The cycleway from hell was paved with good intentions. They need to come back
Unlike mask wearing, state border controls and QR code check-ins, the temporary cycling lanes lingered and are becoming permanent parts of the city. Two have proved especially controversial: the Oxford Street cycleway, where residents have launched legal action against the state government and City of Sydney council; and the Bridge Road route connecting Camperdown to Glebe.
Somewhere along the way, the good intentions slipped like a chain off a sprocket.
The 1.2-kilometre Bridge Road cycleway that runs from Lyons Road to Taylor Street near the new Sydney Fish Market is now used for about 500 trips a day, and is in a part of the city primed for denser living as the government seeks to address a housing crisis. The problem, as Sydney editor Megan Gorrey reports, is that the temporary cycleway is a dangerous path where riders are forced to merge back into traffic lanes.
While the competing needs of cyclists, motorists and pedestrians have long proved divisive, lately the Bridge Road route has succeeded in uniting people in opposition. Residents are not only annoyed at the construction, but have joined cyclists in their concern about safety. Di Anstey, the Bridge Road Friends founder whose advocacy also risks turning permanent, witnesses 'near misses every day' and suggests alternative routes should be considered.
Perhaps the most damning comments come from Balmain MP Kobi Shetty, 'an experienced, lifelong cyclist' who uses the route to get to work but is always uneasy. 'I have to be hypervigilant. I wouldn't let my kids near it.'
Loading
For its part, Transport for NSW said safety would be improved after the upgrade, and it was designed to improve safety for pedestrians, motorists and bike riders. A spokeswoman said the permanent cycleway would also create a more accessible and safer travel option for people riding between the inner west and the city, including to the new Fish Market. It has also promised that additional safety measures, which were suggested in a 2023 audit, had been included in the final design.
As it stands, the cycleway is pleasing no one. Motorists have to keep their wits about them as the few riders who brave the path duck in and out of traffic. Residents are being disrupted by roadworks that few are convinced will fix the problem. And cyclists are already voting with their pedals. That only 500 trips a day are being recorded on the route is evidence that many riders are steering clear of it.
This is not to say all the cycleways should be torn up. Cyclists deserve space to commute in safety, as all road users do. In a city of endless tunnels, train tracks and toll roads, the inability to solve a 1.2-kilometre problem smells of a lack of will. Maybe good intentions need to return.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Disrespectful and derogatory': GP suspended for social media posts about abortion, gender and Covid
A conservative Christian GP has been found guilty of professional misconduct after complaints were raised over more than a decade worth of his 'offensive' social media posts about abortion, the LGBTQI+ community and Covid. Lawyers for Dr Jereth Kok have blasted Tuesday's ruling by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), saying it represents a 'deeply concerning shift in regulatory scope over personal speech'. One post that landed Dr Kok in hot water was a satirical article by conservative Christian US website Babylon Bee titled 'Instead Of Traditional Warfare, Chinese Military Will Now Be Trained To Shout Wrong Pronouns At American Troops'. Instead Of Traditional Warfare, Chinese Military Will Now Be Trained To Shout Wrong Pronouns At American Troops â€' The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) March 20, 2021 VCAT found the post, re-shared by Dr Kok, was 'inconsistent' with the Medical Board's Code of Conduct as it 'failed to respect and be sensitive to gender diversity'. 'The Tribunal is comfortably satisfied that the post was denigrating, demeaning, disrespectful and derogatory to LGBTQI+ community as it trivialised reference to the identity issues of some in the LGBTQI+ community,' VCAT said in its decision. Dr Kok told the tribunal that he believed 'that the Bible very clearly teaches that homosexual conduct, which includes same-sex sexual activity and relationships, is immoral' and that 'the Bible obliges Christian believers to refrain from all immoral conduct, including homosexual conduct'. 'I have provided care to many gay and lesbian patients without ever disclosing my personal views to them,' he said in his witness statement. 'This was no more difficult for me than providing non-judgmental care to heterosexual patients having extramarital affairs (which I personally disapprove of) or even convicted criminals.' In other posts Dr Kok railed against abortion, describing it as the 'massacres of babies' and 'baby killing' and referring to medical practitioners who engage in the practice as 'butchers' and 'serial contract killers'. Dr Kok told the tribunal that as a Christian 'I believe that life and personhood begin at conception' and 'I abhor the way our society conceals the truth about abortion by using deceitful euphemisms'. VCAT upheld complaints against a number of the posts, finding that they denigrated, demeaned and slurred medical practitioners who provide abortion treatment to patients. The tribunal found Dr Kok had similarly demeaned doctors who 'recognise that people who identify as transgender are not suffering from a mental health condition'. In various posts on the topic of gender dysphoria, Dr Kok had described transgender surgery as 'medical butchery' and 'mutilation of genitals' and labelled doctors who performed the procedures as 'crooks'. Dr Kok, who previously practised at a clinic in Melbourne's outer suburbs, was suspended by the Medical Board of Australia in August 2019 after anonymous complaints were raised about his social media activity dating back to 2010. More than six years on, VCAT last week upheld Dr Kok's suspension, finding 54 of the 85 offending posts amounted to misconduct under the Health Practitioner National Law (Victoria) Act 2009. VCAT found Dr Kok had also 'expressed sentiments of violence and made derogatory statements' towards racial and religious groups, despite acknowledging that a number may have been 'meant by Dr Kok in some sort of humorous way'. In a number of inflammatory posts — which Dr Kok insisted were satirical or sarcastic in nature — he called for the colonisation of 'primitive yellow people and black people' and described Chinese people as 'ching chongs'. 'It's time that those primitive yellow people and black people progressed,' Dr Kok wrote in one post, which came in response to the 2015 Obergefell decision in the US legalising same-sex marriage. 'If they won't do it by themselves, we ought to colonise them, that we might educate them in equality, social justice and human rights.' In another post, Dr Kok replied to a friend who had joked about 'ordering some Zyklon B from Amazon' and 'inviting the inferior races over' for a shower with the hashtag '#illridewithyou'. Dr Kok told the tribunal the post was in the context of the December 2017 terror attack in Melbourne and 'specifically, [the fact that] anybody who expresses concern about religious inspired terrorism will be labelled a 'Nazi''. VCAT also found Dr Kok 'denigrated, demeaned and slurred persons that accepted and considered it right to follow Covid-19 public health orders' and 'in relation to Covid-19, drew on and legitimised anti-vaccination and vaccine hesitancy rhetoric and contained misleading information regarding vaccines'. Dr Kok had railed against 'authoritarian' lockdown measures and likened taking the Covid vaccine to playing 'Russian roulette', among other similar comments. 'Some posts provide information about important health matters, but the information is not balanced or unbiased and does not show an understanding of public health principles including for health promotion, disease prevention and control,' VCAT found. The Human Rights Law Alliance (HRLA), which represented Dr Kok, said the tribunal gave little weight to constitutional or freedom-of-speech protections despite the 'political, religious and satirical nature' of the posts. HRLA added that the decision 'sets a concerning precedent for freedom of speech in Australia, particularly for professionals who hold Christian or conservative beliefs'. 'Dr Kok is disappointed that he was unsuccessful with his submissions to the Tribunal that free speech principles should be upheld and that Medical Board discipline should relate to clinical conduct and should not police religious and political expression,' HRLA said in a statement to on behalf of Dr Kok. 'Dr Kok of course respects the Tribunal's decision and is taking advice on the decision and will now turn to preparing for the sanction hearing that will follow these findings.' HRLA noted the case 'did not relate to his medical practice, as the Tribunal acknowledged'. 'Dr Kok accepts that some of the language he used in his social media posts was regrettable and on reflection he would not use that language again,' the statement said. 'He notes that this relates to only a proportion of the posts that were impugned by the Medical Board and that he communicated this acceptance to the Tribunal at his hearing.' Dr Kok was 'heartened that the Tribunal found that the Medical Board's allegations of misconduct were not satisfied for over one third of the social media posts subject to allegations', HRLA added. 'Many of the posts were found to be purely political or religious commentary and so fell outside the Medical Board's remit. Dr Kok was also pleased that the worst allegations suggesting that he supported genocide and violence were not made out and that the Tribunal recognised that many comments used satire and sarcasm.' Christian political party Family First on Monday condemned the ruling, describing it as a 'gross injustice and a chilling attack on freedom of speech'. Family First said it would fight to repeal 'similar anti-free speech laws' in all states and would field candidates at upcoming elections in South Australia, Victoria and NSW. 'Dr Kok has harmed no patient. His only 'crime' was to express his views online — many of them satirical or Christian in nature — and for that, he has been punished with the loss of his medical career,' Family First national director Lyle Shelton said in a statement. 'This is not justice, it is un-Australian. This is Victoria's 'ministry of truth' enforcing ideological conformity and crushing dissent.'
Sky News AU
3 days ago
- Sky News AU
'Living Nostradamus' Athos Salomé issues sombre forecast about Prince Harry and King Charles III amid whispers of a potential Royal Family reconciliation
A Brazilian psychic widely referred to as the 'Living Nostradamus' has made an eerie prediction about the future for Prince Harry and the Royal Family. Athos Salomé, 38, has previously made forecasts surrounding global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Microsoft global outage and the death of Queen Elizabeth II. Because of this, Salomé's followers believe he has an extraordinary gift for foreseeing world events, drawing comparisons to the famed 16th-century seer Nostradamus. Salomé claims his predictions are based on studies in Kabbalah, the ancient Jewish tradition of mystical biblical interpretation, as well as analysis of symbolic patterns and power cycles. In a new interview with The Sun on Thursday, Salomé said his analysis points to Prince Harry travelling back to the UK before the European summer of 2026, not as a heartfelt family reunion, but as part of "an image survival strategy". "Harry knows that he needs to regain some of the British support if he wants to maintain institutional relevance," he told the publication, adding that his wife - Meghan Markle - may stay behind in the US or make "restricted appearances" during the visit. Unfortunately, the Brazilian psychic stated that the Kabbalah ultimately indicates signs of "limited reconciliation" between the 40-year-old Prince and the 76-year-old King, who has been battling an undisclosed form of cancer since February 2024. The prediction follows growing speculation about a possible thaw in the frosty relationship between the Sussexes and the Royal Family, which has remained fractured since Harry and Meghan's departure from royal duties and move to the US in 2020. Two weeks ago, Harry's new chief communications officer Meredith Maines and UK PR rep Liam Maguire were spotted meeting with the King's top aide, Communications Secretary Tobyn Andreae, at London's Royal Over-Seas League. While there was reportedly "no formal agenda", royal insiders said the casual meeting marked a significant shift in tone. "There's a long road ahead, but a channel of communication is now open for the first time in years," a source told The Mail on Sunday, which first revealed the sit-down. Maines, who joined Harry's team in March, was also behind the Duke's May BBC interview where he declared he "would love a reconciliation" with his family. However, not everyone is convinced of the sincerity behind the outreach. On Wednesday, royal commentator Robert Jobson suggested the meeting may have been financially motivated, following reports that streaming giant Netflix will scrap the couple's $100 million deal due to poor ratings. "Well, the deal was always set about $100 million, wasn't it?" Jobson said during The Sun's Royal Exclusive show. "Where does it leave them? Probably with a bit of a bowl out, looking for some handouts. "They can't rely on the Spare money forever, can they?" he added, referencing Harry's bestselling 2023 memoir. As for Harry and Meghan's relationship, Salomé does not foresee a divorce - but believes a professional and emotional rift is forming. "They may remain married for convenience and brand management," he said. "But emotionally, they will be more distant than ever." Already, the Duke and Duchess, who share six-year-old Prince Archie and four-year-old Princess Lilibet, appear to be operating along increasingly separate lines. Meghan is said to be focusing all efforts on her lifestyle brand, As Ever, while Harry is doubling down on his work with the Invictus Games and mental health causes. According to Salomé, this division may become a "model of cohabitation" that is more functional than heartfelt. But he also warned of obstacles ahead, particularly for Meghan. "According to the predictions from the Kabbalah, there are strong indications of problems in the production chain and the exhaustion of the niche if she doesn't reinvent the brand's storytelling," he said.
West Australian
4 days ago
- West Australian
Scott Morrison tells US congress to strengthen aliances against China's economic pressure
US alliances and partnerships must be strengthened to push back against Chinese economic coercion, former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison has told a US congressional panel. 'This is as true in the economic sphere as it is in the security sphere,' Mr Morrison said in a rare appearance by a country's former leader before Congress. He shared with the House Select Committee on China his experience of coping with the country's trade punishments - including restrictions on imports of Australian wine, barley and more - when his government called for an independent inquiry into the origin of COVID-19. Mr Morrison, who was prime minister from 2018 to 2022, said US allies and partners can be tapped to build an alternative supply chain of rare earths, used in technology such as smartphones. For such alliances and partnerships to work, 'there has to be a strong core, and that requires a strong America,' he said.
