Warren wants answers from Social Security chief on phone wait times
In a letter sent Sunday evening to Bisignano, provided exclusively to The Hill, Warren followed up on her meeting with the SSA chief last Wednesday, when, the senator said, she secured a commitment from Bisignano 'that SSA would undergo a public audit by the Inspector General regarding your phone call wait time data reporting and that you would publish additional wait time data.'
A June survey from Warren's staff found that wait times averaged nearly an hour and 45 minutes, with maximum wait times lasting longer than three hours, according to the senator.
'But the SSA is failing to provide policymakers and the public with accurate information about the extent of the problem, using convoluted calculations to obfuscate the real data, or withholding information entirely,' she wrote in her letter.
Warren said she has communicated with the inspector general about the audit and thanked the SSA chief for 'agreeing to a rigorous, independent, public audit.'
The senator did not specify when the audit would take place.
She asked Bisignano to provide data by Aug. 11, including on the total number of calls received; details about the calls taken by an artificial intelligence tool — including the percentage of calls dropped, transferred, or ended without resolving the issue; the same details about the calls taken by a human customer service representative.
Warren expressed similar concerns about the circumstances that, she said, led the SSA to send out 'an inaccurate and overtly partisan email to the millions of 'my Social Security' users that purportedly described the 'Big Beautiful Bill.''
'The email contained a number of falsehoods about the benefits of the bill, including an inaccurate statement that it 'eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security,'' Warren wrote in the letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war on Ukraine
A top aide to President Trump on Sunday accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, remarks that come days ahead of possible White House action to impose major sanctions on countries buying Russian oil. 'What he [Trump] said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia,' said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of Trump's most influential aides. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact,' Miller said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' Trump threatened last week a 25 percent tariff on India over its purchase of Russian oil, which is set to go into effect on August 7, a White House official told The Hill. A bipartisan bill in the Senate calls for a 500 percent tariff on India if Russia fails to halt its war against Ukraine, but sponsors of the bill said they would support Trump imposing one-fifth of that penalty. While some state-owned refineries reportedly paused Russian oil imports in the wake of Trump's threat, India's Foreign Ministry on Saturday signaled it was not going to accept conditions on which countries it sources energy from. 'We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time,' Shri Randhir Jaiswal, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, told reporters on Friday. 'As far as India-Russia relations are concerned, we have a steady and time-tested partnership.' India bought 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, but by June of that year, oil imports rose to 1.12 million barrels per day, the Associated Press reported. The daily imports peaked at 2.15 million in May 2023 and have varied since. The country began increasing its imports of Russian oil after an international price cap – imposed to punish Russia over its war in Ukraine – made it a more affordable option over imports of oil from the Middle East.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
As Trump Guts Climate Justice Work, Coastal Cities Are Pushing Back
This spring, as the federal government was busy canceling $1.7 billion in environmental justice grants, Seattle did the opposite. The city awarded $1.2 million through its Environmental Justice Fund to grassroots organizations confronting climate change on the frontlines — communities facing sea level rise, storm surge, and intensifying heat. The money, raised through a payroll tax on high-income employers, is flowing directly to communities of color, immigrants, the elderly, and low-income residents — people hit first and worst by climate impacts. It's not just Seattle. Across the country, cities are stepping up, even as federal support for climate resilience and environmental justice collapses. Since returning to office, President Donald Trump has wasted no time dismantling climate justice programs. His 'Day One' executive orders terminated all federal environmental justice offices and staff, scrapped the Justice40 initiative, and reopened large swaths of the U.S. coast to offshore drilling. His administration has revoked a decades-old executive order requiring agencies to prioritize environmental justice in their missions, taken key tools — like the Environmental Protection Agency's EJScreen — offline, and cut core funding programs, including disaster preparedness grants. And through the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Trump has gutted the Inflation Reduction Act's environmental and climate justice program — slashing billions once earmarked for clean air, clean water, and green jobs in overburdened communities. These rollbacks are not just performative political retribution. They are already threatening lives and livelihoods in communities across the country. This is especially true in coastal cities, home to more than 47 million people, where rising seas and stronger storms are colliding with long-standing patterns of inequality, nearly 60 percent of coastal city residents are people of color — compared to 37 percent nationally. These cities also have higher rates of poverty, unemployment, rent burden, and non-citizenship. That means when disaster strikes — whether from hurricanes in the Gulf or nor'easters in New York — the communities with the fewest resources to recover are often the ones hardest hit. In these cities, climate justice is more than a policy priority – it's a survival strategy. At Urban Ocean Lab, a think tank for the future of coastal cities, we spoke with local officials nationwide about how they're navigating this new reality. Our new report shares what we learned — and what's still possible. Despite a hostile federal landscape, cities are forging ahead. They're creating local funding streams, investing in community-led planning, and embedding justice into their governments and operational DNA. In Oakland, every strategy in the Equitable Climate Action Plan is evaluated for its racial equity impact. In Seattle, the Race and Social Justice Initiative — now law — requires all city departments to review budgets and programs through an equity lens. This is real institutional change. While the federal government wipes crucial data resources, cities recognize information is integral. In San Diego, the Climate Equity Index maps where environmental risks overlap with socioeconomic vulnerability, guiding city investments in stormwater upgrades, green space, and climate infrastructure. In New York City, the EJNYC Mapping Tool brings together over 100 datasets to highlight environmental burdens in places like the Rockaways and South Bronx — both low-lying areas with aging infrastructure and long histories of disinvestment. These tools help cities steer investments to the neighborhoods that need them most. As federal funding evaporates, many cities are strengthening ties with frontline organizations — the local experts who've been leading the fight for decades. In New Orleans, the Climate Action Equity Project brings community leaders from every city district to co-design resilience strategies, from flood protection to coastal restoration. In Providence, Rhode Island, the Green Justice Zones initiative puts neighborhood groups in charge of planning for flooding and extreme heat in the city's most vulnerable areas. And where national workforce programs are shrinking, cities are building their own pipelines of green jobs. Cleveland is equipping youth from frontline communities with skills to restore urban forests and protect neighborhoods from flooding and water pollution. In New Orleans, programs like Ground CREW and Thrive prepare BIPOC and low-income residents to lead neighborhood-scale stormwater and flood resilience projects. This is what climate justice looks like: tactical, community-rooted, and relentless. It's also what real leadership looks like — in sharp contrast to the political theater playing out in Washington. While Trump stages press conferences and bill signings to celebrate the dismantling of hard-won protections, local governments are doing the real work of protecting lives, preparing for future storms, and closing the equity gap. The stakes aren't theoretical. They're physical — crashing into coastal communities and people's lives. And they're growing more urgent every year. We don't need to wait for the Trump administration to get its act together. But we also can't let cities do this work alone. Philanthropy, state governments, and the private sector all have a role to play in sustaining and scaling the solutions already working at the local level. From backing climate justice funds to supporting green workforce programs, the time to invest is now. Because the fight for a just, climate-resilient future won't wait — and neither will the next disaster. Calla Rosenfeld is a climate policy analyst and research fellow at the nonprofit think tank Urban Ocean Lab. Her work focuses on coastal climate resilience. More from Rolling Stone Texas Democrats Flee State to Block Trump and Republicans' Gerrymandering Plan Trump Is Very Mad at Charlamagne Tha God for Talking About Epstein Campaign Promise Broken? Trump Has No Plans to Mandate IVF Coverage Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
If Trump and the GOP keep this up, AOC is going to be president
Say hello to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Say hello to a blue wave in the 2026 midterms. Say hello in 2028 to President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. If President Trump and congressional Republicans keep this up, it will only be the start of the progressive takeover. Left-wing populists are already winning over voters by raising hell about the rising price of clothes and groceries due to tariffs. The growing appetite for populist left voices damning the high cost of living made headlines earlier this year in the successful ' Fighting Oligarchy,' tour featuring Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Ocasio-Cortez. Poll numbers also make the case that voters are frustrated with Trump's failed promise to deal with inflation. The same angst is evident in declining c o nsumer confidence. And now Scott Bessent, Trump's Treasury secretary, is floating the idea of replacing Social Security with a thousand-dollar gift to American babies. Those 'Trump Savings Accounts' are included in the Republicans' newly passed tax-and-spending plan. Bessent is now suggesting that a one-time payment, far smaller than monthly outlays for current benefits, is all that is needed to replace Social Security. Bessent openly said the 'Trump Savings Accounts' for newborns is 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security' at an event sponsored by the conservative news outlet Breitbart. Bessent excitedly asked his audience to imagine that the thousand-dollar gift to an infant will grow until 'you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement — then that's a game changer too.' 'A stunning admission,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor. 'Bessent actually slipped and told the truth: Donald Trump and his government want to privatize Social Security.' Schumer identified Bessent's musings as a politically potent message for Democrats going into next year's midterms. Have congressional Republicans forgotten the political pain they suffered when President George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security in 2005? The party lost its majority in the following year's midterms, in part due to public outrage. Bessent's search for a way to end Social Security is a longstanding fixation among Republicans. They see the program as contrary to capitalism, a public welfare program sending the message that government has a role in preventing poverty. Former Republican Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) became a conservative hero for daring to talk about privatizing Social Security. When he ran for vice president on the GOP ticket in 2012, liberal groups famously responded with dramatic depictions in advertising of Republicans 'throwing grandma off a cliff.' Now, with the passage of Trump's budget reconciliation bill, which got congressional Republicans to buy into substantial cuts in Medicaid spending, the Treasury secretary feels free to again openly discuss an idea for eliminating Social Security. This comes at a time when the richest 10 percent of Americans own 90 percent of stock market wealth. 'Calling this a five-alarm fire is an understatement,' stated Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). 'Between Bessent's comments and the harm DOGE has already done to the [Social Security Agency], it's clear Trump was lying all along about protecting Social Security. Like every Republican administration going back multiple generations, Trump and his billionaire cabinet want to privatize Social Security to give their Wall Street buddies a payday.' Let's not forget: During the campaign, Trump pledged to bring down inflation and 'make America wealthy again.' But a recent Fox poll found that 56 percent of Americans gave a negative rating to their family finances, and 67 percent rated Trump's handling of the economy negatively. In the Trump Cabinet, Bessent has company in floating ideas for undermining Social Security. 'What do you think [about] paying no taxes on Social Security … fantastic!' exclaimed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick recently, with a bright, wide, television grin on Fox News Sunday. Just one problem, Mr. Secretary. The proposal for 'no taxes on Social Security' didn't make it into the final version of the Trump spending bill (it was turned into a temporary deduction for seniors). The truth revealed by his misleading comment is that the Commerce secretary — a billionaire, like the Treasury secretary — is preoccupied with ending Social Security. Earlier this year, Lutnick implied that Americans who complain about missing a Social Security check are likely fraudsters. 'If Social Security didn't send out their checks this month, my 94-year-old mother-in-law wouldn't complain,' he said. 'She'd think something got messed up and she'd get it next month. A fraudster always makes the loudest noise, screaming and yelling. Anybody who knows payments knows you stop the checks, and whoever screams is the one stealing.' That brutal disrespect for everyone who benefits from safety net protection against poverty is increasingly being heard in public. Earlier this year, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) dismissed a constituent who expressed fear about the tax bill's cuts to health care support provided by Medicaid with a flip comment, replying, 'Well, we all are going to die.' Ernst then doubled down on her callous indifference in a grotesque campaign video filmed in a cemetery, mocking the woman's concern. 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth,' Ernst said. 'So, I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.' Is it any wonder that figures like AOC and Zohran Mamdani are gaining traction?
