logo
Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones

Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones

Yahoo2 days ago
Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys, has an NFL nemesis hell bent on keeping him from reclaiming the glory of the 1990s. That man is Jerry Jones, de facto general manager of the Dallas Cowboys.
To be clear, Jones' talent evaluation and trust in his scouts remain top notch. The Cowboys continue to generate elite homegrown talent on a semi-regular basis. Draft-n-Play Jerry Jones? That guy is an asset. But once those guys get near the end of those rookie contracts, Contract Extension Jerry Jones comes out. And while Contract Extension Jerry is great for his stars' checking accounts, it's actively hindering the roster around them.
None of that is new. Jones' propensity to drag his feet early in negotiations has often led to more expensive deals down the line for players Dallas cannot afford to see leave. What could have been a five year, $262.5 million extension for Dak Prescott in 2023 (using Justin Herbert's deal as a comparison) eventually became a four year, $240 million deal in 2024, paying him $5 million more annually than any other NFL player ($231 million of that is guaranteed). CeeDee Lamb was always set to reset the wide receiver market. Doing so at the eve of the 2024 season lined him up for $34 million per year instead of around $30 million had he signed the offseason prior ($100 million of that is guaranteed).
That creates salary cap bottlenecks down the line for a team that's perpetually high on star power and often low on depth. Jones' hesitation has logic behind it; he's waiting to see if a young player's production wanes before making a massive commitment. At the same time, that keeps said young player on a less expensive salary, which allows some breathing room to pay off the other massive extensions looming around the corner.
However, that strategy keeps costing him money while antagonizing the players on which he relies. And Monday's comments about Micah Parsons, whose upcoming extension gets pricier each month? Fairly antagonistic!
"Even if" is a bold way to address your team's desire to keep a 26-year-old with 52.5 sacks and four Pro Bowl honors in four seasons as a pro. Yet, here is Jones, quietly negging a player who has only missed four games due to injury in his career to date (a fifth game, in Week 18 vs. the Eagles in 2021, was due to COVID-19). Jones also added 'I am not the least concerned about having any dangling participles out here on a contract,' which is a folksy, homespun way of suggesting that, yep, this approach will once again cost Dallas extra money as a luxury tax for an owner/manager who lives for the escalation of contract negotiations but still seems to lose the big ones more often than he wins.
Parsons, by the way, took notice. How could he not?
So why is Jones waiting? He offered a couple rationalizations. The first, naturally, was the fleeting nature of mortality and rising tide of reckless drivers.
The second, more sensible option was that he'd been burned before and had some regrets. And Jerry Jones, because he is Jerry Jones and you do not have to speak diplomatically when you own a superyacht, named names beyond Prescott and his nine missed games in 2024.
Trevon Diggs was an All-Pro his second season in the league and a Pro Bowler the third. He signed a five year, $97 million contract to become one of the league's five highest paid cornerbacks, then missed 15 games due to injury in 2023 and six games in 2024 while providing good-not-great coverage. Steele signed a five-year, $82.5 million contract in 2023 after ascending to a starting role at right tackle, which made him the ninth-highest paid offensive tackle in the NFL. He hasn't missed a game since then, but his play hasn't lived up to the salary even though he'll only be the league's 25th-highest paid tackle in 2025.
Jones paid market value for a boom-or-bust cornerback and a rising young tackle. One of them was derailed by injury and the other has struggled, but there's room for both players to revert to form (Steele is the oldest of the two and only 28 years old). Jones isn't in the hope business, however, he's looking for results. And these results align more closely with his wait-and-see philosophy than the fact Lamb was an All-Pro for the third straight season last fall.
Thus, the Cowboys will likely be stuck with the privilege of paying Parsons a record-setting amount in the late stages of the 2025 preseason. A deal to beat out the $41 million in annual salary to TJ Watt -- resetting the market last offseason probably would have clocked in closer to $36 million per year -- could leave the franchise committed to something like $137 million in annual average salary to three players. That's not unmanageable, but it's a problem. Dallas has been so strapped for cap space in recent years that its top free agent additions the last few seasons have been:
2025: EDGE Dante Fowler Jr. (one year, $6 million)
2024: LB Eric Kendricks (one year, $3 million)
2023: RB Ronald Jones Jr. (one year, $1.25 million)
All the while, players like Connor McGovern, Dalton Schultz, Dorance Armstrong, Tyler Biadasz, Jourdan Lewis and Demarcus Lawrence left for cash elsewhere. That's not why the Cowboys have one playoff win since 2019, but it certainly doesn't help.
Monday's comments were a refreshing display of honesty. Not about Micah Parsons, of course, but about how Jones views his roster management. The sunk cost of paying a player who might get injured or fall off far outweighs the opportunity savings of paying young, proven players what they're worth before it gets damagingly expensive. Jones is content to lose leverage and give up more in guarantees than he would have years earlier if he can find data that rewards his wait-and-see approach.
That's not anything we didn't already know, but it's something else to hear Jones go out and effectively admit it. It's an approach that keeps the Cowboys from turning its stars into a constellation. And while it means guys like Prescott, Lamb and, eventually, Parsons all get truly lucrative contracts down the line, it also means they won't have the support to maximize the talent for which Jones is paying so much.
This article originally appeared on For The Win: Jerry Jones' worst NFL enemy remains Jerry Jones
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook
Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook

(NASDAQ:AMZN) is poised to potentially outperform market expectations in its July 31 second-quarter earnings report, driven by a combination of robust U.S. retail sales, advantageous foreign exchange rates, and accelerating demand for its artificial intelligence-related services through Amazon Web Services (AWS). Strong consumer spending and ongoing efficiency gains in its e-commerce operations are also contributing to a positive outlook for the tech giant. Reinforcing this positive sentiment, Bank of America Securities analyst Justin Post maintained (NASDAQ:AMZN) with a Buy rating and raised the price forecast from $248 to $265. Post raised its second-quarter estimates for the company, citing stronger-than-expected U.S. retail data, favorable foreign exchange (FX) movements, and rising AI-related demand via Anthropic. The analyst forecasted second-quarter revenue of $164 billion, exceeding Wall Street's consensus of $162 expects Amazon Web Services (AWS) to grow 16.5% year-over-year, slightly below the first-quarter's 16.9% but in line with Street projections of 17%. However, Post noted that robust AI demand and accelerating AWS infrastructure investments will drive growth reacceleration in the second half of the year. The analyst projects $17.8 billion in second-quarter profit, above the consensus estimate of $17.0 billion and the high end of Amazon's own guidance of $17.5 billion. Key drivers include resilient consumer spending, signs of acceleration in e-commerce trends, and FX benefits, especially with the euro up 5% year-over-year (Y/Y) and 8% quarter-over-quarter (Q/Q) against the dollar, potentially delivering a 130bps FX tailwind vs. the Street's modest 30bps estimate, he noted. In North America Retail, aggregated BAC credit/debit card data and Bloomberg Second Measure point to a 4-point acceleration in sales growth versus the first quarter, Post noted. The analyst said this sets the stage for Amazon to beat Street expectations by over 2% in the region. International Retail could benefit from FX trends, as the Street models only offer a modest boost. Amazon's guidance for the third quarter is expected to range between $169 billion and $174 billion (vs. Street at $172.8 billion) with GAAP EBIT projected between $14.0 billion and $18.0 billion (Street at $19.4 billion), Post noted. He suggested Amazon's historical conservatism could result in cautious guidance, but if second-quarter results show substantial upside, the third-quarter outlook could surprise higher. Post also highlighted reports of AWS job cuts, which may support margin expansion in the second half. The analyst estimates second-quarter AWS operating margins at 36.0%, slightly above the consensus of 35.3%, though down 3.5 points from the first quarter due to higher stock-based compensation. He further noted that AWS capex spending is scaling rapidly, up 38 points Y/Y, now accounting for 70% of Amazon's capex, signaling a ramp in infrastructure buildout that should alleviate previous supply constraints and support future growth. Post said positives that could boost investor confidence included solid second-quarter retail performance from resilient consumer demand, potential third-quarter boost from a longer Prime Day, retail margin leverage from hiring freezes and cost discipline, AWS revenue acceleration tied to increasing AI and chip demand and improved operating efficiency and tax savings from the Big Beautiful Bill, which could add $6.4 billion in incremental cash tax benefits between 2025–2027. Despite trading at 13.4 times 2026 EV/EBITDA, Amazon remains below its 10-year average of 16.5 times, the analyst said, suggesting potential for multiple expansion if growth momentum holds. Upcoming results from Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) may also influence sentiment ahead of Amazon's report, Post noted. Post projected second-quarter revenue of $163.92 billion and EPS of $1.40. Price Action: AMZN stock is trading higher by 0.26% to $228.05 at last check Wednesday. Photo via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for AMZN Date Firm Action From To Mar 2022 Deutsche Bank Initiates Coverage On Buy Feb 2022 Tigress Financial Maintains Buy Feb 2022 Credit Suisse Maintains Outperform View More Analyst Ratings for AMZN View the Latest Analyst Ratings Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? (AMZN): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details
Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details

The Trump administration wants its AI technology to be considered an industry leader both on home soil and abroad. But it also doesn't want the U.S.'s AI prowess to empower or embolden a foreign adversary. That's quite the balance to strike. If President Trump's AI Action Plan, which was released on Wednesday, is any indicator, the administration seems to still be figuring out the right course of action to achieve those goals. '​​America currently is the global leader on data center construction, computing hardware performance, and models,' the plan stated. 'It is imperative that the United States leverage this advantage into an enduring global alliance, while preventing our adversaries from free-riding on our innovation and investment.' The plan mentions strengthening AI chip export controls through 'creative approaches' followed by a pair of policy recommendations. The first calls on government organizations, including the Department of Commerce and National Security Council, to work with the AI industry on chip location verification features. The second is a recommendation to establish an effort to figure out enforcement for potential chip export restrictions; notably, it mentions that while the U.S. and allies impose export controls on major systems required for chip manufacturing, there isn't a focus on many of the component sub-systems — a hint at where the administration wants the DOC to direct its attention. The AI Action plan also talks about how the U.S. will need to find alignment in this area with its global allies. 'America must impose strong export controls on sensitive technologies,' the plan states. 'We should encourage partners and allies to follow U.S. controls, and not backfill. If they do, America should use tools such as the Foreign Direct Product Rule and secondary tariffs to achieve greater international alignment.' The AI Action plan never gets into detail on exactly how it will achieve Al global alliances, coordinate with allies on export chip restrictions, or work with U.S.-based AI companies on chip location verification features. Instead, the AI Action plans lay out what foundational building blocks are required for future sustainable AI chip export guidelines, as opposed to policies implemented on top of existing guidelines. The upshot: chip export restrictions are going to take more time. And there's ample evidence, beyond the AP Action plan, to suggest it will. For instance, the Trump administration has contradicted itself multiple times on its export restriction strategy in the past few months — including just last week. In July, the administration gave semiconductor firms, like Nvidia and AMD, the green light to start selling AI chips they had developed for China, just months after rolling out licensing restrictions on the same AI chips that effectively pulled Nvidia out of the Chinese market. The administration also formally rescinded the Biden administration's AI Diffusion Rule in May, just days before it was supposed to go into effect. The AI Diffusion rule put a cap on how much AI computing capacity some countries were allowed to buy. The Trump administration is expected to sign multiple executive orders July 23. Whether these will contain detailed plans on how it will reach its goals is unclear. While the AI Action Plan talks at length about figuring out how to expand the U.S. AI market globally, while maintaining dominance, it's light on the specifics. Any executive order regarding chip export restrictions will likely be about getting the proper government departments together to figure out a path forward, as opposed to formal guidelines, quite yet. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store