
‘Charming, cheeky' — and possibly one of Britain's most prolific rapists
Each weekend, France was surrounded by friends at bars and nightclubs in Peterborough, where he was known for being fun and popular. When the night was over, he would invite everybody back to his house to continue the party.
In March, France, 34, a lorry driver, pleaded guilty to one count of rape, plus counts of sexual assault, voyeurism and exposure, and was sentenced to ten years and seven months in jail. The offences were carried out between 2022 and 2023.
Police fear there could be many, many more victims in Peterborough, and elsewhere. He typically targeted the same type — teenage girls of around 18, usually petite, who were often only just discovering clubbing and drinking culture.
Police found cameras positioned around his home and in the garden, including a GoPro. On it they discovered video of France dragging an unconscious teenager out of his hot tub and across the concrete garden path by her legs, before raping her. 'You look so beautiful,' he said, as he pulled her body along the ground.
After his arrest in September, detectives discovered more than 6,000 graphic sexual videos and photographs of women on his mobile phone and other digital devices, recorded in his home in the Cambridgeshire city between 2022 and 2024.
Police fear they will never know the total number of victims and are highlighting the case in a two-part special of 24 Hours in Police Custody, which will be broadcast on Sunday on Channel 4.
Detective Chief Inspector Helen Tebbit, who led the investigation for Cambridgeshire police, said: 'I've been in the police for nearly 20 years and worked as a detective in vulnerability crime for over ten years. In that time, this stands out as a unique and horrific case. I don't think I'll ever see anything quite like it again.'
Plying victims with spiked drinks
France was not an obvious perpetrator; he was quietly spoken and went out of his way to appear kind and non-threatening. He groomed the teenagers in clubs and bars in Peterborough, acting like a friend, adding them on Snapchat and building their trust. France, who looks young for his age, offered them advice about relationships and fallings-out with friends and made them laugh, all while plying them with huge quantities of alcohol.
'Of every person we've spoken to, nobody said that Craig France was a horrible person,' Tebbit said.
France has been convicted of the rape of only one victim: Abby, 22, spoke to The Sunday Times under a false name to protect her anonymity.
They met at an ice-skating rink in Peterborough in 2021, when she was 18 and in a relationship with a woman. 'He came across quite charming but a bit cheeky and overly generous,' she said. 'I had a weird feeling around him but I convinced myself I was just being anxious. I should have trusted my gut more.'
Abby's relationship ended the following year and, feeling isolated, she started texting France. She said he was 'really supportive — we'd talk about the relationship and he'd make jokes, just like a friend would. He seemed to have my back. He said things about my other friends — like that they should be there for me more.'
Abby began to trust him and accepted an invitation to a gathering at France's house in September. She was a keen guitar player and he promised he could teach her to be as good as he was. He told her his friends were going to come around. She was told not to eat beforehand as they would order a takeaway.
When she arrived, he offered her a Koppaberg cider, which she drank, and then a shot of sambuca, which she refused. 'He called me a pussy, so I said if he put a little bit of lemonade in it, I would. He did, so I drank it,' Abby said.
She has no recollection of the rest of that night, aside from 'being in his hot tub, trying to look at my phone but I couldn't really tell what was going on'. She believes the sambuca was spiked
The next morning, she woke to a horrifying scene. She was in France's bed, naked, despite not usually feeling comfortable undressing in front of people. She could see him in his bathroom, washing blood off himself. Abby knew she had been raped but was afraid and thought that nobody would believe her. 'I panicked, so I pretended to be asleep,' she said. Later, France drove her home.
She said: 'I thought about it every single day. You start to feel really guilty because you feel like by not saying anything, you're a part of the problem.'
Over the following days, Abby texted France explaining that she did not want to see him again. 'I said I felt really uncomfortable and didn't remember anything, but that I wouldn't make anything awkward,' she said. He responded: 'It's like you're making it sound like I'm a predator. It takes two to tango.'
Two years later, in August 2024, after hearing that an intimate video of was circulating and learning that a friend had also been assaulted by France, Abby reported the rape to the police. He was arrested.
When searching his home, detectives found video of the events she had described and timestamps which corroborated her account.
Women may not know they are victims
Detectives who reviewed graphic video and photographs of numerous women, many of whom are still unidentified, are fearful about the full extent of France's crimes. He used dating apps and travelled across the country in his job as a lorry driver, transporting cars, and data showed he had been in London and other locations. Additional cameras were found in his lorry, but police were unable to recover videos from them.
'It's very difficult to be able to put a number on how many individuals that could be still to come,' Tebbit said. 'We are open to the potential that there could have been offending committed in places all over the country.'
The nature of France's offending means that many women may not even know they are victims. In much of the footage, women had been plied with alcohol and appear to be asleep or unconscious while he performs sexual acts on them.
One is Leona, 28, who first met France ten years ago on a night out in Bedford when she was 18.
Until 2020, France was somebody she had 'chatted to for a bit, thought he was all right, but didn't think anything about it,' she said. Then, he messaged her 'out of the blue on Snapchat' which turned into 'a constant back and forth for a few months and then daily video calls. It got to a point where it seemed like we were going to end up in a relationship but I cut it off because I wanted to get back with my ex,' she said. 'It wasn't until 2022 that we ended up speaking again. And that's when that night happened.'
The pair went ice skating in Peterborough, had dinner and then went out for drinks with France's brother and some friends and went clubbing, before going back to France's house.
TERRY HARRIS FOR THE SUNDAY TIMES
'I never thought that anything untoward happened that evening,' Leona said. 'It never occurred to me that anything like that could have happened.' The pair did not meet up again, though she saw him with mutual friends on a few occasions.
In November 2024, Leona was contacted out of the blue by Cambridgeshire police. They told her they were investigating France for rape and voyeurism, and were in possession of a number of videos which they believed included her. 'I had no idea that this had happened to me,' she said.
Cameras were found across France's property, both inside and outside
CHANNEL 4 / 24HRS IN POLICE CUSTODY
In the videos, Leona was visibly drunk while France moved her into different positions and took intimate videos of her. She was crying and telling him she was in pain and feeling sick.
While seeing the footage was a shock, Leona 'wasn't overly shocked that it was Craig. As much as he came across as a nice guy to start with, if he was going to get into some sort of trouble, it would be to do with this sort of area,' she said. 'I just didn't know that it would be something like that and that it would involve me. I was angry with him because we had been very close. It made me feel horrible.'
Leona, who spoke in the hope of encouraging other women to come forward, said France would 'buy big bottles of Disaronno [an Italian liqueur] and hand drinks out to everyone, but more so towards groups of girls. He was very charismatic. He could chat to anyone. He was funny. He knew how to talk to people and make them feel comfortable with him.'
Craig France is interviewed by police following his arrest
Describing the impact of France's betrayal, Leona said she now struggles to trust men, even those she has known for a long time and who are close to her.
'If I'm getting changed in front of a guy and he's on his phone, I struggle with that. I know they won't be doing what he did, but it's difficult building trust with people because this was someone I knew closely. I keep beating myself up, saying that I'm an idiot for getting with someone like that. How could I have not seen that he could do something like this?'
At France's trial at Cambridge crown court in March, the judge described him as 'a misogynist predator and a toxic risk to women', but explained his guilty plea meant he was eligible for a reduced sentence of 10 years and 7 months, rather than the maximum sentence of 18 years and 7 months. France had no previous convictions aside from a historic driving offence, though police found he had been expelled from school after touching other pupils inappropriately in intimate areas, and pulling down girls' underwear.
Since France was sent to prison, new potential victims have come forward but Cambridgeshire police believe there may be many more.
'Craig France groomed his victims, everybody felt he was their friend and a person they could trust,' Tebbit said. 'He did all the things that a young woman would find attractive and friendly.'
During the interview process, France did not speak aside from repeating 'no comment' and has shown no remorse for his crimes. 'I'm not of the view that he's ever really accepted what he's done was wrong,' Tebbit said.
For Abby, the rape has caused her so much distress that she was unable to eat or drink and became physically ill, to the point of being hospitalised due to significant weight loss. She cut her hair off 'to look less feminine'.
'I stopped living completely,' she said. 'I stopped going out. I didn't want to leave the house. I'm terrified of everything and everyone really. It's a lot to carry. It eats you up in a way that is difficult to live with. I don't think it's ever going to go away.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gulf Coast Stapletons influencer wife defends husband as he's sentenced to five years in prison for child porn
An influencer known for documenting her dreamy Gulf Coast travels with her husband is standing by his side as he was sentenced to prison for child pornography. Joshua Stapleton, 39, and his wife Brittani, 31, are the faces behind the 'Gulf Coast Stapletons' - a social media account that captured snapshots of their seemingly perfect, picture-postcard lifestyle along the Gulf Coast. But their dreamy world came to a screeching halt when investigators discovered that, over the course of two years, Joshua had downloaded images of prepubescent children portrayed in sexually-charged situations, as reported by Fox 5 News. More than four years after authorities launched their investigation, the Georgia native was sentenced last month to five years behind bars, followed by 15 years on probation. On Friday, however, Brittani took to TikTok with a lengthy video defending her husband - going as far as threatening legal action against anyone spreading what she called 'false' statements. 'Josh was absolutely upfront with me about everything in the charges - there were no secrets,' she said in the video. Brittani also posted a photo on Instagram of herself lying on her husband's lap aboard a boat, captioning it: 'If this is the statement you're looking for, here it is.' Her husband's arrest followed an investigation launched by the Cartersville Police Department's Criminal Investigations Division, with support from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the US Department of Homeland Security. It was during this time that Joshua was discovered to have downloaded images of children in sexually abusive situations between 2018 and 2020. 'Just a mild-mannered guy, nothing that would even give you the slightest inclination that there was some type of criminal activity going on,' Bryan Canty, who lived across the street from Joshua in Georgia, told Fox 5. Recalling the night in 2020 when multiple agencies swarmed Joshua's home, he remembered thinking, 'What in the world is going on?' 'l learned about the child exploitation charges later and that just threw me for a loop,' he added. 'I had absolutely no idea.' Originally charged with 15 counts of child porn possession, Joshua was later indicted on a staggering 40 counts of sexual exploitation of children. He ultimately accepted a non-negotiable plea deal, pleading guilty to 20 counts while the remaining 20 charges were dropped. Joshua and Brittani - who have amassed more than one million likes across TikTok and Instagram - often share duo workouts, meals, and vacations with their more than 81,000 followers. Just last week, the pair shared several videos from their trip to Orange Beach, Alabama. But Brittani's next public words came in an eight-minute video posted to the popular platform - one many have since labeled 'extremely concerning.' In the video, she sought to correct what she called 'misinformation' circulating online after news of her husband's incarceration broke. 'What you're not allowed to do is post anything that is a false statement, that is damaging to someone's reputation,' Brittani sternly said. 'And I've seen a lot of it, so I'm going to set the record straight, but if I continue to see it, naturally I'm going to have to take legal action because it's absolutely illegal,' she added. Brittani went on to address her most frequently asked question: whether she knew about the crimes before marrying Joshua in 2023 - to which she replied, 'Absolutely, I knew.' She explained that they were friends before dating, and when the charges surfaced, she reached out to him because it didn't sound like him - especially since they had already taken multiple vacations and spent a lot of time together. 'I have a really good judge of character and I knew something was up,' she said. 'I knew that was not Josh.' She also pushed back against accusations that they were projecting 'fake lives' on their social media accounts. 'There's nothing fake about it. It was our lives, we are still happy, he and I have no issues,' Brittani posted. Joshua is currently being held in the Bartow County Sheriff's Office Jail. Authorities have yet to release additional information.


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hopes TV show about Peterborough rapist will identify more victims
A detective who helped convict a serial rapist said she believed "there are likely more victims out there" and urged them to come Ch Insp Helen Tebbit made her comments in relation to a TV documentary - 24 Hours In Police Custody - which features the case of Peterborough rapist Craig was jailed for more than 10 years in March 2025 after admitting rape and filming victims without their two-part edition of the Channel 4 programme, titled The Nightclub Predator, is being broadcast on Sunday and Monday. An investigation into France, 34, began when a young woman contacted police in August 2024 to say she had been a search of France's home, officers found several hidden cameras that had captured more than 6,000 disturbing images and other victims were then told that unbeknown to them they also had been to the amount of footage and the nature of France's offending, officers have said it was possible there were more victims yet to be identified. Speaking to the BBC, Det Ch Insp Tebbit said: "I don't think we will ever fully understand how many victims there are of Craig France. But I do think that there are likely more victims out there."The first woman who contacted police had been abused several years previously, said the detective, and she urged any victims to contact the police."I hope that anyone watching the programme sees that we have a team of specially trained officers who who will work tirelessly to ensure we do the very best for victims of serious sexual violence and hopefully that comes across," she said. The TV programme tells the inside story of the investigation into France who police believed has preyed on dozens of women. The control room is seen receiving a distressing 999 call from a young woman who believed she was raped two years previously. The suspect, Craig France, is not known to the police but has a reputation across Peterborough's nightclub scene, and for the notorious hot-tub afterparties he has hosted at his Ford, executive producer of 24 Hours in Police Custody, said: "This is a really disturbing case, but a really important one. "It throws a kind of really sharp light on one how difficult it can be to prosecute rapes and how impressive the Cambridgeshire rape investigation team are. "In a world where we all know that rape prosecutions have crashed, and nationally, it's eally good to see them taking very, very seriously this important case." 'Shocking case' Mr Ford believed the investigation also revealed more about misogyny in society and "the way men behave and what's acceptable in our culture"."There were people in his social group who actually saw videos of some of the things he did and didn't report it to the police," he said."So I think it's a really shocking case."There are possibly hundreds of women across Cambridgeshire who have come across this man and may well have been filmed against their permission without them knowing." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How MI5 piled falsehood on falsehood in court in the case of a spy who abused women
When the BBC revealed that MI5 had lied to three courts, the Security Service apologised for giving false evidence - vowing to investigate and explain how such a serious failure had on Wednesday, the High Court ruled that these inquiries were "deficient", ordering a new "robust" investigation. A panel of judges said they would consider the issue of contempt of court proceedings against individuals once that was we can detail how, over the past few months leading up to the judgment, MI5 continued to provide misleading evidence and tried to keep damning material material gives an unprecedented insight into the internal chaos at MI5 as it responded to what has become a major crisis and test of its the heart of the case is the violent abuse of a woman by a state agent under MI5's control. After the BBC began investigating, MI5 attempted to cover its tracks - scattering a trail of false and misleading case started very simply: I was investigating a neo-Nazi, who I came to understand was also an abusive misogynist and MI5 I contacted this man - known publicly as X - in 2020 to challenge him on his extremism, a senior MI5 officer called me up and tried to stop me running a officer said X had been working for MI5 and informing on extremists, and so it was wrong for me to say he was an extremist was this disclosure, repeated in a series of phone calls, which the Security Service would later lie about to three courts as it attempted to keep X's role and identity shrouded in the phone calls with me, MI5 denied information I had about X's violence, but I decided to spend more time investigating. What I learned was that X was a violent misogynist abuser with paedophilic tendencies who had used his MI5 role as a tool of had attacked his girlfriend - known publicly as "Beth" - with a machete, and abused an earlier partner, whose child he had threatened to kill. He even had cannibal fantasies about eating children. When I challenged both X and MI5 with our evidence, the government took me and the BBC to court in early 2022. They failed to stop the story but did win legal anonymity for for secrecy in a succession of court proceedings, the Security Service told judges it had stuck to its core policy of neither confirming nor denying (NCND) informants' identities, including during conversations with me. Crucially, this stance allowed it to keep evidence secret from "Beth", who had taken MI5 to service aggressively maintained its position until I produced evidence proving it was untrue - including a recording of one of the calls with a senior MI5 accepting it had provided false evidence, MI5's director general Sir Ken McCallum said: "We take our duty to provide truthful, accurate and complete information very seriously, and have offered an unreserved apology to the court."Two investigations were commissioned: an internal MI5 disciplinary inquiry, and an external review by Sir Jonathan Jones KC, who was once the government's chief lawyer. This latter review was personally commissioned by the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and MI5's director of these concluded that the original false evidence was not due to dishonesty by MI5 or any of its officers. They effectively put it down to mistakes, both personal and these two inquiries quickly began to fall apart. Not fair or accurate The government initially refused to provide both reports in full to the many cases involving MI5, this one was held partly in secret to allow the government to use evidence which it says is too sensitive to be discussed in open to the secret, closed part of the case was only available to the government, the judge and security-cleared barristers known as special advocates who were representing the BBC - but who were not allowed to communicate directly with government said it would not be providing any closed evidence about the two inquiries to the judge or the special it provided an "open" version of Sir Jonathan's external review, with apparently sensitive material edited out, and it purported to provide a full account of the internal inquiry in a witness statement by MI5's director general of strategy - known as Witness Jonathan wrote that he was "satisfied" that the open version was a "fair and accurate" account of his full review. Witness B, third-in-command at the Security Service, said in his statement: "I am satisfied that there is nothing in the closed material that has been excluded from the open report which prevents MI5 from providing the court with a frank and accurate account." During hearings, the government argued against disclosing secret material to the court. It eventually agreed to hand over the secret version of Sir Jonathan's review, and then was ordered to disclose the internal investigation report described by Witness B, along with policy documents and notes of interviews with MI5 the disclosure came, it was clear why MI5 was so keen to keep it secret: the summaries, including the one from MI5's third-in-command, were not fair or accurate. Key information had been withheld, which undermined their short, the court was still being the same time, in response to the inquiries, I was submitting new evidence which proved that some of the claims made by the two reviews were the internal investigation nor Sir Jonathan Jones contacted me, despite the fact I was the only other person who really knew what had been said in all the phone calls at the centre of the case. 'The fallibility of memory' The two official reviews concluded that the senior officer who called me - Officer 2 - failed to recall telling me that X was an agent."There is nothing surprising in this narrative, which is ultimately about the fallibility of memory in the absence of a written record," as the Security Service put it in legal Jones review said that, because no formal record was made of the calls, by the time MI5 was preparing evidence the "only first-hand evidence available was Officer 2's personal recollection".Sir Jonathan said the officer's recollection was "uncertain", although it had hardened over time into a position that he had not departed from material that MI5 and the government sought to keep secret shows that Officer 2 gave a detailed recollection of the conversation with me - until I exposed it as recollection was contained in a note of an internal MI5 meeting, arranged to discuss what to tell the special advocates and the court about the conversations with me. In it, the officer insisted he did not depart from NCND and gave a melodramatic account of my "long pauses" as I said I needed the story, before I eventually became cooperative and said I had "seen the light". This was all untrue. He also falsely claimed I had revealed that I had spoken to X's former girlfriend, when I had done no such thing. The note also showed that Officer 2 had told colleagues that he persuaded me to drop the story by implying that agent X was being investigated by MI5 as an extremist. This was the exact opposite of what he had in fact told me, which was that X was an MI5 agent rather than a real Jonathan was aware of the full version of this elaborate false account, but it was absent from the unclassified version given to the court and the MI5 internal review also claimed that Officer 2 had a lapse of said that Officer 2 had told another officer - a key figure involved in preparing the Security Service's false evidence for the court, known as Officer 3 - that he could not remember whether he had departed from his statement to court, Witness B - MI5's director general of strategy - said Officer 2 had said "they could not recall the details" of the conversations with me but "did not think they had departed from NCND" and believed "they would have remembered if they had done so".But an internal note by Officer 3, written after his discussion with Officer 2, contained a very different stated unequivocally that "we did not breach NCND" and that the contact with me "was prefaced with confirmation that this conversation was not on the record".It also stated that, "after being initially fairly bullish, De Simone said that he acknowledged the strength of the argument, and agreed to remove those references".All three claims were false, including about the conversations being off the record, something now accepted by evidence showed specific false claims being presented as memories - not the absence of memory the two inquiries said they found. The written records MI5 said did not exist The question of memory was so important because the court was told that written records were not B - MI5's third-in-command - said the internal investigation established that Officer 2 had "updated colleagues within MI5" about the conversations with me, but that "there was no evidence identified of any written record being made, by Officer 2 or anyone else". "The fact of the matter was that Officer 2 was reliant on personal recollection alone which inevitably carries a degree of inherent uncertainty," Witness B said in his statement to Jonathan gave the same impression in his the secret material MI5 was forced to hand over proved this was false. There were several written records consistent with what had really happened - that MI5 had chosen to depart from NCND and that several people were aware of it. There was a decision were notes of conversations with Agent X were emails. The decision log showed that, just after the authorisation took place, a formal record was created saying the plan was to call the BBC and "reveal the MI5 link to X". The log then noted: "This was discussed with Officer 2 who subsequently approached the BBC to begin this conversation."In an internal email, after I had said I would not include X in an initial story, one of X's handling team reported this development to other MI5 officers and accurately described the approach to me, namely that Officer 2 had claimed my proposed story was "incorrect" and the rationale for this was that most of the material was as a "direct result of his tasking" as an MI5 of calls and meeting with Agent X show he approved the plan to reveal his MI5 role and was kept updated about the calls. In a later meeting with him, MI5 recorded that he was "happy" to meet with me, which was an offer MI5 had made and I it showed that MI5 and X were well aware of the NCND departure, because the Security Service would obviously only try to arrange a meeting with someone like X if they were an agent. In a telling note, MI5 said X thought that a meeting with me would "hopefully serve to counter some of the conclusions that the journalist had reached about X". This is a violent, misogynistic neo-Nazi, a danger to women and children, yet MI5 wanted to do PR for him with a journalist. 'Back in the box' These records and others show that the handling team for agent X understood there had been an NCND departure. This was unsurprising as the calls with me at the time made it clear that his case officers knew what was the internal investigation report records how, as MI5 was preparing to take the BBC to court to block our story on X, one officer went around convincing colleagues that no such departure had ever taken 3 spoke several times to a member of the agent-handling team within MI5 - known as Officer 4 - regarding what had been said to me about X."We have already named him pal," said Officer 4, according to Officer 4's evidence to the investigation and Officer 3 replied: "I can categorically tell you we didn't".After these conversations, Officer 4 said he felt the other officer had put him "back in his box". Other members of the handling team thought what Officer 3 was saying was "odd" and "weird".MI5 has given completely contradictory explanations for how the false claim about not departing from NCND had got into its witness statement. The claim was given to court by an officer known as Witness A, acting as a corporate witness - meaning he was representing the organisation rather than appearing as someone necessarily involved personally in the the government was trying to stop the BBC publishing its story about X in 2022, the BBC's special advocates asked how Witness A could be so sure that NCND had not been government's lawyers said "Witness A spoke to the MI5 officer who had contact with the BBC" - meaning Officer 2 - and the officer had said he neither confirmed nor denied agent X's role. The lawyers' answers strongly appeared to suggest that the pair had even spoken at the time of the calls with we exposed Witness A's false evidence, the lawyers' answers created a problem for MI5 as it either suggested Officer 2 had lied all along - or that he and Witness A were both has since been claimed that the men did not speak to each other at the time of the calls with not reconciling these contradictory accounts, the investigation concluded "the parties were collectively doing their best to prepare a witness statement that was accurate". Five times MI5 abandoned 'neither confirm nor deny' Officer 2 claimed that he had never departed from NCND before and said that was a key reason why he would have recalled doing new evidence I submitted to court showed he had also told me whether or not five other people I was investigating were working with the Security Service. One of them was an undercover MI5 officer - one of the most sensitive and memorable details an officer could 2 had invited me to meet this undercover officer, just as he had offered me the chance to meet Agent X. I had not pursued either offer, which I thought were a crude attempt at pulling me into MI5's the internal MI5 material suggests that its officers wrongly believe that the role of journalists is to be cheerleaders for the Security Service. I was variously described as "bullish", "stubborn", "awkward", and not "as on board as other journalists". They said, before their involvement with me, the BBC was seen as "friendly" and "supportive" of MI5. In reality, journalists like me are here to scrutinise and challenge the five other NCND departures were not apparently uncovered by MI5's internal investigators, nor by Sir Jonathan agent X's role would have been memorable and unusual on its the fact there were also departures on NCND relating to five other people made the chain of events even more extraordinary, and made any claimed loss of memory by Officer 2 – and in MI5 more widely – simply unbelievable. The missing interviews Both inquiries failed to speak to key people who were on the calls they were supposed to be investigating. Neither of them spoke to me - but there were other omissions Jonathan's review wrongly claimed that "only Officer 2 had been party to the calls" with me. In fact, Officer 2 had invited another senior officer to join one of the calls. He introduced himself by saying: "I head up all counter-terrorism investigations here."He referred to my earlier "conversations" with Officer 2 and was plainly aware of their content - he even made a specific pun about something connected to MI5's internal investigation was aware that the head of counter-terror investigations had joined one of the calls and mentioned it in their secret report, investigators never bothered interviewing I submitted new evidence, MI5 was forced to speak to him - but the internal investigators concluded there was nothing to show he knew about NCND Jonathan had also failed to speak to the MI5 officer at the centre of the case, Officer 2. He had simply adopted the conclusions of the internal inquiry - in which MI5 was investigating emerged during the court case that Sir Jonathan did speak to MI5 director general Sir Ken McCallum for his investigation. But when the BBC's special advocates requested any notes of the interview, they were told that none existed. 'Maintaining trust' "MI5's job is to keep the country safe," Sir Ken said after the High Court judgement. "Maintaining the trust of the courts is essential to that mission."Because of this case, the courts have made plain that MI5's practices should change. The government says it is reviewing how the service prepares and gives NCND has been abandoned in relation to Agent X, Beth will now have a fairer trial of her legal claim against MI5. The monolithically consistent way in which the policy has been presented, including in a string of important cases, has been shown to be has become a story about whether MI5 can be believed, and about how it uses its privileged position to conceal and in the beginning - and in the end - it is a story about violence against women and girls, about the importance placed on that crucial issue by the state, and about how covering up for abusive misogynists never ends well.