In veiled attack at Rahul Gandhi in Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar dubs him 'China-guru'
S Jaishankar on Wednesday launched a veiled attack at Congress leader
Rahul Gandhi
in the
Rajya Sabha
, dubbing him as "
China-guru
" and alleging that such people got their knowledge on China by attending Olympics in Beijing and by taking special tuitions from the Chinese Ambassador.
Jaishankar asserted that he, unlike the "China-Gurus", did not hold any secret meetings or deals during his recent visit to China, where he discussed terrorism, de-escalation and trade, besides issues of mutual interest between the two countries.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Data Analytics
Technology
Data Science
Healthcare
others
Cybersecurity
Management
Digital Marketing
Public Policy
Others
CXO
Finance
Leadership
Design Thinking
Project Management
Data Science
PGDM
MBA
Product Management
Degree
Operations Management
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Applied Business Analytics
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Data Analysis & Visualization
Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
Business Intelligence & Data-Driven Decision Making
Analytics Strategy & Implementation
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Applied Business Analytics
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi had attended the 2008
Beijing Olympics
as a special invitee.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In
IC Markets
Learn More
He said that the cooperation between Pakistan and China started in the 1960s, but the previous governments in India did not deal with the neighbour properly.
The minister said there has been talk of a
China-Pakistan connection
by some, who have alleged that he was not doing enough on China, even though he has spent 41 years in foreign service and has been the longest-serving Indian Ambassador in China.
Live Events
"But there are 'China-gurus' now and one sir is sitting across from me, whose affection for China is so great that he made a deal between India and China - 'Chindia'. They had so much love for China.
"Besides him, there is another 'China Guru'. There may have been some shortcomings on my part on China, as I did not get China teaching by going to the China Olympics, as I was not invited and was not a special person. Some people got their China knowledge by going to the Olympics there. But, whom did they meet there? They did not just meet the Chinese, but also others," the minister said.
His reference to 'Chindia' was to a phrase coined by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, who said "Chindia is still a vibrant idea".
"But, when you take the Olympics classroom, some things are left out and then one has to take private tuitions from the Chinese Ambassador after inviting them at home.
"This 'China guru' says that China and Pakistan have come very close, which is the reality. They came together as we left PoK," Jaishankar noted.
"By saying that he is giving a warning... were you sleeping in the history class. This cooperation and strategic partnership grew during the UPA regime, as Chinese companies were invited to invest in India," he said.
Referring to talk by the opposition about
national security
, Jaishankar said the biggest damage for India in the last 20 years in sea was the Chinese occupation of Hambantota port in Sri Lanka, but the then government did not act on it.
"The China-guru gives us lectures on China, they should understand that this happened during their era," he asserted.
Referring to his recent visit to China, he said, "during my visit to China, whatever I did and discussed was publicly open. It was clear, I discussed terrorism, I discussed de-escalation and I discussed restrictions on trade which China has put."
"I made it clear that relations with China will develop only on three mutuals -- mutual interest, mutual sensitivity, mutual respect.
"Unlike some other people, I made no secret meetings, I did no secret deals. That only Olympic people did, only China-gurus do such things and not normal people," the external affairs minister said.
Jaishankar has been accused by the Opposition by not talking about China enough and being soft on it despite the border transgressions by the Chinese Army.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
For Pakistan & US, it is back to doing business
There is a discernible sense of satisfaction within Pakistan's strategic fraternity at the undeniable uptick in the US-Pakistan interface over the past few months. Some may dispute the extent, but given how the relationship had eroded in the past decade-and-a-half, any improvement represents a big change. Given the transactional nature that dominates the US, there is the temptation to find direct factors for the upswing in US-Pakistan relations. (AP) The principal milestones of the US-Pakistan downturn are well known. For Pakistan, the US detection and killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011 in Abbottabad was a betrayal and a public humiliation. For many Pakistanis, that the US acted clandestinely deep inside Pakistan superseded the enormity of the fact that Osama had been living there all the time under the very noses of the Pakistan military. The free fall continued with mounting US frustrations over Pakistan's double game in Afghanistan. President Trump's 2018 New Year Day tweet exemplified this view. The tweet underlined US foolishness in giving Pakistan billions of dollars in aid in return for deceit and lies! This was consistent with emergent US narratives about Pakistan, but that it was from the President himself made it doubly significant. Through the Biden tenure matters crystallised at a low plateau of bad blood and mutual recriminations. The US's final withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 in disorder and disarray added another layer to the deep strategic mistrust and suspicion that now characterised the relationship. President Biden did not have even a telecon with Imran Khan during the time he was PM and Imran Khan in turn blamed the US for his premature ouster from power. In the meantime, most US military and security assistance was suspended. What perhaps hurt Pakistan the most was the impact this had on training programmes for Pakistan military officers in the US. All this happened also when the India-US relationship seemed effortlessly to go from strength to strength. This further highlighted the distance between Washington and Islamabad. The past few months appear quite different. The change was animated quite dramatically by Field Marshal Asim Munir being hosted by President Trump in June 2025 in the immediate aftermath of Operation Sindoor. It is most unusual — perhaps even unprecedented — for a US president to host a chief of a foreign military who is not a head of State or government. This shift also coincides with new ambiguities in the US-India interface — perhaps triggered by President Trump's constant reiteration of having prevented further escalation in the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. To many in Pakistan, this has 'internationalised' Kashmir and highlighted the importance of third-party intervention as equally that even the US was skeptical about India's claims and demands. There had been earlier indicators of change beginning with President Trump's acknowledgement of Pakistan's counter-terrorism assistance in his State of the Union Address in March 2025. The allocation of a significant financial package as assistance to Pakistan for maintaining its F16 aircraft despite an otherwise stringent foreign aid cutback, was another. Alongside, more even-handed references to the India-Pakistan dynamic, meetings and telephone conversations between the US secretary of State and senior Pakistan leaders further underlined this shift. The announcement of a US-Pakistan Trade Agreement, albeit with a 19% tariff on imports from Pakistan, and Trump's enthusiastic references to hydrocarbon exploration and investment, are but the latest in this trend. The trade agreement may not be the best deal Pakistan could have got, but it is not as bad as could have been, and in any case some deal was better than no deal as far as the government of Pakistan was concerned. It may well be argued that there is nothing particularly significant in these transitions, but for most Pakistanis they suggest a return of their country to the US's radar after a long period of being out in the cold. What explains this shift? Given the transactional frame of mind that dominates the US, there is always the temptation to look for a direct and material factor. Numerous reasons are, therefore, assigned for this shift in US policy. Pakistan's counter-terrorism potential and the assistance it can offer is one. That the US is keen to have some relationship with Pakistan given the growing spread of China in the region is another. There is also the view that recommendations of the US Central Command on Pakistan's military potential vis-à-vis Iran in terms of its geographical location and the value of its air bases may have registered on the Presidency amid the current situation in West and South West Asia. Some argue that this shift in policy was also pushed along by crypto currency deals, and by US interest in potential Pakistani reserves of rare earth minerals. Each of these explanations may have some merit but perhaps the weight of any or all of these should not be exaggerated. Instead, it is useful to refocus on some basics. Pakistan is the fifth largest country in the world in terms of population with some 250 million people. It is riven by instability. It has nuclear weapons. It is situated in a sensitive geo-political location, almost in a global fault line. Given these attributes it was always only a matter of time that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would reverse and US interest in Pakistan would reignite. We are at that stage now. All major powers decide on policies based on an appreciation of their own interests and their own understandings of evolving situations. To think that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would have simply continued or that the US would see developments from our perspective alone is, and never was, a realistic assessment. We should take this shift in our stride. If some in India feel betrayed or dismayed at this turn of events, they have only themselves to blame. TCA Raghavan is a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan. The views expressed are personal.
Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
BRS Gadwal In-Charge Basu Hanumanthu Naidu Slams Congress Over Kaleshwaram Report, Calls It a Political Vendetta
Gadwal: The Kaleshwaram Commission report is part of a politically motivated vendetta jointly carried out by the Congress and BJP parties, said Basu Hanumanthu Naidu, BRS Party in-charge for Gadwal constituency. He made these remarks after attending a live screening of the PowerPoint presentation delivered by former minister T. Harish Rao on the Kaleshwaram issue. The session was organized on Tuesday at the BRS District Office in Gadwal, where Basu Hanumanthu Naidu, along with party leaders and cadres, watched Harish Rao's presentation—broadcast from the Telangana Bhavan, Hyderabad—on an LED screen. The presentation addressed what the BRS party claims are false allegations made by the Congress government about corruption in the Kaleshwaram Project. Speaking on the occasion, Basu Hanumanthu Naidu stated that Harish Rao 'broke the lies into pieces' with factual clarity. He accused the Congress of proving the saying 'one lie leads to a thousand lies.' Referring to Congress' earlier claims of ₹1 lakh crore corruption in the Kaleshwaram project, he criticized them for fabricating new lies to back their initial baseless claims after coming into power. 'No matter how many commissions you set up, how many investigations you conduct, or how many hundreds of pages you publish in your reports, the BRS party is ready to face all of it,' he asserted. He added that what the Congress government failed to achieve in 60 years, KCR accomplished in just three years by completing the Kaleshwaram Project and bringing water to drought-hit fields. 'No amount of fake documentation can erase this truth,' he emphasized. The event saw participation from a large number of BRS leaders and supporters, including Nagar Doddi Venkata Ramulu, Chakradhar Rao, G. Raghavendra Reddy, Angadi Basavaraj, Patel Janardhan Reddy, Atukuri Rehman, Monesh, Kottapalli Venkateshwara Reddy, Beechupalli Kurava Palleiah, S. Ramu Naidu, Ganjipeta Raju, Venkatesh Naidu, Tower Mukbal, Mahadevappa, D. Shekhar Naidu, Rayapuram Veeresh, Govindu, Maddileti, Rajini Babu, Muni Mourya, Rolli Krishna, Kangaru Thimmappa, Abraham, Anji, Govardhan, Obulesh, Ramudu, Venkatesh, Thimmappa, Gonupadu Ramu, Nagaraju, Anjaneyulu, along with several party leaders, workers, youth members, and supporters.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress leaders in New Delhi to expedite reorganisation process
Congress leaders in Kerala made a beeline for New Delhi on Tuesday to enlist the help of the national leadership in streamlining the party's much-delayed reorganisation ahead of the local body elections later in the year. A triad headed by Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) president Sunny Joseph, MLA, Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan, and United Democratic Front (UDF) convener Adoor Prakash held marathon meetings with MPs from Kerala, reportedly to ease purported intra-party tensions over recasting district congress committees (DCCs). KPCC working presidents were also involved in the discussions, along with a few select general secretaries. According to a Congress insider, the KPCC aims to replace at least eight DCC presidents, prioritising community, caste, and age demographics, as well as efficiency, over factional considerations. However, he claimed that some tension loomed over the reorganisation process, with a few leaders questioning the wisdom of changing 'entrenched' DCC presidents, including a few of their loyalists, when the local body polls were at the doorstep. 'The KPCC leadership will likely focus on bringing sceptical MPs on board to broadcast a message of unity to flip the script on the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the local body elections projected to be a three-cornered fight,' he said. The leadership meeting also occurs amid intra-party criticism, recently voiced by Congress veteran P.J. Kurien, among others, that, apart from the bluster of young leaders, the party lacked boots on the ground for door-to-door campaigns to ensure pro-party voter turnout. Mr Kurien also pointed out that the Congress lacked ward committees in several regions. Mr. Satheesan rubbished reports that dissent plagued the reorganisation process. Mr. Joseph said the reorganisation would make the Congress election machinery battle-ready. He refused to set a deadline for the process. When asked whether MPs had suggested any particular names for DCC president posts in their respective constituencies, Mr. Joseph said there was 'no dearth of names for leadership roles in the Congress. We are hoping to strike a balance between youthfulness and experience,' he added.
