Video Shows Moment GOP Senator Josh Hawley Leaves Stage Over Heckling
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, was temporarily escorted from the stage amid heckling from pro-Palestinian demonstrations during a panel discussion about the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on American workers with Axios Wednesday morning.
Newsweek reached out to Hawley's office for comment via email.
Why It Matters
Politicians from both sides of the aisle have faced protests from pro-Palestinian protesters during public appearances over the past few years, as the U.S. has remained a closer ally to Israel despite humanitarian concerns about its actions in Gaza.
On October 7, 2023, Hamas led an attack against Israel, killing 1,200 and abducting 251 people. Israel has said 50 hostages remain in Gaza and that only 21 of them are believed to still be alive. Israel has since launched an offensive on Gaza, killing more than 59,000 people, according to The Associated Press, citing Gaza's Health Ministry.
Critics have raised concerns about the number of civilians killed or displaced, as well as conditions such as the threat of starvation in the Gaza Strip. Others, however, have said Israel has a right to respond to the October 7 attack and have blamed Hamas for putting these civilians in harm's way.
What to Know
Hawley, who has been supportive of Israel, faced heckling during Axios' News Shapers conference in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday morning with journalist Stef Kight. The interruption came during a discussion about AI. Hawley warned about a his concerns on "a huge loss of jobs for working people," and that lawmakers need to "put people at the center of our technology policy."
"If we don't do that, I'm worried about what that's going to mean for ordinary working Americans," Hawley said.
Kight continued to ask if he feels like is "alone in that kind of approach," when one protester began shouting at the senator.
Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on April 09, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on April 09, 2025 in Washington, DC."Josh Hawley cannot possibly care about people in this country because he is supporting a war of starvation," the protester said.
Kight asked the protester to allow her to continue with the interview, noting that it was the first instance of a protester during Wednesday's event. She then escorted Hawley from the stage, though Hawley asked, "aAre you sure?" when she got up.
Kight and Hawley quickly returned to the stage after about one minute. Kight asked attendees to "be respectful and allow us to continue our conversation." Hawley quipped that it was "just another day in the Senate" before continuing on with the conversation.
The two protesters with the group Code Pink were removed from the event after the disruption, according to video footage that has circulated across social media.
What People Are Saying
Hawley wrote on X: "Hahahah - pro-Hamas CRAZIES tried to disrupt another event this morning. What a bunch of nutcases. I'm proud as ever to stand for America and our ally Israel."
Code Pink, the group that led the protest, on X: "We shut down Josh Hawley because his career is built on suffering from Gaza to the U.S. As 2.2 million Palestinians face forced starvation, he doubles down on genocide. We won't let him speak freely while children starve."
What Happens Next
The conflict between Israel and Hamas continues as President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff prepares to head to the Middle East to try to broker a ceasefire deal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 minutes ago
- USA Today
The Trump administration is telling immigrants 'Carry your papers.' Here's what to know.
Immigrants have long been required to carry ID proving they're in the US legally, but the rule was not enforced. Until now. Amid the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration, the nation's immigration service is warning immigrants to carry their green card or visa at all times. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services posted the reminder July 23 on social media: "Always carry your alien registration documentation. Not having these when stopped by federal law enforcement can lead to a misdemeanor and fines." Here's what immigrants – and American citizens – need to know. 'Carry your papers' law isn't new The law requiring lawful immigrants and foreign visitors to carry their immigration documents has been on the books for decades, dating to the 1950s. The Immigration and Nationality Act states: "Every alien, eighteen years of age and over, shall at all times carry with him and have in his personal possession any certificate of alien registration or alien registration receipt card issued to him." But the law had rarely been imposed before the Trump administration announced earlier this year that it would strictly enforce it. The "carry your papers" portion fell out of use for cultural and historical reasons, said Michelle Lapointe, legal director of the nonprofit American Immigration Council. In contrast to the Soviet bloc at the time the requirement was written, "We have never been a country where you have to produce evidence of citizenship on demand from law enforcement." In a "Know Your Rights" presentation, the ACLU cautions immigrants over age 18 to follow the law and "carry your papers with you at all times." "If you don't have them," the ACLU says, "tell the officer that you want to remain silent, or that you want to consult a lawyer before answering any questions." A 'precious' document at risk Many immigrants preferred to hold their green card or visa in safe-keeping, because, like a passport, they are expensive and difficult to obtain. Historically, it was "a little risky for people to carry these precious documents such as green card, because there is a hefty fee to replace it and they are at risk of not having proof of status – a precarious position to be in," Lapointe said. But as immigration enforcement has ramped up, the risks of not carrying legal documents have grown. Failure to comply with the law can result in a $100 fine, or imprisonment of up to 30 days. Immigration enforcement and 'racial profiling' U.S. citizens aren't required to carry documents that prove their citizenship. But in an environment of increasing immigration enforcement, Fernando Garcia, executive director of the nonprofit Border Network for Human Rights in El Paso, Texas, said he worries about U.S. citizens being targeted. "With massive raids and mass deportation, this takes a new dimension," he said. "How rapidly are we transitioning into a 'show me your papers' state?" "The problem is there are a lot of people – Mexicans, or Central Americans – who are U.S. citizens who don't have to carry anything, but they have the burden of proof based on racial profiling," he said. "There are examples of U.S. citizens being arrested already, based on their appearance and their race." Not just immigrants: Why some Native American citizens worry about getting caught in ICE's net American citizens targeted by ICE The Trump administration's widening immigration crackdown has already netted American citizens. In July, 18-year-old Kenny Laynez, an American citizen, was detained for six hours by Florida Highway Patrol and Border Patrol agents. He was later released. Federal agents also detained a California man, Angel Pina, despite his U.S. citizenship in July. He was later released. Elzon Limus, a 23-year-old U.S. citizen from Long Island, New York, decried his arrest by ICE agents in June, after he was released. In a video of the arrest, immigration agents demand Limus show ID, with one explaining he "looks like somebody we are looking for." In updated guidance, attorneys at the firm of Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, which has offices in Chicago, Detroit and Los Angeles, advise U.S. who are concerned about being stopped and questioned "to carry a U.S. passport card or a copy of their U.S. passport as evidence of U.S. citizenship." Lauren Villagran can be reached at lvillagran@
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Action Plan Channels Rally Energy, Ignites U.S. Policy Debate
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 23: Jacob Helberg, Hill and Valley co-founder and Under Secretary of State for ... More economic growth designate; NVIDIA co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang; Founders Fund partner and Varda Space Industries co-founder Delian Asparouhov; and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator (EPA) Lee Zeldin give a standing ovation to U.S. President Donald Trump at the "Winning the AI Race" summit. At the Winning AI Race Summit, President Donald Trump delivered a speech combining campaign-style showmanship with concrete policy proposals for America's future in artificial intelligence. Speaking in his trademark improvisational style, assertive and theatrical, punctuated with rally-style slogans, Trump laid out a private-sector-driven strategy to reassert U.S. dominance in AI. It is the start of a 'golden age of America,' he said, punctuating the message with chants of 'Drill, baby, drill and build, baby, build!' and urging American technology companies to go 'all in for America.' The president announced an executive order banning what he called woke AI, a move that immediately sparked debate over the government's role in shaping the values embedded in AI systems. Additionally, Trump also called for expedited permitting for data centers and energy projects, and launched an initiative to make the U.S. an 'AI export powerhouse.' An AI Agenda Tailored For The Tech Industry Trump's speech outlined the plan to boost America's AI global standing, empowering private-sector growth through deregulation, incentives and diplomacy for market access. He called for clearer copyright rules that would let AI systems learn from publicly available content without being blocked by licensing restrictions. He advocated for a single federal AI regulatory standard. A mix of state laws, he warned, could slow innovation and strain early-stage companies and small businesses. The president made clear that he sees the private sector, not government, as the primary engine of innovation. He said Washington should enable innovation, not interfere with it, and declared his intention to keep bureaucrats 'out of the way.' Trump pledged to accelerate the build of AI infrastructure, including data centers, power plants and semiconductor fabs, via deregulation and expedited permitting. He linked this effort to a broader industrial revival, citing the need for electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) technicians and construction workers to meet the rising demand. The speech referred to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the budget reconciliation bill at the core of Trump's second-term agenda with tax cuts, spending adjustments and a debt ceiling increase. It highlighted its provisions allowing companies to deduct capital expenses upfront to accelerate private investment in infrastructure. Internationally, Trump proposed turning the U.S. into an AI export powerhouse of full-stack solutions that include American AI models, applications and the hardware it runs on. The goal is to promote sales to allied nations, backed by diplomatic and trade support from the State and Commerce Departments. On energy, he called for an 'all of the above' strategy, including coal, oil, gas and nuclear to meet AI's rapidly growing power demands. According to the Energy Information Administration, China produced more than twice as much energy as the U.S. in 2023. With abundant power generation, China can support large AI factories, even when powered by less energy-efficient chips, such as older generations of Nvidia chips or locally produced semiconductors from Huawei. Trump vowed to eliminate what he called woke mandates from federally supported AI, criticizing prior policies that tied government funding to diversity goals. President Biden's industrial strategy for semiconductor manufacturing included language encouraging companies to broaden their hiring pipelines. Under a new executive order, the government would be barred from using systems that incorporate ideological screening or require diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) benchmarks. Lastly, Trump said he would support small tech firms to ensure competition and innovation beyond the dominant platforms, arguing that 'the future of AI shouldn't belong to a few companies alone.' The AI Plan Draws Mixed Reactions Critics of the plan warn that it favors entrenched corporate interests while sidelining democratic safeguards and public accountability. Nicholas Garcia, senior policy counsel at Public Knowledge, calls it 'a handout to already-entrenched, powerful tech companies'. The plan's emphasis on deregulation and expedited permitting has raised alarm among environmental advocates, who point to the potential climate impact of large-scale data centers and fossil fuel-heavy power generation. Civil society organizations created the 'People's AI Action Plan,' a manifesto stating that 'We can't let Big Tech and Big Oil lobbyists write the rules for AI and our economy at the expense of our freedom and equality.' Civil liberties groups are also sounding the alarm. The ban on woke AI and the proposed removal of misinformation safeguards have drawn criticism from speech and privacy experts. The Electronic Privacy Information Center said the move is 'placing business interests ahead of consumer protection.' 'The government's interest in only supporting AI that upholds free speech gives me pause,' said Manasi Vartak, chief AI architect at Cloudera. 'In an age of misinformation and where AIs are becoming a key source of information, this banner of free speech can easily be misused.' At the same time, she praised the 'support for open-source and open-weight models and datasets, which are essential for innovation and for continuing research.' The Politics Of AI Policy Trump's AI strategy uses a familiar Silicon Valley formula: deregulate, invest in infrastructure and trust the market to deliver. While the plan is ambitious, much of it remains a framework, leaving federal agencies and Congress to fill in the details. Whether it can move from rally to policy will depend on engagement from civil society, which, until now, has remained at the margin of the administration's approach. As agencies begin translating priorities into rules and funding decisions, implementation could drift into partisan favoritism. But the moment also opens space for new types of governance that move past the usual tug-of-war between regulation and laissez-faire. Policy experts are calling for governance models that pair public-private collaboration with independent audits and oversight systems designed to evolve with the fast-changing AI tools. A report by Fathom, an independent nonprofit, reminds that 'no matter how well-intentioned any government's efforts might be, the reality is that direct government regulation simply cannot keep up with the pace of innovation. Worse yet, it might suffocate it.' How the plan plays out will influence U.S. competitiveness and the rules that shape AI worldwide. As other nations advance their AI strategies, Trump's private-sector-first emphasis will be tested. The plan positions the U.S. for leadership in technology, innovation and global adoption. But its success will ultimately depend on whether people around the world trust and use American-made AI.
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Judge dismisses Justice Department lawsuit over sanctuary laws in Chicago and Illinois
WASHINGTON - A federal judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Justice Department that accused the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago of unlawfully interfering with President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins in Chicago was a setback for Trump's litigation campaign against local "sanctuary" laws that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. White House and Justice Department spokespersons did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump, a Republican seeking to deport millions of immigrants in the country illegally, has sparred with Chicago and other Democratic strongholds over their policies. Democrats, in turn, have criticized the Trump administration's aggressive enforcement tactics, including plainclothes immigration agents covering their faces to hide their identities and arrests of immigrants with no criminal records. Supporters of sanctuary laws have said local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration enforcement would discourage immigrants who are living in the country illegally from coming forward as victims or witnesses to crimes. The Chicago City Council passed an ordinance in 2012 that stops city agencies and employees from getting involved in civil immigration enforcement or helping federal authorities with such efforts. The Illinois legislature passed a similar state law, known as the TRUST Act, in 2017. The Justice Department sued Chicago and Illinois in February, alleging these laws violate the U.S. Constitution's "Supremacy Clause" that states that federal law preempts state and local laws that may conflict with it. Jenkins, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden, rejected that argument in Friday's ruling, saying the city's and the state's policies are protected by the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which ensures that states retain significant powers not explicitly granted to the federal government. The Trump administration on Thursday filed a similar lawsuit against New York City over its local sanctuary laws. A similar case against Los Angeles is pending.
