ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS): Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q1 Earnings?
Is there a buying opportunity in ServisFirst Bancshares, or does it present a risk to your portfolio? See what our analysts have to say in our full research report, it's free.
We're cautious about ServisFirst Bancshares. Here are three reasons why SFBS doesn't excite us and a stock we'd rather own.
While banks generate revenue from multiple sources, investors view net interest income as the cornerstone - its predictable, recurring characteristics stand in sharp contrast to the volatility of non-interest income.
ServisFirst Bancshares's net interest income has grown at a 7.3% annualized rate over the last four years, slightly worse than the broader bank industry.
Net interest margin represents how much a bank earns in relation to its outstanding loans. It's one of the most important metrics to track because it shows how a bank's loans are performing and whether it has the ability to command higher premiums for its services.
Over the past two years, ServisFirst Bancshares's net interest margin averaged 2.8%. Its margin also contracted by 50 basis points (100 basis points = 1 percentage point) over that period.
This decline was a headwind for its net interest income. While prevailing rates are a major determinant of net interest margin changes over time, the decline could mean ServisFirst Bancshares either faced competition for loans and deposits or experienced a negative mix shift in its balance sheet composition.
Leverage is core to the bank's business model (loans funded by deposits) and to ensure their stability, regulators require certain levels of capital and liquidity, focusing on a bank's Tier 1 capital ratio.
Tier 1 capital is the highest-quality capital that a bank holds, consisting primarily of common stock and retained earnings, but also physical gold. It serves as the primary cushion against losses and is the first line of defense in times of financial distress.
This capital is divided by risk-weighted assets to derive the Tier 1 capital ratio. Risk-weighted means that cash and US treasury securities are assigned little risk while unsecured consumer loans and equity investments get much higher risk weights, for example.
New regulation after the 2008 financial crisis requires that all banks must maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio greater than 4.5% On top of this, there are additional buffers based on scale, risk profile, and other regulatory classifications, so that at the end of the day, banks generally must maintain a 7-10% ratio at minimum.
Over the last two years, ServisFirst Bancshares has averaged a Tier 1 capital ratio of 11%, which is considered unsafe in the event of a black swan or if macro or market conditions suddenly deteriorate. For this reason alone, we will be crossing it off our shopping list.
ServisFirst Bancshares isn't a terrible business, but it isn't one of our picks. With its shares underperforming the market lately, the stock trades at 2.4× forward P/B (or $81.34 per share). This valuation tells us a lot of optimism is priced in - we think there are better stocks to buy right now. We'd suggest looking at one of our top digital advertising picks.
Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs.
While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025).
Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
9 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why did stocks tumble this week?
The stock market had a tough week, with the S&P 500 and tech-stock-heavy Nasdaq retreating sharply on Thursday and Friday following a batch of concerning news on inflation, jobs, and tariffs. The S&P 500 fell 2.7% from an early-week high while the Nasdaq lost 3.9% of its value from its peak on Thursday. Here's why stocks retreated, and what could happen next. The stock market sell-off began in earnest following the Federal Reserve's controversial decision to keep interest rates at 4.25% to 4.5%. President Trump has advocated for Fed Chairman Jerome Powell to cut rates aggressively, recommending a 3% reduction. Related: Goldman Sachs revamps Fed interest rate cut forecast for 2025 Lower interest rates support stock prices because they increase household and business spending, fueling revenue and profit growth. Powell's reluctance to lower rates remains a headwind for stocks this year. Powell cited risks of tariffs driving inflation higher later this year and a "solid" economy for the decision to leave rates unchanged. Many viewed his hawkish tone during his press conference as an indication that rates may not get cut at the next meeting in September either. The decision drew the ire of President Donald Trump, who has previously called Chairman Powell "Mr. Too Late" and a "numbskull" for not already reducing interest rates. The President renewed his calls for Powell to resign following the Fed meeting. Despite White House pressure, the Fed's dual mandate targets low unemployment and inflation, which dictates its decisions on monetary policy. The Fed's mandate purposefully excludes political jawboning. Unfortunately, the Fed's dual goals are contradictory. While Fed rate cuts boost economic activity and lower unemployment, they increase inflation. The opposite is true when it raises rates. This dynamic often means that the Fed hesitates for fear of causing more economic problems than it solves. Unfortunately, that often means that the Fed falls behind the curve when setting interest rates at appropriate levels, forcing it to act more aggressively than it might otherwise because the economy has gotten too hot or cold. That chasing can lead to greater uncertainty, causing stock market volatility. The stock market's sell-off earlier in 2025 was primarily due to higher-than-expected import tariffs and the risk that they would boost inflation, zapping economic activity. Those worries fell when President Trump paused many tariffs on April 9, kickstarting a massive stock market rally that sent the S&P 500 and Nasdaq up over 28% and 38%, respectively. More Layoffs: Intel's recent layoffs take an unexpected turnWalmart makes more cuts customers won't likeLooking for a job? Job ads probably won't help you find one However, now that President Trump's tariff pause expired on August 1, he's announced new tariffs ranging from 10% to 41%, including a 35% tariff on Canada, up from 25%. Canada was our third-largest trading partner in 2024. The higher tariffs are problematic, given that they occur even as the impact of tariffs left in place earlier this year seems to be increasing inflation. The Personal Consumption Expenditures index showed inflation increased to 2.6% in June, up from 2.4% in May and 2.2% in April. The higher and faster inflation rises, the more likely business and household spending will shrink, dinging corporate revenue and earnings growth at publicly traded companies. The stock market was also hit by disappointing jobs data. Stocks perform best when the economy creates more jobs and wages grow, creating extra discretionary income. Related: Jobs report shocker resets Fed interest rate cut bets On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said the US economy only added 73,000 jobs in July, far fewer than the 100,000 expected and 147,000 in June. As a result, the unemployment rate increased to 4.24%, its highest level this cycle. Meanwhile, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed the number of open jobs fell to 7.4 million in June from 7.7 million in May. In case that wasn't concerning enough, Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that US employers announced 62,075 layoffs in July, up 29% from June and 140% year over year. Stocks have had a remarkable rally, and it's not shocking that they might take a break. August is a notoriously weak month for stock market returns, and recent gains have lifted the S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio, a key valuation measure, to lofty levels. According to FactSet, the S&P 500's forward P/E ratio was 22.4 on Friday, near the highs set in February before tariff announcements caused a sell-off, and up from about 19 in April, when stocks were near the lows. With valuation arguably rich and inflation and jobs uncertainty growing, stocks could experience more volatility than usual this month. Long-term investors are likely best off simply recognizing that pullbacks are common. According to Capital Group, a money manager with $2.2 trillion under management, the S&P 500 retreats 5% to 10% about once per year. Short-term investors may want to take a different approach, locking in recent gains and looking for lower entry points in the coming weeks. Related: Morgan Stanley resets S&P 500 target for 2026 The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Some strategists see a stock-market bubble brewing — and it's not the Magnificent 7's fault this time
Stock valuations are rising. Rather than the Mag Seven, look at the "Terrific 20." The Terrific 20 stocks includes diverse sectors, indicating a broadening market beyond Big Tech. But some warn of "speculative fervor," given that price multiples, not earnings, are on the rise. Stock valuations are getting frothy again, but this time, it's not all Big Tech's fault. Yes, valuations of the Magnificent Seven stocks — Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Tesla — are back up after since bottoming in April. Yet, the group's 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio is still down from mid-2024, mid-2023, and 2020 levels. Meanwhile, forward PE ratios on the next 20 stocks in the S&P 500 continue to surge, topping levels seen earlier this year. Their valuations are also higher than at any point over the last decade. Arun Sai, a senior multi-asset strategist at Pictet Asset Management, calls the group the "Terrific 20." Some may see the rising forward expectations for a widening number of stocks as a sign of health, as the rally extends beyond just the most popular stocks. But when stocks rise because of multiple expansion instead of earnings growth, it may be a sign that investor sentiment is becoming overheated. "These companies span a broad set of sectors more closely tied to the real economy, including financials, energy, industrials, consumer, and legacy tech," Sai wrote on Tuesday. "Names like Broadcom, Walmart, JPMorgan, Berkshire Hathaway, Visa, and GE Aerospace now account for ~17% of the MSCI US index, compared to 33% for the Mag 7." "Broader participation is a positive — when it's driven by earnings," he continued. "But when more of the market gets expensive, the narrative that 'US equities aren't overpriced, just a few exceptional companies are' becomes harder to justify." Sai compared the current environment to the so-called "Nifty Fifty" bubble in the 1960s. Richard Bernstein, the founder of Richard Bernstein Advisors and former chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch, said in June that there are parallels to another famous episode of euphoria—the dot-com bubble of 2000—as the market seems solely focused on an emerging technology. On Wednesday, Bernstein reiterated his skepticism of the rally, noting that the market is still relatively concentrated even if valuations are surging among more than just the top seven stocks. Trading of leveraged ETFs, zero-day options, and low dollar-value stocks is also picking back up, signs of excess optimism, he said. "If you're a trader, I think you should take a deep breath and kind of look at what's going on and realize that everybody's in this huge speculative fervor," Bernstein told Business Insider. "But if you're an investor and you want to be a little patient, I don't think it gets much better than this." "The reckless abandon is going to leave you with so many opportunities," he continued. "It's going to be like post-2000." Most Wall Street strategists don't see a dramatic pullback ahead, and few have made direct comparisons to prior bubble episodes. In recent days, however, some have extended quiet warnings to investors about the market's near-term direction. Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, CIO Americas and global head of equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note on Tuesday that "investors should be mindful of potential market swings in the coming weeks," and that "capital preservation or phasing-in strategies can be effective in navigating near-term volatility." While valuations are no doubt extended, there's no guarantee a major market top is near, and the AI trade may have room to run as the technology evolves. Meta and Microsoft, for example, reported strong earnings beats this week and gave positive forward guidance, causing shares to soar. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Some strategists see a stock-market bubble brewing — and it's not the Magnificent 7's fault this time
Stock valuations are rising. Rather than the Mag Seven, look at the "Terrific 20." The Terrific 20 stocks includes diverse sectors, indicating a broadening market beyond Big Tech. But some warn of "speculative fervor," given that price multiples, not earnings, are on the rise. Stock valuations are getting frothy again, but this time, it's not all Big Tech's fault. Yes, valuations of the Magnificent Seven stocks — Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Tesla — are back up after since bottoming in April. Yet, the group's 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio is still down from mid-2024, mid-2023, and 2020 levels. Meanwhile, forward PE ratios on the next 20 stocks in the S&P 500 continue to surge, topping levels seen earlier this year. Their valuations are also higher than at any point over the last decade. Arun Sai, a senior multi-asset strategist at Pictet Asset Management, calls the group the "Terrific 20." Some may see the rising forward expectations for a widening number of stocks as a sign of health, as the rally extends beyond just the most popular stocks. But when stocks rise because of multiple expansion instead of earnings growth, it may be a sign that investor sentiment is becoming overheated. "These companies span a broad set of sectors more closely tied to the real economy, including financials, energy, industrials, consumer, and legacy tech," Sai wrote on Tuesday. "Names like Broadcom, Walmart, JPMorgan, Berkshire Hathaway, Visa, and GE Aerospace now account for ~17% of the MSCI US index, compared to 33% for the Mag 7." "Broader participation is a positive — when it's driven by earnings," he continued. "But when more of the market gets expensive, the narrative that 'US equities aren't overpriced, just a few exceptional companies are' becomes harder to justify." Sai compared the current environment to the so-called "Nifty Fifty" bubble in the 1960s. Richard Bernstein, the founder of Richard Bernstein Advisors and former chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch, said in June that there are parallels to another famous episode of euphoria—the dot-com bubble of 2000—as the market seems solely focused on an emerging technology. On Wednesday, Bernstein reiterated his skepticism of the rally, noting that the market is still relatively concentrated even if valuations are surging among more than just the top seven stocks. Trading of leveraged ETFs, zero-day options, and low dollar-value stocks is also picking back up, signs of excess optimism, he said. "If you're a trader, I think you should take a deep breath and kind of look at what's going on and realize that everybody's in this huge speculative fervor," Bernstein told Business Insider. "But if you're an investor and you want to be a little patient, I don't think it gets much better than this." "The reckless abandon is going to leave you with so many opportunities," he continued. "It's going to be like post-2000." Most Wall Street strategists don't see a dramatic pullback ahead, and few have made direct comparisons to prior bubble episodes. In recent days, however, some have extended quiet warnings to investors about the market's near-term direction. Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, CIO Americas and global head of equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note on Tuesday that "investors should be mindful of potential market swings in the coming weeks," and that "capital preservation or phasing-in strategies can be effective in navigating near-term volatility." While valuations are no doubt extended, there's no guarantee a major market top is near, and the AI trade may have room to run as the technology evolves. Meta and Microsoft, for example, reported strong earnings beats this week and gave positive forward guidance, causing shares to soar. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data