
Where do Americans stand on childhood vaccines as RFK Jr. shakes up CDC panel?
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), and its eight new members, met for the first time Thursday after Health and Humans Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced a 'clean sweep' of the panel earlier this month.
The change comes as infectious diseases like measles and whooping cough make major comebacks this year, and after the secretary said health agencies are facing 'a crisis of public trust.'
The 17 previous members of the committee were 'retired' from their job of evaluating 'the safety, efficacy and clinical need of the nation's vaccines,' Kennedy said in a June 9 opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, also posted on the HHS website.
ACIP makes recommendations to the director of the CDC, who then can accept or deny the recommendations. The committee's decisions do not directly allow or prevent vaccines to be given, but they can impact health insurance coverage, NBC News reported.
The panel said previously it would evaluate recommendations for childhood vaccines, according to the outlet, and members of the committee have had varying views on the regimen over the years.
But where do most Americans actually stand on the childhood vaccine requirements?
Majority of Americans support childhood vaccines
The vast majority of U.S. adults support vaccines requirements as they currently stand, primarily as prerequisites to kids attending public school, a June 26 Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health poll found.
The poll included 2,509 Americans over the age of 18, questioned between March 10 and March 31, and with margins of error between plus or minus 2.3 and 4.2 percentage points, according to the report.
Overall, 79% of U.S. adults 'say parents should be required to have children vaccinated against preventable diseases like measles, mumps and rubella to attend school,' according to the survey.
When broken down by political affiliation, 90% of Democrats and 68% of Republicans said they support the requirements, including 66% of adults who self-identified as part of the 'Make America Great Again' movement, the poll showed.
Only 21%, or about one in five, said they didn't support the current requirements, data showed.
'Childhood vaccine requirements are less controversial than many people think,' Brian Castrucci, president and CEO of the de Beaumont Foundation, which collaborated on the poll, said in a news release about the poll. 'This poll shows that they're widely supported across political groups — and it's heartening to see that so many Americans understand the importance of vaccination, which remains a fundamental pillar of public health and disease prevention.'
Opponents cite parental choice, political influence
Kennedy said part of his reasoning for the ACIP shake-up was because the previous committee 'never recommended against a vaccine — even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.'
But when it came to the poll results, of the 21% of adults who stated they didn't support the childhood vaccines, very few cited safety concerns.
About three-fourths of those who don't support the shots said 'a major reason is that they think it should be the parents' choice whether to vaccinate their child,' according to the poll.
Others said 'they think government agencies who enforce vaccine requirements are influenced too much by politics,' or that the requirements are made to benefit large companies and vaccine manufacturers, according to the report.
Less than half of respondents who don't support the requirement noted safety as a major concern, the poll found.
Overall, 88% of parents said they believe vaccines are safe, including 97% of Democrats, 88% of Republicans and 84% of 'MAGA' supporters, according to the poll.
Few changes made in ACIP voting
The HHS announced votes from the first meeting of the new ACIP, with decisions made on RSV recommendations and flu shots, according to a June 26 news release.
The committee approved one dose of clesrovimab for infants not protected from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from their mothers, one of two monoclonal antibody products currently available.
They also reaffirmed a previous recommendation for all people over the age of 6 months to receive an annual flu shot, including for pregnant women, according to the release.
The committee said these shots, however, must be free of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used in vaccines since the 1930s that multiple U.S. and international studies have confirmed the safety of, according to the CDC.
They also voted to update the 'Vaccines for Children Program' specifically for RSV prevention, the HHS said.
'Honesty, transparency and compassion with regard to public health. These are the three pillars that we, the new ACIP members, are guided by. Our central duty is to protect public health, and we understand that we must answer the call for reestablishing confidence in the scientific examination process. This committee strongly supports the use of vaccines, and other counter measures, predicated on evidence-based medicine, including rigorous evaluation and expansive credible scientific data, for both safety and efficacy,' the committee members said in a joint statement shared by the HHS.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Military News
43 minutes ago
- American Military News
Dangerous diseases possible as ticks spread across US, experts warn
Experts are warning of an increased possibility of people contracting dangerous diseases as ticks spread across the United States. Ben Hottel, an entomologist at Orkin, a pest control company, recently told Fox News that ticks are spreading into different regions of the United States due to some traditionally cooler areas of the country experiencing milder winters. Orkin explained that ticks prefer to live in warmer environments. According to Fox News, ticks have been able to remain active longer than usual due to milder winters and higher temperatures and have used hosts to spread outside of traditional locations in the United States. Fox News reported that experts at New York's Binghamton University Tick-borne Disease Center have suggested that tick-borne diseases that were previously only found in certain regions of the United States are now starting to be identified in different parts of the country. Yetrib Hathout, the director of the Binghamton University Tick-borne Disease Center, previously warned, 'Deer ticks are active any time it's over 39 degrees, so we have a lot longer active periods for ticks now, unfortunately.' In addition to milder winters and rising temperatures, Hottel told Fox News that human developments in various wildlife habitats have contributed to the spread of ticks. READ MORE: Outbreak of deadly disease strain confirmed in US 'Another reason for the spread of ticks is the expansion of human developments into wildlife habitats, which helps ticks more easily find human hosts,' Hottel stated. According to Fox News, experts at Ohio State University have warned that the number of concerning tick species has increased from one to five just throughout the past 15 years. Hottel told Fox News that people need to be vigilant during the summer months and use caution with regard to certain ticks, tick bites, and diseases carried by ticks. According to Fox News, experts are warning Americans to check for ticks after spending time outside, use tick repellents, and wear long clothing. 'Awareness is the first step in protecting yourself from tick-borne illness,' Hottel said. 'Some of the pathogens that are only found in the South, like the Rickettsia species that causes spotted fever, are migrating up north,' Hathout warned. 'That's why tick surveillance and tick screening for other things are important. And I think it's important to do it regularly.'

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
High bacteria levels prompt beach closures, advisories from Michigan to New York
Many Americans love to flock toward the ocean to celebrate Independence Day, but high bacteria levels in the water in various areas around the country may disrupt tradition. Officials have closed off swimming at beaches in some parts of Illinois, New York and Washington due to excessive bacteria in the water. In Massachusetts, nearly 20 beaches are closed to the public as swimming could cause illness, according to the Patriot Ledger, part of the USA TODAY Network. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that bacteria known as vibrio are often typically found in coastal waters and can cause various vibriosis symptoms, including diarrhea, stomach cramps, vomiting and fever, as well as blistering skin lesions and dangerously low blood pressure. The CDC warns that some vibrio bacteria can cause severe and life-threatening infections. Here's some of the areas where excessive bacteria levels prompted beach closures or advisories ahead of the Fourth of July. Where are beaches closed? Long Island, New York New York health officials have prohibited swimming at several beaches in Nassau and Suffolk counties due to elevated bacterial levels. Since June 25, bathing is restricted at the following beaches until sample testing proves that waters are safe to swim in again: Massachusetts Officials have closed 19 beaches off to the public due to "bacterial exceedance" posing the risk of illness, according to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. This includes the following beaches: Washington At least five beaches in the Seattle area have been closed due to high bacteria levels while one (West Green Lake Beach) has been closed due to toxic algae, King County's public health department warned over the weekend. Illinois The Illinois Department of Public Health issued multiple beach closures last week along Chicago's northern suburbs due to elevated bacteria levels. This includes the following: Michigan In Michigan, several beaches are under contamination advisories due to unsafe swimming conditions. California Multiple beaches in San Diego County were under water contact advisories Friday, June 27 due to excessive bacteria levels. However, no warnings and closures have been issued yet due to the low severity, according to the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health and Quality. Contributing: Catherine Messier, USA TODAY Network


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Booker calls Trump megabill a ‘moral obscenity'
Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) said Monday that President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is a 'moral obscenity.' 'I think it's a moral obscenity, and it is violence in the sense of what it will do to many families by denying them health care when they're sick, by denying them food when their children are hungry, denying our seniors critical care in their latter years, denying the disabled the kind of support that they need,' Booker said on MSNBC's 'Deadline: White House.' Democrats have vehemently opposed the 'big, beautiful bill' as it has made its way through Congress, with Booker saying in a post on the social platform X Monday that members of his party in the upper chamber were 'standing up right now for our constituents who will lose their health care, who will face rising energy costs, and who will lose access to SNAP benefits.' 'We have to do whatever we can to stop the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Booker continued in his post. House moderate Republicans and hard-line conservatives have recently expressed rising opposition to the Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' only days before they are set to consider the legislation. 'This bill is a moral obscenity, and I'm stunned that only a few senators on their side of the aisle have even been willing to speak to the impact it will have on their states, their constituents,' Booker said Monday. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Monday that the 'ONE GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL, is moving along nicely!' 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' the president added, using his trademark phrase.