Iran Confirms Inmates Killed in Israel's Evin Prison Attack Last Week
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
An Israeli strike on Tehran's Evin Prison on Monday killed 71 people, including inmates, staff and visiting family members, Iran's judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said on Sunday.
Newsweek has reached out to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) via email for comment on Sunday.
Why It Matters
In mid-June, Israel initially struck Tehran and several other cities in "Operation Rising Lion," a campaign it said was meant to preempt a planned Iranian attack and disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities, which have long been a concern of Israel and the U.S.
Iran, which has said its nuclear program is for energy purposes and not nuclear weapons, retaliated. Israeli defense systems—bolstered by U.S. military technology—intercepted nearly all incoming missile fire, according to Israeli officials, although Iran did strike a hospital southern Israel last week. More than 600 Iranians were reported killed by Israeli strikes, and 28 Israelis killed by Iranian strikes, with thousands wounded it both countries.
Israel and Iran entered a fragile ceasefire on June 24, the day after Israel struck Evin Prison.
Last weekend, the U.S. joined Israel in its war against Iran by bombing three nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz, in the largest B-2 bomber operation in U.S. history.
What To Know
On Sunday, Jahangir wrote in Mizan, the Iranian judiciary's outlet, that 71 people were killed in the Israeli strike on Iran's notorious Evin Prison. The update was republished on the official state news outlet, IRNA.
The English version of the Mizan article states that, "Prison administrative staff, conscript soldiers, convicted prisoners, families of prisoners who had visited for meetings or judicial follow-ups, and neighbors living near the prison," were killed. It noted that people had come to the prison that day for various follow-ups on legal proceedings.
The outlet confirmed that Judge Ali Ghanaatkar, who served as deputy prosecutor of Tehran and the detention center's top prosecutor, was killed in the strikes. It did not identify the others killed.
Mizan also reported that foreign journalists from several outlets, including Associated Press and Reuters, participated in a tour of the area.
On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of people filled the streets of Iran's capital for a state funeral honoring about 60 Iranians killed in Israeli strikes over the past few weeks, including top military commanders and nuclear scientists.
The office building at the Evin prison sits damaged in Tehran, Iran, on June 29 after an Israeli strike on Monday.
The office building at the Evin prison sits damaged in Tehran, Iran, on June 29 after an Israeli strike on Monday.
AP Photo/Vahid Salemi
What Is Evin Prison?
Evin Prison holds many of the country's political detainees in Iran, housing dissidents, journalists, protesters, and foreign nationals accused of espionage. The prison is one of the apparatuses of the Iranian regime's domestic security apparatus.
Human rights organizations have long documented abuse, torture and arbitrary detention inside Evin Prison. Notable former detainees include Narges Mohammadi, a human rights activist and a Nobel Peace Laureate, and Jason Rezaian, a Washington Post journalist who was held there for 544 days on espionage charges while serving as the paper's Tehran bureau chief a decade ago.
What People Are Saying
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar posted alleged footage of the bombing after the attack, writing on X, formerly Twitter: "We warned Iran time and again: stop targeting civilians! They continued, including this morning. Our response: Viva la libertad, c*****!"
Narges Mohammadi, a human rights activist and a Nobel Peace Laureate, said in a June 28 X post: "Israel's attack on Evin Prison, carried out in broad daylight in the presence of families and visitors, is undoubtedly a clear example of a war crime...Many families of the detained are unaware of the status or whereabouts of their loved ones. Prisoners from the general wards of Evin Prison have been transferred to prisons around Tehran and are being held in harsh, inhumane, and grueling conditions. Furthermore, no official information has been released regarding the status of prisoners previously held in security wards or solitary confinement."
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote in a Persian in an X post on Saturday: "From the bottom of my heart, I thank you dear people; With love, you bid farewell to the martyrs of our homeland, and our voice of unity reached the ears of the world. We have learned from Husayn ibn Ali (peace be upon him) not to submit to humiliation and not to bow our heads before oppression. Serving such a noble nation is the honor of my life. Forever Iran"
What Happens Next
The ceasefire between Israel and Iran remains fragile. Trump said the U.S. and Iran are due to hold new talks about the country's nuclear capabilities.
"We're going to talk to them next week, with Iran," Trump said at the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. "We may sign an agreement. I don't know."
On Saturday, Araghchi posted on X, "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
8 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Nations decry Iranian threat against IAEA general director
June 30 (UPI) -- Member nations of the International Atomic Energy Agency called out Iran Monday for threats made against Rafael Grossi, the organization's top official. "Any undermining, sanctioning or even threat against the director general personally or his staff are completely unacceptable," posted Austria's Chancellor Christian Stocker to X Monday. The French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs released a statement Monday that it "strongly condemns the threats against the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency." The French statement was further echoed by a joint press release from France, Germany and the United Kingdom that condemned "threats against the Director General of the IAEA Rafael Grossi." Iran's ambassador to the United Nations Amir Saeid Iravani spoke Sunday on the CBS News program "Face The Nation" and said that there was no threat made to Grossi, despite an article that ran last week in Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper that alleged Grossi to be a spy for Israel, and that "as soon as he enters Iran, he will be tried and executed for spying for Mossad and participating in the murder of the oppressed people of our country." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubiohad responded Saturday on X that "calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of IAEA Director General Grossi are unacceptable and should be condemned." Iravani however, when asked by CBS if he condemned calls for Grossi to be executed, replied "Yeah." He also explained that IAEA inspectors already in Iran are safe but are not being permitted to inspect nuclear sites there. "It is our assessment is that they have not done their jobs," Iravani said, and implied the IAEA "failed" in regard to the attacks made by Israel and United States on Iranian nuclear facilities. In the joint statement made by Britain, France and Germany, the countries called on "Iranian authorities to refrain from any steps to cease cooperation with the IAEA." "We urge Iran to immediately resume full cooperation in line with its legally binding obligations, and to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety and security of IAEA personnel," the statement continued. "The organization's work is now more important than ever and must urgently be continued," said Stocker in the same X post he made Monday. The IAEA had announced in a press release Friday that radiation levels in the Gulf region had remained normal following the attacks on Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant and the Tehran Research Reactor. Grossi explained in the release that the attacks "could have caused a radiological accident with potential consequences in Iran as well as beyond its borders." "It did not happen, and the worst nuclear safety scenario was thereby avoided," Grossi said., Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsmax host wants arrest of ‘vermin' CNN owners for ‘sedition' over Iran intel assessment story
Far-right provocateur Michael Savage said he would have the 'vermin' owners of CNN arrested for 'sedition,' claiming that the network 'undermined America in a time of war' because it reported on a preliminary intelligence assessment that indicated Iran's nuclear program was only set back months after 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' Savage, the longtime shock jock who now hosts a Sunday night show on MAGA network Newsmax, piggybacked on Donald Trump's indignation over CNN and other news outlets reporting on the early intel report during his latest broadcast. 'I also want to talk today about the bombing, the most successful bombing of — the most successful bombing mission in history, which was immediately debunked by the vermin at CNN, which to me is sedition,' Savage fumed on Sunday's telecast of Savage Nation. 'I looked up what sedition is.' In recent days, the president and many of his senior administration officials – most notably Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth – have raged over the Defense Intelligence Agency's report that contradicts Trump's claim that the bombing raid 'totally and completely obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities and 'destroyed' its ability to make a bomb. While Hegseth scolded the media for its reporting on the assessment in a fiery press conference intended for an audience of one, the president has ramped up his complaints against CNN – which broke the news about the early intel report. Besides demanding that the network fire reporter Natasha Bertrand, Trump has threatened to sue CNN and The New York Times over the organizations' reporting on the Iran bomb strike. Trump took it to a new level over the weekend, however, when he told MAGA-boosting Fox host Maria Bartiromo that he would seek to force journalists who reported on the leaked intelligence assessment to give up their sources. 'You go up and tell the reporter, 'national security, who gave it?'' Trump said, adding: 'You have to do that. And I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' Throughout the top of his Sunday evening broadcast, Savage repeatedly accused CNN of engaging in seditious activities and called for the ownership of the network – which is currently Warner Bros. Discovery, though the conglomerate will be splitting within the year – to be prosecuted. At the same time, Savage fawned over the airstrikes and continually described them as the 'most successful bombing campaign of our life,' even though the United Nations's nuclear watchdog and a recently intercepted call from Iranian officials have additionally undermined the president's boasts about ending the nation's nuclear program. 'If it was up to me and I was president, I'd rip them out by the hair and I'd arrest them for what they did,' Savage exclaimed, adding that he's 'studied what sedition is' and believes the cable network is guilty of it. 'I would arrest… the ownership of CNN for letting this go out on the air,' he continued. 'They've undermined America in a time of war against radical Islamic terrorists who would kill all of us.' Later in the program, Savage would also call the intelligence report a 'fake bomb damage assessment,' despite the fact that the Trump administration has confirmed its existence and has even said it is launching an FBI investigation to find who leaked the report. Additionally, Trump now plans to limit the sharing of classified information with Congress following reports on the intelligence assessment. 'We are declaring war on leakers,' a White House official told Axios. 'Sedition is what CNN does on a daily level,' Savage declared. 'Now, I believe in freedom of speech. I can be very, very provocative. Let's put it to you that way, but what is sedition? It's a word that has meaning.'After reading the definition of sedition from the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Savage claimed that anyone who says they are 'resisting' Trump is 'committing sedition' before once again alleging the network is guilty of that act. 'Sedition, my friends, is a very serious offense. It's distinct from treason, which involves actually betraying the government through acts of espionage,' he concluded. 'CNN is engaging in sedition by saying the bombing mission didn't work.' The Independent has reached out to Newsmax for comment on Savage's segment and whether the channel endorses or supports his views.
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court to Hear JD Vance Case
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a Republican-led challenge to a federal campaign finance law provision that limits how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates. The case, which centers on free speech claims, involves Vice President JD Vance, who was a U.S. Senate candidate in Ohio when the lawsuit was initiated. The justices took up an appeal from Vance and two Republican committees, contesting a lower court's decision that upheld the spending limits. The challengers argue the restrictions violate constitutional protections by capping party spending influenced by input from supported candidates. Vice President JD Vance speaks during the Ohio Republican Party dinner, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Lima, Ohio. Vice President JD Vance speaks during the Ohio Republican Party dinner, Tuesday, June 24, 2025, in Lima, Ohio. Associated Press The Supreme Court is set to hear the case during its next term, which begins in October. The Trump administration, under then-Republican President Donald Trump, filed a brief in support of JD Vance and the Republican committees. Vance, now serving as Trump's vice president, is a central figure in the case. The Justice Department also urged the Court to take up the matter and requested the appointment of an outside party to defend the lower court's ruling, given that the department no longer supports it. At the heart of the case is a constitutional question: Do federal limits on coordinated campaign spending between political parties and candidates violate the First Amendment's protection of free speech? The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, along with subsequent amendments, governs fundraising and spending in U.S. elections by imposing limits on how much individuals, organizations, and political parties can contribute to or spend on behalf of candidates. The law aims to curb corruption and undue influence in federal campaigns. Under this framework, political party spending that is made without coordination with a candidate's campaign—classified as an "independent expenditure"—is not subject to spending caps. In contrast, "coordinated expenditures", in which a party works in tandem with a candidate, are strictly limited. These limits vary by the population size of the state in which a candidate is running: lower in less populous states, and higher in more populous ones. According to court filings, the 2024 limits ranged from about $123,000 to $3.7 million for Senate races and approximately $62,000 to $123,000 for House contests. In a 2022 lawsuit, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, JD Vance, and former Ohio congressman Steve Chabot asked a court to block the Federal Election Commission (FEC) from enforcing these coordinated spending limits. The plaintiffs argued that the restrictions "severely restrict political party committees from doing what the First Amendment entitles them to do: fully associate with and advocate for their own candidates for federal office." In a 2024 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, based in Cincinnati, upheld the legality of the coordinated expenditure caps, finding them consistent with constitutional protections. The court cited precedent from a 2001 Supreme Court ruling in a similar case from Colorado, which had upheld the same kind of limitations. The 6th Circuit emphasized that it was bound to follow that Supreme Court precedent. When the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court, they urged the justices to reconsider the older precedent. They argued that "developments in campaign finance" and shifts in the Court's broader First Amendment jurisprudence had undermined the logic of the 2001 decision. At the time of the appeal's filing in December 2024, JD Vance was already serving as vice president-elect. On Monday, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs' request to review the case and also approved a motion from three Democratic groups—the Democratic National Committee, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee—to intervene in defense of the lower court's ruling. Marc Elias, attorney for the Democratic groups, told Reuters that the Republican Party has "spent decades trying to eliminate statutory limits on political party expenditures that are coordinated with candidates' campaigns." He added that the Democratic intervenors would offer "a vigorous and informed defense of the coordinated expenditure limits now under attack." This legal battle unfolds against the backdrop of the Supreme Court's influential 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision, which struck down limits on independent expenditures by corporations and outside groups, ruling such restrictions violated the First Amendment's free speech clause. While Citizens United opened the door to unlimited outside spending, the legality of coordinated expenditures between candidates and parties remains at the heart of this newly revived constitutional debate.
