Iran's executions of 3 accused of spying and mass detentions fuel crackdown fears
Fears that the Iranian regime could be using the recent conflict with Israel to crack down on its own population grew Wednesday after three people were executed and hundreds more were arrested and accused of spying.
Accused of espionage for Israel's Mossad spy agency, the three people put to death Wednesday allegedly brought 'assassination equipment' disguised as shipments of alcoholic beverages and used in the assassination of a public figure into the country, according to Tasnim, a semiofficial outlet affiliated with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
A separate report from the state-aligned Fars News Agency Wednesday also said that more than 700 people it described as 'Israeli mercenaries' had been arrested over the last 12 days.
Both reports came after a day of relative calm between Israel and Iran after President Donald Trump demanded they cease hostilities, which began with Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and other targets June 13.
'This crackdown was inevitable,' Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at the London-based Chatham House think tank, told NBC News on Wednesday.
'I think it's going to be quite extensive and quite prolonged,' she said, adding that they were 'a relatively predictable outcome' for a regime that 'remains heavily repressive.'
Having been locked into a decadeslong simmering conflict with Israel before the recent war, Iran has long been known to put people to death over allegations of spying for Mossad.
Suspicions of infiltration are not without basis, after several Israeli media outlets published footage released by the spy agency that appeared to show covert agents launching missiles from within Iran during the recent attacks. NBC News could not independently verify this footage.
The head of Iran's judiciary, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, also called on Saturday for cases of alleged collaborators with Israel to be expedited so they could face sentencing 'as quickly as possible,' according to to Iranian state media outlet ISNA.
But rights groups including Amnesty International have sounded the alarm over the latest round of executions and arrests, warning that there could be more sweeping arrests and executions without any evidence of wrongdoing provided by the regime.
Those concerns were echoed by Kenneth Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, who said that while Israel's early attacks on Iran had suggested local collaborators, 'there is deep reason for concern that people will be accused, convicted, and sentenced for helping Israel on the basis of flimsy if any evidence,' given the country's 'notorious lack of due process.'
The Iranian Embassy in London did not immediately respond to a request for comment from NBC News.
Rights groups have also warned that near-total internet blackouts across Iran can also be used as a tool of repression, blocking the population from sharing information with the outside world.
The Iranian Communications Ministry said this was enforced to prevent Israeli cyberattacks, although the government had in the past shut down or reduced internet access in times of civil unrest.
The crackdown could be 'used as a pretext to pre-empt any signs of dissent or public protest against Iranian government and military officials for their failure to protect civilians and key infrastructure from being targeted,' according to Burcu Ozcelik, a senior research fellow for Middle East security at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank.
She added that the 'manhunt' for spies would also 'likely deflect attention away from the higher level officials in Iran who may be responsible for Israel's successful intelligence penetration inside Iran.'
After several senior military leaders and nuclear scientists were killed by Israel, talk of "regime change" by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will likely have fueled paranoia within the Iranian leadership, although the president has since said he doesn't "want it."
Netanyahu's comments shortly after he ordered the strikes that the Iranian public should use the attacks as an 'opportunity to stand up and let your voices be heard,' were 'felt misguided,' Vakil of Chatham House said.
Under aerial bombardment, 'most people shelter in place,' rather than attempting 'to bring down an institutionalized bureaucratized and repressive system of government,' she said.
But, she added, it was unclear what lies ahead for a population living under a regime likely to 'harden and consolidate."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves must rethink how tax and spend decisions are made after welfare U-turn
There are many lessons for Labour's bruised leadership from last week's embarrassing U-turn on welfare cuts, but one is surely that how – and when – fiscal policy is set is not working. Binary fiscal rules, a slim margin for error (less than £10bn), and the Office for Budget Responsibility's twice-yearly forecasts, have combined to turn tax and spending decisions into a grim spectator sport. City analysts are constantly second-guessing exactly how Rachel Reeves's hand will be forced next. As the Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, put it last week, before the benefits climbdown, 'having the financial markets marking fiscal policy to market on a daily basis is not a good state of affairs'. The chancellor promised to hold only one budget a year, at which tax changes would be announced: a decision aimed at demonstrating stability and strength. However, the Treasury began signalling during the bond market panic in January that she was prepared to use her spring statement to make spending cuts, if higher interest costs set her on course to break her fiscal rules. Some wise heads argued at the time against the idea of hastily drawing up cuts, tailored to close whatever gap the OBR identified in five years' time – the period over which the rules are assessed. As the former Bank deputy governor Charlie Bean put it: 'I think we want to get away from this idea that we continually have to be neurotically changing taxes and spending to try to control this OBR forecast so that it's hitting our target.' In his understated way, Bailey effectively agreed with that this week, arguing: 'There is a danger in overinterpreting a five-year-ahead forecast.' They are right: one result is hasty policy changes driven by cost-cutting targets (although the Treasury lays part of the blame on the Department for Work and Pensions for, it claims, dragging its heels over the reform package). Another consequence is that the debate over economic policy ends up being reduced to a desiccated row over tax and spend. That is especially depressing, given that the contours of an economic strategy are starting to emerge more clearly, a year into Labour's term. The focus last week was meant to be the 'modern industrial strategy' – a hefty document that set out a new approach to nurturing eight strategic sectors, including clean tech, advanced manufacturing and the creative industries. There was much to praise – a senior figure at one business lobby group joked that they would struggle to know what to campaign on next, as so many of their long-running asks had been met. Unions were gratified at the focus on creating jobs and funding additional training – and the promise of workforce strategies for sectors experiencing skills shortages. The government's pragmatic trade strategy, also published last week, was another victim of the overwhelming focus on the welfare row. All this was lost in the Westminster drama of defending the cobbled-together cuts and then negotiating the concessions that already looked inevitable when Reeves insisted on Monday that there would be 'no U-turn'. Her team now have two unenviable tasks ahead of them. First, they will have to start work on a possible package of tax increases to announce in the autumn. As her aides are keen to point out, she could yet strike lucky: growth could bounce back; inflation could ease more rapidly than expected, freeing the Bank of England to crack on with rate cuts; and gilt yields could slide. Treasury officials will be pushing hard over the summer to try to convince the OBR to take into account the growth-friendly nature of some of the government's policies, perhaps nudging forecasts in the right direction. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion However, the majority of independent experts currently believe it is more likely than not that the OBR will downgrade its expectations of productivity – and therefore growth – setting Reeves on course to breach her fiscal rules, even without the £4bn-plus cost of the policy swerves on winter fuel and disability benefits. Reeves could ditch those fiscal rules, of course – but that would be sticking two fingers up at flighty financial markets. Tweaking the rules to allow herself more leeway seems less unthinkable, given how many times previous chancellors rewrote their own rules – but she would have to proceed with caution. While they deny that they are poring over a menu of potential tax rises (although they surely must be), Reeves's allies privately concede that they are thinking about how to avoid another debilitating annual cycle of fevered speculation about fiscal policy. Here they have a number of options, some of which were set out by the International Monetary Fund in its recent report on the UK economy. One is just to build up a bigger buffer against the fiscal forecasts, of course, to reduce the constant sense of jeopardy – but that would probably require an even bigger tax grab. Another would be to commission only one OBR forecast a year instead of two – dodging the spring iteration that prompted the scramble for welfare cuts. This possibility alarms the Treasury, with its echoes of Liz Truss, who saw the OBR as part of the 'anti-growth coalition' and paid the price in the bond markets. A sensible halfway house might be to continue to commission two forecasts but treat the spring one – given there is no budget alongside it – simply as a useful waymarker, for what the chancellor might have to consider in the autumn. Whatever emerges from this rethink, it must allow Reeves to be more flexible in the face of changing economic circumstances because the framework she so carefully constructed to project strength has instead trapped Labour into decisions that ultimately proved untenable.
Metro
34 minutes ago
- Metro
Streeting tells Israel 'get your own house in order' over Glastonbury criticism
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the Israeli embassy needs to take violence against Palestinians more seriously before talking about chants at Glastonbury. The festival saw thousands chant 'death to the IDF (Israeli Defence Forces)' during a performance from Bob Vylan, which Streeting said was 'appalling'. The Israeli Embassy said in a statement: 'The embassy in the United Kingdom is deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival.' This morning, Streeting responded to that statement on Sky News Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips. 'Get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank,' he said. 'I think there's a serious point there by the Israeli embassy that I take seriously. I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously.' Rapper Bob Vylan led chants at Glastonbury of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF'. Irish rap trio Kneecap also led pro-Palestine remarks. Police are currently investigating the chants. 'I thought it's appalling, to be honest, and I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens,' the health secretary added. 'But the fact that we saw that chant at a music festival, when there were Israelis at a similar music festival who were kidnapped, murdered, raped, and in some cases still held captive, whether it's a Palestinian or an Israeli, whether it's a Christian, a Jew or a Muslim, all life is precious. 'All life is sacred. And I find it pretty revolting we've got to a state in this conflict where you're supposed to sort of cheer on one side or the other like it's a football team.' Asked if the BBC should have cut the live feed, he said the broadcaster has questions to answer, but that he did not know what the editorial and operational challenges were of taking such action. Avon and Somerset Police said video evidence would be assessed by officers 'to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the scenes grotesque, writing on X: 'Glorifying violence against Jews isn't edgy. The West is playing with fire if we allow this sort of behaviour to go unchecked.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.' Kneecap, who hail from Belfast, have been in the headlines after member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. In the run-up to the festival at Worthy Farm in Somerset, several politicians called for the group to be removed from the line-up, and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said their performance would not be appropriate. More Trending During the performance, fellow Kneecap member Naoise Ó Cairealláin said: 'The Prime Minister of your country, not mine, said he didn't want us to play, so f*** Keir Starmer.' Glastonbury organisers said in a statement online: 'As a festival, we stand against all forms of war and terrorism. We will always believe in – and actively campaign for – hope, unity, peace and love. 'With almost 4,000 performances at Glastonbury 2025, there will inevitably be artists and speakers appearing on our stages whose views we do not share, and a performer's presence here should never be seen as a tacit endorsement of their opinions and beliefs. 'However, we are appalled by the statements made from the West Holts stage by Bob Vylan chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Inside Rod Stewart's 18th century Essex mansion with jaw-dropping football pitch MORE: Bob Vylan reacts after Glastonbury performance is probed by police alongside Kneecap MORE: Why is there no Glastonbury in 2026? There's a very good reason
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer says he lost grip on Labour welfare revolt due to focus on foreign affairs
Keir Starmer has said he did not get a grip on the Labour rebellion over disability benefits earlier because he was focused on foreign affairs. The prime minister acknowledged he had not got it right, and said he would have wanted to make the concessions earlier. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did,' Starmer said in an interview with the Sunday Times. 'I'm putting this as context rather than an excuse. 'I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend. From the moment I got back from the G7, I went straight into a Cobra meeting. My full attention really bore down on this on Thursday. At that point, we were able to move relatively quickly.' He insisted there had been 'a lot of outreach' over the bill to backbench MPs but acknowledged more should have been done. 'Would I rather have been able to get to a constructive package with colleagues earlier? Yeah, I would. [But] I believe in the world we live in, not the world we want to live in,' he said. It is Starmer's third admission of having taken the wrong course in recent days, indicating he may be moving to try to reset his premiership. He gave an interview to the Observer saying he 'deeply regrets' having used the phrase 'island of strangers' about immigration and that he made the wrong choice in having originally appointed former civil servant Sue Gray to be his shortlived chief of staff. Starmer will be attempting this week to draw a line under the welfare rebellion, with whips working to persuade Labour MPs to back the bill with new concessions on Tuesday. Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, offered the changes at midnight last Thursday, which would protect all existing claimants of personal independence payment (Pip) and raise the health element of universal credit in line with inflation. However, dozens of Labour MPs remain unconvinced, with No 10 facing a battle over the next 48 hours to minimise the size of the revolt. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said he is confident the government will win the vote on Tuesday, telling Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that the changes 'have put us in a much better position'. 'As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected,' he said. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion One of the original leading rebels, Louise Haigh, a former transport secretary, said she would now vote in favour, as long as the details confirmed the changes promised by Kendall. But she said Starmer should now reset the government's relationship with the public and backbenchers. She told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme it was welcome that Starmer has 'acknowledged that mistakes have been made and that things need to change'. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she said. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.'
