NACC issues warning against nepotism hire after corruption finding over $101k job
A former Home Affairs official has been found to have acted in a seriously corrupt manner after she helped her sister's fiance secure a $101,000 job.
The investigation report, which was released by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) on Monday, revealed a tranche of WhatsApp messages and texts shared by the high-level beurocrat, who was given the pseudonym Joanne Simeson, and her sister, Melissa.
The events, which occurred from 2022 to 2024, were in relation to an international engagement officer position, which Melissa's fiance Mark Elbert was hired with a salary of $101,264.
In one message dating back to December 2022, after Mr Elbert secured an interview, Joanne said she would 'talk [Mark] through the lie (that they did not have a close personal relationship),' to which Melissa wrote back: 'he's so bad at lying he's too honest'.
Investigations also revealed Joanne forged a witness signature on an onboarding form, and used her seniority and 'promoted his candidacy and qualities to other staff, created the recruitment requisition, nominated herself as the delegate approver, and took steps to have the onboarding'.
While Joanne claimed she initially hid her relationship with Mr Elbert because she 'did not want the relationship to be known at work', the NACC said she purposely 'used her position to procure the transfer of her sister's fiance into the Department for the purpose of benefiting her sister's fiance and her sister, knowing it to be improper'.
In another instance, Joanne also misused official information by providing interview questions to her sister, who was applying for a job at another branch at the Department of Home Affairs.
The NACC found Joanne's actions were an 'abuse of her office as a public official,' while repeatedly lying about her relationship with Mr Elberty and her sister, plus the 'benefit conferred on' Mr Elbert mounted to serious corruption.
While Joanne was stood down during the investigation in February 2024, and resigned from the department in June 2024, the NACC said it would have recommended her employment be terminated if she still worked at the department.
The investigation also prompted the NACC to warn that 'nepotism, cronyism and undeclared conflicts of interest in recruitment and promotion is an area of widespread concern,' stating that it 'undermines the merit selection process and erodes morale'.
It also noted that nepotism and cronyism (giving favouritism to friends and business associates) was 'systemic' and was one of the 'most commonly observed types of corrupt conduct,' according to the NACC's 2024 Commonwealth Integrity Survey.
Concluding the report, the commission made three recommendations to restrict access to interview questions to only those with a 'legitimate need to know,' and to call on people involved in recruitment to declare any relationship or association with an applicant and target training to people in senior leadership roles.
It also made specific recommendations to review and change hiring processes related to the Home Affairs Department, especially in relation to department transfers which a facilitated by the head of an agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Telegraph
an hour ago
- Daily Telegraph
AFL 2025; Tom Lynch to face tribunal for striking
Don't miss out on the headlines from AFL. Followed categories will be added to My News. Richmond star Tom Lynch was fined twice and faces up to five weeks on the sidelines for his MCG tantrum after being sent straight to the tribunal. Lynch was reported for striking Adelaide defender Jordan Butts off the ball following a contest between the pair during which he made contact with the head of the Crows defender after a wild swing with his arm. But while the blow glanced off Butts' head, Lynch could still face a hefty ban after being charged with intentional conduct, with severe impact and high contact. The premiership winner also was handed two fines totalling more than $4600, one for engaging in a melee and another for striking. Tom Lynch gets heated. Picture: Mark Stewart Lynch apologised to his teammates and had some sympathy from his coach, Adem Yze, but he was also told there were few excuses for his behaviour. 'He apologised to the group because he knew he let them down just by letting it spill over,' Yze said. '... he's been such a good player at this footy club for a long time. 'He's got white-line fever, and he wants to win.' 'I was going to address it, a couple of reverse free kicks, which was just pure frustration and showing that he cares,' Yze said. 'For him to talk to the group before I even had a chance to talk to them, and then almost put his heart on his sleeve in front of the group, was exactly why he's been the player that he is.' Lynch said the incident was the result of 'frustration' after being manhandled by Adelaide defenders in the mammoth loss. 'I didn't want to cause harm or anything like that. I was just trying to get free or whatever and frustration came out,' Lynch told Seven. 'Clearly … I gave away too many free kicks and it is not good enough as a leader. I thought we were playing pretty well in that second quarter and I pretty much stopped the momentum. Originally published as Richmond forward Tom Lynch has been sent straight to the tribunal for his haymaker at the MCG on Sunday
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson ‘disgusted' by Sussan Ley's Acknowledged of Country speech
A 'disgusted' Pauline Hanson has hit out at Sussan Ley after she acknowledged traditional owners during a major speech to national media last week. The One Nation leader has accused Ms Ley of double standards after the opposition leader performed an Acknowledgment to Country during her first major speech at National Press Club on Wednesday. 'I was disgusted. Absolutely disgusted with it,' Senator Hanson said. 'Because the Liberals, they were the ones that actually opposed the Voice to parliament. 'It wasn't just the Liberals that opposed it. It was a lot of people like myself, like Gary Johns, and then you had Barnaby Joyce and you had Jacinta Price. 'Once the public were informed about what it meant and changed in the Constitution, people were better informed and made their decisions about it.' The senator told Sky News' Danica and James that Ms Ley wasn't the right person for the Liberal Party's top job, adding a 'true conservative' needs to replace her. 'It's going to be very interesting what happens the next three years under Sussan Ley,' she said. 'I think she will be overthrown before the next election.' It comes after Ms Ley announced there is a 'time and place' for the declaration while her acknowledgment a stood as a far cry from the staunch stance held by her predecessor Peter Dutton. Under Mr Dutton, acknowledgement of country addresses were missing from a number of major Liberal Party events and speeches. Ms Ley perviously told ABC Radio it wasn't a 'boxing ticking' exercise. 'Look I think Acknowledgements of Country have their place, but in significant moments like yesterday was one of those places,' the Opposition Leader said. 'And as Environment Minister and Health Minister, I listened carefully and I participated in what I would describe as meaningful Welcome to Country ceremonies that involved the circumstances of Indigenous Australians with respect to our natural environment and their own health that were relevant and important. 'I don't think it should be at every work meeting, because I think that actually diminishes the value of what it is. 'So there is a time and a place, and it's about striking the right balance.' A survey of 1005 Australians conducted by independent marketing research firm Dynata on behalf of the conservative Institute of Public Affairs last month found that more than half (56 per cent) of participants agreed Welcome to Country ceremonies have 'become divisive'. IPA deputy executive director Daniel Wild said the survey results were proof 'Australians have had an absolute gutful' of the 'divisive and pointless' tradition. Mr Wild argued Ms Ley's stance at the National Press Club was also 'at odds with modern Australia', and accused her of '[failing] to state who the purported traditional owners of the National Press Club are'. Only 17 per cent disagreed with the statement, while 27 per cent said they were unsure. Surprisingly, 48 per cent of those aged 18 to 24 — a demographic often thought to be more progressive than generations past — did not believe the ritual to be a unifying one. Sentiment around the performance of Welcome to Country before major events like Anzac Day or sporting matches was more mixed — 46 per cent and 49 per cent respectively said they should no longer be performed before either event, versus 34 per cent and 30 per cent who said they should continue.
Courier-Mail
an hour ago
- Courier-Mail
Anthony Albanese rejects call for US to be more transparent about Australian military presence
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Anthony Albanese has rejected Coalition's front bencher Andrew Hastie's call for more 'transparency' from the United States in relation to their operations on Australian bases. Mr Hastie, a former SAS commander, has previously called for 'greater transparency' on how the US is using its Australian bases like Pine Gap near Alice Springs, and the Naval Communication Station on Western Australia's North West Cape, in order to bolster military posture in the Indo Pacific. The Coalition's home affairs spokesman urged for more 'mature' discussions on operationalising the alliance, guard rails for combat operations and clearer definitions for Australian sovereignty. Responding to the suggestion on the ABC, the Prime Minister said: 'I'm not sure what he means by that,' and rejected the idea of Australia using defence as a bargaining chip to secure a tariff exemption. Andrew Hastie has said the government should press the US to be more transparent on its Australian military operations. Picture: Richard Dobson/ NewsWire 'He belongs to a political party that during the election campaign, when President Trump announced tariffs on what he called the Liberation Day, they drew into question, said 'we should be bargaining with our defence relationship,'' Mr Albanese said. 'That was something that I rejected on that day.' Asked if US' military footprint would make Australia more vulnerable in the event of intensified conflict with China, Mr Albanese said it was his goal to 'avoid conflict,' and backed Australia's alliance with the US. 'I think it is in Australia's interest and the United States' interest and the interests of other partners we have to have interoperability, to have the AUKUS arrangements in place,' he continued. 'If Mr Hastie is questioning that, then he should say that. It's why I've been very clear on that.' Anthony Albanese rejected Mr Hastie's calls and backed the Australia-US alliance. Picture: NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Mr Albanese also said despite the 'laser-like focus' on when he would secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump, he was more concerned with 'supporting Australia's national interests'. He also noted that while he was prepared to meet with Mr Trump 'when a suitable time could be organised,' he flagged the yet-to-be-finalised Quad meeting between the US, Japan, India and Australia which will occur in the 'coming months'. 'We also have the Quad meeting coming up, which we are finalising as well,' he said. To date Mr Albanese has had three phone conversations with Mr Trump, and also met with US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, US trade representative, Jamieson Greer and US National Economic Council director, Kevin Hassett while he was in Kanamaskis for the G7. Originally published as Anthony Albanese rejects call for US to be more transparent about its military presence in Australia
