logo
Federal Court Dismisses Roku Lawsuit Against Access Advance, Declines to Set Global Patent Pool Pricing

Federal Court Dismisses Roku Lawsuit Against Access Advance, Declines to Set Global Patent Pool Pricing

Business Wire5 days ago
BOSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Access Advance LLC today announced that the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Roku Inc. seeking to compel the Court to set a global fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty rate for the HEVC Advance Patent Pool. Judge Richard G. Stearns determined that his Court "lacks jurisdiction to determine" a global FRAND royalty rate, noting that the 'US patents constitute only a fraction of a larger portfolio.' The Court further concluded that its 'opinion on the appropriate royalty rate would merely be advisory', which is prohibited under US law.
The dismissal signals to potential licensees that the rule of law matters, and litigation is not a tool to avoid good-faith licensing negotiations.
Court Reinforces Limits on Judicial Intervention
In December 2024, Roku sued Access Advance LLC, along with patent pool licensors Dolby Laboratories Inc. and Sun Patent Trust, in the District of Massachusetts seeking judicial determination of whether any of the numerous offers the Defendants made to Roku for three separate licenses to global patent portfolios – including the HEVC Advance Patent Pool containing more than 27,500 patents owned by dozens of non-parties to the litigation and issued in 117 different countries and territories – were FRAND, and if it was not, then to set a worldwide FRAND rate. Roku's Massachusetts complaint raised issues already pending for months in three cases involving the same licensors before the European Unified Patent Court ('UPC') in Germany. By seeking a second opinion from the Massachusetts Federal Court, Roku attempted to circumvent the UPC's determination of these same questions, forum shop to address the same or similar disputes in multiple venues, and obtain from the Massachusetts Federal Court an opinion on license terms.
In its order dismissing the lawsuit, Judge Stearns determined that the Court does not have jurisdiction to set a global FRAND rate as requested by Roku. The dismissal also effectively precludes any conflict between the Massachusetts lawsuit and the UPC actions well underway in Europe.
Strategic Implications for Industry
The dismissal signals to potential licensees that the rule of law matters, and litigation is not a tool to avoid good-faith licensing negotiations. It reinforces the notion that patents are territorial and that US courts cannot be used as a vehicle to unilaterally set global FRAND royalty rates for patents held by non-parties in lieu of negotiations.
"This is a significant ruling that confirms what we've long understood about the complexities of global patent licensing," said John Kinton, Chief Legal Officer at Access Advance. "We appreciate the court's careful consideration of the jurisdictional challenges involved when dealing with patent portfolios that span more than a hundred countries and involve dozens of patent owners who aren't parties to the litigation."
The Roku decision is consistent with the decisions to date in ongoing litigation in the United Kingdom, where Tesla is appealing the UK Appeals Court's affirmance of the UK Patents Court's denial of Tesla's attempt to obtain worldwide FRAND rates for the Avanci patent pool, which does not own any UK patents.
The decision adds to a growing body of cases in which national courts are reluctant to set worldwide FRAND rates absent agreement from the parties. This is expected to maintain stability in standards essential patent licensing and encourage good-faith participation in SEP pool licensing negotiations.
About Access Advance: Access Advance LLC is an independent licensing administrator company formed to lead the development, administration, and management of patent pools for licensing essential patents of the most important video codec technologies. Access Advance provides a transparent and efficient licensing mechanism for both patent owners and patent implementers.
Access Advance manages and administers the HEVC Advance Patent Pool for licensing over 27,500 patents essential to H.265/HEVC technology and the VVC Advance Patent Pool for licensing essential patents to VVC/H.266 technology. The company's Multi-Codec Bridging Agreement provides eligible licensees with a single discounted royalty rate structure for licensees participating in both the HEVC Advance and VVC Advance pools. In addition, Access Advance offers the VDP Pool, a comprehensive licensing solution for video streaming services covering HEVC, VVC, VP9, and AV1 codecs. For more information, please visit: www.accessadvance.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon's ad business stays strong as CTV, DSP offerings improve
Amazon's ad business stays strong as CTV, DSP offerings improve

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's ad business stays strong as CTV, DSP offerings improve

This story was originally published on Marketing Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Marketing Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Amazon's revenue generated from advertising rose 22% year over year to $15.7 billion in Q2 2025, per an earnings statement. The revenue figure beat Wall Street expectations. Executives highlighted developments around the retailer's demand-side platform (DSP) and its recent deal with Roku around connected TV (CTV), while signaling that Alexa+ could eventually offer advertising opportunities. The company said that it hasn't yet seen diminishing demand nor meaningful appreciation in prices due to tariffs, but noted the possible impact of recessionary fears on its Q3 guidance. Dive Insight: Amazon's ad business continues to grow at a rate that exceeds that of its core retail business, which saw net sales increase 13% to $167.7 billion in the quarter. The company helps advertisers reach an average ad-supported audience of more than 300 million consumers in the U.S. through full-funnel offerings that include its retail marketplace, Prime Video, Twitch and — increasingly — its DSP. 'Our trillions of proprietary browsing, shopping, and streaming signals paired with extensive supply side relationships and our secure clean rooms provide advertisers the ability to optimize advertising, deliver greater precision, and drive efficient and effective advertising outcomes,' CEO Andy Jassy said of the DSP on an earnings call. Along with revamping the DSP user experience in October, Amazon in June integrated it with Disney's Real-Time Ad Exchange (DRAX), allowing advertisers to leverage insights from both companies. Amazon last month also partnered with Roku to offer advertisers using its DSP what the companies claim is the largest authenticated CTV footprint in the U.S., a partnership Jassy called 'momentous.' 'It's a giant leap forward for advertisers bringing best in class planning, audience precision, and performance to TV advertising,' the executive said. Amazon has continued to build out its advertising ecosystem, unveiling artificial intelligence-powered contextual ads at its second annual upfront in May, partnering with InfoSum and Magnite around data and widening access to AI tools for advertisers. For its retail business, Amazon expects Q3 net sales to be between $174 billion and $179.5 billion, a wide range that takes into consideration a macroeconomic environment that continues to be effected by President Trump's moves around tariffs. The company's guidance around operating income in Q3 was lower than analysts expected. Executives noted that it is still too early to see how tariffs will settle and who will absorb the costs. 'In the first half, we just haven't seen diminished demand and we haven't seen any kind of broad scale [average sale price] increases. And, you know, so that could change in the second half. There are a lot of things that we don't know, but that's what we've seen so far,' Jassy said. Recommended Reading Amazon launches AI-powered contextual ads at 2nd blockbuster upfront Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him
N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him

The N.W.T. Court of Appeal has dismissed an application from former Denesoline CEO Ron Barlas. Barlas had sought to appeal an N.W.T. Supreme Court ruling against him, which ordered, among other things, his removal as CEO of Łutsel K'e Dene First Nation's (LKDFN) business arm, Denesoline Corporation. Supreme Court Justice Karan Shaner found Barlas had used his authority improperly to enrich himself and his family. In a decision Friday, Court of Appeal justices Jack Watson, Jolaine Antonio and Karen Wenkebach wrote that neither of the grounds Barlas cited for appeal — whether Shaner had given him and his wife Zeba a fair hearing, and whether the remedies granted to LKDFN were justified — had merit. The decision comes as the latest development in the wide-ranging civil lawsuit LKDFN filed against Barlas, who for years ran Denesoline Corporation. The First Nation accused him of diverting nearly $12 million from its companies for his own gain. The decision states Barlas objected to the fact Shaner's decision relied on affidavits, questioning, documents and lawyers' oral presentations, and felt she should have ordered a trial. "Barlas ... disputes various findings by [Shaner] about discreditable conduct that she found was revealed by his own words and the documentary record," the decision noted. The Court of Appeal found Shaner canvassed similar cases from other jurisdictions of Canada to help her come to a decision. The court wrote that the suggestion that Shaner's decision to not order a trial led to unfairness is "not an accurate way of looking at what happened here." It cited case law where a judge observed that the ultimate question in a fairness test isn't whether a decision was "the" fair one, but rather "a" fair one. "The appellants have no basis to claim that they did not have fair notice or opportunity to present evidence and argument," the court wrote. The Court of Appeal wrote that Shaner's findings, including her characterization of Barlas' actions and attitude, were "amply supported by the evidence."

N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him
N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

N.W.T. appeal court denies former Denesoline CEO's challenge of ruling against him

The N.W.T. Court of Appeal has dismissed an application from former Denesoline CEO Ron Barlas. Barlas had sought to appeal an N.W.T. Supreme Court ruling against him, which ordered, among other things, his removal as CEO of Łutsel K'e Dene First Nation's (LKDFN) business arm, Denesoline Corporation. Supreme Court Justice Karan Shaner found Barlas had used his authority improperly to enrich himself and his family. In a decision Friday, Court of Appeal justices Jack Watson, Jolaine Antonio and Karen Wenkebach wrote that neither of the grounds Barlas cited for appeal — whether Shaner had given him and his wife Zeba a fair hearing, and whether the remedies granted to LKDFN were justified — had merit. The decision comes as the latest development in the wide-ranging civil lawsuit LKDFN filed against Barlas, who for years ran Denesoline Corporation. The First Nation accused him of diverting nearly $12 million from its companies for his own gain. The decision states Barlas objected to the fact Shaner's decision relied on affidavits, questioning, documents and lawyers' oral presentations, and felt she should have ordered a trial. "Barlas ... disputes various findings by [Shaner] about discreditable conduct that she found was revealed by his own words and the documentary record," the decision noted. The Court of Appeal found Shaner canvassed similar cases from other jurisdictions of Canada to help her come to a decision. The court wrote that the suggestion that Shaner's decision to not order a trial led to unfairness is "not an accurate way of looking at what happened here." It cited case law where a judge observed that the ultimate question in a fairness test isn't whether a decision was "the" fair one, but rather "a" fair one. "The appellants have no basis to claim that they did not have fair notice or opportunity to present evidence and argument," the court wrote. The Court of Appeal wrote that Shaner's findings, including her characterization of Barlas' actions and attitude, were "amply supported by the evidence."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store