
Suffolk lawmakers vote to give themselves more time in office — but voters could still say no thanks
The county Board of Legislators sought to justify the permanent extension by tying it to a switch in New York State that is moving local elections to even years so that they line up with federal elections.
The change would prevent lawmakers elected this year to have to run again next year and then again in 2028, but voters will get to decide if they agree on their November ballots.
While Suffolk County lawmakers approved a measure to lengthen their terms in office from two to four year terms, voters will have the final say on Election Day.
Brandon Cruz / NY Post
'This is important legislation,' Suffolk Executive Ed Romaine told The Post.
'It saves taxpayer dollars and protects fair elections. Most importantly, the measure will be put to the voters, unlike the state that decided to change elections without bringing it to the people.'
Romaine said he intends to sign the legislation as soon as it hits his desk.
The state passed the controversial law to consolidate elections in 2023, with local officials claiming it unfairly tied county, town or village elections to national issues while benefiting Democrats in the largely blue state.
The change has so far survived legal scrutiny and this year's races will see candidates who win serve shortened terms as a result.
Suffolk Executive Ed Romaine told The Post, 'This is important legislation,' while County Legislator James Mazzarella in a statement acknowledged that the extended time in office has to do with 'preserving the will of the voters.'
Jim Mazzarella For Suffolk
County Legislator James Mazzarella (R) said the extended time in office was 'about preserving the will of the voters.'
'Without this act, we risk midterm resignations, causing costly special elections and political instability,' he said in a statement.
The county's bill would not change a long-standing 12-year limit for serving in the legislature, but it tweaks the rules for current legislators.
If the ballot measure passes, current lawmakers would be allowed serve out their final term if it goes beyond 12 years — a move politicians claimed was to avoid the 'chaos' of midterm resignations.
Although lawmakers used the shift in election years as justification to beef up the length they could serve without campaigning, Suffolk recently pushed to stretch lawmakers' terms from two to four years in 2020.
More than 70% of voters voted against the measure on ballots.
Westchester County's Board of Legislators similarly tried to extend term limits in 2024, with voters promptly voting against the measure.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trace Gallagher: ‘Common Sense' was up late watching Colbert's interview with Kamala Harris…
'Common Sense' Department: Kamala Harris claims the political system is broken. Is the issue the system or Democratic leadership? The CSD has thoughts.


Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
No nominees deal
The Senate will try to break an impasse Friday to advance three spending bills in hopes of showing progress after days of discord. A separate holdup over presidential nominations, meanwhile, could come down to direct talks between Democrats and the White House. A patchwork of objections from senators on both sides of the aisle have held up the spending legislation for days and foiled a plan for what some had hoped would be a four-bill package. But members expressed new optimism Friday that a second, more limited attempt could move forward. It's one of two pieces of major business Republican leaders are hoping to wrap up before the Senate starts its traditional summer recess. In addition to the spending bills — where they are keen to show some progress ahead of the Sept. 30 government shutdown deadline — they also want to confirm a broad tranche of President Donald Trump's nominees. The nominee conversations appear more dicey, senators said, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Friday that he has put Trump officials 'into conversation directly' with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's team. Top White House staffers were also in the Capitol on Thursday night after Thune met with Trump at the White House. 'This is how this is ultimately going to get resolved,' Thune said. Meanwhile, GOP senators said leaders are running traps on a possible deal that would advance the smaller package of spending bills. Under the pending proposal, leaders would seek unanimous consent to tie together the fiscal 2026 spending bills funding the Veterans Affairs and Agriculture departments, as well as military construction projects and the FDA. A third spending bill, funding Congress itself, could be voted on separately. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins said Friday morning she expects a unanimous consent request on some constellation of those three bills. The Maine Republican is eager to show progress on bipartisan spending bills before the Senate leaves for its lengthy August recess. Upon their return, members will have only a handful of session days to make further progress ahead of the shutdown deadline. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) has made clear he will object to including Legislative Branch funding in the package and wants the chance to vote against the $7.1 billion bill. It's the smallest of the 12 annual appropriations bills, but Kennedy maintains it still costs too much. 'They agreed to my proposal,' he told reporters Friday. 'They're going to have one vote on [Military Construction–VA] and [Agriculture-FDA] together and separate vote on [Legislative Branch] so I can vote no. Then they'll marry them up later if all three pass, as they probably will.' Coming to a nominations deal could be much trickier, given Trump's determination to get all of his 150-plus pending nominees confirmed quickly. Trump on Thursday said on Truth Social that the Senate 'must stay in Session, taking no recess' until all of the nominees are confirmed. Even if senators stay in Washington, that goal will be all but impossible to meet absent Democratic cooperation. Democrats under Schumer are exploring whether to quickly confirm a smaller subset of nominees in exchange for other concessions, such as the release of government funding they claim has been illegally 'impounded' by the Trump administration. Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.


New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Senate Passes Its First Spending Bills, but Battles Lie Ahead
The Senate on Friday overwhelmingly passed the first of its spending bills for the coming year, with bipartisan approval of measures to fund military construction projects, veterans and agriculture programs and legislative branch agencies. But the broad agreement over the $506 billion package of bills, typically the least controversial of the annual federal spending measures, masked a bitter fight in Congress over how to fund the government past a Sept. 30 shutdown deadline. Senators pushed through the legislation after several intense days of haggling as part of an agreement to allow the chamber to make progress on funding the government before senators leave Washington for a monthlong summer recess. 'We are on the verge of an accomplishment that we have not done since 2018 — and that is pass appropriation bills across the Senate floor prior to the August recess,' Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, said on the floor. Still, debate over the package hinted at the bigger spending challenges that lie ahead. Democrats, furious about the White House's efforts to subvert Congress's power in the purse, are wary of striking spending deals with Republicans when President Trump and his team have signaled they intend to continue ignoring or defying lawmakers' spending dictates, even those enacted into law. And Republicans are fighting among themselves over how closely to hew to the Trump administration's spending targets. The package approved on Friday night would provide $452 billion for veterans programs, $300 billion of it mandatory spending to fund veterans benefits; $19.8 billion for military construction and family housing projects; $27.1 billion for agricultural programs; and $7.1 billion for the operations of Congress and legislative agencies. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.