France's National Assembly adopts long-debated bill legalizing end-of-life options
Advertisement
In parallel, another bill on palliative care meant to reinforce measures to relieve pain and preserve patients' dignity was also adopted Tuesday, unanimously.
The proposed measure on lethal medication defines assisted dying as allowing people to use it under certain conditions so that they may take it themselves. Only those whose physical condition doesn't allow them to do it alone would be able to get help from a doctor or a nurse.
The bill has strict conditions
To benefit, patients would need to be over 18 and be French citizens or live in France.
A team of medical professionals would need to confirm that the patient has a grave and incurable illness 'at an advanced or terminal stage,' is suffering from intolerable and untreatable pain and is seeking lethal medication of their own free will.
Advertisement
Patients with severe psychiatric conditions and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease won't be eligible.
The person would initiate the request for lethal medication and confirm the request after a period of reflection.
If approved, a doctor would deliver a prescription for the lethal medication, which could be taken at home or at a nursing home or a health care facility.
A 2023 report indicated that most French citizens back legalizing end-of-life options, and opinion polls show growing support over the past 20 years.
Initial discussions in parliament last year were abruptly interrupted by President Emmanuel Macron's decision to dissolve the National Assembly, plunging France into a months-long political crisis.
Months-long debate ahead
Earlier this month, Macron suggested he could ask French voters to approve the measure via referendum if parliament discussions get off track.
Activists supporting the change have criticized the complexity and length of the parliamentary process that they say is penalizing patients waiting for end-of-life options. Many French people have traveled to neighboring countries where medically assisted suicide or euthanasia are legal.
The Association for the Right to Die with Dignity (ADMD) has called on French lawmakers 'to respect the French who want the same right that our Dutch, Belgian, Luxembourgian, Swiss, Spanish, Portuguese neighbors have.'
French religious leaders this month issued a joint statement to denounce the bill, warning about the 'dangers' of an 'anthropological rupture.' The Conference of Religious Leaders in France (CRCF), which represents the Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist communities, said the proposed measures risk exerting pressure on older people and those with illnesses or disabilities.
Similar talks in the U.K.
The vote in France came as similar talks are ongoing in the U.K., where lawmakers are debating a bill to help terminally ill adults end their lives in England and Wales after giving it initial approval in November.
Advertisement
Medically assisted suicide involves patients taking, of their own free will, a lethal drink or medication that has been prescribed by a doctor to those who meet certain criteria. Euthanasia involves doctors or other health practitioners giving patients who meet certain criteria a lethal injection at their own request.
Assisted suicide is allowed in Switzerland and several U.S. states. Euthanasia is currently legal in the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Canada, Australia, Colombia, Belgium and Luxembourg under certain conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Willing to be complicit': Booker screams on Senate floor over police bills
WASHINGTON – New Jersey Democrat Sen. Cory Booker screamed at his colleagues in a rare occurrence on the Senate floor Tuesday, arguing they were 'complicit' with President Donald Trump and that his party 'needs a wake-up call.' The exchange occurred as Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nevada, sought to swiftly move a package of bipartisan bills that would increase resources and funding to police departments and officers. Booker objected to the package and offered an amendment that would require the administration to allocate public safety grants without political bias. That ignited Cortez Masto's ire, who complained that Booker hadn't raised his concerns when the bills passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he sits on, weeks ago. 'This is ridiculous. This is an attempt to kill all of these bills,' she said. Booker responded, 'This, to me, is the problem with Democrats in America right now is we're willing to be complicit to Donald Trump to let this pass through when we have all the leverage right now.' He also got into a heated back-and-forth with Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, who told him that he couldn't just stop bills that come out of a committee and then "allow for other bills that fund other parts of your budget in your state." Booker said he it was wrong to imply that the police bills were not vital to his state. 'What I am tired of is when the president of the United States of America violates the Constitution, trashes our norms and traditions, and what does the Democratic party do?' he thundered on the Senate floor. 'Comply? Allow him? Beg for scraps?' "The Democratic party needs a wake-up call," he said. Democrats have been divided about how to organize an effective resistance against Trump and break through the cracks of MAGA populism as the party is still recovering after a bruising 2024 election loss. Booker and other progressive Democrats have been urging their colleagues to be more vocal against the administration. 'If we don't stand as Democrats, we deserve to lose. But if we stand united, if we stand strong, if we stand with other people, if we tell, with a chorus of conviction that, 'America, what this president is doing is wrong,' if we stand up and speak that way, dear God, we will win,' Booker said. In April, Booker delivered a marathon 25-hour and five-minute speech on the Senate floor, railing against the Trump administration's policies and actions. 'These are not normal times in America, and they should not be treated as such,' Booker said at the time.
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate Democrats try to force release of Epstein files using arcane law
Senate Democrats are using an arcane procedural tool to try to force the Department of Justice to release additional files from the Jeffrey Epstein case – the latest gambit to keep the issue front-and-center as lawmakers prepare for their month-long August recess. In a new letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Democrats who sit on the Senate Homeland Security Committee requested DOJ release all of the files related to Epstein, including audio, video and any other relevant documents. 'After missteps and failed promises by your Department regarding these files, it is essential that the Trump Administration provide full transparency,' the group wrote in a later dated Tuesday. The letter goes on to request the documents be turned over no later than August 15 and that appropriate accommodations be made to protect victims' identities. The Democrats are also requesting a briefing no later than August 29. Democrats are basing their request on a nearly 100-year-old law that allows five or more members of the Senate Homeland Security Committee to request information from the administration even when they are in the minority and lack subpoena power. The law, however, has not been regularly used nor is it clear whether it would yield the documents Democrats are seeking in an extended court fight challenging the request. Democrats have sought in recent weeks to keep the fight over the Epstein files, and the fallout from it, at the political forefront, viewing it as a key test for President Donald Trump and his ability to contain the fervor for them among his usually loyal base. In the House, an Oversight subcommittee moved in a bipartisan vote to subpoena the Epstein files after Democrats pushed the issue there, and the party has made similar pushes in other committees on both sides of the Capitol. CNN has reached out to Senate GOP Leader John Thune's office and the Justice Department for comment on the letter, which was first reported on by The New York Times. The Democrats' likelihood of success will hinge in part on the willingness of the Trump administration to put the information out, as a court fight would be unlikely to force the documents over to Congress. That's because Congress has struggled for years, especially during Trump's presidencies, to obtain documents and information from the executive branch. Several times, committees and members have sued, with mixed results that often end years later in negotiation rather than a final court ruling. In 2017, a small group of House members sued for documents from the General Services Administration related to its contract with the Trump Internation Hotel in Washington. The House Oversight Committee got some traction at the time from the federal appellate court in DC, which in a split three-judge decision determined members of Congress had the ability to go to court seeking executive branch information if they requested it under the law allowing five senators or seven individual House members to sue. Five years later, however, the Biden administration was still arguing in court for the same policy the first Trump administration had backed: that individual members of Congress, even ranking minority committee members, didn't have that level of legal authority. The Biden administration, in a petition to the Supreme Court in 2022, wrote that members of Congress could always use politics rather than the courts to pressure an administration. The Supreme Court never heard the case, after the Biden administration provided the Democrats in Congress many of the documents they sought. CNN's Paula Reid contributed to this report.
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fetterman announces ‘Unfettered' memoir
A new memoir from Sen. John Fetterman promises to offer an 'unapologetic account' of the Pennsylvania Democrat's 'unconventional' life. 'My public service path, the stroke, depression — 'Unfettered' lays it out and pays it forward for anyone dealing with mental health challenges,' Fetterman said in a Wednesday social media post announcing his forthcoming book. In the memoir, poised to be released on Nov. 11, Fetterman will share 'the story of his journey in public service' as well as 'unvarnished details of his life-threatening stroke and struggles with depression,' according to publisher Crown Publishing Group. 'Unfettered' will also detail 'the truth about what really happens in Washington' and Fetterman's 'vision for navigating our divided country's future.' Fetterman has opened up before about his mental health challenges, which prompted him to take a leave of absence from the Senate in 2023 while being treated for depression for six weeks at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. The 55-year-old lawmaker suffered a stroke in 2022 just days ahead of Pennsylvania's Senate primary. Earlier this year, he dismissed a New York magazine report that detailed extensive concerns from some of his current and former staffers about his mental state. In his X post promoting his memoir, Fetterman said, 'In my career, I've picked the battles that matter.' Calling the book 'raw and visceral,' its publisher said it would serve as a 'reminder that public service comes in many forms, and a vision for fighting the battles that matter in a divided country.'
