
The Ethical Crossroads Of AI: A Call For Human-Centered Solutions
The public relations industry stands at a crossroads. The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence and digital platforms has transformed how we communicate; however, as someone who has dedicated my career to bridging gaps and creating opportunities, especially for underrepresented communities, I see both the promise and the challenges that these changes present.
The Problem: Ethics In The Age Of AI And Digital PR
Public relations professionals are increasingly turning to AI for a range of tasks, from tracking media coverage to creating content. It boosts efficiency, but it also opens the door to serious ethical issues. If we're not careful, these tools can reinforce bias, spread false information or invade privacy. And in today's digital world, even a small mistake—intentional or not—can quickly spiral out of control and damage trust.
Influencer Marketing Hub's 2025 benchmark report estimates that global influencer marketing spending will total $266.92 billion by the end of 2025, highlighting the sector's substantial expansion and also bringing distinct ethical challenges in today's digital landscape.
For instance, imagine a brand launching a digital campaign with popular influencers to promote a new product. The influencers enthusiastically share content that unintentionally offends specific communities, triggering a social media uproar that overshadows the campaign's original message. Even well-intentioned influencer campaigns can go wrong without careful planning and ethical consideration.
I suggest company leaders thoroughly evaluate an influencer's audience, engagement quality, authenticity and past reputation. Ensure clear transparency and that the influencers align with your brand's values and campaign goals.
The Misinformation Dilemma
Imagine a PR team using AI to draft press releases and social media posts. If the AI draws from biased or inaccurate data, it may inadvertently disseminate misinformation.
Today, even minor missteps—whether accidental or intentional—can rapidly escalate, leading to public crises that damage reputations and erode the trust organizations have worked hard to build. These kinds of errors create short-term problems, and they can undo years of relationship-building and push away the audiences we aim to serve.
Solutions: Building An Ethical, Inclusive PR Future
How do we address these challenges? I think the answer lies in a renewed commitment to ethics, transparency and human connection—values I have championed throughout my work supporting underrepresented students and building community networks.
Always disclose when AI tools are used in content creation or communication strategies. Transparency builds trust and helps manage client expectations. For example, if generative AI tools assist in drafting press releases or social media content, a simple note at the bottom, such as "This content was developed with the assistance of AI tools and reviewed by our communications team," can go a long way.
PR leaders can also include a disclosure or policy statement on their website outlining how AI is used in their communications process. This could be placed in the About or Our Approach section to proactively address any concerns. The key is to be upfront and clear. Leveraging AI as a skillset means using it ethically to enhance strategy, streamline work and make informed decisions.
Regularly train PR teams on emerging technologies and ethical best practices. For instance, in our organization, we've updated our internal ethics training to address emerging concerns. This includes guidance on disclosing AI-generated content, clearly labeling paid and sponsored posts and ensuring teams understand how to communicate data usage practices transparently in campaigns.
Ensure that human professionals review AI-generated content for accuracy, fairness and cultural sensitivity. You can help do this by building diverse teams that represent a diverse range of perspectives and can thus better catch blind spots.
In the PR field, this approach involves using AI tools to screen and analyze data efficiently, such as media mentions, sentiment or influencer metrics, while ensuring that final judgments incorporate human insight to capture nuances that machines might miss, like misleading content.
Through balancing automation with thoughtful, human-centered review, executives can maintain integrity and make well-rounded decisions that protect brand reputation and encourage authentic engagement.
Create networks where professionals can share experiences, mentor newcomers and model ethical behavior. The PR industry should foster communities that support ethical growth and accountability.
Creating networks where professionals can share experiences, mentor newcomers, and model ethical behavior is essential to strengthening the PR industry's integrity. In my own work, I actively participate in professional associations, where I both seek and offer mentorship. For example, I've helped organize informal meetups focused on navigating ethical dilemmas in media relations and digital engagement.
One lesson I've learned: Ethical behavior isn't just about following rules—it's about modeling transparency, asking tough questions and being willing to admit when we don't have all the answers. That openness builds trust within teams and with the clients we serve.
Stay informed about new technologies, their capabilities and their risks. Foster curiosity and adaptability, acknowledging that ethical challenges will continually evolve.
More than that, promote a mindset of curiosity and experimentation—one that welcomes iteration, questions assumptions and adapts to new challenges. Ethical dilemmas won't arrive with clear labels; they'll evolve alongside the tools we use. Like how CEOs can steer their teams toward AI maturity, communicators must constantly refine their understanding and strategies to ensure that innovation is matched with responsibility.
Opening Doors, Building Trust
As I have learned from years of building communications campaigns and platforms with my team, the solution to complex challenges is rarely technological alone—it is human. We must open doors for one another, create role models and hold ourselves accountable to the highest ethical standards.
In public relations, trust is our most valuable asset. The future of AI depends on our willingness to lead with integrity, empathy and a commitment to doing what's right.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.


Fast Company
42 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How leaders can be transparent about their belief systems without alienating anyone
Not long ago, leaders largely steered clear of the rough-and-tumble of politics. They inhabited a culture of impartiality, and for the most part stayed in their lane, rising now and then when called upon to offer observations about their specific sectors. Those times are over. We now live in an era of CEO activism, where shareholders, employees, and consumers expect corporate leaders to take a stand on issues far beyond their core industry—issues like immigration, DEI, or gender rights. Whereas before, hardly anyone outside of their industry could pick a chief executives out of a lineup, today's business leaders from Howard Schultz to Bill Gates to Elon Musk are household names, with the ability to influence public discourse—and policy—with a single tweet. For a business, there are distinct advantages to taking a political stand. At the same time, there is a fine line between brand enhancement and brand destruction. In this climate, how can a leader be transparent about her or his belief system without alienating anyone? Rewards and Risks First, it's hard, if not impossible, to reveal your belief system without alienating someone. It's almost a given: audiences and stakeholders these days may demand a political stand, but they can also be thin-skinned and easily offended when they don't agree with that stand. For the leader, the key is to avoid alienating significant portions of the constituencies and stakeholders responsible for the company's ultimate success: shareholders, employees, and consumers. When it comes to affiliating openly with a political figure or party, there can be advantages, such as privileged access and perhaps the ability to favorably influence policy direction. That said, there are also risks. Some of them are obvious: political fortunes are volatile, and public opinion is fickle, both of which can spell trouble for an aligned business. Political leaders have many priorities, and can shift their own positions on a dime, leaving a company that has publicly pledged allegiance with a case of whiplash. They are also prone to scandal, leaving aligned brands exposed to public outrage. Moreover, while there are certainly dangers in speaking out, silence can also have negative consequences in the public eye. It's important to realize that political parties, personalities, even movements come and go. Leaders are in this for the long haul; they should want their company to prosper for more than one election cycle. Recent events demonstrate the power of public opinion. The Trump administration's executive orders against diversity and inclusion initiatives split the business communities. Target rushed to align with the new directives, but Costco remained true to its own DEI stance. As a result, consumers punished Target and rewarded Costco. Staying true to the core Remember that politicians are paid to be politicians. Executives are not. Leaders are paid to ensure a company grows and prospers far into the future. That might mean rubbing elbows with those in power, or even contributing to campaigns, but it does not have to mean selling the soul of your identity, i.e. politicizing the brand or dragging a company's image (along with you) for the sake of a small short-term advantage. Reputations are hard to rebuild, and customers, once lost, are hard to reclaim. While a leader's personal beliefs may inform actions both private and professional, there are a few basic principles that can act as guardrails, providing the freedom to be transparent while preventing the leader's viewpoints and actions from creating conflicts and harming the company's fortunes. 1. Focus on values, not politics Nobody expects an executive and a workforce of thousands to agree on every issue. But a leader can set the tone by emphasizing core organizational values rather than personal political opinions. Companies are strongest when they articulate and consistently adhere to a clear set of values—regardless of shifting political winds. 2. Tie beliefs to business mission As a leader, you are a steward of your company's mission—not a political spokesperson. If your personal convictions align with your business's purpose, express them in a way that supports that mission. If they don't, reflect on whether your current role aligns with your values. A CEO thrives when personal belief and business purpose reinforce one another. 3. Build credibility through consistency While political trends are fickle, brand trust is built over time. Consumers reward companies that consistently uphold their stated commitments—whether to sustainability, product quality, or inclusion. Consistency is credibility. 4. Respect dissent, invite dialogue Foster a culture where respectful disagreement is welcome. Employees should feel safe expressing differing opinions without fear of retaliation. Provide spaces—forums, listening sessions, anonymous feedback tools—for difficult conversations to happen constructively. Diversity of thought is a strength, not a liability. 5. Be strategic If you choose to speak out, do so with intention. Consult your communications team, evaluate stakeholder impact, and conduct a risk-benefit analysis. As Harvard Business Review contributors Aaron Chatterji and Michael W. Toffel advise: 'Select issues carefully, reflect on the best times and approaches to get involved, consider the potential for backlash, and measure results.' Who's doing it right? A number of well-known CEOs have made a point of voicing their beliefs, and have not suffered for it. On the contrary, they have developed a leadership style that manages to be both values-informed and advantageous from a business standpoint. 1. Satya Nadella (Microsoft). Nadella openly discusses empathy and his Hindu faith, speaking often of caring for his son with special needs. He is upfront about his personal values of humility and purpose, but does not impose these upon the firm directly, emphasizing instead organizational culture and customer impact. Under his watch, Microsoft has quadrupled its market capitalization. 2. Dan Schulman (former CEO, PayPal). Schulman has been vocal in support of social justice and economic inclusion, which he links to his personal Jewish ethical values. PayPal pulled out of North Carolina to protest anti-LGBTQ legislation, a move that was criticized by the right but rewarded by stakeholders, with shareholder returns remaining strong. 3. Rose Marcario (former CEO, Patagonia). Markario's Buddhist beliefs and environmental ethics were strongly aligned with Patagonia's corporate mission. So when the company sued the Trump administration over its intention to dismantle and sell off national monuments, it mobilized the company's core outdoor audience and strengthened the brand, with increases in both consumer loyalty and profits. 4. Ken Frazier (former CEO, Merck). In 2017, Frazier resigned from President Trump's American Manufacturing Council following the administration's tepid response to the white supremacist marches and ensuing violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. Frazier's action was seen as deeply principled, and Merck's shareholder value was not damaged. Other CEOs (UnderArmour, Intel, et al) followed suit, in part because Frazier's action created a public demand for moral leadership. Finding balance In the end, leaders must balance their own need to reveal their personal beliefs with the greater good of the organization. This is both an internal and external journey that requires a high degree of reflection as well as an appreciation for the complexity of the company and its role in both the market and society. It's an extremely challenging time to be a leader, but also an exciting one.


Bloomberg
43 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Landing a $35 Billion Tech Deal in the Middle of Trade Turbulence
By Welcome to CFO Briefing, a newsletter devoted to corporate finance and what leaders need to know. This week, I speak to Synopsys CFO Shelagh Glaser about how the software provider navigated the drawn-out approval process for its $35 billion acquisition of Ansys. I also connect with the finance chief of Colombia's biggest bank. But first, here's some other news that caught my eye: