Mantashe takes swipe at countries threatening to impose higher import tariffs on trade partners
Mantashe's concerns about the impact of higher tariffs on miners come ahead of an expected 30% duty on South African products shipped to the US set to take effect at the end of the week.
READ: Mantashe punts critical minerals as a key driver for SA's economic development, job creation
Speaking at an engagement on the G20 critical minerals framework in Sandton on Tuesday, he called on captains of industry to find alternative markets for the country's critical minerals.
The US relies on South African metals and minerals that are essential for its economy and national security, making them the biggest South African exports to the US.
But for US President Donald Trump, doing business with the superpower means taking a hard stance - you're either with the US or you're against it.
During this year's instalment of the BRICS meeting in Brazil in June, Trump threatened BRICS allies with higher tariffs on goods into the US, above the universal baseline on all trading partners.
Mantashe said: "We must not be apologetic for initiatives that take us forward, we must never. If being a member of BRICS attracts tariffs from the US, it tells us that we must diversify our markets more and more aggressively and not focus on where tariffs are imposed on us."
Platinum group metals and chrome were on a list of exemptions before the US paused its previous tariff threats, but a levy on diamonds and other minerals raised concerns about lower export earnings for South Africa.
It's unclear at this stage what parameters will apply to the 1 August tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
36 minutes ago
- The Citizen
SA's electricity price is soaring: Why protests are often the only way for people to be heard
Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. Millions of unemployed South Africans, many of whom survive on a Social Relief of Distress Grant government grant of R370 (about US$21) per month, are not able to pay for electricity and still afford food and shelter. In the working class community of Thembisa in South Africa's industrial heartland of Gauteng, the local government recently tried to make all families pay a fixed monthly fee of R126 (US$7) for electricity. But the residents could not afford this and in late July, occupied roads and shut down the area. Within a day, the mayor scrapped the electricity fee. Luke Sinwell, a scholar of popular history and grassroots mobilisation in South Africa, explains how protests might just be the only way for working class South Africans to make their voices heard. Is electricity affordable in South Africa? No. Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. It is also crucial to view electricity prices in a socio-economic context. For example, the cost of electricity needs to be assessed relative to the disposable income of the household buying it. Low-income families spend up to twenty percent of their household income on energy, making electricity very unaffordable. ALSO READ: Thembisa protest raises risk of national unrest About half of all South African households (approximately 15 million people) don't have nearly enough food to eat. This means that the heads of impoverished or working class households (mostly women of Colour) are forced to decide between putting ideally nutritious food on the table and lighting their houses at night. They're forced to choose between using energy for heating to keep warm during winter or ensuring that their limited fresh food supplies stay cold so that they do not spoil. I'm part of a group of researchers who use the term energy racism to describe the systemic oppression that prevents Black working class people from accessing the electricity they need to survive and prosper. South Africans have been protesting for decades about high electricity prices. Why hasn't the problem been solved? There are weaknesses in South Africa's democratic process. Municipalities (local government) responses to the concerns and demands of communities tend to be shortsighted and inadequate. Currently, the major political parties in South Africa focus mainly on obtaining consensus at the polls through elections every five years. The South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, is overseeing a 'National Dialogue' which he claims will allow the voices of ordinary people to be heard in the corridors of power. It's been designed to appear as an inclusive and democratic process. However, based on my previous research, I believe that hidden beneath the surface, government has largely already decided the agenda and a set of policies that the dialogue will recommend. The South African government is continuing to rely on market-oriented, neoliberal policies which serve profit at the expense of the working class. READ MORE: Experts warn of unintended consequences of giving in to Thembisa demands This guarantees that electricity prices will remain extremely high. It also means that the government will continue to lack interest in proactively engaging those very communities about the cost of electricity. It is useful to remember what happened in September 2011 in Thembisa. About 2 000 residents went to the streets to protest against electricity cuts. Schools were closed, at least 100 residents arrested for public violence, and rubber bullets fired at protestors by police. When the residents of Thembisa shut down their area again recently, the mayor, undoubtedly aware of this history, wanted to avoid a similar situation. This gave residents an advantage – they were aware that protests would jolt the authorities into a favourable response. This means that when local government does not take the initiative to discuss important matters like the price of electricity with residents, communities will inevitably create their own formations through which to mobilise and influence local politics and beyond. How effective are protests against high prices of basic services? Protests are often an immediate response to desperate communities faced with an acute economic crisis. The recent protest in Thembisa is also part of a broader trend of protests and collective action around the lack of electricity in townships and informal settlements in other parts of Gauteng. For example, my research over six years in the informal settlement of Thembelihle in the south west of Johannesburg, found that people burned to death in their shacks because local government had failed to provide electricity. Residents had no alternative but to rely on imbawula (a homemade brazier). This was coal and wood in an oven or tin connected to a makeshift pipe to let smoke out. Many shacks caught fire as a result. They negotiated with authorities for more than 10 years. READ MORE: Traffic delays after residents shut down Thembisa over electricity tariff hike [VIDEO] Still, Thembelihle residents had no effective way to access the levers of decision-making authority which could electrify their homes. So they accessed power on their own terms, forcing authorities to the negotiating table using protest. Following a three-week occupation in 2015, the government conceded to the basic demands to formally electrify a relatively small piece of land where they lived. A sizeable amount of R323 million would electrify 7000 homes. The politics of a community struggle which had once been criminalised and excluded from the halls of power was now enshrined in policy. What does the recent Thembisa electricity price protest tell us? It demonstrates that the most effective way for people to get the government to implement pro-poor decisions is not by voting or attending national dialogues hosted by presidents and parliamentarians. It is by organising in communities and engaging in mass actions which force those in power to concede to the people's demands. The recent protest also tells us that impoverished and working class residents cannot and should not be forced to pay more than they can afford for basic services. READ MORE: Land invaders erecting shacks dispersed with rubber bullets and stun grenades near Makhanda The municipality held Integrated Development Plan and budget meetings with residents a few months before the protests where they revealed the new electricity prices. But these meetings did not seem to acknowledge that the people of Thembisa could not afford to pay. The mayoral decision to suspend the new electricity charges in Thembisa demonstrates that when basic services fail communities, protests work. They also just might be the only reliable means by which ordinary people can access the levers of government policy. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
A call to action: Portfolio committee can address accountability in South African football
One of the primary challenges facing the game lies within the South African Football Association (SAFA), which has been notably reluctant to take responsibility for the ongoing turmoil. This lack of accountability has not only stalled reform initiatives but has also contributed to a climate of distrust among stakeholders, particularly the corporate sector. The Portfolio Committee on Sport, Arts and Culture holds a critical key to unlocking the transformation needed in this beloved sport, provided its members engage thoroughly with the issues at hand and make informed decisions. While the potential for greatness exists within the country's talent and passionate supporters, deep-seated issues continue to hinder progress. As the appointed overseers of the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture, they are tasked with holding vital discussions on budget allocations, policy scrutiny, and performance evaluations, aiming to ensure that the department meets its mandate effectively and is held accountable for its actions. The Portfolio Committee on Sport, Arts and Culture can play a crucial role in revitalising South African football, and it must not be overlooked. To effect meaningful change, members of the Portfolio Committee must undertake diligent research on the myriad of issues plaguing South African football. They have the opportunity to engage with stakeholders from various levels to create a holistic understanding of the problems faced by the sport. This comprehensive engagement is vital; informed commentary and relevant questions can guide discussions in a direction that fosters responsibility and improvement. Their engagement must not merely scratch the surface. There is an urgent need to dissect the intricacies of governance structures within SAFA, demand transparency in operations, and call for a strategy that reinvigorates the passion of South African fans. Engagement must extend into addressing youth development, grassroots initiatives, and infrastructural support – elements that will secure the future of football in South Africa. Significantly, it's the corporate world's participation that could rejuvenate the sport financially and operationally. However, sponsors and investors are unlikely to commit funds so long as there is a perception of inefficiency and a lack of accountability within SAFA. A revitalised football association, one that embraces reform and responsibility, would pave the way for constructive partnerships that could elevate South African football to new heights. The Portfolio Committee can play a transformative role, provided it approaches its mandate with the seriousness and diligence it deserves. A recent parliamentary session raised a host of concerns surrounding SAFA's choices and salaries in coaching appointments across national teams. The South African Football Association (SAFA) finds itself navigating turbulent waters, facing heightened scrutiny over its financial constraints and coaching appointments amid a recent parliamentary session. Issues surrounding operational efficacy and personnel decisions are at the forefront of discussions, particularly concerning coaching roles across national teams. On several occasions, SAFA proudly announced that all coaching positions for the national female teams have been filled exclusively by South African women. SAFA President Danny Jordaan said parliament was highly pleased by this, asserting that the decisions reflect a commitment to empowering local talent. It would seem that the committee was rubber-stamping SAFA's act of prioritising nationality over coaching pedigree, and that undermined the potential for optimal performance. The coaches of female national teams are there firstly because they are women. This focus on gender may undermine teams' competitive edge. As SAFA continues to address its financial pressures, the path forward will undoubtedly require vigilance and a fine-tuned strategy that prioritises both inclusivity and high standards of coaching capability. The committee members should have asked whether these appointments are truly merit-based. Proponents of meritocracy contend that an ideal coaching situation requires a careful balance of nationality and qualifications to ensure optimal performance on the international stage. The fear among various stakeholders is that female coaches are being appointed primarily for their gender rather than their coaching acumen.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
AGENCY quietly increases 2025 SASSA asset and means limits
2025 SASSA asset and means limits all depend on the grant you're applying for. The agency's 'core' grants, like Older Person, Disability and War Veterans tend to be the highest. While other social welfares, like Childcare and SRD, only have a means test and no asset portion. Interestingly, an increase to nearly all 2025 SASSA asset and means limits this year has gone by largely undetected. This new eligibility criteria came into being back in April 2025, at the same time above-inflation increases were initiated for 'core' SASSA grants. It's now that bit harder to qualify for a SASSA grant in South Africa. Image: File Nevertheless, what are the South African Social Security Agency's new 2025 SASSA asset and means limits? Below, we will list all the eligibility requirements at the beginning of the year versus what they are today, starting with Old-Age Grants in August 2025: GRANT INCOME BEFORE INCOME NOW Older Person, Disability and War Veterans R101 640 (single) R107 800 (single) R203 380 (married) R215 760 (married) Child Support R63 600 (single) R67 200 (single) R127 200 (married) R134 300 (married) Child Care Dependency (Disability for u/18s) R261 800 (household) R277 200 (household) Social Relief of Distress (SRD) R624 unchanged *figures are annually, so divide by 12 for a per-month figure * figures represent a 17% increase, which is way above inflation in 2024/2025 A new fourth payment date (typically the first Friday of the month) means those under grant review don't have to wait too long for payment. Image: File Since May 2025, the agency has been tightening its income verification processes. As The South African reported previously, SASSA now cross-references your income with several third-party sources. So, even if you've been getting away with extra income before, you should be careful if you don't declare so to the agency now. If you are one of the quarter of a million SASSA grant recipients who has had their monthly stipend halted, this is how you can rectify the situation: Report in-person to your nearest SASSA branch. Bring along a recent bank statement. Valid work payslip. Copy your ID (plus your child's ID if applicable). Supply your proof of residence (no older than three months). If you have indeed overstepped the 2025 SASSA asset and means limits, you will have three options open to you. You may either pay the money back in full, arrange a debit order that goes off each month from your bank account. Or the agency can setup a payment system for you. However, this will accrue interest and end up costing you more in the long run. Graphic: SASSA Older Person – Tuesday 5 August 2025 Disability & War Veterans – Wednesday 6 August 2025 Childcare – Thursday 8 August 2025 Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
