
Map Shows Countries Offering Easy Path to Citizenship for Americans
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Interest is growing among Americans who want to leave the United States and find a new home elsewhere, often seeking countries with fast pathways to citizenship, not just legal status.
While President Donald Trump has promised that those able to spend at least $5 million can obtain a pathway to U.S. citizenship through his planned Gold Card visa, other countries, including multiple Caribbean nations, are offering speedy citizenship to those willing to spend a fraction of that amount.
Other countries, particularly some in Europe, offer pathways to citizenship through descent to those whose grandparents or parents were born there, while others, such as the U.S., offer pathways through naturalization or spending a qualifying amount of time in the country.
One of the organizations that helps Americans with such pathways is International Living. Ted Baumann, the organization's chief of global diversification, told Newsweek that there has been a noticeable shift in recent months.
"There are two main groups. The first one, which is actually the smaller group, are those diversifying their wealth outside the U.S. Dollar and outside the U.S. financial system, because they are deeply concerned about its future," Baumann, based in South Africa, said.
"The other group are the people who are appalled by what's happening in the United States. I guess you would call them liberals, in American language, but effectively they are people who have modern sensibilities, they think of the world in globalist terms, they're not stuck on the United States as Number One, and they want to get out."
Upwards of 20 countries offer fast-track citizenship, including several Caribbean nations, but this process can take anywhere from three months to three years, depending on the specific requirements.
Americans may be seeking a second citizenship for various reasons, including dissatisfaction with the current administration, as Baumann has observed a growing number of LGBTQ+ individuals and Jewish people seeking residency outside the U.S.
Others are simply seeking better tax advantages and easier global mobility.
"The world is a big place, there are plenty of places you can be happy, there are plenty of places you can do well financially and protect your wealth," Baumann said.
Younger people are increasingly considering their residency and citizenship options, compared to a few months ago, when it was typically middle-aged or retired individuals who wanted to spend part of the year in the South of France, for example.
Citizenship by Descent
Some European countries offer citizenship to those with ancestors who originated there, such as Portugal, Ireland and Italy. GovAssist, another organization working in the field, explained in a July 7 article that individuals seeking a second passport in these countries would enjoy greater financial and personal freedom, including the ability to travel visa-free.
With a large proportion of Americans having immigrant roots, particularly from European nations many decades ago, Baumann said that several U.S. citizens who have held onto the idea of obtaining a second passport someday in the future are now taking steps to make it happen.
Stock image of a visa for Spain tucked inside a passport.
Stock image of a visa for Spain tucked inside a passport.
Getty Images
"What most people want is the right to live somewhere," Baumann said. "That when they decide to get on a plane and fly abroad, they don't have to come back in 90 days. That's the first thing that people are looking for."
He added that 90 percent of Americans he speaks with simply want a residency that may or may not eventually lead to citizenship. However, more countries are looking to tighten restrictions on who can get a passport, making citizenship a more urgent goal.
Until recently in Italy, Italian Americans who could prove ancestry back to the 1800s could gain citizenship. Now, this is limited to parents and, in some cases, grandparents.
Some of these pathways are not as fast as obtaining citizenship through financial means, but Ireland and Poland can process applications in between six and 18 months in some cases.
Citizenship by Investment or Donation
The other common route to residency or citizenship is through investment or donation, with multiple Caribbean nations offering this pathway with short time frames.
Saint Kitts and Nevis, which has one of the longest-running citizenship-by-investment programs, can process applications in as little as four months, following a minimum investment of at least $250,000.
Elsewhere, the governments of Moldova and North Macedonia don't require investments, but rather donations between $100,000 and $200,000.
For some nations, citizenship by investment has become a lucrative option for governments that do not receive significant income from their citizens.
Baumann said the turmoil in the U.S. economy earlier this year, brought about in part by tariff threats from the White House, caused Americans to consider moving themselves or their assets elsewhere. Despite the recovery in May, tariffs are back on the cards.
"Now it's going this way again and they're just saying: 'I gotta get off this rollercoaster,'" Baumann said. "It's not just people who don't like Trump; it's people who maybe voted for Trump and maybe recognize that one of the costs of supporting Trump is that it might hurt their wealth, and so they're very quietly moving their own wealth outside the United States."
Until recently, International Living received few inquiries about obtaining a Caribbean passport; however, interest has sharply risen in the last few weeks. Not all nations require individuals to reside there.
One caveat is how the rest of the world views such passports, as the European Union does not offer visa-free travel to these nations.
Whichever route Americans looking to emigrate choose to go down, one thing is clear to Baumann, who has noticed time becoming a critical factor for those who want as quick an exit from the U.S. as possible.
"People are freaked out, there's no question about it," Baumann said. "This is not a normal situation."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Banking Expert: 7 Mistakes I See People Make When Setting Up Their Bank Accounts
TD Bank's inaugural Financial Preparedness Report revealed that 44% of Americans think about their financial preparedness daily, but 36% of respondents reported being unconfident that they had enough savings to cover unexpected bills that could arise. While planning for the unexpected can be challenging, it's essential to start by ensuring that your finances are correctly set up with your banking accounts. What are the most common and costly mistakes that people make when setting up their accounts? GOBankingRates spoke with banking experts to find out the mistakes that you want to avoid to ensure that your banking setup aligns with your financial goals. Check Out: Read Next: Mistake 1: Leaving All of Their Funds in One Account 'The mistake that is most likely to happen to people when they establish their bank accounts is putting everything under the same roof,' said Ryan McCallister, a banking expert and founder of F5 Mortgage. 'They operate their spending, savings and bills as well as emergency funds out of one checking account, and this makes it difficult to tell where money is actually going.' You want to ensure that every banking account serves its own purpose so you don't get confused about what's happening with your money. By having all of your funds in one account, you can easily spend more money than you intended to or touch your savings without realizing it. McCallister suggests dividing your accounts by purpose: One account to pay fixed bills One to spend One to save Learn More: Mistake 2: Not Understanding the Purpose of an Account Another common mistake when setting up a bank account is not understanding its purpose. McCallister stated that it's vital that you understand the significance of every account within your complete financial picture. You don't want to make the mistake of opening multiple accounts to chase a promotional rate or some bonus. Before you open any kind of banking account, make sure you need and want the account — that it plays a designated role in your finances — so you don't have your funds spread out over random accounts. Mistake 3: Not Automating Finances McCallister stressed that people tend to neglect automation. They use memory to send money to savings or to pay bills and this can result in late payment or inaccurate savings. When setting up a banking account, you also want to take out the guesswork about budgeting by automating transfers. This basic setup performed at the early stages can spare you headaches and overdraft charges in the future. Mistake 4: Not Setting Up Overdraft Protection 'Overdraft protection can prevent declined transactions or costly overdraft fees when your balance runs low,' said Denise Romanelli, assistant vice president of corporate social responsibility and certified financial counselor at TruMark Financial Credit Union. 'You can typically link a savings account, credit card or line of credit to your checking account so funds are automatically transferred to cover shortfalls.' Since every financial institution has different policies on overdraft handling, you want to ensure that you know what you're signing up for. You'll want to take some time to understand the terms before opting in or making a decision about overdraft protection. Mistake 5: Not Maximizing Digital Banking Tools for Security and Convenience Romanelli pointed out that digital tools can help you manage your money more efficiently and securely, but that many consumers will forget to set these up when opening a new bank account. She added, 'Start by setting up real-time alerts for things like low balances, large transactions or direct deposits. These notifications help you monitor activity instantly and spot suspicious charges early.' Some of the digital banking tools you want to look into are: Mobile deposit to deposit checks without visiting a physical branch to save you time in the future. Two-factor authentication (2FA) for your financial institution mobile app or online portal for an extra layer of security. Free credit scores and reports to see where you stand with your overall financial picture. Spending tracker and budgeting insights to know what's happening with your money. Leveraging these features can help you avoid late fees, stick to a budget and stay in full control of your finances. Mistake 6: Not Naming Beneficiaries Romanelli warned that failing to name beneficiaries when setting up bank accounts could lead to serious issues. 'Naming beneficiaries is a key step when opening your account because it ensures your funds are passed directly to your chosen individuals without going through probate, saving time and legal hassle,' she said. While it's important for traditional bank accounts, you also want to designate beneficiaries for digital investment platforms and savings apps as well. Handling this aspect is an important part of overall financial planning. Mistake 7: Ignoring the Fine Print A final pitfall when setting up a banking account is the failure to read the fine print of the account. McCallister noted that individuals often open accounts without reviewing the minimum balance, monthly charges and transaction limits. Those little fees slowly erode your balance, and you didn't even see them coming. This is why it's crucial that you read the terms and never use accounts that charge you to access your own money. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on I'm a Banking Expert: 7 Mistakes I See People Make When Setting Up Their Bank Accounts Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Atlantic
23 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Are Fancy Credit Cards Still Worth the Cost?
I don't mean to shock you, but being a coal miner at the turn of the 20th century was not super fun. The work was dangerous, unpleasant, and low paid. The industry was extractive and poorly regulated. The people who ran it could be irresponsible and indifferent to human suffering. Also, the shopping was abysmal —when you wanted groceries or new clothes, you generally had to buy whatever was available at the company store, often using scrip: fake money issued by your employer as credit against a future paycheck. Even if you felt like you had consumer choice, you were really locked into a closed system run by one company, your life weirdly governed by something sort of similar to—but fundamentally different from—actual money. I was thinking of the coal miners because Chase recently changed the terms on its highest-end consumer credit card, the Sapphire Reserve. Most notably, the annual fee increased by nearly 45 percent, from $550 to $795. That hike was theoretically to be offset by an increase to the card's rewards, which are now purportedly worth $2,700 annually, offered not in the form of legal tender but rather as a long and complex list of credits, many of them issued in the conditional tense. For example, you can get $500 off stays at hotels—if those hotels are on a special list picked by Chase, and if you book for at least two nights. And the credits are actually meted out in chunks, so to get the full reward, you need to book two different stays: one in the first half of the year, the other in the second. You also get a host of similarly caveated coupons to Chase's corporate partners—Apple, StubHub, DoorDash, Lyft, Peloton. The line item advertising $300 in DoorDash promos reads like an ancient riddle: You can get up to $25 off each month, though only $5 can be used on restaurant orders, and $20 can go to two separate grocery or retail orders. (I have omitted the asterisks, of which there are many.) It is technically possible to save money—if you can figure out how to do it. To be clear, being a coal miner in 1903 was pretty different from being a high-net-worth individual in 2025. But not completely different: As coal mines did for their miners, today's credit-card issuers have essentially invented their own fiat currency—'points,' usually—that can be redeemed only within their apparatus, for rewards the company has designated, at an exchange rate that it can change at will. Three out of every four credit cards are now rewards cards: They are how Americans, especially rich ones, shop. As the cards get more popular, though, reaping their benefits is becoming harder and more like homework. Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reported a 70 percent increase in complaints about points-issuing credit cards since 2019: The agency found card issuers hiding complex redemption requirements in fine print, forcing borrowers to use janky proprietary portals to book rewards travel, and failing to resolve technical glitches or customer-service issues, among other things. The report concluded that 82 cents out of every dollar in rewards that American credit-card holders earned in 2022 went unclaimed at the end of the year—a 40 percent increase since 2019. In effect, credit-card companies are selling consumers a book of coupons they are unlikely to use. The Sapphire Reserve is a fascinating product. It costs money, but it's not exactly something you buy. You can't sell it, because it has no inherent market value. But it comes packaged like a $10,000 watch and is advertised via perplexing billboards designed to make the card look like a high-fashion accessory, which maybe it kind of is. At any rate, the message is not subtle: This is a fancy card for fancy people. It enables the purchase of luxuries, and is itself a luxury. When the Reserve was introduced, in 2016, the highest-status credit card on the market had been the American Express Centurion, which you may know from rap music and James Bond as the Black Card, and which was available by invitation only. The Reserve, though, required only decent credit and a willingness to shell out for a sizable annual fee. It kicked off a new era in spending money: 'That's where we really saw this premium-card market go mainstream,' Nick Ewen, a senior editorial director at the credit-card-review website The Points Guy, told me. The Reserve, and cards like it—most notably Capital One's Venture X and American Express's Platinum—had high fees, high rewards, and high-spending customers who dined out and traveled a lot. Like the Centurion, they signaled exclusivity, but in a different way: The Black Card's conspicuous consumption largely involved shopping; the new cards were for consumers who prioritized experiences. They advertised by using imagery of hot urbanites at restaurants and on vacation, their lives rich with money but also adventure. 'What they did was they made it about your values,' Stephanie Tully, a consumer-behavior expert at the University of Southern California, told me. Wealth wasn't just about how much you had; it was about how you spent it. Literally. And spending is what card issuers are hoping you will do. The Reserves of the world generally make money not from the interest on unpaid balances but from transaction fees charged to businesses. In other words, these cards want you swiping. They encourage it by offering benefits—fat introductory bonuses, cash back on all kinds of purchases, ungettable restaurant reservations, access to airport lounges. Recently, they have gone beyond flat-rate rewards and added more and more complex, hyperspecific perks onto the pile, partnering with businesses that are happy to offer the card companies a discount in exchange for access to their customers. Card issuers have also increased their annual fees, presumably betting that people will either not notice or not care, and that they will happily trade real money for fake money, or at least the promise of it. Rewards make the consumer feel in control and empowered, as if they're making money even while they spend it. They reduce what behavioral economists call 'pain of payment': They make parting with your wealth feel fun, as if you are a video-game protagonist collecting magic stars, even when you are buying diapers or booking flights to a funeral. Rewards seem somehow different from normal currency. 'It's not your income minus your expenses; it's just this extra pool of money that has been accumulating through other things that you do,' Tully told me. 'It feels like free money'—like a windfall or winning the lottery, even if you paid hundreds of dollars for the right to earn the rewards in the first place. In a 2024 poll, 37 percent of rewards cardholders said they'd spend less on their cards if points weren't offered. In 2023, the CFPB received 1,200 complaints about credit-card rewards across a number of brands. Cardholders report that rewards are devalued, denied, disappeared, or fine-printed to oblivion, their actual redemption details dramatically different from their marketing materials. They are often subject to dynamic pricing; sometimes, a card's portal will glitch, and the number of points required to book a flight or hotel will spike. Sometimes, the airport lounge that a customer is theoretically entitled to is full, crowded with all of the other people who are also trying to maximize their rewards. Sometimes, dealing with it all is just too complicated—hence, all of the unredeemed credit-card points. Of course, nobody emails the government about how much they love their credit card, and an unredeemed point is not necessarily a wasted one. Still, Ewen has noticed that his readers—who presumably have a more sophisticated understanding of credit-card rewards than the average person—are having a hard time figuring out how to use theirs. People are so flummoxed by the logic puzzle of spending their points that they sit on them, something he called 'analysis paralysis.' But, he told me, that's not a great strategy, because card companies reserve the right to change terms whenever they want. Suddenly, points that were worth $300 might be worth much less. The Points Guy's official stance on rewards is 'earn and burn,' Ewen said: 'Points are not a long-term investment.' Ewen has 24 credit cards, and he loves to get the most out of them. Every year, he sits down and crunches the numbers to make sure he's made back his annual fee on each of his cards. This is both his job and his hobby—he's a points guy! But not everyone is. 'For some people, it absolutely is kind of like a game,' Tully said. But, she said, even for the people who don't think about credit-card points for a living, 'it can become a job almost.' Consumers, she continued, need to weigh 'how much time and effort they want to put into their credit cards when they're choosing what credit card to buy.' Fancy cards are like coupon books or miners' scrip, but they are also, in this sense, more like high-end gym memberships. The commodity they offer is access to a rarefied place, one where everyone else is attractive and competent, putting in the work and reaping the rewards. The product is a subscription to do more work—it's a tax on laziness or a deposit on your future self's conscientiousness. But it seems to me that credit-card companies, and gyms, know something consumers don't: Everybody thinks they'll be a more diligent person tomorrow.


Buzz Feed
24 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
20 Far-Right Conservatives Spewed Their Wild Beliefs In A Debate With 1 Progressive, And It's Going Viral For Being Absolutely Absurd
If you haven't heard of the media company Jubilee, they specialize in hosting political and social debates between people of widely opposing views, and their videos are known for being both educational and unhinged. Their latest video, called "1 Progressive vs 20 Far-Right Conservatives," features Mehdi Hasan, an award-winning journalist and former TV host on MSNBC, as the progressive. Hasan agreed to timed debates with a group of far-right conservatives on various political topics, and so many moments are going mega-viral. Some of the highlights from the 1 hour and 40-minute-long debate include one argument about whether or not immigrants are good for America: Jubilee / Via Then, during an argument about whether or not Donald Trump is defying the Constitution, one far-right debater made a shocking admission: After that, another far-right conservative made this bizarre claim during a debate on whether or not Donald Trump is pro-criminal: Jubilee / Via Then during an argument about Donald Trump's plan for Gaza, this horrific moment happened: Jubilee / Via Then, during the debate about immigrants being good for America, things got personal: One person said, "The value of these seem to be demonstrating how it is ok to say things in public that would have been unthinkable to admit 10 years ago." @adityav84 / Via "Just sat through the this.. The disgusting and horrible rhetoric that I just witnessed makes me absolutely sick," another person wrote. This person praised Mehdi's knowledge in the debate. "I gotta say, the few of these types of videos I've seen clips from, the person hasn't been argumentative enough. Has been too afraid to really drop the hammer on people. Mehdi IS that guy and I have loved every clip I've seen from this video. Knows his stuff and isn't afraid."