Graduated driving licences for young people 'could have saved my daughter', says bereaved mother
A mother whose daughter was killed in a car crash has said tougher laws for new drivers could have saved the teenager's life.
Speaking on The UK Tonight With Sarah-Jane Mee, Sharon Huddleston called on the government to bring in new laws to "help save young lives [and] give teenagers a future".
Caitlin Huddleston, 18, was a passenger in a vehicle which collided with a van in July 2017. The crash killed both Caitlin and the driver, her friend Skye Mitchell, also 18. A backseat passenger and the van driver were left with severe injuries.
Skye had passed her test just four months before the crash, which occurred after she "entered a bend slightly too fast for her experience and lost control", Ms Huddleston said.
The car then spun on to the opposite carriageway and in front of a van travelling in the opposite direction.
Ms Huddleston later "found out about a law called a graduated driving licence which could have saved my daughter's life".
In 2023, around a fifth of people killed or seriously injured in Great Britain in car collisions involved a young driver.
Graduated Driving Licences (GDLs) have been introduced in a number of other countries including Canada, where it takes at least 20 months for a new driver to gain a full driving licence by earning in stages.
Young drivers working towards their full licence face extra rules such as not being allowed on the roads between midnight and 5am, and a limit on the number of under 19-year-old passengers.
2:18
As reported by Sky News' Dan Whitehead, evidence shows deaths among 16 to 19-year-old drivers in Canada have fallen by 83%.
But the government has previously stated it has no plans to introduce GDLs, saying they could "unfairly" penalise young drivers.
"Our children have been penalised from living their lives," Ms Huddleston said in response.
"We want this implemented to help save young lives, to give teenagers a future. Our children's futures were taken from them.
"These children who are killed on the roads, they're being penalised from living their lives, we shouldn't have to bury our children," she continued.
Ms Huddleston was joined on The UK Tonight by Dr Ian Greenwood, whose daughter Alice died at the age of 12 after a speeding, young driver crashed into a car she was travelling in with her mother and sister.
Dr Greenwood said: "They were speeding, they were distracted, it's a rural road.
"It's almost like doing a bingo for the risk factors of a graduated driving licence - other than alcohol, they were all present in that crash."
The driver of the car and his passenger also died, he said.
1:57
A Department for Transport spokesperson told Sky News: "Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way.
"Whilst we are not considering Graduated Driving Licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads, and we are exploring options to tackle the root causes of this without unfairly penalising young drivers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Express
20 hours ago
- Auto Express
Almost half of UK drivers break the speed limit… and that's an improvement
Almost half of UK drivers are suspected of breaking the speed limit when driving in 30mph zones, according to the latest estimates from the Department for Transport (DfT). And while that may sound shocking, it's actually an improvement over the last few years. The Government doesn't seem to have much faith in the UK public's ability to adhere to speed limits, as official figures estimate that 43 per cent of drivers will speed in 30mph zones when there's free-flowing traffic and no speed cameras. Advertisement - Article continues below Although undeniably alarming, it's actually a significant step forward from 2017, when more than half of drivers (51 per cent) were thought to be straying over the limit in these circumstances. However, things are even worse when you consider 20mph zones, as the Government reckons the amount of people going faster than the law permits jumps up to around three-quarters (76 per cent), with 10 per cent of drivers exceeding the limit by more than 10mph. These figures haven't been pulled out of thin air; the DfT has created these estimates by using data collected from Automatic Traffic Counters (ATCs) – the discreet strips of wire you sometimes see stretched across the road. These obtain information such as the speed and volume of traffic and are typically placed away from bends and junctions to gather an accurate picture of how traffic is progressing. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Speeding isn't exclusive to slower roads, either; 44 per cent of drivers are thought to exceed the limit on the motorway, although interestingly, this drops to just nine per cent in national speed limit zones on A and B roads. It's no surprise, then, that in 2024, a total of 205,522 drivers were found guilty of a speeding offence – an increase of 87 per cent since 2011 – with more than 1.8 million attending a speed awareness course last year. The most cited reason for speeding by offenders, according to the RAC's 2024 Report on Motoring, is that they were matching the speeds of others. However, a spokesperson for the National Police Chiefs Council told Auto Express: 'Driving in excess of the speed limit is a conscious decision. You can choose not to do it and many lives can be saved as a result. 'Thousands of people are killed or seriously injured on our roads each year as a result of excessive speed and for each one of those people there will be multiple friends, families and communities affected, so the true impact is almost impossible to quantify.' Come and join our WhatsApp channel for the latest car news and reviews... Find a car with the experts New Volvo EX60 electric SUV: latest details and confirmed reveal date New Volvo EX60 electric SUV: latest details and confirmed reveal date The upcoming, all-electric Volvo XC60 alternative is designed to 'keep learning and evolve with time' BYD and Octopus Energy team up for 'all-inclusive' EV deal BYD and Octopus Energy team up for 'all-inclusive' EV deal Octopus' 'Power Pack Bundle' includes a leased BYD, a wallbox charger and charging all for less than £300 per month New Skoda Epiq baby SUV could be a Tardis on wheels New Skoda Epiq baby SUV could be a Tardis on wheels The new Skoda Epic will sit below the Elroq and Enyaq in the brand's ever-expanding SUV range and is set to offer plenty of space despite its compact …
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Daily Mirror
'My arm and leg were torn off by two trains - one thing breaks my heart most'
Sarah de Lagarde is taking London Underground Ltd to court for breach of duty when in September 2022 she slipped on a platform, leaving her with physical and psychological damage A mum-of-two miraculously survived being hit by two Tube trains on the London Underground after she slipped at a station, but says there's one thing that breaks her heart the most. Sarah de Lagarde was commuting home from work at the High Barnet stop in north London in September 2022 when she fell down the gap between the train and platform. She was then twice hit by separate trains before being rushed to hospital to have an arm and leg amputated. The 47-year-old now uses two prosthetic limbs and is bringing a legal claim against London Underground Ltd (LUL), which is part of Transport for London (TfL), for a breach of duty. Speaking of her ordeal, she said the one thing that breaks her heart the most is the fact she lost her "ability to hug my two young children with both arms." The first hearing in the case was held at the Royal Courts of Justice today (June 25). Sarah hailed it a 'significant milestone' in her 'journey towards justice', with LUL defending the claim. Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice following the hearing, she described the harrowing incident and the resulting impact it has had on her life. 'I was commuting home from work. I fell through the gap. I was run over and crushed by not one, but two London underground trains on the Northern Line. Miraculously, I survived, but it cost me dearly – the first train took my arm, and the second train took my leg," she said. The most heartbreaking effect of her amputations, however, is Sarah's inability to hug her children like she did before the incident. She explained: 'That night I also lost my mobility, my independence, my dignity and, above all, my ability to hug my two young children with both arms. 'Today, I stand before you not just as a survivor, but as a voice for change. This afternoon's court hearing marks a significant milestone in my journey towards justice against Transport for London, and I am optimistic.' She added: 'As we prepare for the full trial, I am not just fighting for justice for myself but for a safer, more accountable transport network for all.' At the preliminary hearing in London, Judge Roger Eastman said an eight-week trial would likely take place at the beginning of 2027, with a further hearing due to take place in September this year. He also said: 'I appreciate this is a very high value claim, potentially, and very serious claim.' James MacDonald, representing Mrs De Lagarde, told the court the case was 'not an ordinary personal injury case'. In written submissions, he said the issues the trial judge will have to decide include whether LUL was in breach by not having a system in place to ensure that the Platform Train Interface (PTI) is monitored as passengers are getting off a train at a terminus station. Another issue is whether LUL 'was in breach by virtue of its train operators not being trained to look for passengers on the tracks when entering a station'. Prashant Popat KC, for LUL, said: 'We recognise that this is a tragic case, and the claimant sustained some horrific injuries.' In written submissions, he added: 'The defendant denies these allegations. It also pleads contributory negligence. 'The parties are agreed that the case should proceed first towards a preliminary issue trial on liability. This would encompass breach of duty, causation and the issue of contributory negligence.' Speaking after the hearing, Sarah said she suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and has not returned to using public transport since the incident. She added: 'I'm absolutely terrified.' Thomas Jervis, a partner at law firm Leigh Day, which is representing Sarah, said: 'This case is incredibly important and may have a profound impact on how London's transport network is operated in the future.'
Times
4 days ago
- Times
BBC Breakfast rift as staff back editor in row with Naga Munchetty
A number of BBC Breakfast staff are understood to have rallied around the beleaguered editor Richard Frediani amid further allegations of inappropriate comments made by the presenter Naga Munchetty. Staff working on the daily show have been encouraged by bosses to come forward to share their experiences after a week in which the strained relationship between its boss and highest paid presenter boiled over. Frediani is expected to return to work soon after an extended period of leave taken after reports published in The Sun last week. The newspaper reported historical allegations that he was the subject of disciplinary action for allegedly 'shaking' a female colleague in February last year. It also included a claim that he once kicked a bin in frustration. The reports, which had originally been widely published in April, resurfaced around a fortnight after talks between Munchetty and Sky News about the possibility of her becoming Kay Burley's successor are understood to have broken down.
