and fuel-sipping engines. "And this will mean to us a lot of additional profit," said CEO Antonio Filosa, trying to steer a turnaround. The big picture: The Trump administration has been moving quickly to unwind Biden's EV-favorable policies. Trump ditched his predecessor's ambitious CO2 emissions targets and canceled California's EV mandates (although 11 states are suing to block that effort). His administration is also erasing consumer tax credits for EV purchases and repealing existing fuel economy targets and CO2 emissions standards. By removing penalties for non-compliance, the government is also eliminating any incentive for carmakers to buy regulatory credits from overachieving rivals. Zoom in: Ford, for example, said last year it had contracts to purchase about $3.8 billion of non-compliance credits from other carmakers — presumably Tesla, which said in October that it had long-term contracts to sell $4.7 billion of credits. As of this week, however, Farley told analysts that Ford has already reduced that commitment by nearly $1.5 billion — money that can instead be invested in other parts of the business or to improve profits. On the flip side, Telsa is staring down a "few rough quarters" as support for EVs goes away and it pivots toward autonomy and robots starting next year. Aside from vanishing tax breaks that will likely dampen EV demand, Tesla is also losing that easy money — $15 billion since 2012 — it made from selling regulatory credits.

8 Popular Car Brands To Stay Away From in Retirement
8 Popular Car Brands To Stay Away From in Retirement

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

8 Popular Car Brands To Stay Away From in Retirement

Buying a car in retirement isn't just about style or performance; it's about long-term value and reliability. With a fixed income and fewer daily driving needs, retirees should prioritize vehicles that are affordable to maintain over time. Unfortunately, some popular car brands come with surprisingly high upkeep costs that can drain your savings. Consider This: Read Next: If you want to protect your budget and peace of mind, consider not just the cost of your new car, but also the cost to keep it running through your retirement. According to CarEdge, these are the top eight most expensive car brands to maintain along with some of their pricier 2025 models. Ram You might have favored certain makes and models in the past, but now that you've entered a new chapter in your life, it might be time to reevaluate. The industry average for maintenance costs for popular brands is $8,303, making Ram's over $20,000 estimate a steep bill to consider. Moreover, CarEdge found that there is a 68% chance that your Ram will need a major repair within 10 years, which is considerably worse — over 43% worse — than other auto manufacturers studied. Average 10-year maintenance costs for Ram models: $21,595 Ram 3500 10-year maintenance costs: $27,445 Ram 2500 10-year maintenance costs: $27,423 Ram 1500 10-year maintenance costs: $19,357 Jeep It's wise to research car maintenance costs, so you don't accidentally buy a new car that requires pricey upkeep that will eat into your fixed income and Social Security benefits. Jeeps are often on many mechanics' lists of car models to avoid due to their higher than average 10-year maintenance and repair costs. With a jeep, there is a 32% chance your vehicle will need a major repair within the first 10 years of ownership, whereas the industry average sits at a little over 24%. Here are a few of the pricier options to maintain: Average 10-year maintenance costs for Jeep models: $11,690 Jeep Gladiator 10-year maintenance costs: $12,679 Jeep Grand Wagoneer L/ Jeep Grand Wagoneer 10-year maintenance costs: $12,375/ $12,269 Jeep Wrangler 10-year maintenance costs: $11,664 Jeep Grand Cherokee 10-year maintenance costs: $11,217 Learn More: Chrysler When you are budgeting out your monthly expenses in retirement, you plan on gas and insurance costs for your car, but excessive maintenance may put you over what you have allotted. If you decide to purchase a Chrysler, you'll have to factor in maintenance costs that are $3,064 higher than the average. This is in addition to the 32% chance of your car needing a major repair. Here are a few specific models you may want to dodge in retirement: Average 10-year maintenance costs for Chrysler models: $11,367 Chrysler Pacifica 10-year maintenance costs: $11,520 Chrysler Voyager 10-year maintenance costs: $11,207 Dodge If you want to be both fiscally and frugally responsible as a retiree, make sure you don't invest in cars that will cost you more than just standard wear and tear on your wallet. The $11,352 average maintenance and repair cost for Dodge vehicles is $3,049 over the industry average, meaning retirees will have to account for that added expense when budgeting. Similar to the Chrysler and Jeep brands, Dodge also has a 32% chance of requiring a major repair within the first 10 years of owning the vehicle. Here are some 2025 Dodge models that can be expensive to upkeep: Average 10-year maintenance costs for Dodge models: $11,352 Dodge Durgango 10-year maintenance costs: $11,768 Dodge Hornet 10-year maintenance costs: $10,934 Ford Just because something is built Ford tough doesn't mean it won't be hard on your finances. The cost to maintain and repair your Ford over 10 years will run an average of $10,392, which is $2,089 over the average for popular brands overall. And the chance your vehicle will need a major repair during that time is approximately 7% worse than the standard. If you want to stretch your nest egg a bit further in retirement, you may want to consider alternative modes of transportation. Average 10-year maintenance costs for Ford models: $10,392 Ford F-150 to Ford F-450 10-year maintenance costs: $11,367 to $16,170 Ford Expedition 10-year maintenance costs: $10,302 Ford Bronco 10-year maintenance costs: $10,159 Ford Explorer 10-year maintenance costs: $9,766 Chevrolet Chevrolet is another popular car brand with a steeper than average 10-year maintenance and repair cost — $1,359 higher to be exact. With a 28% chance of your Chevy needing a major repair, which is 4% worse than other auto manufacturers studied, retirees may have to contend with costlier mechanic bills alongside their other necessary expenses. Average 10-year maintenance costs for Chevrolet models: $9,662 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 to Chevrolet Silverado 3500 10-year maintenance costs: $11,045 to $15,497 Chevrolet Colorado 10-year maintenance costs: $10,713 Chevrolet Suburban 10-year maintenance costs: $10,108 Chevrolet Tahoe 10-year maintenance costs: $10,029 GMC It may seem counterintuitive to expect the unexpected, but when it comes to car expenses, you may need more than your emergency savings to cover some of these maintenance costs. GMC models on average will cost retirees nearly $9,500 in maintenance and repairs over 10 years. Not only that, but GMC vehicles have a 28% chance of requiring a major repair. Average 10-year maintenance costs for GMC models: $9,467 GMC Sierra 1500 to GMC Sierra 3500 10-year maintenance costs: $10,002 to $14,014 GMC Canyon 10-year maintenance costs: $9,568 GMC Yukon XL 10-year maintenance costs: $9.373 Buick Buick may bill itself as exceptional by design, but that design could cost you with an average 10-year maintenance and repair cost that's $715 higher than the industry average. While this may not seem like a lot, every dollar counts if you're living with a fixed income. Add to that the 25% chance of your car needing a major repair, which is 1% worse than other manufacturers, and you might want to consider avoiding these models in your golden years. Average 10-year maintenance costs for Buick models: $9,018 Buick Enclave 10-year maintenance costs: $9,322 Buick Envision 10-year maintenance costs: $9,105 Buick Encore GX 10-year maintenance costs: $8,857 Editor's note: Data sourced via CarEdge, and is accurate as of Jul. 31, 2025. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on 8 Popular Car Brands To Stay Away From in Retirement Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store