
Italy's detention of rescue vessels in Mediterranean will lead to more deaths, say campaigners
On Tuesday the Berlin-based NGO Sea-Watch received confirmation that its vessel, the Aurora, had been detained in Lampedusa for 20 days. It was detained after the vessel had helped to rescue about 70 people in international waters, many of whom had been suffering from fuel burns, seasickness and dehydration.
'This decision is politically motivated; those who rescue are punished,' said Karla Primc, the head of operations on the Aurora. 'That is the reality in 2025.'
A smaller vessel that was also involved in the rescue operation, the Dakini, was also detained. Sea-Watch linked the detentions to the decision to bring the 70 rescued people to the port of Lampedusa, rather than the much farther port of Pozzallo, where the Italian authorities had directed them.
'Due to the difficult weather conditions, the Aurora developed a significant list and the rescued persons and crew were exposed to a high risk of hypothermia and going overboard,' it said. 'Keeping the Italian authorities constantly informed, the ship's crew headed for the closer port of Lampedusa. After about 10 hours, the Aurora entered Lampedusa with explicit consent of Italy and brought all rescued persons safely ashore.'
Rights groups began sounding the alarm over an increase in vessel detentions in early June when the authorities detained the Nadir, a ship operated by the German association ResQship, for 20 days. It was the first time a sailing vessel had been detained since the Italian government imposed hardline rules on civilian sea rescue activities in 2023.
Days later, a vessel operated by the Germany-based search and rescue organisation Sea-Eye was also detained. The ships faced varying accusations of not complying with the authorities' instructions around rescues at sea, which have included requirements preventing ships from responding to multiple distress calls and making them travel long distances to ports in central and northern Italy.
'It's clear now that the Italian state is really trying to use all its means to keep us away,' said Jelka Kretzschmar, a crew member of the Nadir. 'The effects of this will obviously be that people disappear at sea, they drown, they suffer with no one watching and the scandal of how this is being systematically curated by Europe will not be exposed. Instead people will be more extensively pushed back by European authorities and pulled back by Tunisian and Libyan authorities and put back in torture camps or abducted and dropped in the desert.'
The Italian government did not respond to a request for comment.
Since the hardline rules on civilian sea rescues took effect in early 2023, NGO ships have been detained 29 times, leaving them languishing in harbours for 700 days instead of saving lives, according to the affected organisations. Another 822 days were lost navigating to far-off ports.
What appears to be different this time around is that smaller vessels, such as the Dakini, which offers life vests and water but cannot bring people onboard due to its small size, are also being targeted, say campaigners. 'Therefore the practice of detention hits a new era – including now also ships of the so-called minifleet that are only supporting rescue operations,' the ship's crew said in a message to the Guardian.
This year marks 10 years since NGO ships began operating in the Mediterranean. Over the years they've rescued more than 175,000 people, even as many have grappled with increased criminalisation and legal crackdowns. Earlier this month, 32 organisations issued a statement demanding that the Italian government end its 'systematic obstruction' of NGO search and rescue efforts.
'Deliberately keeping non-governmental search and rescue organisations away from the central Mediterranean causes countless more deaths at sea on one of the deadliest flight routes worldwide,' the statement noted. 'Without the presence of NGO assets and aircrafts, more people will drown while fleeing across the central Mediterranean, and human rights violations as well as shipwrecks will occur unnoticed.'
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
The statement was made days after the crew of the Nadir received news that it had been detained for a second time. For another 20 days, the vessel had been unable to leave the port of Lampedusa, even as mayday calls rang out over the radio.
'It's like there's an invisible wall,' said James Watson, a British doctor who was on his fourth volunteer trip on the vessel when it was detained. 'You can hear about these cases which are really distressing, you can hear it in the voices of the people who are reporting them. Everyone of those cases is really scary and represents people whose lives are at risk. And then you're just sort of sat there, unable to do anything about it.'
Figures from the International Organization for Migration suggest that this year more than 800 people have drowned in the Mediterranean, though the actual death toll is believed to be significantly higher.
Ultimately Watson felt as though the Italian government's actions were aimed at quelling the crucial roles that NGO rescue ships play in the Mediterranean. 'These deliberate efforts to make the sea rescue harder, to take people who can be involved and help, out of that area not only increase the number of people dying but they kind of invisibilise it,' he said.
'If nobody is in the area to find boats, to report on boats, then we don't even know how many people are dying,' he said. 'So it's not just that people are going to die, which they definitely are, but nobody's even going to hear about those people dying.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
European leaders express concerns over new trade deal with US
Update: Date: 2025-07-28T11:09:02.000Z Title: the EU has a new trade deal with the US. Content: Benjamin Haddad, France's Europe minister, says deal will 'bring temporary stability' but is generally 'unbalanced', calling the situation 'not satisfactory' Jakub Krupa Mon 28 Jul 2025 12.09 BST First published on Mon 28 Jul 2025 09.05 BST From 9.05am BST 09:05 Jakub Krupa Good news: Bad news: There don't seem to be many people who think it's a particularly good deal. The framework agreement, agreed by European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at a late meeting in Scotland, manages to avert a damaging transatlantic trade war, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods – half the threatened rate. German chancellor Friedrich Merz focused on the fact that it managed to keep the unity of the European Union and offer some stability to businesses on both sides of the Atlantic, even if he would have liked the deal to achieve more. Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni said she needed to see the details of the deal to assess it further, asking questions about possible exemptions, promises of European investment and gas purchases from the US, and how to help affected industries. French Europe minister Benjamin Haddad said that while the deal would 'bring temporary stability,' it was generally 'unbalanced,' calling the situation 'not satisfactory and … not sustainable.' Not ideal. Global markets responded positively, as you can see on our business live blog, but there is much more to this deal than that. It is not business as usual. Elsewhere, I will be looking at Spain where the country's embattled prime minister Pedro Sánchez is due to give a summer press conference and the latest reports from Ukraine. I will bring you all key updates from across Europe today. It's Monday, 28 July 2025, it's Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live. Good morning. 12.02pm BST 12:02 Meanwhile over in Madrid, Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez is the latest to publicly respond to the EU-US agreement, saying wearily he supports the deal 'without any enthusiasm'. He says that Europe needs to draw lessons from this situation and double down on its plans to achieve strategic autonomy and develop better trade ties with other countries, including the Mercosur bloc. He says the EU needs to diversify its trade relations with other countries, and he supports von der Leyen's ambition to get deals with Indonesia and India. Updated at 12.09pm BST 11.41am BST 11:41 Responding to some criticism coming from the member states, Šefčovič warns them that the world as we knew it before April, and Trump's new trade policy, 'is gone.' He says the EU needs to adjust and a strategic deal with the US is the best possibly option. He repeats that 30% tariffs, the default scenario without the deal, would put companies under dramatic pressure and lead to substantial job losses, potentially eventually putting the EU to negotiate in worse circumstances. This is the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances. Šefčovič adds that the conversation with the US yesterday started with a 30% tariff threat. He adds that the deal was not only about trade, but also about broader security, Ukraine, and joint response to growing geopolitical volatility through keeping the US on side in future talks. 'I'm 100 percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States,' he says. Updated at 11.56am BST 11.32am BST 11:32 On China, Šefčovič says 'despite the strenuous efforts of my colleagues and myself and several long meetings with my Chinese counterpart,' there are growing trade issues with 'the list of accumulated issues on the table' not getting any shorter. He specifically talks about subsidies, access to public procurements, and critical raw materials and export permissions. 11.25am BST 11:25 Šefčovič also talks about the energy part of the deal, saying that given the EU 'will be phasing out the Russian energy supply by 2027, it is very clear that Europe will need to solid, consolidated and reliant supply of energy,' not just LNG, but also oil and nuclear. He also stresses the importance of working with the US on developing technologies, including high-quality chips for AI. Updated at 11.25am BST 11.22am BST 11:22 Šefčovič says the EU's view is that 15% is 'acceptable' if it is 'inclusive', meaning with no stacking tariffs and further changes. He says that politically the two sides are 'opening a new chapter' and 'understand each other's senstiivties, perspectives' better after these negotiations. 11.21am BST 11:21 Not surprisingly, Šefčovič highlights what he sees as positives of the deal – including on steel, cars and future technologies - and confirms he briefed the member states and members of the European Parliament earlier today. He stresses that 'all in all, this is an agreement which should generate meaningful and mutual benefits, and I hope it will be a stepping stone to a broader EU US trade and investment agreement in the future.' 11.17am BST 11:17 Šefčovič opens by saying the deal 'brings renewed stability and opens door to strategic collaboration.' He says it's important to 'pause … and consider an alternative.' He says: 'A trade war may seem appealing to some, but it comes with serious consequences. With at least a 30% tariff, our transatlantic trade would effectively come to a halt, putting close to 5 million of jobs, including those in SMEs in Europe, at grave risk.' He says that businesses wanted to 'avoid escalation and work towards a solution that delivers immediate relief.' 11.13am BST 11:13 Jakub Krupa EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič's press briefing is about to start. You can watch it live below, but I will bring you all the latest updates here. 11.00am BST 11:00 Kate Connolly Reactions from Europe's largest economy over the Trump tariff deal hatched in Turnberry, Scotland at the weekend, have inevitably been mixed, with some breathing a sigh of relief that there is finally a concrete figure to work with, but others exasperated, and warning that with such an unpredictable US president, it would be foolhardy to see the figure agreed upon as set in stone. MPs from Ursula von der Leyen's own political heimat, the CDU, as well as leading German economists have reacted with disappointment and urged caution. Manfred Weber, leader of the European People's Party in the European parliament, described the deal as 'merely damage limitation,' in an interview with Bild, and nothing to be celebrated. The result, he told the tabloid, 'is certainly better than many had feared.' At least, he said, 'it gives the European economy planning security'. He said the deal had made clear the importance of forging trade deals with other parts of the world, and had at least reinforced the importance of an integrated single market (even as non-EU member UK has struck a better deal). The economic policy spokesman for the CDU/CSU, Andreas Lenz, said 15% was surely better than the 30% previously suggested, but was a 'painful compromise', which harmed both economy and consumers. The most positive aspect of the agreement for the German economy, of course, is that the current 27.5% tariffs on cars, will be reduced to 15% Chancellor Friedrich Merz clung to the car customs cut in his attempt to put a positive spin on the whole deal, which he said would at least avoid an unnecessary escalation in transatlantic trade relations. 'With this agreement, we have succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard. This applies particularly to the automotive industry, where the current tariffs will be almost halved from 27.5 percent to 15 percent. It is precisely here that the rapid reduction of tariffs is of utmost importance,' he said on Sunday. However, the lack of a deal on aluminium and steel, currently expected to be 50%, hangs heavily over economic movers and shakers this morning. Wolfgang Niedermark, foreign trade expert at the Federation of German Industries (BDI), called it an 'additional blow' and said it sent 'a fatal signal to the closely intertwined economies on both sides of the Atlantic.' 10.45am BST 10:45 Jakub Krupa We should get more detail on the deal from EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič as he is expected to speak at the European Commission's press conference at the top of the hour. We will bring it live on the blog. 10.44am BST 10:44 Lisa O'Carroll in Brussels The zero rate tariff on US imports will not apply to sensitive agricultural products, senior officials in Brussels have confirmed. Specifically this means exports from the US of beef, rice, ethanol, poultry, and sugar are not included in the deal clinched last night. The concessions on tariffs have only been made on agricultural products that the EU does not grow or produce including nuts. 10.29am BST 10:29 Lisa O'Carroll in Brussels The 15% tariff agreed in the EU-US deal will apply to 70% of all exports to the US worth €380bn, officials have said. Rates on pharma and steel are still being negotiated and are not expected to conclude by Friday, Donald Trump's self-imposed deal for a deadline. While the talks continue, a zero tariff rate will continue to apply on pharma and 50% on steel. Wine and spirits are still being negotiated with talks more advanced on spirits than wine. The EU will lower what it calls 'nuisance' or negligible tariffs on a group of products including non-sensitive agricultural products worth about €70bn a year. The €600bn investments in the US, referred to in the deal last night refer to private investments already or about to be committed by private businesses. It does not refer to any EU fund. Zero rated tariffs on US exports to the US will apply to a range of still to be finalised products that include nuts, lobster, processed fish, cheeses, some dairy products, and pet food. Exports to the US that will be zero rated including aircraft and aircraft parts, some medical devices and some non-available natural resources such as cork used as bottle stoppers and flooring. 10.27am BST 10:27 Lisa O'Carroll in Brussels Tariffs on pharmaceuticals exported from the EU to the US will never go above 15% under the deal struck last night between Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Senior EU officials have said they will remain zero rated until such time as Trump completes his 232 national security investigation into pharmaceuticals. But if he does, at the end of that, decide to impose tariffs on EU imports, they will be set at a top level of 15%. This explains the contradictory statements last night between Trump and von der Leyen with the former claiming medicines were not in the tariff deal and the European Commission chief saying they were. On steel, EU officials have confirmed, they are now going to open negotiations on a quota. This is not for presidential negotiations, they have said. On value of deal, EU officials have said that the 15% tariff will apply to 70% of all exports to the US. Updated at 10.28am BST 9.38am BST 09:38 French prime minister François Bayrou joined the growing list of European leaders expressing their less-than-enthusiastic reactions to the EU-US trade deal. In his first reaction on social media, he said: Von der Leyen-Trump Agreement: it is a sombre day when an alliance of free peoples, united to affirm their values and defend their interests, resigns themselves to submission. 9.35am BST 09:35 Senior Zelenskyy aide Andriy Yermak posted a video of a tower bloc in Kyiv hit by Russian drones saying 'this is how Putin responds to calls to end the war and sit down at the table' after another night of attacks on Ukrainian cities. 324 Russian drones and 7 missiles were reported overnight. Yermak sought to increase pressure on Russia, saying 'there is no alternative to sanctions, increasing Ukraine's long-range capabilities, and tough actions against Putin's entourage and himself.' [Putin] wants nothing but war and Ukraine's defeat. And there will be no defeat. Yermak also warned that Russians were also 'testing Nato's reactions' with drones crossing into other countries, warning that these 'signals cannot be ignored' – a reference to the earlier drone incident in Lithuania (10:20). 9.20am BST 09:20 An unmanned drone is believed to have entered the Lithuanian airspace overnight from Belarus, a second this month, with residents in the capital city of Vilnius reporting the characteristic sound and later receiving an alert from authorities about the incident. Locals were told to be cautious and not to approach the object, which was believed to have crashed in the early hours of this morning. It was earlier sighted close to Vilnius, flying at an altitude of 200 meters, Lithuanian media reported, posting a grainy footage of the object. The search for the drone continued this morning, and authorities told reporters they had no clarity on whether the object posed any danger. But defence miniser Dovilė Šakalienė said that additional resources will be directed to monitor the Lithuanian-Belarusian border. If confirmed, it would be a second case of an unmanned flying object entering Lithuanian airspace from Belarus after a decoy Gerbera drone crashed near the border at the beginning of July. 9.18am BST 09:18 Lisa O'Carroll in Brussels While EU leaders can breathe a huge sigh of relief that a trade deal with the US is done, the agreement is being widely seen as a victory for Donald Trump. Several commercial banks have told clients this morning it is an 'asymmetrical' deal favouring the US over the EU. As if to underline the contrasting fortunes of China which imposed retaliatory tariffs from the beginning, Trump has just made further concessions to Beijing. It emerged on Monday, that Washington has paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with President Xi Jinping this year. The industry and security bureau of the US Commerce Department, which oversees export controls, has been told in recent months to avoid tough moves on China, the newspaper said, citing current and former officials. The EU acknowledges that the deal is worse than the zero-zero tariff deal it offered Trump in April. 'Fifteen percent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get,' European Commision chief Ursula von der Leyen admitted last night. Stability and predictability would be returned to Europe's businesses and markets, she said describing the deal in Trump like terms as 'huge'. But Renew group MEP Sandro Gozi described the deal as 'unbalanced and dangerously shortsighted.' Hildegard Müller, president of the German car industry federation, the VDA, said 'further escalation' of a tariff and potentially trade war has been averted but added the deal would push costs up for an industry, already struggling against Chinese rivals. 'The US tariff of 15 per cent on automotive products will cost German automotive companies billions annually and place a burden on them in the midst of their transformation.' And financial institutions? 'Is this a good deal for the EU? Probably not. The outcome is heavily asymmetrical, and it leaves US tariffs on imported EU goods at much higher levels than EU tariffs on imports from the US,' Unicredit said in a note to clients. 9.05am BST 09:05 Jakub Krupa Good news: Bad news: There don't seem to be many people who think it's a particularly good deal. The framework agreement, agreed by European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at a late meeting in Scotland, manages to avert a damaging transatlantic trade war, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods – half the threatened rate. German chancellor Friedrich Merz focused on the fact that it managed to keep the unity of the European Union and offer some stability to businesses on both sides of the Atlantic, even if he would have liked the deal to achieve more. Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni said she needed to see the details of the deal to assess it further, asking questions about possible exemptions, promises of European investment and gas purchases from the US, and how to help affected industries. French Europe minister Benjamin Haddad said that while the deal would 'bring temporary stability,' it was generally 'unbalanced,' calling the situation 'not satisfactory and … not sustainable.' Not ideal. Global markets responded positively, as you can see on our business live blog, but there is much more to this deal than that. It is not business as usual. Elsewhere, I will be looking at Spain where the country's embattled prime minister Pedro Sánchez is due to give a summer press conference and the latest reports from Ukraine. I will bring you all key updates from across Europe today. It's Monday, 28 July 2025, it's Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live. Good morning.


Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Italy's MFE sweetens bid for Germany's ProSieben
MILAN, July 28 (Reuters) - MFE-MediaForEurope (MFE) ( opens new tab, the TV group controlled by Italy's Berlusconi family, said on Monday it had improved its offer for German peer ProSiebenSat.1 ( opens new tab. MFE raised its offer by 0.4 MFE A shares to 1.3 MFE A shares while leaving the cash component unchanged at 4.48 euros per share, the company said in a statement. The decision was made "not because the initial bid was inadequate, but because, as leading shareholders, we have supported this industrial project for years," MFE chief Executive Pier Silvio Berlusconi said in a separate statement. He added the Italian group is not seeking total control of ProSieben. MFE owns around 30% of the German company and made a cash-and-share bid for it in March as part of its broader push to create a pan-European broadcaster. The move triggered an all-cash counter-bid by ProSieben's second-largest investor PPF [RIC:RIC: which owns private TV stations across six Eastern European countries. ProSieben called that counter-bid financially "inadequate". Germany's culture minister said on Saturday he had invited Italian media magnate Pier Silvio Berlusconi to a meeting to discuss the bid, adding the German firm's journalistic independence must be preserved.


Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
Why France is cracking down on topless tourists
Police have been sent out to patrol France's seaside promenades. Not to chase hardened criminals – but to look for bare-chested tourists. From Les Sables-d'Olonne to Cassis, and in a growing number of coastal towns, local authorities are introducing by-laws banning shirtless men from wandering around in public. The fines are €150 if you're caught walking from the beach to the bakery in swim shorts and flip-flops, but no shirt. Uniformed gendarmes have been instructed to enforce the rules. Posters have gone up at beaches. Police are stopping tourists, handing out tickets and giving lectures. The summer's great threat to republican order, it seems, is the male torso. 'We are not nudists' declared Yannick Moreau, the mayor of Les Sables-d'Olonne, defending the new rules he's implemented as a matter of 'respect' and 'civic-mindedness'. In Cassis, on the Mediterranean coast, the town hall says the aim of the new measures is to 'preserve the elegance of the town'. Even the slogans are sanctimonious – 'Du sable à la ville, on se rhabille', that's 'when going from the beach to the town, we get dressed again.' One mayor, asked if the policy might be seen as heavy-handed, replied simply 'we're not asking people to wear a suit and tie, just a T-shirt'. There's something oddly comforting about it all if it were not for the bigger picture. The French state, for all its troubles, can still mobilise gendarmes to patrol the promenade, hand out fines and preserve a certain idea of public decency. Shirtless tourists, at least, the authorities know how to handle. But when it comes to the country's real problems with violent crime and insecurity, gang warfare, and lawless enclaves, the state increasingly looks powerless. The front page of yesterday's Journal du Dimanche showed a blood-red map of France, marking dozens of towns now gripped by a violence which was once thought to be limited to the banlieues of large towns and cities. Knife attacks, shootings, cars set alight, gang reprisals, even mortar fire. In Béziers, Blagnac, Albi, Lunel, Cavaillon, Metz, the gendarmes are not chasing bare-chested tourists, they're dodging bullets. Police in the small town of Carpentras in the Vaucluse won't go at all into certain housing estates without significant reinforcements. In Béziers, mayor Robert Ménard says his town is experiencing a wave of gangland violence. 'Eighty per cent of the troublemakers,' he told the Journal du Dimanche, 'come from immigration'. In Tarn, the body of a 22-year-old was found after what police believe was a drug-related execution. In Limoges, teenagers are barricading streets and launching attacks on emergency services. In Clermont-Ferrand, officers responding to a noise complaint were ambushed with iron bars. In Pontarlier, grenade blasts and gunfire now rattle quiet residential streets. These are far from isolated incidents. According to Ofast, France's anti-drug agency, the spread of organised crime into provincial towns is now 'deeply entrenched.' Cocaine is no longer a big city vice. It's a national industry. In response, some towns have tried imposing curfews. Others have begged for more police or tighter sentencing. What they often get is silence or lectures about the 'complex roots' of delinquency. Meanwhile, in places like Les Sables-d'Olonne, the authorities continue to defend the €150 fine for not wearing a shirt. The contrast is telling. The state can still act when it wants to. It can deploy uniformed officers to enforce swimwear etiquette. It can issue municipal by-laws about torsos and flip-flops. But faced with criminal networks, urban warfare and a judiciary that barely functions, it hesitates, defers or looks away. It's easier to fine a tourist without a shirt than to deal with drug traffickers on a housing estate. It's human nature to follow the path of least resistance. Policing beachwear is entirely risk-free. The new measures in seaside towns play well with local voters nostalgic for order. There is no national scandal, no debate in the Assemblée Nationale, no risk of accusations of stigmatising anyone, and no complaints from the hard left. It's public order in symbolic form alone: controlled and deeply unserious. But the deeper problem isn't symbolic. It's structural. Robert Ménard has asked to further arm Béziers' municipal police dealing with increasingly violent heavily armed gangs. The state said no. Local prosecutors complain they lack the tools to put violent offenders behind bars. The interior minister announces new plans every few months, but sentences are rarely served in full. There isn't enough space in prisons, not enough police, and not enough will to confront what everyone now sees. The France that worked, quietly, efficiently, locally, is faltering. It has become a theatre of control. You can see it clearly in the small and medium-sized towns that were once the last bastion of republican order. These were places where the state still worked. Where people trusted the police, the mayor, the courts. That's now all slipping away. In town after town, people no longer feel safe. France still knows how to police the small stuff. It can stop a man buying a baguette without a shirt. It can fine him on the spot, with a polite smile and a printed receipt. But when it comes to the real collapse, of order, of confidence, of the state's ability to impose the law where it truly matters, the state shrugs, retreats, or launches yet another working group.