‘Noticeably fickle': Trump's new submarine chief a critic of Australia
Jerry Hendrix, a retired navy captain who holds a senior role in the president's Office of Management and Budget, said last year that 'the Australians have been noticeably fickle' about AUKUS and queried if the deal had true bipartisan support.
Meanwhile, with AUKUS under review by the Pentagon, the heads of a US congressional committee on China have written to the Trump administration to defend the agreement, arguing it would 'dramatically enhance' collective efforts to defend against Beijing's aggression.
The letter to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is the second time in as many months that members of the US Congress from both sides of politics have written to the former Fox News host to defend AUKUS, underlining fears a US review of the pact will recommend major changes.
This masthead has reported the review is focusing on four main concerns, one of which is the capacity of the American shipbuilding industry to build enough nuclear-powered submarines to meet US demands and fulfil AUKUS obligations – a long-standing concern.
In April, Trump signed an executive order to 'restore America's maritime dominance', which established a shipbuilding unit on the National Security Council under Ian Bennitt. But the NSC has been downsized and Bennitt has left for the private sector, with the shipbuilding program moved to the Office of Management and Budget.
Hendrix, whose title at the office is deputy to the associate director (defence), has been critical of Australia. In May 2024, he told US conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt that he was not convinced there was lasting bipartisan support for the AUKUS agreement in Canberra.
'I am not sure, given the political parties in Australia, whether the next administration that comes in, the next prime minister, will provide similar support to AUKUS as the present government does,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
19 minutes ago
- West Australian
Risk of higher US tariffs looms despite beef deal
Australia's move to lift restrictions on US beef is unlikely to shift the dial on tariff negotiations, as the nation's products face the possibility of even steeper duties. The Albanese government will allow access to US beef that has been raised in Canada or Mexico but processed in America, following a safety review. Australia is subject to a baseline 10 per cent tariff applied by the Trump administration and has been keeping an eye on the trade negotiations of other countries. AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said Donald Trump's flagged higher tariffs might include the nation's exports. "The risk for Australia is that we may be lucky to hang on to 10 per cent, which could actually turn out to be higher," he told AAP. "This (beef decision) might help us hang on to 10 per cent or avoid a worse outcome, but I don't think there's any guarantees of that." American beef was banned from Australia almost two decades ago following an outbreak of mad cow disease. Mr Trump has pressured the government to ease restrictions as Labor argues for an exemption from the tariffs as part of the US president's deepening trade war. Former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said while biosecurity investigations can take a while to finalise, it was a "sensible outcome". "The challenge here is it doesn't look like we're putting together a package deal," he said. "It'd be better if there was a package approach to this if we're seeking to gather an overall trade outcome with the US." Australian Farm Institute executive director Katie McRobert said the cattle industry has been "extremely nervous" about biosecurity traceability from different parts of the north and South America regions. "We wouldn't expect a significant impact on Australian producers from the potential to import American beef ... because we already produce far more beef in Australia than we can possibly eat," she said. Trade Minister Don Farrell said he didn't have any meetings scheduled with American counterparts after last meeting US trade representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of an OECD ministerial meeting in Paris in June. Senator Farrell said Mr Greer didn't raise beef concerns at that meeting. "We believe that America should lift those tariffs on Australia, there's no justification whatsoever for the United States to apply tariffs to Australia," he told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. "We have a free trade agreement, that agreement makes it very clear that it's a tariff free arrangement." Senator Farrell also denied the move was to create a bargaining chip. The Philippines and Japan recently struck agreements with the US to lower their tariff rates, but both are still above the 10 per cent baseline.
Perth Now
19 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Risk of higher US tariffs looms despite beef deal
Australia's move to lift restrictions on US beef is unlikely to shift the dial on tariff negotiations, as the nation's products face the possibility of even steeper duties. The Albanese government will allow access to US beef that has been raised in Canada or Mexico but processed in America, following a safety review. Australia is subject to a baseline 10 per cent tariff applied by the Trump administration and has been keeping an eye on the trade negotiations of other countries. AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said Donald Trump's flagged higher tariffs might include the nation's exports. "The risk for Australia is that we may be lucky to hang on to 10 per cent, which could actually turn out to be higher," he told AAP. "This (beef decision) might help us hang on to 10 per cent or avoid a worse outcome, but I don't think there's any guarantees of that." American beef was banned from Australia almost two decades ago following an outbreak of mad cow disease. Mr Trump has pressured the government to ease restrictions as Labor argues for an exemption from the tariffs as part of the US president's deepening trade war. Former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said while biosecurity investigations can take a while to finalise, it was a "sensible outcome". "The challenge here is it doesn't look like we're putting together a package deal," he said. "It'd be better if there was a package approach to this if we're seeking to gather an overall trade outcome with the US." Australian Farm Institute executive director Katie McRobert said the cattle industry has been "extremely nervous" about biosecurity traceability from different parts of the north and South America regions. "We wouldn't expect a significant impact on Australian producers from the potential to import American beef ... because we already produce far more beef in Australia than we can possibly eat," she said. Trade Minister Don Farrell said he didn't have any meetings scheduled with American counterparts after last meeting US trade representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of an OECD ministerial meeting in Paris in June. Senator Farrell said Mr Greer didn't raise beef concerns at that meeting. "We believe that America should lift those tariffs on Australia, there's no justification whatsoever for the United States to apply tariffs to Australia," he told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. "We have a free trade agreement, that agreement makes it very clear that it's a tariff free arrangement." Senator Farrell also denied the move was to create a bargaining chip. The Philippines and Japan recently struck agreements with the US to lower their tariff rates, but both are still above the 10 per cent baseline.
Perth Now
19 minutes ago
- Perth Now
'Trade-offs' on cards to get productivity back on track
Australians are being warned to prepare for trade-offs in areas such as housing if the nation's productivity push is to be successful. Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood is calling on Australia to adopt a "growth mindset" to prioritise economic outcomes and boost living standards. That means changing corporate taxes to promote investment, simplifying regulations, speeding up housing and energy approvals and ensuring AI adoption is not undermined by unnecessary regulation, among other suggestions. It comes as the commission prepares to release a series of reports detailing how Australia can get productivity moving again. "Australia should be a place where children born today can expect to live better and more prosperous lives than the generations who have come before them,'' Ms Wood said. "Productivity growth is essential to fulfilling that promise." But productivity growth has plummeted in recent years. How much Australia produces with the same amount of workers has grown at just under 0.4 per cent per year since 2015, compared with the 60-year average of 1.6 per cent. That's been caused in part by governments ignoring or minimising economic growth when making policy choices in recent years, according to a paper released by the commission. Policymakers have made it harder that it should be to start a business or build essential infrastructure such as housing or renewable energy because they have failed to weigh trade-offs effectively, been too risk-averse or "overly influenced by vocal stakeholder groups". Governments must balance competing objectives and make choices that improve Australians' overall wellbeing, even if those decisions might negatively affect other goals. "Bringing a growth mindset to policy decisions means elevating economic growth and its benefits,'' Ms Wood said. "That doesn't mean policymakers should ignore other objectives, but it does mean being clear-eyed about the trade-offs." The paper lays the groundwork for five forthcoming reports the commission is preparing to release before an economic roundtable convened by Treasurer Jim Chalmers. He said the report made clear the productivity problem had been around for decades and almost every comparable country had the same challenge. "The best way to strengthen our economy and make it more productive is to work through the issues in a methodical and considered way in collaboration with business, unions and the broader community," Dr Chalmers said. In its submission to the roundtable, a joint group of industry associations including the Business Council of Australia and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry outlined four priority areas for reform. They include reforming research and development funding models to boost innovation; cutting the regulatory burden by 25 per cent by 2030; co-ordinating and unifying planning processes to speed up project approvals; and committing to comprehensive tax reform. "We need to cut unhelpful red tape, streamline planning, fix the tax system and improve incentives for investment," Business Council chief executive Bran Black said. "These policies can deliver benefits for economic activity across the whole country and importantly ensure future generations aren't worse off."
