Implications And Scenarios If U.S. Oil Production Plateaus In 2027
Conjecture about when U.S. oil production may plateau is not new. Many in the industry, including several energy bosses, reckon the country's output - currently north of 13.5 million and the highest in the world - will continue to rise at least until 2027.
In March, at CERAWeek 2025, a major energy event organized by S&P Global, ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance and Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub joined many of their industry peers in predicting a U.S. crude production plateau sometime between 2027 and 2030.
Now the Energy Information Administration, statistical arm of the Department of Energy, has also predicted that a 2027 production plateau sounds fairly plausible.
In its Annual Energy Outlook 2025 published on Wednesday, the EIA said U.S. production will rise to 14 million bpd in 2027, and may likely stabilize at or near that level for a few years up until the early 2030s, before a gradual decline comes into view.
After that, a further decline may happen at a much faster rate through to the 2050s as the uptick from the U.S. shale bonanza starts to ebb away. Shale production itself is also expected to peak in 2027.
It draws the contribution of U.S. shale industry into sharp focus. In 2024, U.S. output grew on an annualized basis by 2%, or by 270,000 bpd, to average around 13.2 million bpd. Nearly all the production growth came from the Permian region, which accounted for nearly half of total U.S. crude oil production, according to the EIA.
Shale production is expected hit a record of 10 million bpd by 2027, up from 9.7 million bpd expected in 2025. Thereafter, it may well be on a sliding track down to 9.33 million bpd by 2050.
Commenting on the EIA's projections, the DoE criticized the previous Biden Administration and flagged President Donald Trump's pro oil credentials since he took office in January.
"The report reflects the disastrous path for American energy production under the Biden administration - a path that was soundly rejected by the American people last November.
"By unleashing energy that is affordable, reliable, and secure, this administration is ensuring America's future is marked by energy growth and abundance - not scarcity."
As things stand, the U.S. remains the world's leading oil producer, a crown it bagged toward the end of 2023 and continues to hold. It may continue to bag that title till at least the turn of the decade, if not longer.
However, Saudi Arabia is sitting on spare capacity of 3 million bpd and could be in a position to challenge the U.S. if the latter's decline rate is deeper than forecast. Becuase despite the U.S. shale bonanza, the Saudis remain the world's buffer producers, i.e., they hold a large amount of spare capacity that can be used to absorb supply shocks and stabilize oil prices.
Overall, a market adjustment may be required by importers of light sweet crude out in Asia, from the Indian subcontinent to the East. Many are currently enjoying being in the position of being able to import readily available and competitively priced U.S. light sweet crudes.
But there is belief in the wider industry that U.S. output decline is likely to be gradual and may be mitigated through technology.
For instance, Lance of ConocoPhillips predicted at CERAWeek that will be a slow decline beyond 2030 and technology can help with resource maximization.
"Of course, market share for OPEC+ will start rising again as U.S. oil production starts to plateau and demand continues to rise as we think it will over time. But there's a ton of resources in the U.S. I've never been against this industry in terms of technology because you can always figure out a way to get more resource out of the rock."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Today's Market: Tax Bill Uncertainty Ignites Dow Rally, Sends Nasdaq Tumbling
July 1 - U.S. equity benchmarks diverged Tuesday as lawmakers debated extending Trump?era tax cuts. The Dow Jones Industrial Average edged up about 1%, while the S&P 500 slipped less than 0.5%. The Nasdaq Composite slid about 0.5% from its record high. Investors are weighing the prospects of a fresh tax package that could roll back individual and corporate rates, which some see as a boon for consumer stocks and small?caps. Uncertainty over the bill's details, such as the duration of rate extensions and offsets for lost revenue, has prompted traders to pare back exposure to high?valuation technology names. Technology shares led declines, with semiconductors and software companies under pressure. Meanwhile, financials and industrials found modest support, buoyed by expectations of sustained consumer spending if tax relief is approved. Treasury yields held near recent peaks, reflecting growing confidence in near?term economic strength but also fears of higher deficits. Market participants will focus on upcoming congressional sessions for clues on the bill's final shape. With fiscal policy negotiations set to intensify, investors may see further volatility as new details emerge. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 real estate investors shared with us an overlooked advantage to buying property
Real estate investors use leverage to boost returns and build wealth quicker. Leveraged appreciation involves using borrowed money to maximize property investment gains. Avoiding lazy equity by reinvesting can enhance cash flow and accelerate financial growth. There are a variety of ways to put your money to work — and how you choose to invest depends on factors like your risk tolerance and goals. Buying real estate comes with its unique challenges and often requires a decent chunk of upfront cash, but has proven to be a wealth-builder for a handful of investors Business Insider has spoken with. What real estate investors like about owning property is that it opens the door to making money in multiple ways. "The S&P 500 index has gone up, on average, 11%-12% per year for the last 100 years," James Berkley, who spent much of his career on Wall Street before transitioning to real estate, told Business Insider. "With real estate, you can blow those returns away because there are four ways you can make money." And one is easy to overlook, four investors say. Among the many ways to build wealth through real estate investing, leveraged appreciation is "the biggest one," said Berkley, who made enough money from real estate to quit his finance job. Real estate can appreciate in value like other investments, but a major benefit of financing real estate deals is that you can borrow a lot of money (from a bank or mortgage lender) to buy the asset, but you don't have to share any of the appreciation with your lender. Berkley gives the example of two different home buyers who are planning on buying a $1 million home, and both have $1 million to spend. Person A wants to buy in all cash, while Person B wants to put 10% down and borrow the other 90%. That means Person A is paying $1 million upfront and borrowing $0, while Person B is paying $100,000 upfront and borrowing $900,000. If the house goes up 10% in value, it's now worth $1.1 million, meaning Person A has made a 10% return (they put in $1 million and now have $1.1 million). Person B also made $100,000, but since they only put $100,000 down, they made a 100% return. Person A can only afford to buy one, $1 million home, but Person B can buy 10 $1 million homes and control $10 million worth of property. If those homes all go up 10%, Person B makes $1 million, while Person A has only made $100,000. "That's the power of using other people's money, and that's how you really get rich," said Berkley. "The bank doesn't require you to share the profit with them, so that's why I always try to lever up as much as possible. But you have to make sure that you have significant cash flow to cover your debt payments, otherwise you get in trouble." Not all debt is bad, he added: "It's bad if you use it on your credit card. But it's not bad in real estate, as long as you have cash flow." Jeremy Barker, who bought his first property for $3 million with just $30,000 of his own money, agrees. "The money the bank puts in is irrelevant. What matters is how much you personally have to put in," he said, providing his own example: "You buy a house for $200,000, and you sell it for $300,000. What do your friends tell you? 'I made $100,000.' Fair enough." But let's say you only put 10% down on the property, so you're out of pocket $20,000, he added. That means, "you took $20,000 and turned it into $100,000. You 5 times-ed your money." The lower you can keep the amount of money you're personally putting in, "the higher the multiple goes," he said. The puzzle to solve then becomes: "How much do you personally have to come to the table with to get the asset that gives you the return you're looking for?" "Lazy money" is essentially money that isn't working for you — money that you have sitting around in a bank account earning next to nothing in interest, for example. The concept applies to real estate, as well. Financially independent investors Letizia Alto and Kenji Asakura, who built a portfolio of rentals to give themselves the option of cutting back on their demanding physician jobs, refer to it as "lazy equity." It's the portion of a property you own that isn't generating much of a return. While equity in a property tends to increase over time due to appreciation and paying down your mortgage, your return usually doesn't keep pace. They give an example on their blog: Assume you buy a $100,000 property with 25% down, and that property proceeds to cash flow $4,000 a month. That means your return on equity (ROE) is 16% ($4,000/$25,000). Say you pay down the mortgage for 10 years, and your equity grows from $25,000 to $50,000. Assuming your cash flow remains the same, your new ROE is 8% ($4,000/$50,000). But let's say the property has also appreciated in value by $50,000 over that decade. That puts your ROE at 4% ($4,000/$100,000). In short, your money isn't working as hard for you as it was when you first bought the property. To avoid lazy equity, you have a few options: sell and upgrade to a more expensive property that'll cash flow better via a 1031 exchange, which allows you to sidestep capital gains taxes, or do a cash-out refinance, which allows you to pocket money if your home has increased in value since you bought it. These strategies require time and money, so you'll want to consider how important or unimportant lazy equity is for you. "Some people can't stand the thought of being leveraged (being more in debt and having less equity) and want to pay off their loans as quickly as possible. However, the cost is lower return on equity and slower growth," the couple explained. "If your goal is to achieve financial freedom as fast as possible, then you'll want to be more leveraged and get rid of lazy equity as soon as possible." That's what Berkley does. "If I have too much lazy capital in the property, I want to take that money out and put it to work by buying another property to increase my overall cash flow," he said. "One property funds another. It's a snowball. You just keep rolling the ball downhill." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Official: Monza sale brings end to Berlusconi ownership
AC Monza has officially been bought by American investment fund Becket Layne Ventures, which will bring an end to the Berlusconi family's reign over the club. Official: Berlusconi family agree to sell Monza to US investors Monza, who were relegated from Serie A at the end of the 2024-25 season, have been bought out by new American investors. Becket Layne Ventures have purchased an initial 80% stake in the club, and have agreed to purchase the remaining 20% of the shares by June 2026. Advertisement For the meantime, Fininvest, the holding company owned by the Berlusconi family, will remain minority shareholders, and will remain on the board 'in line with its remaining shareholding', it has been confirmed. epa10119403 Silvio Berlusconi (L) and Adriano Galliani before the Italian Serie A soccer match between AC Monzaa and Torino FC at U-Power Stadium, 13 August 2022. EPA-EFE/Roberto Bregani Once Becket Layne have bought out the remaining 20% of the shares from Fininvest, the Berlusconi family will no longer have control over the club. Monza was officially bought by Fininvest, then under the control of former Prime Minister of Italy and ex-Milan President Silvio Berlusconi in 2018. Along with the guidance of former Milan CEO Adriano Galliani, Monza earned promotion to Serie A for the first time in the club's history at the end of the 2021-22 season. The club remained in possession of Fininvest after the death of Silvio Berlusconi in 2023. The holding company remained under the control of the Berlusconi family, who have since agreed to sell 100% of their shares in the club following the team's relegation to Serie B at the end of the 2024-25 campaign.
