Taoiseach 'surprised' by Fianna Fáil MEP's criticism of Eamon Ryan getting EU housing role
The MEP for Ireland South responded to the news that the former Green Party leader would be taking up the role of chairing the EU's housing advisory board last Tuesday.
Kelleher said he was 'deeply concerned' by Ryan's
appointment as the so-called EU housing tsar.
I'm deeply concerned with this appointment.
Mr Eamonn Ryan has given his life to public service, but I can't see where he has contributed to increased housing supply in his political life.
EU is in the midst of a housing crisis.
@DanJoergensen
https://t.co/l97W66Ba7w
— Billy Kelleher MEP (@BillyKelleherEU)
July 1, 2025
Advertisement
In a post on X, Kelleher continued: 'Mr Eamonn Ryan has given his life to public service, but I can't see where he has contributed to increased housing supply in his political life. EU is in the midst of a housing crisis.'
Speaking to reporters in Osaka today during his visit to Japan, Martin said he was 'surprised' by Kelleher's remarks and that he has 'great respect' for Ryan despite some disagreements in the past.
Ryan was minister for the transport and the environment in the last coalition government, during which Martin served as Tánaiste and Taoiseach.
Martin said he was 'glad for him, that he's been appointed' and wished him well.
'I think he wants to give something back, given the very considerable experience he has as a former minister, former party leader, and particularly a person who played a significant role in a number of COPs on climate.
'So I certainly wish him well. It's not concerning.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Elaine Loughlin: College fees could be the snag that will unravel an already fractious Coalition
The student fees budget row may be just the beginning of an unravelling of an ineffective Coalition. To unravel would suggest that Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have been working constructively together up until recent days, when the rift over third-level fees emerged. Not the case. With just a week and a half left until the Dáil rises for the summer, members accept that both parties — despite being in government together for the previous five years — have yet to fully settle in and bed down. This has been noted not just at senior level, but right the way down the ranks. Relationships between ministers and their junior counterparts are still very much in the 'building' phase. The departure of several long-serving political advisers at election time means the cogs that keep both sides informed in the background are not yet fully turning. One adviser, who has served for multiple ministers, noted that while there was always a healthy level of caution between those working for Fianna Fáil ministers and those serving Fine Gael politicians in the last coalition, both sides knew each other for a considerable period and could casually pick up the phone to one another. The Budget 2026 spat over college fees fully erupted when James Lawless took to the airwaves on RTÉ last Sunday and again on 'Drivetime' the following day. File picture: PA With a raft of new appointments, advisers have been getting to grips with their own departments and the workings of Government Buildings, cross-party co-operation is therefore down the list of priorities. Student fees exposed deeper issues While political spats nearly always have an element of the contrived about them, the student fees issue has brought up some deeper issues between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael, which were papered over in the last coalition. The Independents in government have taken up a largely 'silent partner' role this time around, and without the mudguard of the Green Party, an easy target in the last administration, the two Civil War parties no longer have a mutual enemy and are now eyeing each other with increasing distrust. Fine Gael members feel aggrieved, with one senator this week raising what has been perceived as Fianna Fáil's unfair treatment of Helen McEntee when she held the justice portfolio. On the other side of the fence, senior Fianna Fáil sources have pointed out that Fine Gael has been strongly 'marking' a number of Fianna Fáil-held portfolios, such as justice. One minister vented frustration around the level of lobbying and querying from Fine Gael advisers to department officials, suggesting that Simon Harris should be picking up the phone to the line minister instead of using sneaky backchannels. As the third-level row refused to settle down, Fianna Fáil members claim Harris has been overly fixated on his former department. 'He is not the minister anymore' 'He is not the minister any more,' one senior Fianna Fáil source said after the Tánaiste first briefed a private meeting of his party 10 days ago on the student fees issue. Referencing the fact that he brought down fees during his time as higher education minister, Harris outlined a number of budget priorities to the Fine Gael parliamentary party, including measures to reduce the cost of third-level education that would include student fees. Privately, it sparked almost immediate fury within the ranks of Fianna Fáil, with one senior member suggesting to the Irish Examiner that the Tánaiste was 'setting a trap' for the current higher education minister as previous cuts to student fees came out of a cost-of-living pot which will not be possible as part of this autumn's budget. 'It's him [James Lawless] that's the problem' The Budget 2026 spat fully erupted when James Lawless took to the airwaves last weekend, stating that student fees, which were reduced by €1,000 over the past three years, will return to €3,000 as the budget will not contain a cost-of-living package. 'The shite that he has landed us in over this,' one Fine Gael minister said of last Sunday's RTÉ radio interview and a further appearance on Drivetime the following day. 'He rang into a radio station. I've never heard anything like it. It's him that's the problem, it was a non-issue before he went on radio.' In a voice note sent to Fine Gael politicians, Harris also took a direct swipe at Lawless, claiming that the programme for government clearly commits to reducing fees 'on a permanent basis'. Fianna Fáil countered by stressing that a clause at the end of that sentence only promises to bring down fees in 'a financially sustainable manner'. Opposition make hay with Coalition tensions Members of the opposition have made hay on the Coalition tensions, pressing every minister who entered the Dáil chamber this week for a definite answer on fees, none of whom were able to provide absolute clarity. As the debate rumbled on, the Taoiseach was again questioned on the matter in Japan yesterday. Without referring to anyone by name, Mr Martin said: Certainly, I think people perhaps could have paused and reflected, maybe before hitting out, but that's politics. Opening up another budget fissure, Martin then moved to dismiss proposals for a two-tier system of welfare that would see those on unemployment benefits receive a lower increase than other social welfare recipients. It came just days after the Tánaiste said there is 'merit' in unemployment benefit not rising at the same rate as other social welfare payments, such as pensions. Having differences of opinion in any coalition is not necessarily a negative, nor does it signal an immediate election, as long as both sides can constructively work to find consensus. But this Coalition now finds itself in a particular space. It can allow the drift to continue with tit-for-tat counter-briefings and bitching which will eventually render it nonfunctional. Or both sides can consciously decide to end the sniping and make this Government work.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Book review: Fresh, relevant, and concise
The time it takes to write a book, and the gap between completing a book and it being published, makes tackling contemporary events tricky. This is particularly so in the turbulent rollercoaster that is world politics and conflict. But Professor Donnacha Ó Beacháin has risen to the task in his new book, Unfinished Empire: Russian Imperialism in Ukraine and the Near Abroad. It is not just a study of contemporary politics. It has the added heft of history: charting the rise of Russian imperialism since the 15th century, Russian interests during communism, the post-Soviet era, and Russia's resurgence under Vladimir Putin. The author's landscape extends from Finland to the Baltics, focusing, naturally, on Ukraine, then onto the South Caucasus and the 'Stans' — the five Central Asian countries. Ó Beacháin, a professor of politics in DCU, complements academic knowledge with extensive personal experience of the so-called Russian 'Near Abroad', having lived and worked for 12 years in the region, conducting research in every post-Soviet state. There are other reasons to commend his book: it is refreshingly short at 218 pages — just 163 pages of the core book and the remainder a chronology, references, primary sources, and bibliography; and it is written in plain English. People move properties from an office building destroyed by a Russian strike in Kyiv, Ukraine, last month. Picture: Evgeniy Maloletka/ AP Ó Beacháin's central concern is Russian imperialism and — similar to other empires — the damage it causes to those at the receiving end. He covers the expansion of what was a small country to a sprawling land empire — from the reigns of Ivan 'The Terrible', Peter I — who Putin is a fan of — to Catherine II (The Great). The reader learns of the grim fate for many indigenous peoples on the way, such as the Circassians. Ó Beacháin writes: 'As many as 1.5m Circassians lived in the Caucasus in 1860 of whom almost half are estimated to have perished as a result of Russia's annihilationist campaign.' Under communism, state-induced famines claimed at least four million lives in Ukraine and a third of Kazakhstan's indigenous population. Two central chapters cover Putin's two wars in Ukraine — first, the annexation of Crimea and Donbas in 2014 and second, the full-scale invasion in 2022. Ó Beacháin authoritatively dispatches the various 'reasons' Putin cited for the invasion — denazification, demilitarisation/spread of Nato, and protection of ethnic Russians. Separate chapters follow on Belarus, Moldova, South Caucasus, and the Central Asian states. In his final chapter, Ó Beacháin sums up: Russia's war on Ukraine has a 'clear, genocidal intent'; Putin has created the 'very bogey' he most feared — a Russia-hating Ukraine bent on joining the EU and Nato and has pushed Finland and Sweden into joining Nato. The author is critical of the EU and the US under Biden in the level and speed of their military help to Ukraine, stating the 'war could have ended quickly' if Ukraine got what they asked for at the time. Ó Beacháin knows that Trump II is the unknown factor — a US President who sees Ukraine as a 'pawn in a much larger game' and how this has 'emboldened Putin'. The author is clear what has to happen: Europe needs a sustainable peace; accountability for war crimes is essential and, more fundamentally, 'Russian defeat is necessary'. Perhaps because of space reasons, he does not set out exactly how this might happen or what the risks of implementing this might be. But Ó Beacháin finds hope in the ultimate concern of Putin — to stay in power and how this matters more than success in Ukraine. Ó Beacháin believes that if Putin sees that continuing the war will weaken his reign, the faster the war will end. Read More Book review: Warnings on Putin ignored at our peril
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
'Lord of the Dance' Michael Flatley may run for Áras an Uachtaráin
Lord of the Dance star Michael Flatley is considering running for president, it has emerged. Informed sources have indicated that the dancer and businessman is prepared to throw his hat into the ring and is seriously considering a race for the Áras. The Riverdance star, who has spoken about his cancer battle and who is now in remission, lives in Monaco. He also has a mansion, Castlehyde, near Fermoy in North Cork. Mr Flatley, who was among the invited guests at the White House in March when the Taoiseach handed over a bowl of shamrock to US president Donald Trump, is expected to make a final decision on whether to declare his interest in running in the coming weeks. US ambassador to Ireland Edward S Walsh with Michael Flatley at the July 4 celebrations at the ambassador's residence in the Phoenix Park, Dublin. Picture: Brian Lawless/PA He was also in attendance at the US embassy in Dublin for the annual Fourth of July celebrations on Thursday where he entertained over 2,500 guests with a tune on the flute. It is not clear whether the dancer will run as an independent candidate or if he is to be nominated by a political party. However, senior sources within Fianna Fáil last night laughed off any suggestion that the dancer might be on the party ticket. Parties consider possible candidates It is expected that it could be as late as September before Micheál Martin publicly announces his party's candidate, with former ministers Peter Power and Mary Hanafin being rumoured, along with MEP Cynthia Ní Mhurchú. "We are assessing it at the minute, we are not going to make any decision until late summer," a party spokesperson said. Only last year on radio during an interview, Mr Flatley said he was "flattered" when he was told that fans would love to see him in Áras an Uachtaráin. When he was pressed on the matter he declined to comment further. Fine Gael has yet to formally select its candidate. However, former EU Commissioner Mairéad McGuinness and MEP and former GAA president Sean Kelly are the frontrunners. Meanwhile, Sinn Féin has yet to decide if it will put forward its own party candidate or join other left-leaning parties and back a consensus candidate. The largely ceremonial role has a term of office of seven years with a maximum of 14 years. However, presidents such as Michael D Higgins, and former occupants Mary McAleese and Mary Robinson, have elevated the status of the role, frequently weighing in on matters of social justice and human rights, while also courting controversy at times for doing so.
