logo
Why are Republicans refusing to budge on the Jan. 6 plaque honoring law enforcement?

Why are Republicans refusing to budge on the Jan. 6 plaque honoring law enforcement?

Yahoo23-05-2025
After the Jan. 6 attack, lawmakers agreed to install a permanent plaque to honor the law enforcement personnel who helped protect the U.S. Capitol against right-wing rioters. By statute, the plaque would list the names of the officers who served; it would be placed on the western side of the building; and it would be in place by March 2023.
That was two months ago. As The Washington Post reported, the plaque is done, and it's ready to be installed, but it's currently 'sitting in a Capitol basement utility room surrounded by tools and maintenance equipment.'
Last week, House and Senate Democrats used the backdrop of National Police Week to highlight their ongoing efforts to have the legislation implemented. They say the only thing keeping the plaque from public view is that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) and Republican members have not yet instructed the Architect of the Capitol to install it.
The Post's report added that Architect of the Capitol Thomas Austin confirmed during a congressional hearing last month that his office needs approval from the House speaker's office — that and Johnson still hasn't given his approval.
As is usually the case when the political discussion turns to the Jan. 6 assault, a variety of Democrats have been quick to draw attention to this, while Republican officials have denied comment.
There's no great mystery here. GOP officials could follow the law and honor the officers who protected democracy and our country's principal seat of government, but in Republican politics, the story of what transpired on Jan. 6 has been turned on its head.
The heroes, according to the party's preferred narrative, were the rioters.
In the only 2024 debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the Republican was asked whether he had any regrets about the Jan. 6 attack. It was a good question, which he struggled answer.
'Ashli Babbitt was shot by an out-of-control police officer that should have never, ever shot her,' Trump said, adding, 'Nobody on the other side was killed.'
This was wrong and offensive for a variety of reasons — Trump's condemnation of the officer was absurd — but of particular interest was his description of law enforcement as 'the other side.'
In other words, for the incumbent president, there's an 'us' and a 'them.' The rioters who attacked the Capitol in Trump's name are part of the former, while the police are part of the latter. It's a perspective rooted in the idea that there are tribal political teams, and as far as Trump's concerned, the officers who served on Jan. 6 were the opposition.
Congressional Republicans know this, which helps to explain why the plaque that should've been installed months ago is gathering dust in a closet.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers
Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers

President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. Related: 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Related: Related: Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. Related: An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month. You can watch the whole exchange here. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Mike Flood met with anger at Nebraska town hall
Mike Flood met with anger at Nebraska town hall

Washington Post

time16 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Mike Flood met with anger at Nebraska town hall

LINCOLN, Nebraska —Nebraska was anything but nice. Rep. Mike Flood (R-Nebraska) faced about 750 voters during a contentious town hall here on Monday night. The two-term Republican lawmaker was there to explain his vote for President Donald Trump's signature achievement: the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that extended the 2017 tax cuts and plowed billions into immigration enforcement while slashing health care and food programs for the poor.

Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released

Advertisement A message seeking comment from prosecutors was not immediately returned. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamor for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Advertisement Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The filing aimed to support their request to release the usually secret records amid a public clamor for more transparency about the investigation into Epstein, six years after the financier died in prison. Maxwell, his former girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. The transcript face-off comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted. Some of President Donald Trump's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for staying interested in Epstein, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store