How do atoms form? A physicist explains where the atoms that make up everything around come from
Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you'd like an expert to answer, send it to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com.
How do atoms form? – Joshua, age 7, Shoreview, Minnesota
Richard Feynman, a famous theoretical physicist who won the Nobel Prize, said that if he could pass on only one piece of scientific information to future generations, it would be that all things are made of atoms.
Understanding how atoms form is a fundamental and important question, since they make up everything with mass.
The question of where atoms comes from requires a lot of physics to be answered completely – and even then, physicists like me only have good guesses to explain how some atoms are formed.
An atom consists of a heavy center, called the nucleus, made of particles called protons and neutrons. An atom has lighter particles called electrons that you can think of as orbiting around the nucleus.
The electrons each carry one unit of negative charge, the protons each carry one unit of positive charge, and the neutrons have no charge. An atom has the same number of protons as electrons, so it is neutral − it has no overall charge.
Now, most of the atoms in the universe are the two simplest kinds: hydrogen, which has one proton, zero neutrons and one electron; and helium, which has two protons, two neutrons and two electrons. Of course, on Earth there are lots of atoms besides these that are just as common, such as carbon and oxygen, but I'll talk about those soon.
An element is what scientists call a group of atoms that are all the same, because they all have the same number of protons.
Most of the universe's hydrogen and helium atoms formed around 400,000 years after the Big Bang, which is the name for when scientists think the universe began, about 14 billion years ago.
Why did they form at that time? Astronomers know from observing distant exploding stars that the size of the universe has been getting bigger since the Big Bang. When the hydrogen and helium atoms first formed, the universe was about 1,000 times smaller than it is now.
And based on their understanding of physics, scientists believe that the universe was much hotter when it was smaller.
Before this time, the electrons had too much energy to settle into orbits around the hydrogen and helium nuclei. So, the hydrogen and helium atoms could form only once the universe cooled down to something like 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (2,760 degrees Celsius). For historical reasons, this process is misleadingly called recombination − combination would be more descriptive.
The helium and deuterium − a heavier form of hydrogen − nuclei formed even earlier, just a few minutes after the Big Bang, when the temperature was above 1 billion F (556 million C). Protons and neutrons can collide and form nuclei like these only at very high temperatures.
Scientists believe that almost all the ordinary matter in the universe is made of about 90% hydrogen atoms and 8% helium atoms.
So, the hydrogen and helium atoms formed during recombination, when the cooler temperature allowed electrons to fall into orbits. But you, I and almost everything on Earth is made of many more massive atoms than just hydrogen and helium. How were these atoms made?
The surprising answer is that more massive atoms are made in stars. To make atoms with several protons and neutrons stuck together in the nucleus requires the type of high-energy collisions that occur in very hot places. The energy needed to form a heavier nucleus needs to be large enough to overcome the repulsive electric force that positive charges, like two protons, feel with each other.
Protons and neutrons also have another property – kind of like a different type of charge – that is strong enough to bind them together once they are able to get very close together. This property is called the strong force, and the process that sticks these particles together is called fusion.
Scientists believe that most of the elements from carbon up to iron are fused in stars heavier than our Sun, where the temperature can exceed 1 billion F (556 million C) – the same temperature that the universe was when it was just a few minutes old.
But even in hot stars, elements heavier than iron and nickel won't form. These require extra energy, because the heavier elements can more easily break into pieces.
In a dramatic event called a supernova, the inner core of a heavy star suddenly collapses after it runs out of fuel to burn. During the powerful explosion this collapse triggers, elements that are heavier than iron can form and get ejected out into the universe.
Astronomers are still figuring out the details of other fantastic stellar events that form larger atoms. For example, colliding neutron stars can release enormous amounts of energy – and elements such as gold – on their way to forming black holes.
Understanding how atoms are made just requires learning a little general relativity, plus some nuclear, particle and atomic physics. But to complicate matters, there is other stuff in the universe that doesn't appear to be made from normal atoms at all, called dark matter. Scientists are investigating what dark matter is and how it might form.
Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.
And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Stephen L. Levy, Binghamton University, State University of New York
Read more:
What do molecules look like?
Many stable atoms have 'magic numbers' of protons and neutrons − 75 years ago, 2 physicists discovered their special properties
Asteroids in the solar system could contain undiscovered, superheavy elements
Stephen L. Levy receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. He is affiliated with CyteQuest, Inc.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Did genes or ancestry make the Manning brothers? Why not both?
The field of sports genomics is rife with argument, starting with the simple question of what athleticism even is. For every study that shows a relationship between ribonucleic acids and raising trophies, another contradicts it. The interplay of slow- and fast-twitch fibers that makes balance, concentration, spatial awareness, these are not traits like hair color. Maybe someday genomics will be a useful predictor of whether you're growing a Hall of Famer at your kitchen table, but for the moment, it's overneat to the point of uselessness. If you're going down the rabbit hole of athleticism, at least go down a more intriguing path that embraces the messiness and mystery: genealogy.


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Respiratory Training Shows Modest Benefits in ALS
TOPLINE: Respiratory muscle training moderately improved lung function, especially respiratory muscle strength, in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared with no intervention or sham training. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of respiratory muscle training on lung function and respiratory muscle strength in patients with ALS. They gathered data from five randomized controlled trials including 170 patients with ALS (mean age range, 53-63 years; 58.8%-69.2% men), majority of whom had spinal onset of the disease (72.9%-84.6%). Researchers assessed the role of standalone respiratory muscle training and compared it with control conditions — physical exercise, usual care, or no intervention — to gauge its unique impact. The outcomes included assessments of lung function, respiratory muscle strength, survival, functional capacity, and adverse events. TAKEAWAY: According to a meta-analysis of three trials, maximum expiratory pressure was superior in the group that underwent respiratory muscle training compared with control conditions (standardized mean difference [SMD], 19.53; P = .02). Similarly, respiratory muscle training significantly improved the maximum inspiratory pressure compared with control conditions (SMD, 13.96; P = .010). A meta-analysis of four trials found no significant difference in the forced vital capacity between the groups (SMD, 0.90; P = .14). No studies reported serious adverse effects, supporting respiratory muscle training as a safe intervention for patients with ALS. IN PRACTICE: 'RMT [respiratory muscle training] shows potential as an adjuvant intervention for patients with ALS,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by María Jesús Benzo-Iglesias, Health Research Centre, Humanidades-498 Research Group, University of Almería, Almería, Spain. It was published online on June 09, 2025, in Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease. LIMITATIONS: This study had a small sample size, which limited the generalizability of the findings. It comprised only five trials, which may have affected the findings' robustness and restricted the ability to perform sensitivity analyses. The wide CIs in the heterogeneity analysis indicated substantial heterogeneity. DISCLOSURES: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Biologists Uncover Previously Unknown Structure Hiding Inside Human Cells
Even after decades of peering into cells, biologists are still finding surprises. In a twist, researchers at the University of Virginia and the National Institutes of Health uncovered a new organelle, dubbed the hemifusome. This tiny membrane-bound structure serves as a cellular recycling center and may hold the key to treating several genetic diseases. The research has been published in Nature Communications. 'This is like discovering a new recycling center inside the cell,' co-author Seham Ebrahim, a biophysicist at the University of Virginia, said in a statement. 'We think the hemifusome helps manage how cells package and process material, and when this process goes awry, it may contribute to diseases that affect many systems in the body.' Scientists had not previously identified the structure because it only appears when needed. But thanks to cryo-electron tomography—an imaging technique that flash-freezes cells and captures them in 3D and in near-atomic resolution—researchers were able to observe the ephemeral structure. The researchers say hemifusomes may aid in the formation of cellular vesicles, tiny sacs that shuttle and combine material throughout the cell. They might also help form other organelles composed of multiple vesicles, the study suggests. However, some evidence shows that hemifusomes do not participate in endocytosis, the traditional pathway by which cells engulf external material. 'You can think of vesicles like little delivery trucks inside the cell,' Ebrahim said in a statement. 'The hemifusome is like a loading dock where they connect and transfer cargo. It's a step in the process we didn't know existed.' Despite their fleeting nature, hemifusomes are not rare. They appear to be surprisingly common in certain parts of cells, particularly near the cell membrane. Still, scientists aren't exactly sure how or why hemifusomes form and then disappear. They're hoping to find that out—as well as understand what happens when hemifusomes fail to function properly. Problems with how cells handle cargo are at the root of many genetic disorders. 'This is just the beginning,' Ebrahim said in a statement. 'Now that we know hemifusomes exist, we can start asking how they behave in healthy cells and what happens when things go wrong. That could lead us to new strategies for treating complex genetic diseases.'