logo
Moneysupermarket parent group saw energy deals surge ahead of price cap rise

Moneysupermarket parent group saw energy deals surge ahead of price cap rise

Independent08-05-2025
Moneysupermarket said it saw a surge in its energy and home services business as suppliers raised promotional deals in advance of prices rising again in April.
The company, which is owned by London-listed Mony Group, said the growth in deals had helped it deliver a 'modest increase' in revenue from January to the end of April compared with the same point last year.
That is despite having had 'an exceptionally strong comparative period in 2024″, it said.
The group was updating investors on its financials ahead of its annual general meeting on Thursday.
The energy price cap was hiked again in April, which saw customer bills reach an average of £1,849 a year.
At the time, consumer groups urged the 22 million homes still covered by the cap to consider fixing their prices so they would not be affected by the rise.
Mony Group said it is on course to meet its full-year profit guidance and that its money division had seen 'continued momentum' despite fewer banking promotions.
Meanwhile, its travel comparison service 'remains stable despite the challenging economic conditions and uncertainty currently impacting the UK consumer'.
It comes after the group reported record revenues in 2024 as it benefited from growth in its insurance arm.
The insurance division also enjoyed strong trading in home, life and travel insurance, which partly offset 'continued headwinds' in the car insurance switching market.
The company added that its SuperSaveClub membership platform passed 1.3 million members.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

River Island may have to close… but I'll cherish the memories of my 1990s fashion disasters
River Island may have to close… but I'll cherish the memories of my 1990s fashion disasters

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

River Island may have to close… but I'll cherish the memories of my 1990s fashion disasters

For my 13th birthday in the 1990s, all I dreamed about was a denim button-up dress from River Island worn over an oatmeal body-suit. Oatmeal – the height of sophistication! Not boring school shirt-white, not bland-old beige – but oatmeal. Slightly ribbed, with minute white flecks like a speckled egg. If I only had that body-suit, I'd look exactly like Nicole Appleton from All Saints, I just knew it. I could wear it, I fancied, to attract boys like Justin Peterson in the year above me; whose name I used to write in my diary – over and over – with my special glittery pen with the pom-pom on the top. One look at my River Island denim dress with the irridescent shell pop buttons and he'd be mine. How could he resist? And if he wasn't sure, I had a secret weapon: shimmer pink lipstick with dark brown lipliner and a silver puffa jacket. Phwoar. (Spoiler: he wasn't mine, and I never forgave my friend Gemma for wearing an even better denim dress with a maroon body-suit beneath it, from Tammy Girl.) Now, perhaps you can understand my heartbreak, because rumour has it that River Island – bastion of bucket hats, purveyor of crop tops, combat trousers and woven belts, stalwart of satin slip dresses and velvet chokers with a small silver cross dangling from the middle – could collapse within weeks, following £33m losses. According to the Telegraph, the beloved retailer will go unless landlords and creditors approve a radical rescue plan – due to be put before the High Court next week – which would see 33 stores close, rents slashed on a further 71 shops and debts written off. If the rescue plan works, then an emergency loan from River Island 's founders might just save it. If not, it'll close by August. And not only would the closures be devastating for those who work there – River Island employs 5,300 people in its various stores, plus a further 950 at its head office in Hanger Lane – but it would decimate one of the last faded giants of 1990s nostalgia. Be still my beating heart that pumps in time to 'Pure Shores' – they cannot do this to us, they cannot. If River Island goes, it will join the ghosts of Topshop, Miss Selfridge, Morgan de toi and Jane Norman. And where will we get our crushed velvet dresses and cami tops, then? I put an urgent call-out to the friends who dressed as badly in the nineties as I did, to see what they'd miss most about the retail chain if it went under. 'For me, River Island was all about the store in Ilford Exchange. It was the first shop where I felt like a grown-up,' Roz admitted. 'Prior to that, it was all about going into C&A – in the Clockhouse section – and Tammy Girl. But shopping in River Island in Ilford felt like I'd graduated to a higher level. 'The plastic bags were coveted because they were so iconic – multi-coloured, floral – if you had something in a River Island bag, you were the height of chic. It's where I bought my favourite item of clothing that decade – a pair of oatmeal linen trousers, which I obviously wore with a body. Plus, they had really, really good accessories.' 'This isn't directly related but I remember fondly the store at Oxford Circus,' Emma told me. 'It was pretty much opposite Aroma [a popular coffee shop chain in the 1990s] where we'd meet in the downstairs area and smoke ciggies and drink coffee and then shop at River Island and feel very grown up and like we had found life.' While Louise said: 'You were literally s**t hot if you had a bag from River Island. I used to go shopping there for chunky belts, vest tops, crushed velvet and cargo trousers, like All Saints, which we'd wear with Timberland boots, obviously. I think glitter make up was just starting. And, if we were going 'out out', it'd be assymetric skirts and tops with chunky necklaces.' One of my colleages at The Independent (who's asked to remain nameless), meanwhile, shared his fond experiences of working in River Island menswear. 'On my first day, the pregnant manager, who interviewed me and offered me the role, was marched out by police in handcuffs for stealing jeans,' he reminisced. 'I got paid £4.35 an hour and used to hide in the stockroom and drink vodka and orange with the 30-year-old managers who I genuinely thought were the coolest people alive. Skinny jeans and really pointy brogues, Scouting For Girls on loop all day... there was loads of shagging going on, too, in the stockroom.' But when I ask my teenage daughter if she ever shops in River Island when she goes to Westfield with her mates, she actually stops and stares at me with what looks a lot like... horror. 'No, Mummy. As if I go to River Island. That's for old people – like you. Or Nanny.' Sigh. Kids today have no taste. Let's just hope the rescue plan works. They can take River Island – but they'll never take the memory of our 1990s fashion disasters.

More than 300,000 benefit claimants owed money after PIP errors lead to millions in underpayments
More than 300,000 benefit claimants owed money after PIP errors lead to millions in underpayments

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More than 300,000 benefit claimants owed money after PIP errors lead to millions in underpayments

Hundreds of thousands of disabled people are owed money from the government after it admited to major errors while paying out the Personal Independence Payment (PIP). More than £260 million has already been paid to make up missing funds to those who saw the benefit wrongly denied or underpaid by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). But there are still more than 300,000 claimants owed money, with some payouts potentially reaching more than £2,000. Claimed by 3.7 million people, the health-linked benefit is designed to help with extra costs incurred by living with an illness or disability. It recently made headlines for being at the heart of Labour's planned welfare reforms, before a last minute change of direction from the government. In its latest annual report, the DWP identified three errors in the administration of PIP – two for the first time – which has forced it to carry out several payback schemes. The largest relates to a Supreme Court decision that changed how the DWP had to consider one specific criteria for a person to qualify for PIP – the ability to engage with people face to face – effectively making it more lenient. There are around 325,000 claimants who may still be due payments for the issue, with 308,000 cases already reviewed reviewed. The total amount paid out is now £250 million, meaning compensation has been worth at least £800 per person and as not all cases reviewed with result in a payout, likely even more. Meanwhile, the first new issue saw a number of claimants that did not provide a National Insurance Number when applying for PIP have their applications processed incorrectly. This is despite it not being a requirement to supply the information to apply. So far, only 455 records have been reviewed over this issue, with £500,000 paid out overall. This means payouts have been worth at least £1,098 per claimant. The next newly-identified issue relates to thousands of claimants in Scotland who transferred from PIP to the Adult Disability Payment, which has replaced the benefit for Scottish residents. An estimated 4,867 were identified as potentially having their payments suspended during the transition, with only 176 cases left to review. So far, £13 million has been paid out over the issue, meaning an average payment of at least £2,771 per claimant. The issues come as criticism continues to grow over the management of PIP by the government. Following Labour's decision to back down on changes that would effectively make the benefit harder to claim, it was confirmed that social security minister Stephen Timms would carry out a review of the effectiveness of PIP in meeting the needs of claimants. The DWP has been approached for comment.

Britain's biggest pension scheme to lobby governments more on climate
Britain's biggest pension scheme to lobby governments more on climate

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Britain's biggest pension scheme to lobby governments more on climate

LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - Britain's biggest private sector pension scheme plans to step up lobbying of governments, regulators and standard-setters to push for faster action amid a worsening climate outlook, its investment chief told Reuters. The Universities Superannuation Scheme, which manages nearly 78 billion pounds ($105.67 billion), has reduced emissions linked to its own portfolio. But Simon Pilcher said there was only so much schemes could achieve through asset reallocation. "That's why the high-value engagement is with governments and regulators to create the environment where the low-carbon action happens. It is, I would say, 90% up to them and only 10% up to capital allocation," the chief executive of USS Investment Management said. The British government in May signed an accord with pension investors to try to scale up investment in UK infrastructure and green programmes to help the country reach its net-zero goal, which is enshrined in law. Pilcher said changing the rules to make it easier for companies and consumers to overhaul their climate-damaging practices was the most effective lever for change, and the scheme had decided to "turn the dial up" on its lobbying efforts. "Corporates will change their activity when it's sane for them to do that," Pilcher said. "There needs to be a strong financial interest for those businesses to do the sensible thing; no one is going to spend money if, bluntly, they're going to be wasting that money." While USS IM has no formal arrangements with other investors, it has good relationships with the UK's local government pension schemes, and investors such as Railpen and Nest, the country's biggest auto-enrolment scheme, making it an influential voice within the sector. In the UK, lobbying would include talking to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero about its strategy and encouraging them to, for example, reform the planning process to make it easier to connect renewables to the electricity grid. The United Nations said last October the world was on course to hit more than 3 degrees Celsius of warming above the pre-industrial average by the end of the century, based on current emissions-reduction pledges by countries, way off the world's goal of capping warming at 1.5 C. ($1 = 0.7381 pounds)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store