FIFA, CAS Decisions Can Now Be Challenged By Tribunals Outside Switzerland, Rules EU Top Court

News18

a day ago

The European Court of Justice ruled that EU courts can review FIFA and CAS decisions, challenging Swiss-based arbitration.
In a landmark ruling, the European Union's highest court determined on Friday that decisions made by FIFA, world football's governing body, can be contested in courts outside of Switzerland.
Why is this monumental?
Well, the decision significantly weakens the long-standing requirement that legal challenges against sports rulings must go through Swiss-based arbitration.
EU Courts Can Review CAS Rulings
The European Court of Justice (ECJ), based in Luxembourg, stated that courts within the 27 EU member states must have the authority to conduct a thorough review of arbitral decisions to ensure they align with European Union law.
'Tribunals in the 27 EU member states must be able to carry out an in-depth review of those awards for consistency with the fundamental rules of EU law," the ECJ said in an official statement.
This ruling effectively allows national courts within the EU to review and potentially overturn decisions made by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the Lausanne-based tribunal that handles disputes in global sports.
According to the ECJ, the arbitration awards made by CAS cannot be immune to judicial scrutiny, especially where fundamental rights and public policy of the EU are concerned.
'The awards made by the CAS must be amenable to effective judicial review," the Court emphasized.
It added that 'national courts or tribunals must be empowered to carry out … an in-depth judicial review" to ensure these awards conform to 'EU public policy."
Neither FIFA nor CAS issued immediate responses following the ruling.
A Decade-Long Legal Battle
The decision stems from a case brought by Belgian football club RFC Seraing and Maltese investment firm Doyen Sports, who began their legal fight against FIFA in 2015.
The dispute centered on FIFA's ban on third-party ownership (TPO) of players' economic rights—an arrangement where external investors hold a stake in a player's financial value, often influencing transfer decisions.
RFC Seraing and Doyen challenged the rule in a Belgian commercial court, arguing that the prohibition on TPO violated EU competition law. However, FIFA's regulations required that any challenge to its rules be taken to CAS, where the ban was upheld.
The ECJ's ruling now potentially reopens the door for such challenges within national legal systems.
Impact on Switzerland-Based Sports Tribunals
CAS was established in 1984 by the International Olympic Committee to serve as a centralized venue for resolving sports-related disputes.
Based in Lausanne, it has traditionally held binding authority in cases involving FIFA, UEFA, and other major sporting organizations headquartered in Switzerland.
However, Friday's ruling marks the latest legal blow to the dominance of Swiss sports bodies within the EU.
It follows two other significant ECJ judgments that challenged FIFA and UEFA's control under EU competition law. One was the high-profile European Super League case, and the other involved French footballer Lassana Diarra, whose transfer dispute also questioned the legitimacy of FIFA regulations under EU law.
(with AP inputs)
News18 Sports brings you the latest updates, live commentary, and highlights from cricket, football, tennis, badmintion, wwe and more. Catch breaking news, live scores, and in-depth coverage. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.