logo
Did genes or ancestry make the Manning brothers? Why not both?

Did genes or ancestry make the Manning brothers? Why not both?

Washington Post15 hours ago

The field of sports genomics is rife with argument, starting with the simple question of what athleticism even is. For every study that shows a relationship between ribonucleic acids and raising trophies, another contradicts it. The interplay of slow- and fast-twitch fibers that makes balance, concentration, spatial awareness, these are not traits like hair color. Maybe someday genomics will be a useful predictor of whether you're growing a Hall of Famer at your kitchen table, but for the moment, it's overneat to the point of uselessness. If you're going down the rabbit hole of athleticism, at least go down a more intriguing path that embraces the messiness and mystery: genealogy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Startling Percentage of Neuroscientists Say We Could Extract Memories From Dead Brains
Startling Percentage of Neuroscientists Say We Could Extract Memories From Dead Brains

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Startling Percentage of Neuroscientists Say We Could Extract Memories From Dead Brains

When you die, your memories die with you, never to be experienced again. Or at least, that's always been how the case. Now, though, in an exercise to assess shifting scientific consensus, a cohort of 312 neuroscientists were quizzed by researchers on whether memories might live on in the structure of deceased brains. And a surprisingly larger number — 70.7 percent of the group — believe they may, findings which were newly published in the science journal PLOS One. In addition, about 40 percent of those surveyed said they think it will be possible in the future to extract these memories from actual preserved parts or the entire brain of the deceased. The neuroscientists also gave a tentative roadmap for how that could unfold. They estimated that scientists would be able to resurrect memories from dead roundworms by 2045, and then from lab mice brains by 2065. For humans, scientists might achieve this incredible feat by 2125, the neuroscientists estimated. "That's a substantial chunk of neuroscientists who think there's a very real chance that it will work, and my guess is that actually that number will creep up over time as we get better at doing these brain implants, emulations, all these other things," Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston, a research fellow at Monash University in Australia and the paper's first author, told IFL Science, which flagged the research. One major roadblock: there isn't yet a consensus on exactly how memories are stored. Zeleznikow-Johnston told IFL Science he thinks preserving the brain's connectome, which are neural pathways, would probably be the key to preserving, extracting and recalling memories from the dead. Before all this stuff happens, lots of major work needs to happen. But advanced tools such as AI could give scientists a significant boost in efforts to decode the human brain and possibly even decode memories from the deceased. If it does come to pass, we can barely imagine the ethical questions that would arise from such a feat. More on neuroscience: Scientists Scanned the Brains of Authoritarians and Found Something Weird

Hiking Exoskeletons: Like E-Bikes For Your Legs
Hiking Exoskeletons: Like E-Bikes For Your Legs

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Hiking Exoskeletons: Like E-Bikes For Your Legs

Hypershell Hiking Exoskeleton at National Trails Day, Lake Tahoe 2025 Is this the time when wearable robotics takes off? For decades, researchers and entrepreneurs alike have been seeking the ideal application domain for wearable human augmentation, including medical, military, industrial, and even first responder settings. For the first time, exoskeleton technology is gaining traction and finding a strong foothold among individuals who want to walk and hike more, but could use that extra little push. Americans are bombarded with messages that suggest moving, such as walking, jogging, bicycling, and simply being more active, can lead to longer, healthier lives. The market has been flooded with wearables that track, beep, vibrate, play music, and try to encourage their users to move, but they will not do anything to physically help one move. This is where consumer exoskeletons and wearable robotics come into play: these devices exert force against one or more joints on the body to facilitate movement (or resistive training). Exoskeletons for hiking are closely following the classical Gartner Hype Cycle. They emerged on the scene between 2021 and 2023 as crowdfunding campaigns that easily met and exceeded initial minimum requirements. These new hiking consumer exos joined the already existing sports exoskeletons for skiing and STEM education. Just as companies follow the hype cycle, they have experienced delays and cancellations to date. With the technical hurdles resolved, hiking exoskeletons are hitting the market and gaining popularity quickly. The companies leading the charge on hiking exoskeletons are Hypershell, Dnsys, Skip, and WIRobotics, with companies like VIGX and Decathlon also developing their versions. These hiking physical human augmentation wearables are exiting the Trough of Disillusionment, led by three factors that work in their favor: low price, influencer content, and public demonstrations. Powered exoskeletons have always been expensive. They require motors, controllers, batteries, and motion control that is error-free and intuitive. Typically, they cost in the many thousands of dollars, yet consumer hiking exoskeletons are vastly more affordable, retailing for as low as $990. So does one get one 1/1oth of an exoskeleton for 1/10th of the price? I have been lucky enough to wear and try out over 100 exoskeletons in the last decade, and hiking exos so far appear to be both sufficiently durable and robust. Influencers have been responding positively to this new family of wearables, with videos featuring them reaching millions of views and garnering more publicity than anything that came before them. Consumer wearables have an obvious edge over those designed for hospitals or warehouses, as they can be seen in public places like parking lots and hiking trails. Finally, hiking exoskeletons have the advantage of being easier to show off to the public. There have already been public demonstrations in China, South Korea, and the U.S. These events allow people with no prior knowledge of wearable robotics to clip on an exo and take it out for a spin. The National Trails Day is an event that happens at 200 hiking paths simultaneously. It is designed to introduce volunteers to carrying heavy tools and making repairs and modifications to popular paths. The Lake Tahoe event was sponsored by Hypershell, which donated 30 units. When asked by onlookers what they were wearing, the volunteers began to refer to the Hypershell as 'e-bikes for your legs.' While it is still early to tell, it appears that consumer exoskeletons for walking, bicycling, and hiking may be the application domain in which powered exoskeletons see significant sales and adoption.

US researchers find cancer's secret weapon to defeat death
US researchers find cancer's secret weapon to defeat death

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

US researchers find cancer's secret weapon to defeat death

Dallas (tca/dpa) — Fat isn't just a guilty pleasure — it's cancer's secret weapon. New research from UT Southwestern Medical Center is shedding light on why this is the case. In a study published this month in the journal Nature, the researchers found cancer cells steal fat-packed molecules from the bloodstream, arming themselves with a potent antioxidant that shields them from death. Tumours appear to do this by reeling in lipoproteins — molecules that carry fats and fat-soluble nutrients like vitamin E in the bloodstream — through sugar-coated molecules on their cell surface. These sulfated glycosaminoglycans (or GAGs) allow cancer cells to fortify their cell membranes with vitamin E and avoid a form of cell death called ferroptosis. Though clinical applications are still a ways off, the study underscores how understanding cancer's metabolism could open new doors for treatment, said Dr. Shad Thaxton, an associate professor of urology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, who was not involved in the study. 'I think this paper and others in the field (emphasize) the appreciation for ferroptosis as a mechanism to kill cancer cells — that mechanism of cell death is so intimately intertwined with cell metabolism,' Thaxton said. 'I think what's interesting for people is that metabolism has a really big impact on the potential vulnerability of cancer cells to specific therapies.' Building blocks with functional perks Cancers rewire their metabolism in ways that support their growing horde of destructive cells. Some of this rewiring involves producing energy from glucose and acquiring cellular building blocks such as nucleic acids, proteins and lipids. Amassing cellular building blocks is especially crucial since a tumour's uncontrolled growth lends to it creating a hostile microenvironment where there aren't enough nutrients and other resources, said Javier Garcia-Bermudez, an assistant professor at UT Southwestern Medical Center's Children's Medical Center Research Institute, who led the study. Lipids are essential for a tumour to grow and progress. The plasma membrane of each cell is a bilayer of lipids; as cancer cells swell in number, they have to source lipids from their immediate environment or make their own to maintain their plasma membranes. Garcia-Bermudez said that was the prevailing theory as to why lipids are so important to cancer. Emerging research has since discovered that lipids may offer cancer cells more functional perks. For example, a September 2024 study found that cancer cells use lipids called sphingolipids to go into stealth mode, evading detection and destruction by the immune system. Studies have also found lipids are somehow involved in ferroptosis, a type of cell death discovered in 2012. A portmanteau of 'ferrous,' the Latin word for iron, and apoptosis, the scientific word for programmed cell death, ferroptosis happens when a buildup of toxic molecules called oxidants and iron overwhelms a cell, causing it to essentially rust from the inside out. 'Oxidants damage the lipids that are forming the membranes (of) a cell,' Garcia-Bermudez said. 'What's interesting is that cancer cells tend to produce more oxidants than normal cells,' he added, noting that there's been interest in understanding why some cancers are more susceptible to this type of damage and in using ferroptosis to kill cancer cells. Cut the GAGs, kill the cancer The crafty masters of survival that they are, cancer cells have devised ways to dodge ferroptosis. Unraveling the reason why put Garcia-Bermudez and his lab on a four-year journey of scientific inquiry. One of the researchers' first findings, after screening 200 metabolic genes linked to cancer, was that an enzyme called glutathione peroxidase 4 was active in tumours. This wasn't a new discovery: Studies have shown this enzyme, which can stop lipids from degrading, plays a pivotal role in controlling ferroptosis. When glutathione peroxidase 4 was erased from a cancer cell's genome, the tumor would die — unless it was given a drug blocking ferroptosis or fed lipoproteins. 'That was a clue that lipoproteins were somehow related to ferroptosis,' said Dr. Ralph DeBerardinis, director of UT Southwestern Medical Center's Eugene McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, who coauthored the study. In a battery of experiments that included depriving cancer cells in petri dishes of lipoproteins and exposing them to different antioxidants, the full picture began to be unveiled. Cancer cells were intercepting lipoproteins, particularly those bearing vitamin E — a fat-soluble antioxidant — from their surrounding environment. Like a fisherman with a fishing line, cancer cells accomplished this not with the usual reels used to catch lipoproteins but with long, flowy sugar chains called sulfated glycosaminoglycans (or GAGs). These molecules are attached to a cancer cell surface through another molecule called a proteoglycan. When the scientists blocked the biochemical pathway responsible for manufacturing GAGs, this limited a lab-grown cancer cell's access to vitamin E and made it more vulnerable to ferroptosis. In mice grafted with cancer cells, cutting off the pathway slowed tumor growth. The researchers also examined 20 tumours donated by patients with clear cell renal carcinoma, the most common type of kidney cancer, affecting over 640,000 people in the United States. These tumors had higher levels of GAGs and vitamin E — about 15 times more of the latter — compared to normal kidney tissue. Disrupting the biochemical pathway producing GAGs prevented kidney cancer cells from devouring vitamin E-laden lipoproteins, dying by the iron hand of ferroptosis. Future research Garcia-Bermudez and DeBerardinis caution that there is much more research to be done before their study's findings have any clinical application for treating cancer. 'We know that GAGS are on the surface, they speak to the lipoproteins and they affect the uptake of lipoproteins,' Garcia-Bermudez said. 'But how mechanistically this happens, especially in the cancer cell, hasn't been shown before … If we understand how this works and we find molecular targets that maybe we can treat with drugs and block, then we have a way to specifically deplete vitamin E in the tumor.' DeBerardinis said the research does not suggest any association between dietary vitamin E and cancer risk, or how vitamin E levels correlate with cancer patient outcomes. Figuring out those possible connections would be points for future study. In the short term, DeBerardinis said, these findings could be used to investigate whether tumours with higher levels of glycosaminoglycans or stored vitamin E are linked to patient outcomes, such as survival rates or how well they respond to treatment. Thaxton said there are currently no federally approved cancer treatments that incite ferroptosis. His lab at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine is conducting research into synthetic lipoproteins devoid of any lipid passengers — a Trojan horse without soldiers hiding inside. The cancer cells expect to get the lipoproteins with fats like cholesterol and vitamin E, Thaxton said, but 'they end up dying of ferroptosis. Our drug doesn't carry anything and it's through this mechanism by which you can kill the cell.' For Garcia-Bermudez and DeBerardinis, their research efforts were like finding a needle in a haystack, one they hope to find more needles in. 'Our study is really exciting, but at the same time it's a very basic discovery,' Garcia-Bermudez said. 'It was incredible to discover something that people have not observed in cancer before, to understand why these tumours are so resistant. I'm super excited to keep working on this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store