Decision day for Penshaw Monument cafe plans
The National Trust, which owns Penshaw Monument, has also objected to the new proposals over "impact on the setting" and potential "unacceptable" ecological and traffic effects.Ten objections were submitted during a public consultation, raising concerns about increased litter and the number of cafes already operating in the area.Applicants said the building was "designed to be low profile and unobtrusive" and would not affect the number of visitors to Penshaw Monument.However, council planning officers said the development's "modern appearance" was "out of keeping and wholly incongruous" within a "traditional, sensitive rural setting".A committee report also stated the application had not provided enough information for ecological impacts to be fully assessed, or an appropriate level of parking.Council planning officers would have typically made a decision on the application under delegated powers, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.However, it was elevated to the Planning and Highways Committee because of high public interest.
A decision is expected to be made on Monday evening.
Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Retirees pull billions from pension pots to escape Reeves's tax raid
Middle-class Britons risk a retirement 'disaster' after a record £5bn was pulled from pension pots in the wake of Rachel Reeves's inheritance tax raid. Official figures showed 672,000 retirees, representing roughly 5pc of all pensioners, pulled £5bn from their pots in the first three months of this year. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said the amount taken from retirement funds was 25pc higher than the same quarter a year ago, with 13pc more people withdrawing money. It means withdrawals during the period were the highest since George Osborne introduced pension freedoms a decade ago. It comes after the Chancellor announced in her maiden Budget last October that pension pots would no longer be exempt from inheritance tax from April 2027, making them subject to a levy of up to 40pc. Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, urged the Chancellor to reverse the policy, warning that many more people would choose to withdraw money from their retirement pot as soon as possible, creating a 'pensioner poverty time bomb'. Sweeping changes mean retirees can now withdraw unlimited amounts from their pot as soon as they hit 55. The figures also revealed a 50pc increase in the number of octogenarians taking money out of their pensions over the course of last year with the amount withdrawn by those aged 81 and over up by 80pc to £360m. 'It's a disaster' The Chancellor hopes to raise £1.5bn from her decision to bring pensions within the scope of inheritance tax. Pension withdrawals from defined contribution pots above the 25pc tax-free lump sum incur an income tax charge of 20pc for basic rate taxpayers and a 40pc levy at the higher rate. The changes mean heirs will be subject to both inheritance and income tax at the marginal rate from 2027. 'It's a disaster,' Lady Altmann said, adding that she expected withdrawals to accelerate as more people became aware of the looming inheritance tax charge. She added that the 'draconian' way the policy was introduced was storing up a crisis for the future, and said she was pushing for changes in the Lords that would see beneficiaries charged a maximum 20pc 'pension recovery tax' instead on inherited pots. Lady Altmann said: 'This policy could end up being as damaging to workplace pensions as Gordon Brown's tax rate was for DB [defined benefit] pensions. 'I honestly think this is an existential threat to the long-term survival of our DC [defined contribution] pensions, because there's a clear incentive to take the money out as soon as you possibly can.' She added that this would leave many middle-class families in danger of not leaving themselves enough to fund their retirement. Lady Altmann said: 'This IHT [inheritance tax] imposition will ensure that more and more people – especially those who don't have massive amounts of money – will just say, 'Why on earth would I want to lose two thirds of my pension to the taxman? I'll just take it out as soon as I can.' 'Those who build up, say, between £200,000 and £300,000 over their working life are now in danger of having a real financial incentive not to keep money in their pensions for their later life and then end up in poverty.' 'Taking a big hit' Guy Opperman, another former pensions minister, said: 'Pensions are taking a big hit from the Government's actions. 'The consequences of this policy are clear: people will save less for their pension and will withdraw more. This will also affect the ability to pass money on. There is time for the Government to think again and they should. It is very short-term.' Jamie Jenkins, director of policy at pensions giant Royal London, which manages more than £170bn of client cash, said there was already clear evidence that people were changing their retirement planning ahead of the changes. He said: 'There is increased interest from advisers and their clients in how they can mitigate the potential inheritance tax bill.' Claire Trott, at wealth managers St James's Place, added: 'Every individual's circumstances are different, but IHT changes to pensions have certainly triggered more conversations about gifting strategies and whether it makes sense to start drawing from pensions earlier.' An HM Treasury spokesman said: 'We continue to incentivise pensions savings for their intended purpose – of funding retirement instead of them being openly used as a vehicle to transfer wealth – and more than 90pc of estates each year will continue to pay no inheritance tax after these and other changes.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fears that London house price fall will spread through UK
Fears are growing that a downturn in the prime London property market may spread across the country as a recent rise in stamp duty forces sellers to lower their asking prices. Evidence suggests the ultra-rich are renting rather than buying mansions in the capital to avoid the hated tax. Stamp duty is paid by buyers when they buy a property and in April two key thresholds were changed – meaning most homebuyers now pay it. Property portal Zoopla found that 83 per cent of buyers would pay stamp duty if they bought a home today, compared to 49 per cent before April. This has led more buyers to negotiate a price cut to compensate for the extra tax. Some 951,000 now pay the levy. That is still below a recent peak of 1.2million but the figure is set to rise sharply as more people are dragged into the tax net. More than a third – or £4.5billion – of the money raised by stamp duty comes from property deals in the capital. In London, where property prices are higher than the rest of the country, it now costs home movers up to £2,500 more than before April if they buy an average house costing £532,449. But the impact of the rise is most keenly felt in central London locations where prices are being slashed by up to 30 per cent to attract foreign buyers. The stamp duty charge on a £20million mansion in Belgravia or Mayfair is £2.3million for a UK purchaser. For a person not resident in the UK, acquiring a second home in the city, the bill is about £3.7million. This used to be seen as the price of admission to the London lifestyle. But now even the mega-rich are baulking at the bill. Property experts say the international set are now preferring to rent not buy in London. 'The annual rent on a £20million pad would be about £570,000,' said Neil Hudson of the Built Place consultancy. 'On that basis, if you were a UK purchaser, you could rent for four years for what you would have to pay in stamp duty alone.' There are concerns the downbeat mood in central London could spread nationwide. 'At the height of the boom in 2015, London's properties became overpriced and have been largely moving sideways ever since,' said Richard Donnell, head of research at Zoopla. 'This is bad news for the whole market since London has been the engine of house price growth, with the effects rippling out to other regions.'
