logo
‘Disrespectful and derogatory': GP suspended for social media posts about abortion, gender and Covid

‘Disrespectful and derogatory': GP suspended for social media posts about abortion, gender and Covid

News.com.au16 hours ago
A conservative Christian GP has been found guilty of professional misconduct after complaints were raised over more than a decade worth of his 'offensive' social media posts about abortion, the LGBTQI+ community and Covid.
Lawyers for Dr Jereth Kok have blasted Tuesday's ruling by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), saying it represents a 'deeply concerning shift in regulatory scope over personal speech'.
One post that landed Dr Kok in hot water was a satirical article by conservative Christian US website Babylon Bee titled 'Instead Of Traditional Warfare, Chinese Military Will Now Be Trained To Shout Wrong Pronouns At American Troops'.
Instead Of Traditional Warfare, Chinese Military Will Now Be Trained To Shout Wrong Pronouns At American Troops https://t.co/5ZbPfXyZ6H
â€' The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) March 20, 2021
VCAT found the post, re-shared by Dr Kok, was 'inconsistent' with the Medical Board's Code of Conduct as it 'failed to respect and be sensitive to gender diversity'.
'The Tribunal is comfortably satisfied that the post was denigrating, demeaning, disrespectful and derogatory to LGBTQI+ community as it trivialised reference to the identity issues of some in the LGBTQI+ community,' VCAT said in its decision.
Dr Kok told the tribunal that he believed 'that the Bible very clearly teaches that homosexual conduct, which includes same-sex sexual activity and relationships, is immoral' and that 'the Bible obliges Christian believers to refrain from all immoral conduct, including homosexual conduct'.
'I have provided care to many gay and lesbian patients without ever disclosing my personal views to them,' he said in his witness statement.
'This was no more difficult for me than providing non-judgmental care to heterosexual patients having extramarital affairs (which I personally disapprove of) or even convicted criminals.'
In other posts Dr Kok railed against abortion, describing it as the 'massacres of babies' and 'baby killing' and referring to medical practitioners who engage in the practice as 'butchers' and 'serial contract killers'.
Dr Kok told the tribunal that as a Christian 'I believe that life and personhood begin at conception' and 'I abhor the way our society conceals the truth about abortion by using deceitful euphemisms'.
VCAT upheld complaints against a number of the posts, finding that they denigrated, demeaned and slurred medical practitioners who provide abortion treatment to patients.
The tribunal found Dr Kok had similarly demeaned doctors who 'recognise that people who identify as transgender are not suffering from a mental health condition'.
In various posts on the topic of gender dysphoria, Dr Kok had described transgender surgery as 'medical butchery' and 'mutilation of genitals' and labelled doctors who performed the procedures as 'crooks'.
Dr Kok, who previously practised at a clinic in Melbourne's outer suburbs, was suspended by the Medical Board of Australia in August 2019 after anonymous complaints were raised about his social media activity dating back to 2010.
More than six years on, VCAT last week upheld Dr Kok's suspension, finding 54 of the 85 offending posts amounted to misconduct under the Health Practitioner National Law (Victoria) Act 2009.
VCAT found Dr Kok had also 'expressed sentiments of violence and made derogatory statements' towards racial and religious groups, despite acknowledging that a number may have been 'meant by Dr Kok in some sort of humorous way'.
In a number of inflammatory posts — which Dr Kok insisted were satirical or sarcastic in nature — he called for the colonisation of 'primitive yellow people and black people' and described Chinese people as 'ching chongs'.
'It's time that those primitive yellow people and black people progressed,' Dr Kok wrote in one post, which came in response to the 2015 Obergefell decision in the US legalising same-sex marriage.
'If they won't do it by themselves, we ought to colonise them, that we might educate them in equality, social justice and human rights.'
In another post, Dr Kok replied to a friend who had joked about 'ordering some Zyklon B from Amazon' and 'inviting the inferior races over' for a shower with the hashtag '#illridewithyou'.
Dr Kok told the tribunal the post was in the context of the December 2017 terror attack in Melbourne and 'specifically, [the fact that] anybody who expresses concern about religious inspired terrorism will be labelled a 'Nazi''.
VCAT also found Dr Kok 'denigrated, demeaned and slurred persons that accepted and considered it right to follow Covid-19 public health orders' and 'in relation to Covid-19, drew on and legitimised anti-vaccination and vaccine hesitancy rhetoric and contained misleading information regarding vaccines'.
Dr Kok had railed against 'authoritarian' lockdown measures and likened taking the Covid vaccine to playing 'Russian roulette', among other similar comments.
'Some posts provide information about important health matters, but the information is not balanced or unbiased and does not show an understanding of public health principles including for health promotion, disease prevention and control,' VCAT found.
The Human Rights Law Alliance (HRLA), which represented Dr Kok, said the tribunal gave little weight to constitutional or freedom-of-speech protections despite the 'political, religious and satirical nature' of the posts.
HRLA added that the decision 'sets a concerning precedent for freedom of speech in Australia, particularly for professionals who hold Christian or conservative beliefs'.
'Dr Kok is disappointed that he was unsuccessful with his submissions to the Tribunal that free speech principles should be upheld and that Medical Board discipline should relate to clinical conduct and should not police religious and political expression,' HRLA said in a statement to news.com.au on behalf of Dr Kok.
'Dr Kok of course respects the Tribunal's decision and is taking advice on the decision and will now turn to preparing for the sanction hearing that will follow these findings.'
HRLA noted the case 'did not relate to his medical practice, as the Tribunal acknowledged'.
'Dr Kok accepts that some of the language he used in his social media posts was regrettable and on reflection he would not use that language again,' the statement said.
'He notes that this relates to only a proportion of the posts that were impugned by the Medical Board and that he communicated this acceptance to the Tribunal at his hearing.'
Dr Kok was 'heartened that the Tribunal found that the Medical Board's allegations of misconduct were not satisfied for over one third of the social media posts subject to allegations', HRLA added.
'Many of the posts were found to be purely political or religious commentary and so fell outside the Medical Board's remit. Dr Kok was also pleased that the worst allegations suggesting that he supported genocide and violence were not made out and that the Tribunal recognised that many comments used satire and sarcasm.'
Christian political party Family First on Monday condemned the ruling, describing it as a 'gross injustice and a chilling attack on freedom of speech'.
Family First said it would fight to repeal 'similar anti-free speech laws' in all states and would field candidates at upcoming elections in South Australia, Victoria and NSW.
'Dr Kok has harmed no patient. His only 'crime' was to express his views online — many of them satirical or Christian in nature — and for that, he has been punished with the loss of his medical career,' Family First national director Lyle Shelton said in a statement.
'This is not justice, it is un-Australian. This is Victoria's 'ministry of truth' enforcing ideological conformity and crushing dissent.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victorian government eyes further bail changes as its critics target childcare crisis
Victorian government eyes further bail changes as its critics target childcare crisis

ABC News

time24 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Victorian government eyes further bail changes as its critics target childcare crisis

Victoria's childcare regulators and child safety authorities could be probed by a parliamentary inquiry, amid accusations Premier Jacinta Allan's rapid review of the sector was designed to avoid scrutiny. The three-day sitting week is the first time parliament has met since more than 70 charges of child sex abuse were laid against childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown — allegations that have thrown the sector and its regulation into the spotlight. Meanwhile, the government will use the resumption of parliament to make it even harder for repeat offenders to get bail. The Victorian Greens are pushing for a parliamentary inquiry into the state's childcare regulators and child safety authorities, amid allegations a government-backed review was designed to avoid further investigation. The opposition will also move a private member's bill to immediately overhaul Working with Children Check (WWCC) laws and implement recommendations made by the Victorian Ombudsman three years ago. The proposals flagged last week include lowering the threshold for the WWCC accreditation to be revoked and requiring applicants to undertake child safety training. "It makes sure that people understand their obligations when getting a Working with Children Check," Shadow Education Minister Jess Wilson said. "It can't just be a tick and flick exercise; it needs to mean something." However, the private member's bill is unlikely to succeed, with the Allan government traditionally not supporting bills tabled by the opposition. In the upper house, the Victorian Greens will move to set up a parliamentary inquiry into the childcare sector, with MP Anasina Gray-Barberio accusing the government of setting up a rapid sector review to avoid proper scrutiny. The review, led by former South Australian premier Jay Weatherill and due to report next month, was announced by the government in the wake of the allegations against Mr Brown. It is set to recommend urgent changes based on existing proposals in other states, but it is not looking at the performance of the sector's regulator or the Commission for Children and Young People. Ms Gray-Barberio said the review had "gaping holes" and would fail to ask the hard questions. "Labor's narrow review avoids scrutiny of their own regulation while they've been marking their own homework," she said. "We need this inquiry to fill in the gaps." The parliamentary committee, which is understood to have the backing of Coalition MPs and the crossbench, would scrutinise the performance of the state's education department. It would also examine the differences between private, for-profit operators and not-for-profit childcare centres in Victoria, as well as the WWCC system and staff-to-child ratios. Earlier this month, the government told the ABC it was making changes to Working with Children Checks to take into account any prohibition notices, rather than just police charges, when determining whether to revoke or suspend a WWCC. The government has also committed to creating a childcare worker register as soon as possible, and moving to ban personal devices from childcare centres. Meanwhile, the government has unveiled details of a new round of bail law changes that it says will build on earlier reforms it deemed the "toughest bail laws" in the country. The new changes will see people accused of committing six serious robbery and home invasion offences while on bail, refused bail unless the decision-maker is satisfied that it's highly likely they won't reoffend. A new "second strike rule" will also make it harder for people accused of repeat indictable offending to get bail. "The data tells us that there are certain types of serious offences that are more likely to be repeated or committed again by people who are out on bail," Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny said. "The two tranches of bail reform are directed squarely at addressing the concerns from the community about serious offending by people who are out on bail, but also about sending a strong message that there are consequences for people who continue to commit and reoffending while on bail." The government said the changes, to be introduced to parliament on Tuesday, will be subject to "key safeguards to mitigate any disproportionate impact on vulnerable people". The changes that passed parliament in March included installing community safety as the overarching principle for bail decision-making, and removing remand as a last resort for serious youth offenders. However, they were strongly criticised by community legal groups and youth advocates who said the laws were dangerous and discriminatory. The government anticipates the combined changes will increase the number of adult and youth offenders on remand and says it is hiring new prison staff and bringing more prison beds online to prepare. In his first wide-ranging interview since joining the force, Victoria's police commissioner this week told the ABC he didn't want to see young people in prison, "but some need to be there to protect the public".

Good journalism reveals problems and just asks more questions
Good journalism reveals problems and just asks more questions

The Age

time24 minutes ago

  • The Age

Good journalism reveals problems and just asks more questions

'Stop anyone in your country and ask, 'do you need more news faster?' They will say, 'no, we don't. We need better news. I need to know which people have the best solution to the problems I have'.' The world has always been beset by bad news. Today it seems unusually beset. There is a cascade of concatenating crises on a grand scale. Trump is dismantling the global order, Putin wages war in Europe, climate change is increasingly destructive, there's the prospect of war in Asia. All of this is aggravated by 'social' media, exacerbating the existing problems and inflicting its own new harms. This complex has been called variously the polycrisis, pluricrisis, or socio-ecological crisis. People everywhere are depressed by continuous exposure to the news, punch-drunk just by trying to follow events. Kate Torney, news director of the ABC until 2015, speaks of news fatigue among audiences: 'When I stepped away from journalism, I gained a much clearer understanding of why some people are so overwhelmed. The focus on conflict and negativity can be exhausting and leaves audiences feeling helpless.' Torney took the leadership of the Constructive Institute's Asia Pacific hub, based in Melbourne's Monash University, eight months ago, working closely with Haagerup. She, too, is working to be part of the solution. News titles 'should be the best friend of people', says Haagerup. 'What is that? Is it somebody who constantly calls you up and says 'the castle is on fire'? Or is it someone constantly complaining about everything? Is it somebody who wants to make money out of you? People don't think we are good friends.' All well and good, but surely this is a utopian project. How can he change the instinctive human interest in bad news, in what's going wrong, in the aberrant? 'News is something out of the ordinary,' he says. 'What if everyone is fighting? With everyone fighting, if some people are living peacefully, tell us how. That's intriguing.' He has a point. 'People in towns and cities with the same problem you have, how have they fixed it? People want to read that story.' He offers an example. South Korea solved the problem of masses queueing for COVID vaccinations, with the risk of infecting one another, by applying the McDonald's drive-through concept. The world followed its lead. He lists a sample of eight Nordic and German news outlets that have started to systematically apply constructive approaches to their journalism. For instance, the Norwegian national broadcaster, NRK, changed the format of its regular political radio debate, says Torney. Instead of a standard clash with a winner and loser, the producers required the debate participants to return to the program at a later date with three points of agreement. 'The impact was extraordinary,' reports Torney. 'It went down really well with the audience.' Loading The Herald 's editor, Bevan Shields, concurs that while reporting of hard news will always be essential, readers often say they don't want to feel depressed by the time they've finished reading the news: 'They want light and shade, and there is an increasing demand for constructive, solutions-focused journalism as part of that.' The Herald and its Melbourne twin, The Age, already apply the principle tentatively. For example, the story last week of an education case study – how a failing public primary school at The Entrance on the NSW Central Coast was turned into a success. Liam Mannix, science reporter for the two papers, was given a fellowship at the Constructive Institute in Denmark last year. It inspired him to tell a number of constructive yarns, including the one headlined: ' How Tom walked away from knee pain without expensive surgery. ' Potentially life-changing for millions. Shields says that environment coverage is another example. 'Yes, there is a political contest to cover, but readers also want information about practical ways to help the environment.' 'What's in it for me?' ask the shareholders. 'There is also a commercial benefit for newsrooms if we can do this well,' says Shields. Subscribers demand new offerings. Constructive journalism can add value, he says. Some of the Nordic outlets can attest to its commercial success. Haagerup recounts the way that fast food invaded Denmark some 30 years ago. With hamburger and pizza and kebab shops lining the streets, some Danish chefs got together to mourn the takeover by cheap, fast, unhealthy food. They proposed a solution – to restore restaurant dining with wild, local and seasonal ingredients. They founded NOMA in Copenhagen. It revolutionised fine dining worldwide. Even McDonald's in Denmark introduced gourmet-style hamburgers.

Good journalism reveals problems and just asks more questions
Good journalism reveals problems and just asks more questions

Sydney Morning Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Good journalism reveals problems and just asks more questions

'Stop anyone in your country and ask, 'do you need more news faster?' They will say, 'no, we don't. We need better news. I need to know which people have the best solution to the problems I have'.' The world has always been beset by bad news. Today it seems unusually beset. There is a cascade of concatenating crises on a grand scale. Trump is dismantling the global order, Putin wages war in Europe, climate change is increasingly destructive, there's the prospect of war in Asia. All of this is aggravated by 'social' media, exacerbating the existing problems and inflicting its own new harms. This complex has been called variously the polycrisis, pluricrisis, or socio-ecological crisis. People everywhere are depressed by continuous exposure to the news, punch-drunk just by trying to follow events. Kate Torney, news director of the ABC until 2015, speaks of news fatigue among audiences: 'When I stepped away from journalism, I gained a much clearer understanding of why some people are so overwhelmed. The focus on conflict and negativity can be exhausting and leaves audiences feeling helpless.' Torney took the leadership of the Constructive Institute's Asia Pacific hub, based in Melbourne's Monash University, eight months ago, working closely with Haagerup. She, too, is working to be part of the solution. News titles 'should be the best friend of people', says Haagerup. 'What is that? Is it somebody who constantly calls you up and says 'the castle is on fire'? Or is it someone constantly complaining about everything? Is it somebody who wants to make money out of you? People don't think we are good friends.' All well and good, but surely this is a utopian project. How can he change the instinctive human interest in bad news, in what's going wrong, in the aberrant? 'News is something out of the ordinary,' he says. 'What if everyone is fighting? With everyone fighting, if some people are living peacefully, tell us how. That's intriguing.' He has a point. 'People in towns and cities with the same problem you have, how have they fixed it? People want to read that story.' He offers an example. South Korea solved the problem of masses queueing for COVID vaccinations, with the risk of infecting one another, by applying the McDonald's drive-through concept. The world followed its lead. He lists a sample of eight Nordic and German news outlets that have started to systematically apply constructive approaches to their journalism. For instance, the Norwegian national broadcaster, NRK, changed the format of its regular political radio debate, says Torney. Instead of a standard clash with a winner and loser, the producers required the debate participants to return to the program at a later date with three points of agreement. 'The impact was extraordinary,' reports Torney. 'It went down really well with the audience.' Loading The Herald 's editor, Bevan Shields, concurs that while reporting of hard news will always be essential, readers often say they don't want to feel depressed by the time they've finished reading the news: 'They want light and shade, and there is an increasing demand for constructive, solutions-focused journalism as part of that.' The Herald and its Melbourne twin, The Age, already apply the principle tentatively. For example, the story last week of an education case study – how a failing public primary school at The Entrance on the NSW Central Coast was turned into a success. Liam Mannix, science reporter for the two papers, was given a fellowship at the Constructive Institute in Denmark last year. It inspired him to tell a number of constructive yarns, including the one headlined: ' How Tom walked away from knee pain without expensive surgery. ' Potentially life-changing for millions. Shields says that environment coverage is another example. 'Yes, there is a political contest to cover, but readers also want information about practical ways to help the environment.' 'What's in it for me?' ask the shareholders. 'There is also a commercial benefit for newsrooms if we can do this well,' says Shields. Subscribers demand new offerings. Constructive journalism can add value, he says. Some of the Nordic outlets can attest to its commercial success. Haagerup recounts the way that fast food invaded Denmark some 30 years ago. With hamburger and pizza and kebab shops lining the streets, some Danish chefs got together to mourn the takeover by cheap, fast, unhealthy food. They proposed a solution – to restore restaurant dining with wild, local and seasonal ingredients. They founded NOMA in Copenhagen. It revolutionised fine dining worldwide. Even McDonald's in Denmark introduced gourmet-style hamburgers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store