macOS Embraces Linux Containers with Native Support
Containers have become central to modern software engineering by packaging applications with all dependencies in a consistent, portable environment. Up to now, Mac users have typically relied on resource‑heavy, shared VMs to run Linux containers, often encountering sluggish performance and battery drain on Apple Silicon machines. Apple's solution leverages its own Virtualization framework and Apple Silicon optimisations to spin up sub‑second containers, each within its own minimal‑footprint VM.
Isolation and security are core pillars of Containerization. Each container receives a dedicated IP address, entirely separate CPU and memory allocations, and performs directory sharing only when explicitly requested. The container's root filesystem omits core utilities, libc, and dynamic libraries by default — a deliberate measure to reduce the attack surface. The init process, vminitd, is written in Swift and acts as the VM's first process, handling IP assignment, filesystem mounting and process supervision.
ADVERTISEMENT
Performance gains are significant. By optimising the Linux kernel and exposing container filesystems as EXT4 block devices, Apple has achieved rapid cold‑boot speeds while maintaining low I/O overhead. Benchmarks suggest these containers outperform Docker Desktop in terms of startup time, memory footprint and CPU use on Apple Silicon systems.
Technical details from GitHub show support for OCI‑compliant images, enabling compatibility with existing registries and Kubernetes systems. The container CLI mirrors familiar commands—pulling and running Alpine Linux images is as simple as typing container image pull alpine:latest. The project repo, licensed under Apache‑2.0, is written entirely in Swift, optimised for Apple Silicon and designed for community contribution.
Apple's launch places Containerization among strong open‑source contenders such as Podman, containerd, Buildah and Rancher Desktop. Yet the per‑container VM model marks a departure from standard shared‑kernel container runtimes, offering enhanced isolation at the cost of slightly increased base resource use. Notably, critics and users on Reddit and in industry commentary have voiced curiosity about whether this approach outclasses lightweight VM tools like Orbstack or Lima.
A potentially limiting factor is network isolation on macOS 15. Full network capabilities, including container‑to‑container traffic, are only available on the upcoming macOS 26, currently in beta and expected later in the year. Users on the earlier Sequoia release may experience restricted container networking or compatibility issues. Additionally, a Rosetta 2 bug affecting x86_64 processes in Linux VMs may impede workflows involving amd64 containers—a challenge both Apple and downstream projects like Podman are working to resolve.
The timing of Containerization aligns with a broader developer toolkit refresh. Alongside this framework, Apple introduced Swift 6.2, Xcode 26 featuring LLM integration, and Game Porting Toolkit 3. This suite reflects a strategic push to consolidate development workflows across desktop, mobile, AI and cloud environments within the Apple ecosystem.
Early adopters with Apple Silicon and access to macOS 26 beta are already testing the CLI and framework. Feedback is mixed: some praise the speed and security enhancements, while others caution that lack of full networking and Rosetta issues may restrict use in complex container orchestration setups.
Apple's decision to open‑source Containerization is notable. It invites cross‑platform contributions, and standards compatibility via Swift and OCI means downstream projects could integrate with or build on the framework. If momentum grows, it could prompt a shift away from third‑party container tools on macOS, benefiting the entire developer ecosystem.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
14 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
New Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max leak suggests major upgrade
A new leak has stirred excitement among Apple fans, hinting that the upcoming iPhone 17 Pro Max—expected to launch this September—may feature the largest battery ever seen in an iPhone. The leak originates from Weibo user Instant Digital, a source with a mixed but occasionally accurate track record when it comes to Apple predictions. Bigger, thicker, and built to last? According to the leak, pointed out by Forbes, the iPhone 17 Pro Max could pack a battery close to 5,000mAh, surpassing the current heavyweight, the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which sports a 4,676mAh battery. That would mark almost a 10% boost in capacity, a significant jump. Fueling these claims is a widely reported rumour that the iPhone 17 Pro Max will be thicker than its predecessor, increasing from 8.25mm to approximately 8.725mm. That additional half a millimeter could offer enough space for a larger battery without drastically altering the feel of the phone in hand. Despite Apple's consistent yearly upgrades—better cameras, faster processors, smarter AI—battery life remains one of the top demands from users. Currently, the iPhone 16 Pro Max boasts an impressive 33-hour battery life, up from 29 hours on the iPhone 14 Pro Max and just 20 hours on the iPhone 12 Pro Max. If the iPhone 17 Pro Max gains an extra 300mAh in capacity, analysts believe we could see that number climb to 35 hours or more. Beyond battery life, a report in MacRumors suggested the iPhone 17 Pro Max (and its sibling, the iPhone 17 Pro) will be equipped with a trio of 48MP rear cameras and an upgraded 24MP front camera. Interestingly, no major differences in camera capabilities have been rumoured between the two models. Though Apple has yet to confirm anything, all signs point to the iPhone 17 Pro Max being the endurance champion of the lineup, with a bulkier design making room for a near-5,000mAh battery. That alone could make it the go-to choice for power users, even if other specs remain largely identical to the Pro version. With a launch expected in just a few months, the countdown to the newest iPhone has begun.
Arabian Post
2 days ago
- Arabian Post
Lyon shifts to open-source in bid for digital sovereignty
Lyon's municipal government has begun phasing out Microsoft Office, Windows and SQL in favour of open-source alternatives, marking one of Europe's most significant moves away from US proprietary software. The third‑largest city in France, which employs around 10,000 public servants and serves over a million residents, will adopt OnlyOffice for productivity tasks, Linux as the operating system and PostgreSQL for database management. City officials emphasised that this decision aligns with efforts to reduce dependence on American technology, extend hardware lifespan and reinforce control over critical digital infrastructure. The move is expected to bring environmental benefits by avoiding e-waste and minimise the need for frequent licence upgrades tied to proprietary systems set to reach end-of-life in the coming years. Beyond migration, Lyon is developing 'Territoire Numérique Ouvert', a French-designed suite for video conferencing and office automation hosted in local data centres. The initiative received a €2 million grant from L'Agence nationale de la cohésion des territoires and is already used by multiple French communities. ADVERTISEMENT Training for around 10,000 civil servants began in June, supporting the transition and underscoring the scale of the change management involved. Comparable plans are under way elsewhere in Europe, with Denmark's Ministry for Digital Government moving to LibreOffice and Linux, and Germany's Schleswig‑Holstein state transitioning 30,000 public sector users. However, challenges persist. Compatibility with legacy applications—especially those relying on advanced Excel functions or Microsoft Exchange—is a major concern. Organisations like Munich have previously attempted full open-source migration and later reversed course due to user dissatisfaction and integration difficulties. Local IT experts warn the city must provide robust support for employees throughout the migration. Lyon's Deputy Mayor for Digital Policy, Bertrand Maes, stated the city's aim is to 'empower citizens and safeguard their data' by championing open-source solutions guided by European digital sovereignty principles. Salaried IT staff are part of a gradual rollout designed to allow adaptation and avoid workflow disruption. Combining digital autonomy, cost savings and environmental stewardship, Lyon's approach reflects a broader EU policy shift emphasising open standards, interoperability and reduced vendor lock‑in. While the city's IT consultants note that short‑term costs such as training and infrastructure alignment could be high, savings from licence fees and reduced hardware churn may offset these in the long haul. Europe's growing urgency around data privacy and jurisdictional exposure, especially under mechanisms like the US Cloud Act, has fuelled interest in locally controlled alternatives. Lyon's step joins an expanding coalition of municipalities and states aiming to reclaim control over their digital ecosystems.
Arabian Post
3 days ago
- Arabian Post
Brazilian Antitrust Authority Urges Apple Penalties
Brazil's antitrust regulator CADE technical body has urged the conviction of Apple for what it deems anti‑competitive conduct within its iOS ecosystem. This recommendation, made on 30 June, comes after complaints from 2022, including one by MercadoLibre, alleging that Apple restricts digital‑goods distribution and forces developers to use its proprietary payment system for in‑app purchases. The body has proposed an undisclosed fine and a cease‑and‑desist order, with a final decision now pending before CADE's internal tribunal. The technical body's report highlights Apple's practice of banning alternative in‑app payment options and prohibiting developers from steering users to external purchase methods. CADE observes that these restrictions stifle competition by locking app makers into Apple's ecosystem and preserving the company's dominant position in digital transactions. Apple has pushed back, warning that the proposed measures could degrade user experience and pose privacy and security risks. The company emphasised its intention to maintain dialogue with CADE while protecting its integrated model for managing apps and payments. ADVERTISEMENT Cade's scrutiny of Apple is not new. In November 2024, the regulator mandated the company to allow links to external payment sites and alternative in‑app payment methods, threatening daily fines of 250,000 reais for non‑compliance. That ruling remains in effect as part of the ongoing probe. MercadoLibre, the region's leading e‑commerce platform, spearheaded one of the original complaints. The company argued that Apple's restrictions extended to areas such as music, video games, books and other digital content, effectively forcing consumers to transact through Apple's payment system rather than allowing developers to offer more cost‑effective or region‑specific solutions. Digital‑economy experts note that Apple's model—mandating its own payment system—has faced growing scrutiny worldwide. The company has encountered comparable legal challenges in South Korea, the European Union and parts of the United States, where accusations of excessive market power have led to legislative changes mandating alternative app packaging and payment options. In South Korea, Apple bowed to a new law allowing third‑party app stores but continues to impose a commission on transactions—even through alternate stores. Meanwhile, EU regulators have pushed for app‑steering rights, allowing developers to redirect users to external payment methods. Apple is currently appealing a significant EU antitrust ruling, which would cap app‑store commissions and allow developers to provide payment links. Brazil's move follows this global trend, suggesting mounting pressure on Apple to adapt its App Store policies. Within Latin America, the company's practices are scrutinised amid efforts to promote fair competition and reduce consumer costs. Critics argue that Apple's commission—often up to 30 per cent—raises prices and limits developers' profitability. Apple has justified its control over in‑app payments by citing benefits to user security, privacy and the integrity of its ecosystem. The company states that its integrated payment system ensures data protection, fraud prevention and consistent user experience. CADE, however, contends that alternatives could offer similar safeguards without undermining competition. A verdict from CADE's internal tribunal is imminent, with stakeholders anticipating a decision within weeks. Should the tribunal affirm the technical body's recommendation, Apple may face both fines and a directive to alter its platform policies—potentially setting a precedent that affects its operations not only in Brazil but across emerging and developed markets alike. Observers emphasise that this case reflects a broader shift in digital‑market regulation. Governments—from Seoul to Brussels to Brasília— are increasingly focused on curbing the market power of dominant app‑store operators. How CADE rules could influence Apple's global strategy, with implications for developers, consumers and the future of mobile digital ecosystems.
