Russian forces claim first foothold in new Ukraine region
The Russian defence ministry said its forces captured the village of Dachne in the Dnipropetrovsk region, an important industrial mining territory that has also come under mounting Russian air attacks.
Russian forces appear to have made crossing the border a key strategic objective over recent months, and deeper advances into the region could pose logistics and economic problems for Kyiv.
Kyiv has so far denied any Russian foothold in Dnipropetrovsk.
Moscow first said last month its forces had crossed the border, more than three years since launching its invasion and pushing through the neighbouring Donetsk region.
Earlier Monday, Ukraine's army said its forces "repelled" attacks in Dnipropetrovsk, including "in the vicinity" of Dachne.
Dnipropetrovsk is not one of the five Ukrainian regions -- Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Crimea -- that Moscow has publicly claimed as Russian territory.
Sheltering in basements
Russia used its main city of Dnipro as a testing ground for its "experimental" Oreshnik missile in late 2024, claiming to have struck an aeronautics production facility.
An AFP reporter in the eastern city of Kharkiv saw civilians with their belongings being evacuated from a residential building damaged during Russia's overnight attacks, and others sheltering with pets in a basement.
At least four people were killed and dozens wounded across Ukraine, mostly in the Kharkiv region bordering Russia and in a late-morning attack on the industrial city of Zaphorizhzhia.
"Air defence remains the top priority for protecting lives," President Volodymyr Zelensky said on social media after the attacks, as fears mount over the continuing deliveries of US military aid.
Zelensky said Ukraine was "strongly counting on our partners to fully deliver on what we have agreed".
The air force said Moscow had launched 101 drones across the country and four missiles. Seventy-five of the drones were downed, it added.
Attacks on Monday targeted two recruitment centres in separate cities wounding four people, the Ukrainian army said, in what appears to be a new trend following similar strikes over the weekend and last week.
"These strikes are part of a comprehensive enemy operation aimed at disrupting mobilisation in Ukraine," Ukraine's Centre for Strategic Communications, a government-funded body, wrote on social media.
It added that Russia had attacked recruitment centres last week in the cities of Kremenchuk, Kryvyi Rig, and Poltava.
In Russia, the defence ministry said that it had shot down 91 Ukrainian drones overnight, including eight in the Moscow region, with the majority of the rest in regions bordering Ukraine.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Ukraine's wartime reshuffle: what we know
Here are the main points to know about the shake up, which comes as ceasefire talks with Russia stall and with the White House vowing to keep backing Kyiv. PM with US ties Ukraine's new prime minister will be Yulia Svyrydenko, an economy minister known for finalising a natural resources deal with the United States that nearly derailed ties between the countries. "She was the key and the only person leading these negotiations. She managed to prevent them from unravelling," said Tymofiy Mylovanov, a former economy minister who worked with Svyrydenko. She won the respect of US partners including senior US political leadership, analysts have said. "Trump and his administration are now a priority for Ukraine. Svyrydenko has proven herself there and will continue to do so," said political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko. Svyrydenko, 39, has earned the trust of Ukraine's business community for her handling of the country's wartime economy, President of the American Chamber of Commerce Andy Hunder said. "We've had a transparent, trust-based and collaborative relationship," Hunder said. New US ambassador Zelensky has indicated that Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, who had taken part in negotiations with Russia, will be the next US ambassador. "Ukraine needs more positive dynamics in relations with the United States and at the same time new steps in managing the defence sector of our state," Zelensky told Umerov in a meeting last week. Trump has criticised the last administration's decision to send billions of dollars in aid to Ukraine, but has authorised NATO members to make arms purchases on Kyiv's behalf. Umerov's appointment "means only one thing. The key issue in bilateral relations between the US and Ukraine right now is weapons", Fesenko said. "Arms supplies are the number one issue. The second issue is negotiations to end the war. Umerov has been involved in both," he added. Outgoing prime minister, an unassuming technocrat, Denys Shmygal, will take over the defence ministry brief, Zelensky has said. More control? Zelensky's rivals have long accused him of seeking to consolidate power and some critical media say Svyrydenko's appointment marked the latest step in this trend. She is seen as loyal to Andriy Yermak, the powerful head of the Zelensky's office. Ukrainska Pravda, a respected independent media outlet, published a report describing the moves as "the strengthening of the head of the presidential office -- although it's hard to see how that's possible." "It's obvious that the Presidential office's influence will increase," opposition lawmaker Mykola Kniazhytskyi told AFP. "The authorities are pursuing further centralisation and refusing any dialogue," he added. What now? Svyrydenko has set her priorities as prime minister as strengthening the economy, scaling up arms production, and expanding support programs. Fesenko said Shmygal's appointment as defence minister would likely see him "bring some order" to the ministry, which has previously been plagued by corruption scandals. Lawmakers voted on Wednesday to officially dismiss the government and were set to approve new ministers the following day.
France 24
20 hours ago
- France 24
What we know about mysterious explosions on ships visiting Russian ports
The Eco Wizard tanker was hit by two explosions just ten minutes apart on July 6, according to shipping publication Lloyd's List. The vessel was docked at Russia's Ust-Luga port on the Baltic Sea. Russia's transport ministry stated on Telegram that there had been an "incident during loading and unloading operations" on the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tanker, leading to a "minor ammonia leak". "The 23-person crew has been evacuated (...). There are no casualties," the ministry also specified. Following the incident, regional governor Alexander Drozdenko wrote on Telegram that the leak posed no threat to health or the environment. While many questions remain unanswered, this incident raises concerns, particularly in light of recent similar incidents. Seventh incident in seven months Experts are pointing to similarities with explosions that have hit five tankers since the beginning of 2025. Just two weeks before the incident involving the Eco Wizard, the crude oil tanker Vilamoura, also under Greek management, suffered an explosion. It was carrying one million barrels of crude oil off the coast of Libya and had to be towed to southern Greece. In the winter of 2025, four additional tankers had been targets of explosions, with three of those incidents occurring in the Mediterranean Sea. The crude oil tanker Seacharm was damaged in mid-January while in the vicinity of Turkey's Ceyhan port; the Grace Ferrum was impacted off Libya in early February; and the Seajewel was hit in Italy's Savona port on February 15. The port of Ust-Luga had previously experienced another incident on February 9, involving the tanker Koala. These incidents came after the Ursa Major, a cargo ship owned by a company affiliated with the Russian Ministry of Defence, sank in the Mediterranean following several explosions in late December 2024. Calls at Russian ports Establishing a definitive link between these incidents remains challenging. But industry analysts consistently highlight a shared pattern: all the vessels involved had made regular port calls in Russia. Public maritime traffic data reveals that in the two months before their respective explosions, three of the six tankers involved had stopped at the port of Ust-Luga, while the other three had visited Novorossiysk, a Russian port on the Black Sea. 'The perpetrators were likely targeting shipping for having called Russian ports,' wrote British maritime security firm Ambrey in a threat circular published on March 7, 2025, after the first five incidents. 'It's difficult to speak about coincidence considering the nature of the attacks, the previous port calls, and the areas in which these explosions took place,' Tomas Alexa, a lead analyst at Ambrey, told the FRANCE 24 Observers team. He stressed that such incidents were "highly uncommon" in the region until recent months. Martin Kelly, head of consulting services for British security agency EOS Risk, echoes this sentiment, arguing that not only the shared port calls but also the type of incidents and damage point to these not being isolated events. Most vessels suffered multiple explosions close to their engine rooms and machinery. Limpet mines? The exact cause of the explosions remains unclear, but mounting evidence suggests that external factors, rather than any ship malfunction, are to blame. For instance, TMS Tankers, which manages the Vilamoura, told TradeWinds that an "explosive device' was used in the tanker attack. Experts believe these vessels may have been victims of naval mines. 'No naval mines have been recovered [...] but the damage and the timing of multiple concurrent explosions are highly suggestive of these weapons,' Ambrey wrote in March. The maritime security firm said it had reviewed hull inspection footage that provided 'clear evidence' of naval mines. 'The footage revealed large breaches in the hull plating, with the metal deformed inward and clear shearing along the lap joints, indicative of high-intensity external explosions,' it wrote. Attention is focused on a particular kind of naval mine: limpet mines. Dryad Global, a maritime security firm, reported that a 'clear pattern' was emerging, in which 'vessels recently calling at Russian ports are being struck by suspected limpet mines'. Dean Mikkelsen, an independent maritime analyst, told our team: 'Limpets are a type of mollusk. This sea creature attached itself to something. So essentially, a limpet mine is a disk that attaches itself to the hull of the ship and has to be manually put there by someone. Then, that limpet mine has either a time or remote detonation that causes it to explode. They're generally fixed below the water line, most often near the engine room, where it can cause more damage. They can cause precise damage to a specific vessel, by being detonated remotely and anticipating the position of the ship at a given time.' How could these mines have been laid? Ambrey states in its circular, 'it [is] highly unlikely that naval mines would be placed whilst the vessel was alongside in port given the risks involved, but there are opportunities en route to/from ports where vessels have slowed down sufficiently for divers to attach limpets.' Alexa from Ambrey explained: "We believe that there is more than one team conducting these [explosions]. There might be teams operating in the Mediterranean, Aegean, Black Sea, and Baltic Sea. Therefore, there might be disparity and variety in the type of explosives they use. But we believe that the threat actor is acting as a unified force in different areas." State actor Who could be behind these explosions? 'It is highly likely that a state actor has deliberately targeted' the tankers, Ambrey assessed. Alexa told our team: "We believe it is a state actor because of the sophistication of the operation, the type of explosives likely used, and the overall geographical span of these events. These limpet mines have to be attached by a diver, most likely in low visibility or at night. You have to be specially trained to be able to deliver explosive payloads and attach them to the vessels without being detected. None of the vessels prior to the explosions reported any suspicious behaviour." 'The attacks demonstrate military-grade sophistication,' Dryad Global wrote, estimating that they were 'potentially involving state-sponsored actors or proxy groups amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict.' Ukrainian Secret Services? The vessels' connections to Russian ports have led some experts to suggest that Ukraine could be implicated in these explosions. Ukraine, however, has neither confirmed nor denied any link to the incidents. In June, following the explosion of the Vilamoura, Ukraine's military intelligence merely indicated that the vessel was "belonging to Russia's so-called shadow fleet' and had a 'track record of transporting Russian oil products'. 'Deterring vessels from calling at Russian ports' Kelly from EOS Risk Group told us: 'I think the actor that gains the most benefit from the series of attacks is Ukraine. There is no hard evidence or intelligence that I have seen that suggests it is Ukraine. But Russian exports are used to fund Russia's war against Ukraine. Disrupting these vessels would surely impact revenue from Russian exports. By doing these attacks, I think Ukraine really sends a financial and reputational message to shipping firms that are still calling at Russian ports. The intent is quite clear: it is to deter vessels from calling and exporting Russian goods from Russian ports.' He also pointed out that Ukraine has launched several attacks against Novorossiysk itself, aiming to put the port 'out of action'. However, some industry analysts remain cautious. 'The reality of it is that we do not have evidence that it was done by Ukraine,' Alexa said. 'Would Ukraine benefit from discouraging vessels from calling Russian ports? Yes.' Unsanctioned Vessels The implications may be even more significant considering that these six tankers were not subject to sanctions at the time of the explosions, Alexa noted. Only the Koala has since been sanctioned by the EU for "transport[ing] crude oil (...) that originates in Russia or [is] exported from Russia". Its then manager, Lagosmarine Limited, had also been sanctioned by the US in January 2025. While the Koala was on Lloyd's List's dark fleet watchlist, the other three tankers hit this winter – the Seacharm, Grace Ferrum, and Seajewel – were not part of this fleet, according to the publication. As for the Vilamoura, despite accusations from Ukrainian intelligence services that it belonged to 'Russia's so-called shadow fleet', Ukraine does not feature it on its registry of shadow fleet vessels. Moreover, the majority of these vessels were not transporting products subject to sanctions, such as ammonium. Several of these ships had docked at Novorossiysk port, which primarily exports Kazakh crude oil, according to Ambrey. 'We assessed that the threat actor does not differentiate whether you [are transporting] Kazakh oil or Russian oil. The differentiating factor appears to be Russian port calls. Kazakhstan pays Russia a significant amount of money to export its oil through their ports. Whilst you might be exporting Kazakh oil, you are still using Russian ports and pay fees, entries, and port duties. So there is a considerable income [for Russia] even from the export of Kazakh oil.' Implications of Libyan actors? This, however, isn't the only theory advanced by industry analysts. Lloyd's List also highlights a connection some vessels have with Libya. Two incidents – involving the Grace Ferrum and the Vilamoura – occurred off the country's coast. 'It remains a possibility, but the level of sophistication to deploy a limpet mine is probably consistent with a state actor rather than some sort of militia,' Kelly believes. Nonetheless, those in the industry seem to have incorporated this threat into their thinking. 'We understand that Russia does conduct inspections in Ust-Luga, and that the Greek owners are now asking for inspections in Novorossiysk as well,' Alexa said. As for the economic impact of these attacks, Alexa pointed out that the cost of maritime insurance for Russia 'is holding steady" for now. 'That said, if we see further attacks of this nature, it is likely that it would lead to a rise in war risk premiums, which would therefore make doing business in Russia more expensive,' he added.
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
What's at stake in Syria's Sweida clashes?
07:23 15/07/2025 'The moment of truth': French PM Bayrou lays out budget cuts 15/07/2025 Gaza truce still out of reach after Doha talks as deadly strikes continue 15/07/2025 French prisoner who escaped in inmate's bag recaptured 15/07/2025 In Iraq, drought threatens water supply and ancient heritage 15/07/2025 Syria declares ceasefire after deadly clashes in Sweida 15/07/2025 Mexico: Femicide filmed by a surveillance camera Americas 15/07/2025 French PM Bayrou stakes political survival on budget squeeze 15/07/2025 Ukraine skeptical as US sets 50-Day deadline for Russian ceasefire 15/07/2025 Extreme runners conquer North Pole Summer Marathon
