‘Dark day': French PM says EU's Trump trade deal is a ‘submission'
Trump announced a trade deal between the U.S. and the EU on Sunday after meeting with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland.
Bayrou took to social media to criticize the deal, which would see an across the board 15 per cent tariff on most goods from Europe.
'Von der Leyen-Trump Agreement: it is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to affirm their values and defend their interests, resolves to submission,' Bayrou posted in French on the social media platform X.
2:04
What Trump's EU trade deal reveals about talks with Canada
The response from French government officials stands in contrast to some other European nations. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal.
Story continues below advertisement
'We have been able to safeguard our core interests,' Merz said in a statement on Monday.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
On the other hand, French President Emmanuel Macron has not reacted to the announcement of a trade deal, while other senior French officials have been cautious in their reactions.
'The trade agreement negotiated by the European Commission with the United States will bring temporary stability to economic actors threatened by the escalation of American tariffs, but it is unbalanced,' French deputy minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad said in a statement on X.
'The current situation is not satisfactory and cannot be sustainable. The free trade that has brought shared prosperity to both sides of the Atlantic since the end of the Second World War is now rejected by the United States, which is choosing economic coercion and complete disregard for WTO rules,' Haddad added.
The private meeting between Trump and von der Leyen culminated months of bargaining, with the White House deadline Friday nearing for imposing punishing tariffs on the 27-member EU.
'It was a very interesting negotiation. I think it's going to be great for both parties,' Trump said. The agreement, he said, was 'a good deal for everybody' and 'a giant deal with lots of countries.'
Von der Leyen said the deal 'will bring stability, it will bring predictability that's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Story continues below advertisement
Trump said the EU had agreed to buy some $750 billion worth of U.S. energy and invest $600 billion more than it already is in America, as well as making a major purchase of military equipment.
'We are agreeing that the tariff straight across for automobiles and everything else will be a straight across tariff of 15 per cent,' Trump said. 'We have a tariff of 15 per cent. We have the opening up of all of the European countries.'
Von der Leyen said the 15 per cent tariffs were 'across the board, all inclusive' and that 'indeed, basically the European market is open.'
— With files from Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
13 minutes ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: Trump fires senior official over jobs numbers
CTV National News: Trump fires senior official over jobs numbers U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered the firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after job numbers were lower than expected in July.
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Meta Platforms, Inc. Earnings Call Highlights AI Growth
Meta Platforms, Inc. ((META)) has held its Q2 earnings call. Read on for the main highlights of the call. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Meta Platforms, Inc. recently held its earnings call, showcasing a strong performance driven by advancements in AI technology. The company reported significant growth in revenue and user engagement, attributed to its strategic investments in AI infrastructure and talent. Despite these achievements, Meta faces challenges, particularly with losses in its Reality Labs division and regulatory pressures in the European Union. Strong Revenue Growth Meta reported a total revenue of $47.5 billion for the second quarter, marking a 22% increase on both a reported and constant currency basis. This impressive growth highlights the company's robust financial health and its ability to capitalize on market opportunities. AI-Powered Ad Improvements The company has seen a notable enhancement in ad conversions, thanks to AI-powered recommendations. Instagram experienced a 5% increase in ad conversions, while Facebook saw a 3% rise. These improvements underscore Meta's commitment to leveraging AI to optimize its advertising platforms. Increased Engagement Meta's advancements in recommendation systems have led to increased user engagement, with a 5% rise in time spent on Facebook and a 6% increase on Instagram. This growth in engagement is a testament to the effectiveness of Meta's AI-driven strategies. Family of Apps Revenue Surge The Family of Apps division reported a revenue of $47.1 billion, reflecting a 22% year-over-year increase. This surge underscores the strength and popularity of Meta's suite of applications. Strong Operating Income Meta's operating income for the second quarter was $20.4 billion, representing a 43% operating margin. This strong performance indicates efficient cost management and a successful revenue model. Growing Meta AI Engagement Meta AI now boasts over 1 billion monthly active users, highlighting the widespread adoption and integration of AI across Meta's platforms. Expansion of AI Devices Meta is making strides in the AI devices market with the successful launch of Ray-Ban Meta glasses and the new Oakley Meta HSTN. These products are gaining momentum, contributing to the company's growth in the augmented reality space. Reality Labs Operating Loss Despite the overall positive performance, Reality Labs reported expenses of $4.9 billion and an operating loss of $4.5 billion. This division remains a challenging area for Meta, requiring strategic adjustments to achieve profitability. Regulatory Challenges in Europe Meta is facing increased legal and regulatory headwinds in the EU, which could significantly impact its business and financial results. Navigating these challenges will be crucial for Meta's continued success in the region. High Infrastructure Costs The company's total expenses for the second quarter were $27.1 billion, up 12% due to higher infrastructure costs. This increase reflects Meta's ongoing investments in its technological backbone to support future growth. Increase in Capital Expenditures Meta's capital expenditures reached $17 billion, driven by investments in servers, data centers, and network infrastructure. These expenditures are essential for maintaining and expanding Meta's technological capabilities. Forward-Looking Guidance Looking ahead, Meta provided extensive guidance for the second quarter of 2025. The company expects Q3 2025 revenue to range between $47.5 billion and $50.5 billion. Total expenses for 2025 are anticipated to be between $114 billion and $118 billion, driven by continued investments in infrastructure and talent. Meta's strategic focus remains on AI development, with advancements in the Llama 4.1 and 4.2 models and growth in the augmented reality space. In conclusion, Meta Platforms, Inc. has demonstrated strong financial performance and user engagement growth, driven by its strategic focus on AI advancements. While challenges persist, particularly in Reality Labs and regulatory environments, Meta's forward-looking guidance suggests continued growth and investment in key areas. Investors and stakeholders will be keenly watching how Meta navigates these challenges and capitalizes on its opportunities in the coming quarters.
National Observer
4 hours ago
- National Observer
A Canadian researcher was 'indispensible' to helping Trump dismantle climate action
A Canadian economist and conservative columnist who recently called Prime Minister Mark Carney a "climate zealot" played a critical role in the Trump administration's push to eradicate US climate rules. Ross McKitrick, an associate professor at the University of Guelph and a senior fellow at libertarian thinktank the Fraser Institute, was one of five co-authors recruited by US Energy Secretary Christ Wright to author a 150-page US Department of Energy (DOE) report that undermined the US government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He was "indispensible" to the project, wrote co-author and climate denier Roy Spencer in his blog. The report argues "CO2-induced warming appears to be less economically damaging than commonly believed," and "mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial." The report was published last week as part of the Trump administration's proposal to repeal the Environmental Protection Agency's Endangerment Finding — the legal mechanism underpinning most US climate legislation. Eliminating the finding, a longstanding goal of climate deniers, lets the government undermine standards that limit emissions, including from oil and gas operations, power plants and landfills. There is a widespread scientific consensus that human activity, mostly burning fossil fuels, is the main driver of climate change. That finding was backed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the European Climate Risk Assessment, and the US's Fifth National Climate Risk Assessment, published during the Biden era. Bill McKibben, the prominent climate scientist, journalist, climate advocate and co-founder of told Canada's National Observer McKitrick's involvement is a rare example of climate denial flowing from Canada to the US. "I suppose it's proof that once in a while the damage goes the other way across the border," he said. If the Trump administration successfully eradicates all US climate measures, the country is projected to emit an extra seven billion tons of greenhouse gases between now and 2030 — like adding an additional 10 Canadas to the world's emissions. A Canadian economist and conservative columnist who recently called Prime Minister Mark Carney a "climate zealot" played a critical role in the Trump administration's push to eradicate US climate rules. McKitrick has been downplaying the impacts of climate change and bolstering the fossil fuel industry for decades. As far back as 2000, he joined a briefing by the so-called "Cooler Heads Coalition," a group with close ties to the oil industry, to criticize the IPCC's Third Assessment Report. "The inclusion of Ross McKitrick, whose work is widely debunked and who isn't even American, tells you just how hard it is to find researchers who will question the overwhelming scientific consensus on carbon dioxide emissions and climate change," said Simon Donner, a climate scientist at the University of British Columbia and a lead author on the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. As the conversation continued around climate change, McKitrick continued to publicly criticize climate science and renewable energy throughout the 2000s and 2010s through his work writing reports for the Fraser Institute and other thinktanks, in news media and as a public speaker. In 2020 he published an op-ed for Troy Media that claims we must ' fight climate extremists before they upend society" and slammed Canada's then-proposed plastic pollution rules for imposing " costs and inconvenience … while doing nothing to fix the [pollution] problem." He remains a prominent voice against climate action, contributing climate-skeptical columns to the Financial Post, the National Post and the oil and gas outlet Energy Now. He also continues to write for conservative thinktanks, including a 2025 report for the Fraser Institute that concludes achieving Canada's net zero goals isn't worth the economic and social cost. A spokesperson for the US DOE said in an emailed statement that McKitrick and his co-authors, the prominent climate contrarians John Christy, Judith Curry, Steve Koonin and Roy Spencer, "represent diverse viewpoints and political backgrounds." Wright, the US energy secretary, wrote in the report's preface that "media coverage often distorts the science" on climate, pushing "many people [to] walk away with a view of climate change that is exaggerated or incomplete. To provide clarity and balance, I asked a diverse team of independent experts to critically review the current state of climate science. "I've reviewed the report carefully, and I believe it faithfully represents the state of climate science today. Still, many readers may be surprised by its conclusions — which differ in important ways from the mainstream narrative," Wright, a former oil and gas executive, continued. In February, Wright described the global effort against climate change as "sinister" and a "tool used to grow government power [and], top-down control, and shrink human freedom' while speaking at Jordan Peterson's Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference. A few weeks later, he attacked Biden-era climate measures as a "quasi-religious' agenda 'that imposed endless sacrifices on our citizens.' Climate experts have slammed the new DOE report. Ben Sanderson, senior researcher on climate mitigation at the Centre for International Climate Research (CICERO) in Oslo, dismantled the paper in a thread on Bluesky. The "tiny" list of authors and lack of external peer-review undermines the report's credibility, he wrote. (Reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change usually contain contributions from hundreds of authors.) McKitrick and his co-authors presented "minority contrarian viewpoints" by "isolating specific talking points and presenting them as a comprehensive assessment. "Each chapter follows the same pattern. Establish a contrarian position, cherry-pick evidence to support that position, then claim that this position is under-represented in climate literature and the IPCC in particular. Include a bunch of references, most of which don't support the central argument," he wrote. In a Tuesday post on X, McKitrick claimed that he and his co-authors weren't involved in designing the government's push to repeal the Endangerment Finding and "only knew what was in the news." However, the post links to blog posts by his co-authors Curry and Spencer where they address the key policy head-on: Spencer wrote that the group"suspected the Endangerment Finding would be the topic of greatest interest" to the Trump administration when they were commissioned to write the report. Curry wrote that "the looming US policy issue is the EPA Endangerment Finding" and that she hopes the report will break "Breaking the link between energy policy and human-caused climate change".
