Man formerly on death row can't serve 2 life terms at the same time, Tennessee Supreme Court rules
The court's ruling said a Memphis judge lacked the jurisdiction to give Payne two life sentences to run at the same time rather than one after the other. The concurrent sentences allowed Payne to be eligible for parole in 2026 — 30 years earlier than if the sentences were consecutive.
The Supreme Court did not issue the consecutive life sentences for Payne in its ruling. Instead, it returned the matter to the trial court in Memphis for further proceedings.
Payne had been on death row for the killings of a woman and her 2-year-old daughter. In January 2022, Judge Paula Skahan sentenced Payne to concurrent sentences of life with the possibility of parole after ruling in November 2021 that his death sentences must be vacated because he was intellectually disabled.
The case has drawn national attention from anti-death-penalty activists and included the involvement of the Innocence Project, which argues for the use of DNA testing in cases claiming wrongful conviction. DNA tests failed to exonerate Payne.
Skahan's ruling that Payne should be removed from death row was based on a Tennessee law passed earlier in 2021 that made prohibiting the execution of intellectually disabled people retroactive to past cases. Before the 2021 law, Tennessee had no mechanism for people to reopen a case to press an intellectual disability claim.
Executions of intellectually disabled people were ruled unconstitutional in 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court found they violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Payne, 58, was convicted of first-degree murder for the killings of Charisse Christopher and her 2-year-old daughter, Lacie Jo, who were repeatedly stabbed in their Millington apartment and left in a pool of blood. Christopher's son, Nicholas, who was 3 at the time, also was stabbed but survived.
Payne, who is Black, has always maintained his innocence. He told police he was at Christopher's apartment building to meet his girlfriend when he heard the mother, who was white, screaming and tried to help. He said he panicked when he saw a white police officer and ran away.
During his murder trial, prosecutors said Payne was high on cocaine and looking for sex when he killed Christopher and her daughter in a 'drug-induced frenzy.' Prosecutors said the evidence overwhelmingly pointed to Payne as the killer.
However, evidence presented by two experts showed Payne was intellectually disabled, while Payne's supporters said he had taken significant steps in his rehabilitation while serving three decades in prison.
It was not immediately clear Monday when Payne would be eligible for parole under the Supreme Court's decision. A hearing must be set to address the new ruling.
Payne's lawyer, Kelley Henry, has pushed for Payne's full exoneration.
'Pervis Payne remains incarcerated for a crime he did not commit,' she said in an email Monday. 'We will continue to fight for his freedom and to bring him home to his family.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
The FCC won't enforce a ban on ‘exorbitant' prison phone call prices
The Federal Communications Commission will suspend the enforcement of a rule that would lower the price of prison phone and video calls. On Monday, the Trump-appointed FCC Chair Brendan Carr announced that prisons won't have to comply with the pricing rules until April 1st, 2027, reversing plans to apply the caps this year. Family members and friends of incarcerated people have long been charged fees the FCC described in 2024 as 'exorbitant' to keep in touch with phone or video calls. Though some states — like Connecticut, California, Minnesota, and Massachusetts — have made phone calls from prison free, the majority of states allow fees that can reach as high as $11.35 for a 15-minute phone call, often including kickbacks to the jails and local governments. In 2023, former President Joe Biden aimed to address call prices by signing the Martha Wright-Reed law, a rule that allows the FCC to regulate the rates of phone calls from prison and lower existing price caps. The FCC voted to adopt the new rates last year, promising to drop the price of a 15-minute phone call to just 90 cents in larger prisons. The rules were set to go into effect on a staggered basis starting January 1st, 2025. On Monday, however, the FCC declared it will hold off on enforcing these rules for two more years. In his announcement, Carr says that the efforts to regulate prison phone calls are 'leading to negative, unintended consequences,' claiming that the rules would make the caps 'too low' to cover 'required safety measures' and wouldn't give states enough time to find another source of funds. He adds that the decision to delay these rules is supposed to ensure that 'important safety and security protocols are maintained,' which he indicates could include the adoption of public safety tools with 'advanced AI and machine learning.' Carr partially voted to approve the phone call caps in 2024. FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez slammed Carr's decision to pause the implementation of the Martha Wright-Reed Act. 'Rather than enforce the law, the Commission is now stalling, shielding a broken system that inflates costs and rewards kickbacks to correctional facilities at the expense of incarcerated individuals and their loved ones,' Gomez said in a statement. 'It's time for the FCC to do its job. Its responsibility is not to protect profit-driven contracts — it is to uphold the law and serve the public.'
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Diddy Trial: Jury Asks For Clarity On Racketeering Charge As Deliberations Continue
The jury deliberating whether Sean 'Diddy' Combs is guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking sent a note to the judge seeking clarity on the racketeering charge, the jury's second question after it told the judge one of the jurors may not be able to follow instructions. The jury in the criminal case against Diddy began deliberating Monday. (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty ... More Images for MRC) Getty Images for MRC The jury asked Judge Arun Subramanian late Monday afternoon, the first day of deliberations, for clarity on whether it is considered drug distribution if a person who is asked for controlled substances provides them to that person, CNN reported. Drug distribution is one of the alleged acts jurors are being asked to consider when deciding whether Combs is guilty of the racketeering charge, alongside bribery, forced labor, kidnapping, arson and sex trafficking, according to the jury's verdict sheet. Subramanian said Tuesday morning he would refer the jury to language in its instructions about drug distribution: 'The word 'distribution' means actual, constructive, or attempted transfer. To distribute simply means to deliver, to pass over, or to hand over something to another person, or to cause it to be delivered, passed on, or handed over to another. Distribution does not require a sale.' The jury will return to deliberations Tuesday, after it deliberated for more than five hours on Monday. Quickly after deliberations began Monday, the jury gave Subramanian a note that said: 'We have a juror, No. 25, who we are concerned cannot follow your honor's instructions.' Subramanian returned a note to the jury reminding 'every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law,' urging them to continue deliberating. Mark Zauderer, a veteran trial and appellate lawyer, told Forbes jury questions are not uncommon and that the problem may blow over if the jury moves on and does not request any more intervention from the judge. When Could The Jury Return A Verdict—and Will Diddy Be Convicted? It's unclear, as the jury will deliberate as long as it needs to reach a verdict. Subramanian has previously said he wanted to wrap up the trial, which began in May, by the July 4 weekend. Legal analysts previously told Forbes the prosecution presented a strong case against Combs, but it is impossible to know what a jury will decide. Zauderer said he believes Combs is more likely to be convicted than acquitted, but noted such a verdict may depend on whether the jury believes prosecutors sufficiently proved Combs ran a 'criminal enterprise,' which would satisfy the racketeering charge. Former federal prosecutor Mark Chutkow also said the prosecution made a 'very compelling case,' noting the prosecution's emphasis on surveillance video depicting Combs attacking his ex-girlfriend and a key witness in the case, Cassie Ventura, in a Los Angeles hotel. Chutkow said, however, a jury may feel the video depicts domestic violence, which he is not charged with, instead of sex trafficking or racketeering. Chutkow also said it is possible the trial could end with a hung jury, meaning not all jurors agree on a verdict. Combs faces five federal charges: two counts of sex trafficking, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. Throughout the trial, the government has called high-profile victims to testify, including Ventura, considered a key witness for both the racketeering and sex trafficking charges. She testified Combs coerced her into 'freak-off' sex performances throughout their decade-long relationship, which she said his employees assisted in producing, which some legal experts said could be evidence of Combs operating a criminal enterprise. Rapper Kid Cudi also testified Combs broke into his home and said he believed Combs was involved with setting his car on fire after he discovered Kid Cudi and Ventura were dating. Other alleged sex trafficking victims central to the prosecution's case testified under the pseudonyms 'Jane' and 'Mia.' Judge Orders Diddy Jury To 'Continue Deliberating' After Concerns Over Juror No. 25 (Forbes) Jury Begins Deliberating Criminal Case Against Diddy: Here's Why A Verdict Is So Unpredictable (Forbes)
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Sean "Diddy" Combs trial jury resumes deliberations as judge responds to another question
With no verdict reached in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on the first day of deliberations, the jury of eight men and four women gathered again Tuesday to continue discussing the charges. Judge Arun Subramanian began by addressing with the prosecution and defense a question posed Monday from the jury about one of the alleged racketeering acts — possession with intent to distribute drugs — which relates to the racketeering conspiracy charge Combs is facing. The jury sent a note asking for clarification on the part of the instructions addressing drug distribution. Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. An exchange between Subramanian and Combs' defense team got a little testy as they wrangled over the response. "Can you do what I'm asking or no?" the judge asked. "Of course I can do what your honor is asking," one of the defense lawyers responded. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to federal charges of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for allegedly arranging to fly sex workers across state lines. The first day of deliberations saw several notes from the jury, as well as Combs and his supporters bowing their heads in prayer in the courtroom. One of the notes came not long after jurors started deliberating and raised concerns from several jurors about another member of the panel. They told the judge they thought "he cannot follow your honor's instructions." After a discussion between the judge, attorneys for Combs and prosecutors, the judge reminded the jurors of their obligation to follow the law and sent them back to resume their deliberations, but said if more issues should arise, the foreperson should send another note. To help them come to a verdict, jurors were provided with a laptop loaded with all of the exhibits shown in court, including text messages, photographs and videos of the sexual encounters at the heart of the case. Five alternate jurors are also on standby in case they're needed to fill in on the main jury. The jury will sift through seven weeks of at times graphic and emotional testimony about the rap, fashion and reality TV impresario's propensity for violence and his sexual predilections, including drug-fueled sex marathons dubbed "freak-offs" or "hotel nights." Defense lawyers argued that there was no conspiracy and that his conduct did not violate federal laws. contributed to this report.
