Sen. Thom Tillis in stepping aside goes the way of other Republicans who have challenged Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — Flake. Corker. Romney.
And now, Sen. Thom Tillis.
The roll call of Republican senators in the U.S. Congress who have called it quits, rather than endure a political career sideways with President Donald Trump, is long, notable -- and apparently, still growing.
Tillis, the GOP senator from North Carolina, announced his decision not to seek reelection Sunday, a stunning moment, given its timing.
It arrived a day after Donald Trump trashed Tillis online, threatening to campaign against him, after the senator revealed he would oppose Trump's big tax breaks bill because of its deep cuts to Medicaid that he warned would devastate his state.
'My goal is not to undermine the president,' Tillis told the Associated Press and others late Sunday night at the U.S. Capitol.
'But why not do it right? And why not take the time to make sure that we're not going to have unintended consequences, which will also have, I think, substantial political consequences next year if we're not careful."
The senator, like others before him, has run up against the limits of his own perceived truth-telling, particularly when it goes against the views of the president or threatens the White House agenda.
A tough reelection became tougher
Tillis' reelection in the Tar Heel State was already expected to be difficult, a $600 million campaign, he said he was told. Democrats see the state as a prime pick-up opportunity in next year's elections as they try to flip the seat and retake majority control of the Senate from Republicans.
Turning 65 later this year, Tillis said he had been weighing his decision, and having put a cancer diagnosis behind him was charting the next phase of his life. A former House speaker in North Carolina, he noted he has been in office for some 20 years.
But Trump's unchallenged grip on the party, and his singular ability to not only tank political careers but also deeply influence the views of Republican voters, leaves little room for dissent.
Most GOP senators who confronted Trump during his first term – Arizona's Jeff Flake, Tennessee's Bob Corker and Utah's Mitt Romney, who was the only Republican to vote to convict Trump in both of his Senate impeachment trials – have long since stepped aside.
Tillis bristled at those comparisons.
"No, no, no. Look, I am an unlikely senator,' Tillis said.
He insisted, 'I don't like any of the trappings that many senators like up here. I like doing work. I like going home, and I like being with my family. That's me.'
Tillis wants Trump to succeed
Tillis, as he walked back to his Senate office, told the story of living in a trailer park in Nashville as a teen with his family, before branching out on his own.
At about 16, he had been a cook at a roadside diner, 'like a Denny's,' he said, but found that the waiters made more money with tips, so he switched. He was grossing about $10,000 a year. Then he moved on to a warehouse job, earning about the same pay, and was able to move into the trailer of his own.
That's one reason why he opposes Trump's tax bill: he says it's not the kind of relief the president is promising for working Americans. Take the president's no tax on tips plan, he said.
'Thom Tillis the waiter gets a tax break. Thom Tills the warehouse worker doesn't,' he said.
'Why can't we figure out a way to give it to both of them versus something that catches an applause line in Las Vegas?'
Tillis went on, 'I would love to have told the president this story. Instead of people getting gimmicky and targeting things — and not looking at the inherent unfairness of that policy and the additional billions of dollars we have to spend on that — which is forcing the Medicaid debate.'
He said, exasperated, 'Folks, pull back.'
Trump and Tillis talk
Tillis did talk with Trump over the past several days. On Friday night he said he had a good call with the president and shared his concerns with the bill.
But once the president lashed out against him Saturday night, that was about it.
"I told the president after that post that it'd probably be a good time for him to start looking for replacements,' Tillis said
In a speech later Sunday, Tillis appeared somewhat liberated, free to publicly call the bill as he saw it, a betrayal of Trump's promises.
'I'm telling the president that you have been misled: You're supporting the Senate mark will hurt people who are eligible and qualified for Medicaid,' he thundered from the chamber floor.
Colleagues have been taking notice. Democrats in particular can't help but remember another pivotal moment when Republicans were trying to cut health care and a single GOP senator stood up and said no.
Tillis, McCain and health care
Sen. John McCain famously voted thumbs down against the Republican plan to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, in a stunning setback during Trump's first term in the summer of 2017.
Tillis brushed off that comparison, too.
'We're gonna get the tax bill done,' he said.
But he said, the president has advisers that are 'politically too cute by half, and they're having fun while we're having to implement suboptimal policy that will degrade the enormous impact and the legacy that this president could otherwise have.'
And as he heads for the exits next year, Tillis said 'if they continue to do this, I'll start spending some time focusing on just who those people are.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
9 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Daybreak: Senate Pulls All-Nighter
On today's podcast: 1) Senate Republican leaders continue to scrounge for votes to pass Donald Trump's $3.3 trillion tax and spending bill as lingering intraparty fights threaten to upend the legislative centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. 2) President Donald Trump lashed out at Elon Musk on Tuesday, accusing the Tesla Inc. and SpaceX chief executive officer of benefiting excessively from government electric vehicle subsidies. Tesla shares tumbled. 3) US equity futures are taking a breather after the S&P 500 notched its best quarter since 2023, as investors monitor progress on trade talks and wrangling in Washington over President Donald Trump's tax bill.
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
What's at stake from GOP megabill's coverage losses
Nearly 12 million people would lose their health insurance under President Trump's "big, beautiful bill," an erosion of the social safety net that would lead to more unmanaged chronic illnesses, higher medical debt and overcrowding of hospital emergency departments. Why it matters: The changes in the Senate version of the bill could wipe out most of the health coverage gains made under the Affordable Care Act and slash state support for Medicaid and SNAP. "We are going back to a place of a lot of uncompensated care and a lot of patchwork systems for people to get care," said Ellen Montz, a managing director at Manatt Health who oversaw the ACA federal marketplace during the Biden administration. The big picture: The stakes are huge for low-income and working-class Americans who depend on Medicaid and subsidized ACA coverage. Without health coverage, more people with diabetes, heart disease, asthma and other chronic conditions will likely go without checkups and medication to keep their ailments in check. Those who try to keep up with care after losing insurance will pay more out of pocket, driving up medical debt and increasing the risk of eviction, food insecurity and depleted savings. Uninsured patients have worse cancer survival outcomes and are less likely to get prenatal care. Medicaid also is a major payer of behavioral health counseling and crisis intervention. Much of the coverage losses from the bill will come from new Medicaid work reporting requirements, congressional scorekeepers predict. Work rules generally will have to be implemented for coverage starting in 2027, but could be earlier or later depending on the state. Past experiments with Medicaid work rules show that many eligible people fall through the cracks verifying they've met the requirements or navigating new state bureaucracies. Often, people don't find out they've lost coverage until they try to fill a prescription or see their doctor. States typically provide written notices, but contacts can be out of date. Nearly 1 in 3 adults who were disenrolled from Medicaid after the COVID pandemic found out they no longer had health insurance only when they tried to access care, per a KFF survey. Zoom out: The Medicaid and ACA changes will also affect people who keep their coverage. The anticipated drop-off in preventive care means the uninsured will be more likely to go to the emergency room when they get sick. That could further crowd already bursting ERs, resulting in even longer wait times. Changes to ACA markets in the bill, along with the impending expiration of enhanced premium subsidies, may drive healthier people to drop out, Montz said, skewing the risk pool and driving up premiums for remaining enrollees. States will likely have to make further cuts to their safety-net programs if the bill passes in order to keep state budgets functioning with less federal Medicaid funding. The other side: The White House and GOP proponents of the bill say the health care changes will fight fraud, waste and abuse, and argue that coverage loss projections are overblown. Conservative health care thinkers also posit that there isn't strong enough evidence that public health insurance improves health. Reality check: Not all insurance is created equally, and many people with health coverage still struggle to access care. But the bill's impact would take the focus off ways to improve the health system, Montz said. "This is taking us catastrophically backward, where we don't get to think about the things that we should be thinking about how to best keep people healthy," she said. The bottom line: The changes will unfold against a backdrop of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s purported focus on preventive care and ending chronic illness in the U.S.
Indianapolis Star
13 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana taxpayers shouldn't subsidize $168M in data center corporate welfare
The next time you see a huge data center pop up in your backyard, enjoy it, because you're paying for it. If the Indiana Economic Development Corp. gets its way, the state will have four new energy-and-water-hogging data centers in high-population areas — all funded by you, the taxpayer. The IEDC recently approved $168 million in tax incentives to attract four data centers. Hoosiers will be subsidizing these monstrosities for up to 50 years. Government leaders claim they will create jobs — a total of 180. For those keeping count at home, that's more than $930,000 in taxpayer money per job being "created." Hicks: Braun's smart IEDC picks must now tackle Indiana's development spending mess Indiana has become a haven for data centers because, in 2019, the state government allowed them a 35-year tax exemption to entice them to plop down in Hoosier cornfields. As Libertarians, we believe in private property rights. You can do what you want with your justly acquired property, as long as you pay for it and you own the property. However, the line is drawn when governments get involved. Governments should not take land from others, nor should it hand out bags of tax money and incentives to give one business a leg up over any other competing uses for a property. Nearly all of these data center projects are in high-growth, high-demand suburban areas, where there would be multiple viable uses for the land. Without incentives, the market prevails — and the data centers likely find less populated areas to locate. We also believe in transparency. These four projects are using code names because they're operating in secrecy to prevent the public from knowing which companies they're throwing your money toward. One of the projects, in Hancock County (or Project Redline), is being proposed by Surge Development LLC. Its principal, Chris King, just happens to be an IEDC board member. This approval doubles down on a data center plan Surge recently withdrew due to intense public opposition. The Republican-led state government claims to be pro-business. It needs to embrace the free market instead. Free markets don't have governments picking winners and losers, nor making deals in secret. Free markets don't use taxpayer incentives to favor one business over another. They don't have governments spending billions to buy land and then turn it over to other private companies, as happened in the controversial LEAP project in Boone County. They don't privatize profits and leave the losses on the backs of the taxpayer. Opinion: Indiana's 201% cigarette tax hike will fuel smuggling, not just revenue For every new state-funded project by the IEDC, taxpayers get the shaft. They have to pay for the road, water and power lines, while the businesses themselves are getting a break from paying sales and property taxes, especially as local governments pile on with tax abatements of their own. That means residents and small businesses who have been in the community for years get to shoulder more of the burden of paying for roads, schools and public safety. If Indiana truly wants to be pro-business, it needs to embrace the free market. No tax abatements, no exemptions, no handouts, no special favors that the common citizen or small business doesn't have access to. Instead, focus on keeping taxes low and having a common-sense regulatory environment. Indiana should abolish the IEDC, as well as local economic development corporations. A business can thrive on its own. It doesn't have to mooch off the taxpayers to do so.
