Starmer to discuss ‘global problem' of illegal migration with German Chancellor
'The networks of these criminal gangs stretch across countless countries and legal systems, showing no respect for our borders,' he added.
'We'll go further to tackle this shared issue together.'
According to the Home Office, 353 people crossed the English Channel by small boat on Friday, just a day after the Prime Minister signed a deal with French President Emmanuel Macron aimed at deterring migrants from making the perilous journey.
This was down from the 573 people who crossed on Thursday, the first time any such journeys were made in a week.
More crossings were witnessed on Saturday, but the full figures are yet to be published.
Border force vessels and the RNLI were called out on both Thursday and Friday to reports of multiple boats crossing the channel, the Coastguard said.
A statement from the Coastguard said: 'HM Coastguard has been co-ordinating a response to multiple incidents involving small boats in the Channel on 10 and 11 July.
'UK Border Force and RNLI vessels have been sent as part of this response.'
Under the terms of the deal agreed by the Prime Minister and Mr Macron, the UK will be able to send migrants back to France for the first time in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain.
The so-called one in, one out deal is due to begin in weeks on a pilot basis, but needs final legal verification from the EU.
Downing Street has indicated ministers expect the EU to support the arrangement, amid concerns among some European governments that migrants who have travelled to Britain could end up back on their territory.
No details have been given about how many people will be covered by the pilot, but French officials had indicated it could initially be limited to about 50 a week, a small fraction of the weekly average this year of 782.
Sir Keir wrote: 'This is what serious, practical solutions to global problems look like.
'We will do our duty as a compassionate country, accepting genuine asylum seekers who respect our rules and our way of life. That is fair.
'But people who try to make the crossing illegally will soon find themselves back where they started. That is a real deterrent.'
At least 21,000 people have already made the journey since January, putting 2025 on course to be a record year for crossings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
9 minutes ago
- The National
'Stop excuses and recognise Palestine', SNP tell UK Government
The party's comments follow a speech by French President Emmanuel Macron during his state visit to the UK last week, in which he said recognising the state of Palestine was 'the only path to peace'. The SNP also called on the UK Government to stop the sale of arms to Israel, saying that failure by the Government to 'use the power it has' to end the conflict in Gaza would make it 'totally complicit' in what it called a 'slaughter'. The SNP's Middle East spokesperson at Westminster, Brendan O'Hara MP, said that if the UK Government 'could muster just a shred of conviction and courage they would have the power to act'. READ MORE: 'Why must Palestinians pay?': Holocaust survivor speaks out on Gaza genocide He went on: 'After witnessing another week of slaughter, the Labour Party could, and should, begin this new week by taking two concrete steps. 'They should start this new week by finally stopping all arms sales to Israel and finally recognising the state of Palestine. 'President Macron was crystal clear that he is preparing to join other European nations in recognising the state of Palestine and that he is pressing the UK to join this 'political momentum' towards a ceasefire and a permanent peace. 'Keir Starmer should stop the excuses and join him in recognising the state of Palestine without any more damaging delays. 'That would send the clearest of signals that we are prepared to protect and guarantee the right of the Palestinian people to their own homeland – and that all diplomatic levers will be used to prevent any plan that effectively proposes ethnic cleansing in Gaza. 'It is also blindingly obvious that anyone claiming to support a two-state solution must back immediate recognition of Palestine, otherwise their words ring hollow. 'If after this week Westminster stays sitting on its hands and fails to use the power it has to act, then they will be totally complicit in giving the (Benjamin) Netanyahu government impunity to commit week upon week of slaughter, even deadlier than the one Palestinians have just suffered.' READ MORE: How arms firms are buying exclusive access to MPs for as little as £1499 The party pointed out that 144 members of the UN, including Ireland, Spain and Norway, have already moved to recognise Palestine. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said earlier this week that the UK Government remained 'completely committed' to recognition, but refused to set a time frame for it, saying it was a 'moving, live situation'. A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'From day one we have taken decisive action – suspending relevant export licences, suspending trade negotiations, restarting UNRWA funding, sanctioning Israeli Ministers, providing aid to hundreds of thousands of civilians, and using our position on the UN Security Council to demand the end of this war and the full resumption of aid into Gaza. 'We continue working with international partners to end Palestinian suffering, free the hostages and secure lasting Middle East peace.'
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Top pollsters say Starmer's ‘one in, one out' migrant deal will have ‘no impact'
Leading pollsters have dismissed Sir Keir Starmer 's "one in, one out" migrant return deal with France as a "publicity stunt" unlikely to boost the government's popularity. The agreement is criticised for its small scale, reportedly aiming to return only 50 migrants a week, despite over 700 arriving on small boats on the day of its announcement. New polling reveals significant opposition among Labour Party members to Sir Keir's plans to tighten legal migration, such as extending the citizenship application period to 10 years. The government's focus on both legal and illegal migration is seen as a strategy to counter the growing support for Nigel Farage's Reform UK, which is currently polling ahead of Labour. Pollsters highlight record-low public confidence in the government, with only 23 per cent expressing confidence, suggesting the deal will have minimal impact on voter perception.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Football governance bill's passage can create a fairer game at every level
It seems like a lifetime ago that the fan-led review into football governance emerged from the wreckage of the failed European Super League. The ideas that underpin the independent regulator were born out of that crisis: an attempt to stop the drift of our national game toward private greed, corporate overreach and ownership disconnect from local communities. Years later, we are probably on the verge of finally seeing those ideas enshrined in law. Tuesday's resounding 415 to 98 vote on the football governance bill. in the House of Commons means the process should come to a resolution with royal assent in the coming days. Although that may feel inevitable given the overwhelming cross-party support in the Commons, anyone who has worked in politics knows better than to celebrate before the final whistle. But we are, at last, in what looks like the final minutes of the game. I have always been an advocate for reform, and Grimsby Town were one of the founding members of Fair Game – an alliance of clubs and campaigners determined to build a fairer, more sustainable future for football. Under the tireless leadership of Niall Couper, Fair Game has kept the spirit of the fan-led review alive: challenging, proposing, organising. The football community owes him a debt of gratitude. He should never have to buy a pie or a pint at any ground in England again, though he may find himself less welcome at venues where quiche and chablis are more the order of the day. The Premier League's main objection to reform has been that any interference with its structure may jeopardise its market-leading status. The Premier League is a global phenomenon. Its broadcasting revenue is greater than the combined total of the top European leagues. That is a remarkable achievement and a real soft-power asset for the UK, and nobody in this debate wants to dismantle or devalue the Premier League as a product or as a representation of the English game at its finest. That has never been the intention of the independent regulator. It has never been about meddling with the quality of football on the pitch. It is about redistribution, about recognising the historical and current contribution of all professional clubs in English football, from the Premier League to the National League. The ecosystem relies on a delicate balance, built since the Football League was created in 1888, and the game is only as strong as its foundations. Yes, the clubs who formed the breakaway in 1992 and turned it into the global success it is today deserve their rewards. But every club, big or small, has contributed to that history. Their continued survival is not a romantic ideal, it is a necessity. One of the recurring concerns is that any extra money trickling down will be funnelled into inflated player wages. That is a risk, and it is right that we legislate for it. No one is arguing that players should not be well paid, but the reality is that when some owners are willing to absorb significant losses through equity injections, it distorts the market. In the past couple of years, we have seen wage inflation of more than 30% in some cases, driven by newly acquired clubs such as Wrexham, Carlisle and Birmingham. In the absence of safeguards, that sort of escalation becomes the new norm that most clubs have to adapt to in order to remain vaguely competitive. It is not only unsustainable, it is impossible to maintain over the long term without more clubs going bust. We undoubtedly need better cost controls on salaries, ideally through a league-specific cap on each squad, but I would also like a requirement that at least 50% of any redistributed funds go towards the women's game, infrastructure, academies and community-led initiatives. These are the investments that build clubs for the long term: developing homegrown talent, improving local facilities and embedding football clubs deeper into their communities. It is about legacy, not just liquidity. Of course, not everyone agrees. Some early drafts and media coverage painted the independent regulator as a Trojan horse for 'mission creep' – the start of a faceless body that could end up interfering in everything from shirt sponsors to starting XIs. That was never not the intention, nor will it become the reality. The bill as drafted focuses on three core areas: redistribution, ownership and directors' tests, and fan engagement. Get these right, and the game will be in a far better place. Whatever your politics, this should be regarded as a proud moment. It is an example of what politics can do at its best – listening, responding and building something in the public interest. Credit must go to the previous Conservative government, and particularly Tracey Crouch, whose leadership and integrity helped get the ball rolling after the Super League fiasco. And it is to the credit of Lisa Nandy and the Labour government that they have kept the momentum and got the bill through in a substantive and meaningful way. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Now the clock starts ticking. Within 18 months of royal assent, the independent regulator must produce a state of the game report, and the Premier League is required to put forward a serious offer to the EFL on revenue sharing. There is little incentive for the Premier League to act swiftly; the longer it delays, the later the money flows. It seems likely that the regulator, under the leadership of David Kogan, will have to invoke backstop powers to force a settlement. Even then, we are probably two years away from clubs such as ours seeing any financial benefit. But the vote in parliament is a significant milestone and an inflection point for all of us. Football has always reflected the society around it, its values, its inequalities, its triumphs and its failings. But unlike other industries, football has an unusual emotional gravity. It binds generations. It builds identity. It belongs, at least in spirit, to the people. We are not asking for nostalgia, we are asking for a renewed commitment to stewardship. And while there is still plenty of work to do, the fact that the independent regulator has moved from concept to near reality is a powerful reminder that change is possible even in football. Even in politics. Jason Stockwood is the co-owner of Grimsby Town
