
U.S. Wine Imports Make Up 37% Of Market: Analyzing The Impact of Potential Tariffs
Getty
The U.S. is the fourth largest wine-producing nation in the world but still doesn't produce enough wine to slake the thirst of American wine lovers. Instead, every year, the U.S. imports around 37% of the wine it consumes, about 5 times more than it exports.
This analysis was conducted by Rafael del Rey, an international wine economist and founder of Del Rey Analysts of Wine Markets (Del ReyAWM). Headquartered in the E.U. and with more than 30 years of experience analyzing the global wine trade, he has recently published a report on the impact of the potential 200% tariffs the Trump administration has threatened on E.U. wine exports, as well as strategies businesses can adopt.
'Given that 72.3% of the imported wine to the U.S. comes from EU countries, the potential 200% tariff increase would make it nearly impossible for distributors and consumers to continue purchasing them at the new prices,' stated del Rey, in an online interview.
For example, a bottle of Veuve-Clicquot Yellow Label Brut Champagne – the top-selling Champagne in the U.S. market, which averages around $65 per bottle at retail, could soar to over $150 per bottle.
'Ultimately, American consumers would face a difficult choice: either pay significantly higher prices for wine or reduce their consumption,' continued del Rey.
Wine Imports and exports In and From the U.S.
Del Rey
Of course, American wineries could benefit from expanding their wine production and brands to fill in the gap, but will U.S. consumers be willing to give up their European wines?
Given that 49% of American wine consumers regularly or occasionally drink wine from the E.U., according to the Wine Market Council, many consumers may be reluctant to give up their 'old world wines' – many of which have different flavors and styles than their U.S. counterparts.
Furthermore, the time to plant and develop new vineyards to increase U.S. production ranges from 2 to 5 years, so the lag time would be quite significant. Plus, at this point, there doesn't appear to be any message to drink more American wine.
However, the American wine market is quite lucrative – even with declining consumption – because consumers continue to trade up in price points. According the Gomberg-Fredrikson, a U.S. wine market intelligence firm, Americans purchased $78.9 billion worth of domestic wine and $31.6 billion of imported wine in 2024, up from 3.4% in value from 2023.
The tariff conversation appears to be shifting on almost a daily basis, leading experts to question the outcome. Will the proposed EU wine tariffs ultimately end at 200%, or be negotiated to similar levels as those imposed by the Trump administration in 2019?
'EU wine producers had already faced a tariff hike in 2019, but it was limited to the four countries involved in the Airbus project—France, Spain, Germany, and the UK. That increase was 25%, initially backed by the WTO, and was resolved within a few months,' reported del Rey.
But it is possible that the EU could retaliate similarly to Canada when they were threatened with a 25% tariff. Even though the proposed tariff was paused until April 2, Canadian retailers retaliated by immediately canceling all U.S. wine orders and removed American wines from their store shelves.
It is possible that the EU could engage in further retaliation tactics, such as taxing French wine barrels, corks, bottles, and other wine production equipment that American wineries purchase from European countries.
'These tariffs started when the U.S. imposed tariffs on EU aluminum, the EU responded by raising tariffs on U.S. bourbon, and the U.S. retaliated with higher tariffs on EU wines—creating an endless cycle. It's a senseless approach,' stated del Rey.
'In the end, businesses on both sides and, most importantly, consumers, bear the greatest burden,' he added.
'In the end, businesses on both sides and, most importantly, consumers, bear the greatest burden from the proposed EU tariffs.'
Rafael del Rey, International Wine Economist, Founder, Del Rey Analysts of Wine Markets
Del Rey
When asked what wine businesses and consumers could do to successfully navigate this dynamic period of tariff wars, del Rey responded:
'Convincing the new U.S. administration of these negative consequences is one part of the strategy. The other key strategy is diversification. This was evident when Australia faced new Chinese tariffs and again during the pandemic when different countries imposed varying trade and consumption restrictions.'
However, with the U.S. being the largest wine-consuming market in the world, it is not realistic in the short term that EU producers will be able to find a home for all of their wine.
According to Ignacio Sanchez Recarte, Secretary General of the Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins, in an interview with Bloomberg, many grape growers and wine producers will be in deep financial trouble. 'Will see companies closing the door, because there is no way we can find an alternative market that quickly.'
While in the U.S. many wine lovers are already stocking up on their favorite European wines, with reports of run on Champagne, Prosecco, and other popular wine styles and regions.
America is the Largest Wine Market in the World
getty
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

21 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: Trump, Schumer trade barbs over Senate nominations
The Senate voted on some of Trump's nominations before the August recess. 2:17 The Senate on Saturday considered some of President Donald Trump's nominations before the August recess. Earlier this week, Trump issued an executive order slapping tariffs on many of America's trading partners but the new duties are set to go into effect in seven days. Trump also continues to face questions over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and his relationship with the accused sex trafficker. Latest headlines: 3 minutes ago Johnson makes last-minute visit to Israel 57 minutes ago Greer suggests Aug. 12 tariff deadline for China could slide 1 hour and 37 minutes ago Texas state House set to consider new congressional maps on Monday Here's how the news is developing. 46 Updates Jul 28, 2025, 10:00 AM EDT Trump says he is 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, but it's 'inappropriate' to discuss When asked by reporters if he would pardon Ghislaine Maxwell -- the convicted associate of deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein -- President Donald Trump said he is "allowed to give her a pardon" but "nobody's approached me with it." "Nobody's asked me about it. Right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it," Trump said on Monday. He said he hasn't been "overly interested" in the Epstein files, and called the 'whole thing a hoax' in regard to whether his name is in the files. Jul 28, 2025, 9:56 AM EDT Starmer says he has a 'very good relationship' with Trump British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he has a "very good personal relationship" with President Donald Trump, emphasizing that the United Kingdom and the United States have "always stood together." In terms of best interests for the two countries, Starmer added that he and Trump have a "huge amount of common ground." Trump says he is 'not interested in talking' to Putin President Donald Trump said he has "always gotten along" with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but on Monday, he said he is "not interested in talking" to him. "Russia could be so rich right now. But instead, they spend everything on war. I really thought this was going to end. Every time I think it's going to end, he kills people," Trump said. Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would reduce the 50-day window for Russia to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine. Jul 28, 2025, 9:37 AM EDT Trump says Powell 'has to' cut interest rates While meeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, President Donald Trump said Fed Chair Jerome Powell "has to" cut interest rates. "He should cut. A smart person should cut," Trump said. This comes after Trump visited the Federal Reserve on Thursday, repeating calls for lower interest rates while standing alongside Powell.


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
How foreign policy could crash Republican midterm prospects
This summer's MAGA revolt over the Epstein Files has challenged the longstanding assumption that President Trump has an unbreakable bond with the Republican base. Trump loyalists from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to Steve Bannon to Tucker Carlson have recently criticized the president not just on the Epstein disclosures but also on Medicaid cuts in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Yet new polling shows that another issue could cost Trump crucial support and substantially lower his standing among independent voters whom Republicans need in order to win future elections. While Republicans largely rallied around Trump following the June 22 bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, recent YouGov polling commissioned by the Center for Economic and Policy Research demonstrates substantial political risks for the president and his party if he supports an expanded war involving Israel and Iran. When respondents consider the economic consequences of a broader conflict, as well as their trust in the justifications offered for involvement in such a war, Trump faces overwhelming dissent among Independents. These voters are about one-third of the electorate and currently about evenly split between Democrat-leaning and Republican-leaning. If an issue becomes important in an election and the Independent voters move strongly in one direction, that can swing the election. A clear majority of voters — 65 percent — reported they would hold Trump responsible if gasoline prices rose to $6 a gallon as a result of expanded U.S. military involvement. Among Independent voters, this sentiment rises to 69 percent. Further, when informed that economists would expect a significant rise in mortgage interest rates to result from an expanded conflict — potentially adding over $100,000 in lifetime payments for a typical home — 72 percent oppose U.S. military involvement, with two thirds of those expressing 'strong' opposition. Most polls treat foreign policy decisions as isolated events, simply asking whether voters support or oppose military action. But major interventions do not occur in isolation — they can impact gas prices, mortgage rates and overall confidence in politicians and their political parties. A true measure of public sentiment on expanded military involvement must account for these potential and even likely consequences, which often drive voter attitudes more than abstract strategic considerations. Donald Trump rose politically by highlighting Americans' declining trust in institutions, from government regulators and health experts to traditional media. But the polling shows that Trump himself faces serious accusations from his base of breaching public trust and caving to wealthy donors advocating unconditional support for Israeli policies that millions of voters view as wrong and dangerous. Sixty-three percent of respondents expressed concern that Trump's decision to attack Iran could be influenced by major campaign donors, a concern particularly strong among Independents. And two-thirds of voters — including nearly one-third of Republicans — feel that intervening in an Israel-Iran conflict contradicts Trump's core 'America First' promise. In June, Tucker Carlson accused Trump of being 'complicit in the act of war' following Israel's attacks on Iran, and influential MAGA voices like Steve Bannon echoed similar skepticism. Yet commentary alone is unlikely to shift conservative public opinion. People respond to tangible impacts in their lives. If Trump once again follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into major military action in the Middle East, the consequences may extend beyond geopolitics and significantly impact the president's party in next year's midterm elections. Consider some midterm math. On all five questions related to U.S. intervention in Iran, voters who identify as Republican or Democrat overwhelmingly aligned with their respective parties. For example, by a ratio of 88 percent to 12 percent, Democrats said they did not believe that 'Trump is getting involved in this war for the sake of U.S. national security.' Republicans held the opposite view, with 77 percent believing national security was the reason and 23 percent not believing it. This leaves Independent voters as potentially decisive. According to current polling data, Independents are evenly divided between 'Republican-leaning' and 'Democrat-leaning,' generally indicating close national elections. However, on questions regarding U.S. participation in a war against Iran, Independents are solidly opposed, by a margin of two to one. This leads to an overall result of 63-37 saying that they do not believe that U.S. involvement in such a war is 'for the sake of national security.' While the June war between Israel and Iran appears to be over, another Israeli attack in the near future remains quite possible. Should Trump decide to join such an operation before the next election, it could significantly undermine Republican chances of retaining Congress. Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He is the author of 'Failed: What the 'Experts' Got Wrong About the Global Economy (Oxford University Press). Justin Talbot Zorn is a senior adviser at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Truman National Security Fellow, and served as legislative director for three members of Congress.


NBC News
23 minutes ago
- NBC News
This cookware maker is bracing for steel tariffs behind a wall of pots and pans
Checkbook Chronicles Steel and aluminum tariffs are going to cost Heritage Steel hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. But Danny Henn, who runs the family-owned stainless steel cookware company, says it may have a competitive edge. Aug. 3, 2025, 2:06 PM EDT By Emily Lorsch Heritage Steel, a small, family-owned cookware manufacturer in Clarksville, Tennessee, is expecting to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in tariffs this year. The company recently received a tariff bill of $75,000 on an order of handles, and the company's vice president of operations, Danny Henn, is anticipating another bill of closer to $200,000 for goods that will likely reach the U.S. this month. 'We're a pretty small business,' Henn said. 'Having that as an additional sort of surprise expense is not insignificant.' But even with that new cost factored in, Heritage Steel believes steel and aluminum tariffs could be good for the business. 'Just from the base economics of it, yes, we have to pay more, but others have to pay a whole lot more,' Henn added. Heritage Steel employs about 40 workers and has more than doubled its revenue since 2018. The company is up 60% in cookware sales since last year. While company leaders now have to rethink pricing and make adjustments in response to President Donald Trump's trade war, Henn said they're feeling optimistic. Business highlights Danny Henn's grandfather Donald Henn was a door-to-door cookware salesman after graduating from college. In 1983, he purchased a factory in Clarksville, Tennessee, and from there was born New Era, which later became Heritage Steel. 'My grandma and grandpa and my parents were always big people about cooking at home. The cookware was always there,' said Henn. From frying pans and skillets to stock pots, saucepans and knives, Heritage Steel sells about 50 different cookware products on its website and Amazon. The company also sells wholesale to independent gourmet retailers. 'We are happy and proud to be an American producer of goods.' Heritage Steel needs three main types of inputs to make its cookware, and about 75% of the company's materials are imported. The most important part and the largest cost is the five-ply cladded body, which includes a combination of stainless steel and aluminum. 'It's very specialized processing that it has to go through to get into this form,' Henn said. 'And so, because it is very specialized, there's not a whole lot of people that do it.' Tariff impacts Heritage Steel imports its cladded steel from South Korea, which will be facing a 15% tariff that Trump announced on Wednesday after the country made 'an offer to buy down' the 25% duty level he had previously set. The company imports its handles, made from pure stainless steel using a process called lost-wax casting, from China. Meanwhile, the company purchases the material for its stainless steel lids in the U.S. Those parts don't have to be cladded and are a more simple single layer of stainless steel that's more widely available. Heritage Steel had previously sourced cladded steel from U.S. vendors, but those providers have since exited the business, according to Henn. 'There's just not enough of a U.S. market for cookware manufacturing of this type … right now. There isn't a viable vendor for us to find.' Since the company only makes a handful of raw-material purchases each year, it typically has a large order coming in all at once, which set up the company nicely when the first 25% tariffs on steel went into effect earlier this year. 'We had a good amount of it,' Henn said, referring to the raw materials, 'so that gave us more time of being able to know we're going to be able to manufacture and sell a bunch of stuff without the tariff cost on it.' Henn said that wasn't a tariff strategy, but instead a benefit of his company's workflow. However, they knew that leeway wasn't going to last forever. Eventually it became time for Heritage Steel to order more materials. That first tariff bill was about $75,000, and Henn is expecting the next to be more than twice as much. Who pays? For Heritage Steel, there was never a doubt it would have to raise prices because of the tariff expenses. The question was how high would they have to go? 'We're happy and proud to be a provider of really high-quality cookware, but one that's more affordably priced than some of the others on the market,' Henn said. 'We want to continue to offer the best price we can, given our constraints.' As of Friday, the company had raised prices by about 15% on all of its products. Heritage Steel explained the increase in an announcement on its website, calling the adjustment 'fairly modest' considering the price of the company's input materials spiked at least 50%. 'Obviously, we can't bear the full impact of these cost increases,' Henn said, 'but we also don't want our customers to bear the full cost.' He expects these changes to negatively impact the company's profit margins, but as of now the extent is unclear. Henn believes the company has more flexibility than a lot of its competitors because Heritage Steel is only importing raw materials, not the full product, and manufactures in the U.S. That's why he expects the overall market disruption could be good for the company. 'They might have to do something closer to a 50% price increase,' he said of his competitors, 'because their entire cost of goods is going up by 50%.' For Heritage Steel, on the other hand, only the price of parts is up 50%, not the full product. Henn said it's all about finding the sweet spot: a fair amount to charge customers to compensate for the new costs while still being a price leader in the market. 'We're just doing our best to do good by our customer, not raise prices too much, do well by our employees, keep paying them well and try to stay competitive within the market.' Even though Henn is optimistic about this potential competitive edge, that doesn't mean he believes the Trump administration's tariffs are the right approach. What makes more sense to him, he said, is a change over a longer period of time. 'If there is something that would have a similar effect of giving incentives to bring more more industry back to the U.S., I think that would likely be a positive,' he said, adding that he believes the intent of the tariffs policy is good. 'The implementation is a little bit rocky,' he said. Henn declined to comment on his political views and whom he voted for in the presidential election. As for other options that could bring down Heritage Steel's tariff bill, that's something being discussed as well. While stainless clad cookware is the company's bread and butter, Henn and his co-owners are exploring a range of possibilities. 'If we had our full wish,' Henn said, 'we would be able to have a fully U.S.-based supply chain for our entire manufacturing process.' Emily Lorsch Emily Lorsch is a producer at NBC News covering business and the economy.